Ούτε Ένας Μουσουλμάνος δεν επιτρέπεται να παραμείνει σε
Ελλάδα ή Ευρώπη: ο Μουσουλμάνος Ανατολιστής καθ. Μεγαλομμάτης εξηγεί γιατί!
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2019/11/12/ούτε-ένας-μουσουλμάνος-δεν-επιτρέπετ/
αναδημοσιευμένο εδώ:
https://thesecretrealtruth.blogspot.com/2019/11/blog-post_618.html
================
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – τολική Ρωμαϊκή Αυτοκρατορία
Ούτε Ένας Μουσουλμάνος δεν επιτρέπεται να παραμείνει σε Ελλάδα ή Ευρώπη: ο
Μουσουλμάνος Ανατολιστής καθ. Μεγαλομμάτης εξηγεί γιατί!
greeksoftheorient Fighting against the Islamic Terrorism and Barbarism, Globalism - Γκλομπαλισμός
(Παγκοσμιοποίηση), Αποικιοκρατία
& Καταπιεζόμενα Έθνη, Αραμαίοι
- Aramaeans - Арамейцы, Ασία
- Азия - Asia, Αφρική, Ανατολή
& Δύση - Orient & Occident, Γεωπολιτική
- Geopolitics, Διάλυση
των συγχρόνων κοινωνιών και δράση δαιμονικών ιεραρχιών, Διεθνής
Πολιτική - World Politics, Ευρώπη
- Πολιτική & Οικονομία, Εκπαίδευση
- Education, Ελλάδα
& Ευρώπη, Ελλάδα
- Πολιτική, Ιστορία
- History, Ισλαμική
Τρομοκρατία, λαθρομετανάστες κι η διάλυση της Ευρώπης, Συρία-Ιράκ, Σχετικά
με τον καθ. Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτη, Τουρκία
& Κεμάλ Ατατούρκ, Χριστιανωσύνη,
αιρέσεις και άλλες θρησκείες, ελληνική
κοινωνία, ιστορία
θρησκειών, ισλάμ, Multiculturalism - Мультикультурализм - Πολυπολιτισμικότητα, Orientalism - Οριενταλισμός,
Ανατολιστικές Επιστήμες November 12, 2019 24 Minutes
Μην επιτρέπετε στα καθάρματα της ελληνικής
πολιτικής, στους λωποδύτες δημόσιους υπαλλήλους, στους απατεώνες των κομματικών
μηχανισμών, στους εγκληματίες της παραπληροφόρησης των ΜΜΕ, στους αμόρφωτους
προπαγανδιστές των ψευτο-πανεπιστημίων, στους άχρηστους στρατιωτικούς, και στην
αισχρή οικονομική ολιγαρχία να σας αποπροσανατολίζουν και να σας αδρανοποιούν,
όταν μπορείτε να τους εξοντώσετε και να πάρετε την Ελλάδα στα χέρια σας για να
σώσετε την πατρίδα μας!
Ούτε μισός μουσουλμάνος δεν μπορεί να ‘ενταχθεί’ στην Ελλάδα ή στην Ευρώπη
– και συνεπώς κανένας δεν επιτρέπεται να παραμείνει. Όσοι διεστραμμένοι και
ψυχανώμαλοι, ως Αριστεροί, διατείνονται το αντίθετο είναι οι πρώτοι εχθροί των
Ελλήνων, της Ρωμιοσύνης και της Ορθοδοξίας – κι είναι οι πρώτοι που πρέπει να
καθαρίσετε από την μέση, για να μην δείτε την γυναίκα σας να φοράει χετζάμπ,
την κόρη σας να γίνεται μουσουλμάνα σκλάβα του έρωτα, και τον γιο σας να ευνουχίζεται
εξεπίτηδες από τους λαθρο-εισβολείς για να εξοντωθούν – αποδεδειγμένα έτσι
βάσει σχεδίου – η φυλή και το έθνος
Η ισλαμική τρομοκρατία δεν παρασκευάστηκε λίγα μόνον χρόνια πριν το
κακόφημο 9/11. Το πρόγραμμα τελικού αφανισμού των Ευρωπαίων, το ξεκίνησαν εδώ
και δυο αιώνες αυτοί που εξουσιάζουν τις δυτικο-ευρωπαϊκές και
βορειο-αμερικανικές χώρες μισώντας την φυλετική καταγωγή και την χριστιανική
ταυτότητα των εντοπίων. Η αποικιοκρατία των Γάλλων και των Άγγλων σε τμήματα
της Ασίας και της Αφρικής μπορεί φαινομενικά τότε να μετέφερε τεράστιο πλούτο
στις χώρες αυτές αλλά στην πραγματικότητα προετοίμασε / προξένησε το
ισλαμιστικό τσουνάμι που παρατηρούμε σήμερα. Λάθος ή σχέδιο; Αυτό θα αναλύσουν
ιστορικοί. Η ουσία είναι ότι αν δεν αντιδράσετε άμεσα, χάνεστε!
Ο Έλληνας ανατολιστής, ιστορικός και πολιτικός επιστήμονας, καθ. Μουχάμαντ
Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης, ο οποίος προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ το 1992, είχε την ειλικρίνεια, ως κορυφαίος ευρυμαθής ερευνητής και ως άνθρωπος με
σπάνια ηθική ακεραιότητα, να καταγγείλει πρώτος τα σχέδια που διεκπεραιώνουν
εις βάρος των Ευρωπαίων, των Ελλήνων και γενικώτερα των Χριστιανών οι σκοτεινές
δυνάμεις του χάους και του αφανισμού. Σε μια σειρά τριών βαρυσήμαντων και
πραγματικά προφητικών άρθρων του το 2007, εξήγησε τους λόγους για τους οποίους
δεν είναι εφικτή η ‘ένταξη’ των μουσουλμάνων στην Ευρώπη – εντελώς
γελοιοποιώντας ήδη πριν από 12 χρόνια την εγκληματική και προδοτική πολιτική
της κυβέρνησης του σκουπιδιού ‘Μητσοτάκης’.
Ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης σε αρχαιολογική έρευνα στο Ντιγιάρμπεκιρ το 1984 – έξω
από τα Ιουστινιάνεια τείχη της πόλης και με φόντο τον Τίγρη ποταμό
Ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης σε διάλεξή του το 1995
Ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης σε αρχαιολογική έρευνα στο (νοτιοανατολική Τουρκία, νότια
της Ούρφα/Έδεσσας της Οσροηνής, κοντά στα τουρκο-συριακά σύνορα) Χαρράν το 1995
Ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης διευθυντής – αρχισυντάκτης περιοδικού στο Κάιρο το 2002
Ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης με την Ευρωπαία Επίτροπο Ferrero Waldner στην
Αλεξάνδρεια το 2005
Ο τίτλος του πρώτου από τα τρία άρθρα τα λέει όλα: “Ένταξη των Μουσουλμάνων
σημαίνει Διάλυση της Ευρώπης”. Μάλιστα, στα αγγλικά αυτό ακούγεται ακόμη πιο
έντονα επειδή χρησιμοποιούνται δυο λέξεις ετυμολογικώς ολότελα αντίθετες μεταξύ
τους: ” Integration of Muslims means Disintegration of Europe”. Μέσα σε επτά
μόνον λέξεις ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης λέει όλη την αλήθεια που κακουργηματικά κι
εθνοκτονικά παραμορφώνουν ‘αθλιοι εγκληματίες και μυσαροί σατανιστές, όπως ο
παθητικός ομοφυλόφιλος βουλευτής ΣΥΡΙΖΑ Αντίχριστος Γιαννούλης κι η έκφυλη
σατανίστρια Ντόρα Μπακογιάννη.
Οι ιστορικοί λόγοι, τους οποίους παραθέτει ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης και για τους
οποίους ένταξη των Μουσουλμάνων σημαίνει Διάλυση της Ευρώπης, είναι οι εξής:
– μακραίωνο ευρωπαϊκό μίσος κατά του Ισλάμ
– ψευδέστατο ακαδημαϊκό – πνευματικό υπόβαθρο και ψεύτικη ταυτότητα της
σύγχρονης Ευρώπης (Ελληνισμός)
– στρεβλή αντίληψη της Παγκόσμιας Ιστορίας εξαιτίας της σκευωρίας ‘Δύση
εναντίον Ανατολής’
– αποτρόπαια παραμόρφωση του ‘άλλου’ (Οριενταλισμός)
– διάλυση της Οθωμανικής Αυτοκρατορίας
Στο δεύτερο άρθρο της τριλογίας, υπό τον τίτλο ” Reasons making Muslim Integration in Europe Impossible” (Λόγοι που καθιστούν την Αδύνατη την Ένταξη των Μουσουλμάνων στην
Ευρώπη), ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης παραθέτει επιπλέον ιστορικούς λόγους που καθορίζουν
το συγκεκριμένο πρόβλημα:
– τραγική κατάληξη του ισλαμικού πολιτισμού και άνοδος της βαρβαρότητας απ’
άκρου εις άκρον των κατ’ όνομα ισλαμικών επικρατειών
(στο σημείο αυτό ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης ορίζει το έτος 1580 ως ημερομηνία
θανάτου του ισλαμικού πολιτισμού, συνεπώς καταλυτικά εκθέτει όλους τους
υπερασπιστές των λαθρο-εισβολέων ως συμπαραστάτες βαρβάρων)
– διαμόρφωση του παναραβισμού και ψευδούς ταυτότητας και γλώσσας για τις
μάζες των αποικιών της Γαλλίας και της Αγγλίας
(στο σημείο αυτό ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης αναλύει ποια υπήρξαν τα εργαλεία του
εκβαρβαριστικού ρόλου της Γαλλίας στον χώρο των αποικιών της, περιγράφει το
αβυσσαλέο γαλλικό μίσος κατά του Χριστιανικού Κοπτικού Πολιτισμού της Αιγύπτου,
και ορίζει τον παναραβισμό ως ένα απάνθρωπο και βάρβαρο σύστημα συμπεριφοράς
που μετατρέπει τα θύματά του σε υπανθρώπους)
– συστηματικό και διεστραμμένο έργο εξαφάνισης
Α- της βερβερικής γλώσσας, παιδείας και ταυτότητας
Β – της κοπτικής γλώσσας, παιδείας και ταυτότητας
Γ – της αραμαϊκής γλώσσας, παιδείας και ταυτότητας, και
Δ – της υεμενικής γλώσσας, παιδείας και ταυτότητας – εκ μέρους των Άγγλων
και Γάλλων αποικιοκρατών
(στο σημείο αυτο ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης καταγγέλλει την εκ μέρους των δυτικών
οριενταλιστών χρήση ψευδών εθνικών ονομάτων για τους Αραμαίους, όπως οι γελοίοι
κι ανύπαρκτοι όροι ‘Χαλδαίοι’ και ‘Ασσύριοι’, καθώς και την απαγόρευση και
πάλιν εκ μέρους των δυτικών αποικιοκρατών της χρήσης του ονόματος ‘Φοινίκη’
αντί του πλαστού όρου ‘Λίβανος’. Επίσης ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης καταδεικνύει ποιο
είναι το καίριο σημείο το οποίο αποκαλύπτει την δυτικοευρωπαϊκή ταυτότητα των
ακαδημαϊκών γονέων του ισλαμικού εξτρεμισμού)
– άγρια διαστρέβλωση των εθνικών ιστοριών των παρανόμως αποσπασμένων από
την Οθωμανική Αυτοκρατορία λαών, η οποία συνοδεύτηκε από πολλαπλή σύγχυση –
εξαπάτηση της διεθνούς ακαδημαϊκής κοινότητας (εκ μέρους των Άγγλων και Γάλλων
οριενταλιστών)
– διεστραμμένη αναπαράσταση του Αρχαίου Ανατολικού και του Ισλαμικού
Παρελθόντος προ του ευρωπαϊκού, δυτικού και διεθνούς αναγνωστικού κοινού (εκ
μέρους των Άγγλων και Γάλλων οριενταλιστών)
Αναδημοσιεύω στην συνέχεια τα δύο πρώτα άρθρα της τριλογίας του κ.
Μεγαλομμάτη και στο θέμα θα επανέλθω με επόμενο κείμενο.
———————————————————
Integration of Muslims means Disintegration of Europe
By Prof. Dr.
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Published: 8/9/2007
Too little, too
late: this expression characterizes the post September 11th European approach
to the (important for the Europeans) issue of the social integration of the
Muslim populations.
For a Historian
with non-subjective criteria it may look comical and even absurd how Europeans
dare imagine they could ever help integrate these populations that gullibly or
intentionally European administrations allowed to enter – or attracted in –
Europe. Certainly, there are ostensible financial reasons for the presence of
cheap manpower in countries like France, England, Germany, Italy, Spain, etc.
and this may be quite easily understood. But were these reasons the only
element to take into consideration? If this proves to be the real reason behind
the presence of so great numbers of Muslim immigrants in Europe, the post WW II
political – economic establishments of Western Europe are made exclusively of
ideologically indoctrinated and politically myopic imbeciles.
If this ominous
development of the last 60 years is the result of sheer coincidence and has
gone unmonitored, uncontrolled and unnoticed until its dimensions became very
preoccupying, the post WW II political – economic establishments of Western
Europe are made exclusively of seriously dangerous and totally irresponsible
people.
Moral Principles:
the Supreme Law of All Societies, and All Social Endeavours
There is one,
irreversible and inevitable, reality; as political and economic affairs are part
of activities undertaken within the context of a society of human beings, the
political and economic undertakings of the members of that society obligatorily
have to abide by the moral principles of the society in question. If the
political and economic undertakings of the members of a society do not reflect
the existing moral principles of the society in question, the society gets soon
disintegrated. Even worse, a society without moral principles in general is
predestined to soon disappear.
The moral principles
certainly vary from one civilization to another, from one country to another.
This is normal and obvious; it does not change in anything the previous
statement, namely that there have to be moral principles in a society. As a
matter of fact, moral principles predetermine the radiation of a civilization
and country. You never had a corrupt society lasting long in the History of
Mankind. And certainly, higher the moral principles are, greater the
civilization is. This evaluation is not short-term oriented, but reflects
assessments over an entire period of History, i.e. possibly many centuries and
at times millennia. This evaluation should not be misinterpreted either; a low
moral principles realm does not necessarily disintegrate immediately, but it can
last centuries – without a significant cultural radiation.
Practically
speaking, we cannot afford to approach the phenomenon of History without a
viewpoint that hinges on our moral principles. However picturesque she might
be, Cleopatra VII of Egypt can never be taken as a perfect model of female
ruler, as she committed suicide, a deeply immoral act.
Following this
brief introduction, we can understand that Moral Principles are a determinant
factor in the Search of Knowledge. There cannot be an immoral use of knowledge
gathered upon a vicious target, and if this is the case, it always backfires,
soon or late.
The Immoral
Knowledge of Modern Europe: Unsurpassed Venom
As the world of
Islam started being disintegrated in the 17th century, the European Academy
rose in force. The long oppressed and tyrannized (in Western Europe) dynamics
of the Mental, Intellectual, Artistic, Scientific, and Philosophical Force were
unleashed at the times we call ‘Renaissance’ (an erroneous term), and after
setting the bases of the method of Thinking and Analyzing, the Europeans
embarked on the Systematic Research of the Past – the past of theirs, and the
Past of the Others. This long procedure was undertaken over the past four
centuries in a most immoral and ego-centric way. This statement should not be
misread; as effort, the Search for the past was good, and the thirst for
knowledge, exploration, and discovery are seminally human, and humanly
brilliant. However, the final manipulation was mostly evil; and the original
motif was at times truly malignant.
The very negative
element in the aforementioned European Epic of Academic Research is to be
identified with the Difficulty to accept an unpleasant reality, the
Impossibility to undergo a severe Self-Criticism, the (egocentrically sought
after) Profit, and the Willingness and Readiness to commit a sin and diffuse
lies in order to possibly create a better Image (or Representation of the Past)
for the badly (or never) accepted real (but not as brilliant as desired) ego.
The bitter truth is that the act of diffusing a falsehood of the sort “My past
is greater than the others” is not just a simple lie, a secondary oversight
that another scholar would modify and correct. As mental and academic effort,
it is utterly evil. And, as everything abides by the Law of consequence, this
evil academic effort brings evil consequences and latter moment’s disastrous
repercussions.
All we say here is
that the European Search for knowledge and the Effort to represent the
Antiquity were utterly immoral. The exaggeration of a preconceived imaginative
‘truth’, the replacement of the real, historical truth with peremptorily
created images, the imposition of the imaginative as real and the elimination
of the real (as unpleasant to psychologically corrupt and tore up egos), all
these acts are unspeakably immoral. They consist in real murder, simply one
cannot take the cases to a Court of Justice established among the human
societies. However, in the same way one murderer, who committed blunt murder in
the middle of a forest without being noticed by anyone, feels the consequences
of his iniquitous act, when overcome by remorse, the consequences of the
preposterous European academic reconstruction – representation of the European
and the Human past are evident, omnipresent and overwhelming.
The Incredible
Burden
There is therefore
an inconceivably heavy – yet invisible – burden on the minds of the Europeans
when trying to approach to the issue of the possibility of social integration
of the Muslim immigrants in the average European societies. This burden is
invisible because the system and the contents of the academic disciplines of
Humanities have never been thoroughly, properly and effectively criticized,
assessed and re-assessed, modified or partly rejected. Even worse, as the
exploratory dynamism of the 18th and the 19th centuries has been replaced by
late 20th century conventionalism and academic conformism, basic errors in
conceptualizing things and developments – errors that go back to the 17th, the
18th and the 19th centuries – are out of reach by the modern, conformist and
superficial pseudo-scholars who accept these errors as unquestionably correct.
Recovery is not possible in this way, and error identification becomes an
impossible task, as long as the error itself is invisible, because its layer is
not to be dealt with.
At this point, we
want to enumerate – not analyze – the issues that exert a negative impact on
the European thinking about the Muslim immigrants’ integration in the European
societies. These are the reasons for which the Europeans are predestined to
fail when dealing with this issue. They consist in the incredible burden that
we have good reason to believe that the Europeans will never be able to remove
/ get rid of; with all the tragic consequences that we will soon attest.
Point 1 – Centuries
long European Hatred of Islam
Europe has crossed
many pre- and post-Renaissance centuries of Catholic and Orthodox Enmity and
Hysteria against Islam, and personally against the founder of this religion,
Muhammad. Even worse, these centuries of paranoid hatred (up to the point of
identifying Muhammad with the Antichrist) had a second, anterior, past: the
Catholic – Orthodox abysmal hatred against Arian, Eutyches, Theodore of
Mopsuestia, Nestorius and other Supreme Theologians, who heralded the
theoretical – Christological positions of Muhammad.
Point 2 –
Fallacious Academic – Intellectual Background and Fake Identity of Modern
Europe (Hellenism)
The Modern European
Identity, as emanating from the Renaissance and the Classicism, is very
problematic, if not fake, and this adds on. The formation of Classicism
consists in serious disfigurement of the Historical truth of the Mediterranean
Antiquity; the errors are due to both, severe lack of sources (when Classicism
emerged as a system of representation of the Antiquity, most of the ancient
languages of the Mediterranean basin, Egyptian hieroglyphics, Hittite
cuneiform, Hatti hieroglyphics, Ugaritic Cuneiform, Aramaic, Phoenician, etc.
had not been deciphered) and disastrous misreading of Greek and Latin sources
(either erroneous selection of ‘founding literature’ or misunderstanding of
excerpts). Hellenism is a totally irrelevant fallacy that misled Modern
Europeans with disastrous results.
Pont 3 –
Misperception of the World History through the Scheme West vs. East
Building on
Classicism, and the totally inconsistent Hellenism (that totally misrepresents
the Balkan / Aegean / Anatolian World’s past), the late 18th century, colonial
Academia of Europe, expanding and exploring, created an unprecedented, inhuman
felony: the East – West Divide. This is the greatest historical lie of all
times. There is no distinction between East and West, there was never such a
divide, and this absolutely racist concept is a theoretical construction
targeting at humiliating the colonized peoples who had a far more illustrious
past than the Europeans; the most Ancient of the European intellectuals, the
Greek Pre-Socratic philosophers, confessed that they were ignorant and they
learnt everything as humble pupils of the Great Wise Elders and Priests of
Babylon, Persia and Egypt. By alienating themselves from the identical (and not
different) peoples of the Orient, the Europeans entrapped themselves in an
impossible position, because of the (theologically, absolutely Satanic)
creation of the ‘Other’, which now intends to demolish them. Worse developments
occurred after the false creation of the ‘Other’.
Point 4 – Execrable
Disfigurement of the ‘Other’ (Orientalism)
The formation of
the doctrines of Orientalism (Egyptology, Iranology, Assyriology, etc.) had
nothing to do with a honest and benign interest for erudition; it was a
shameful, dishonest and criminal act of cultural usurpation of other peoples’
past, culture, identity and monuments. The Oriental disciplines were carefully
kept out of the main interest and the bulk of pedagogical activities and
endeavours in the European universities, as the main accent was always put on
the ‘Western’ part of the ‘divided’ world (with great numbers of students
conducted to Classical studies). Even worse, critical conclusions and
acquisitions of Orientalist research were kept out of the general readership,
excluded from the mainstream historical manuals of the Primary and Secondary
education, marginalized within newspapers and magazines. When a supposedly informative
and groundbreaking article is published in magazine, a review, and a newspaper
about Oriental civilizations, the accent is always put on the material not the
intellectual, mental and spiritual achievements. Of course, there is never a
comparison, because the Fallacy Europe cannot stand the Truth that in the early
5th century BCE, in the clashes between the Persians and the Athenians, the Top
elements of Civilization, Knowledge, Science, Wisdom, Erudition, Culture, Art,
and Humanism, were all on the Iranian side, and the Athenians represented the
ignorance, the misery, and the barbarism. Even the word ‘barbaric’ is not Greek
but Assyrian – Babylonian, as Greeks misunderstood the term ‘BaruBalu’ that
meant the ‘unholy land’. Quite viciously – within the same context –, the
Europeans select as positive example and point of reference those who were
rejected by the Top Center of Civilization in the entire South Balkan area,
namely the Oracle at Delphes that had advised all the Aeolians, the Ionians, and
the Dorians to make peace with Darius and become part of the Iranian Empire.
In an even more
disreputable way, the Orientalism progressed as the ground work performed by
racist European academia, acting mostly as agents of secret services of the
colonial empires that perpetrated the following most nefarious deed – epitome
of duplicity and malignancy. Instead of properly explaining to local
populations, Muslim, Christian or other, the importance (for them, not the
Europeans) of unveiling, studying and incorporating their past into their
present and the significance of Historicity in a pertinent nation building
effort, they manipulated local feelings in a way to turn the local populations
to indifference and even more to hatred of the archeological unearthing and the
historical reconstituting their past. Like this, they permanently prohibited
nation building procedures similar to those practiced in Europe, being
responsible for engulfing these populations in absolute ignorance, hatred of
their past and their identity, and permanent cultural – intellectual – academic
stagnation. In parallel, they embarked on a disastrous work that alone could
easily lead to the present situation.
Point 5 –
Demolition of the Ottoman Empire
Of course, main
responsible for this work are France and England, not Germany, Austria –
Hungary, Italy or Russia. The previous sentence is enough to reveal a possible
way and remedy of the explosive situation with the Muslim immigrants in Europe.
If Germany gets rid of the French impact and influence, if Germany, Italy and
Poland form a decolonizing alliance within Europe – against France and England
–, if this Mitteleuropa eliminates the colonial elements from any activity
within the European Union, closely working with the US (whose worst enemy is
not Ossama Bin Laden but England and France), then Europe will have a chance to
solve the problem with Muslim immigrants.
The demolition of
the Ottoman Empire was the most perverse, anti-Islamic act throughout the
History of Islam. Little matters whether the Iranian Ayatollahs share this
opinion or not; of course they do not, because the Ottoman Empire was the their
rival in diffusing their Shia version of Islam, and more importantly because
the two countries were successive formations of the Sassanid Empire of Iran and
the Eastern Roman Empire, so when fighting against each other in the 18th
century they represented 15 centuries of confrontation!
The demolition of
the Ottoman Empire was the most perverse, anti-Islamic act throughout the
History of Islam. Little matters whether terrorists like Ossama Bin Laden and
the (stupidly considered by Europeans as non terrorist) muftis of Mecca, Medina
and Jerusalem share this opinion or not; of course they do not, because the
Ottoman Empire is enemy no 1 for all Islamic extremists. The reason is simple;
all the Islamic Extremists are a Western product. They do not originate from
the World of Islam. The world of Islam, as civilization and political power,
does not exist. Islamic civilization was gradually extinguished in the late
16th – early 17th centuries. When Napoleon arrived in Egypt in 1798, there was
no Islamic Civilization, but the absolute darkness of the post-Islamic
Barbarism. And with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the existence of any
real and possible Islamic State terminated.
The demolition –
gradual decomposition of the Ottoman Empire allowed the criminal colonial
powers of England and France to perpetrate the most iniquitous deeds in the
Modern History. This was absolutely immoral; of course, it could last 10 years,
20 years, 100 years. However, it would end with the total destruction of both
colonial countries. That is why it is important for America to disentangle
itself from the Anglo-French pestilence. That is why it is crucial for Germany,
Italy, Poland, Spain and others to reconsider Europe (along with Turkey,
Ukraine and Russia), through first the rediscovery of their Authentic
Identities (German, Italian, etc.), and second the marginalization,
denunciation and castigation of France and England.
The demolition –
gradual decomposition of the Ottoman Empire brings us in straight line with all
current developments, and with the European crisis with the Muslim immigrants.
What happened as consequence of this ominous choice of the colonial powers can
be enumerated in a few more points that complete the Incredible Burden of
today’s Europe; this will be the subject of a forthcoming article.
Note
Napoleon leaving Egypt; the 1798 French expedition in Egypt triggered – through
many intermediate stages – the Islamic Extremism.
———————————————————
Reasons making Muslim Integration in Europe Impossible
By Prof. Dr.
Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Published: 8/12/2007
In this article, we
describe the existing incredible burden on the minds of the Europeans when they
are trying to develop a theoretical approach to the issue of the possibility of
social integration of the Muslim immigrants in the average European societies.
In an earlier
article entitled ‘Integration of Muslims means Disintegration of Europe’, we
evoked first the impossibility of politics devoid of Moral Principles, and we
partly described the existing Incredible Burden on the minds of the Europeans
when trying to develop a theoretical approach to the issue of the possibility
of social integration of the Muslim immigrants in the average European
societies. We enumerated five points, namely 1) Centuries long European Hatred
of Islam, 2) Fallacious Academic – Intellectual Background and Fake Identity of
Modern Europe (Hellenism), 3) Misperception of the World History through the
Scheme West vs. East, 4) Execrable Disfigurement of the ‘Other’ (Orientalism),
and 5) Demolition of the Ottoman Empire. In this article we will advance and
describe other basic pillars that bear the aforementioned burden; without their
most radical, drastic and irreversible removal, Europe will not avoid its
History’s most thunderous crisis that is approaching with astronomic speed.
Point 6 – Tragic
termination of the Islamic Civilization and Rise of Barbarism throughout the
nominally Islamic territories
This a point of
seminal importance; the event antedates the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, and
even the arrival of Napoleon in Egypt in 1798. Of course, one cannot fix a date
of death for a civilization that is not destroyed along with the destruction of
the state where this civilization had strived. If we put an end to Ancient
Elamite civilization at 640 BCE, this is due to the fact the Assyrian Emperor
Assurbanipal destroyed Susa, the Elamite capital, invaded the entire territory
of Elam, exterminated the entire population of the country, and even spread
salt over the entire (unholy for the Assyrians) territory of Elam. But the
Islamic Civilization, which was a multi-cultural phenomenon, not a national
civilization, did not end like this. One of the main linguistic supports of the
Islamic Civilization, Arabic, had gradually been decomposed (as early as
beginning of the 16th century) into varied dialects, each of which was an
amalgamation with other local languages. No other language rose to replace it,
Ottoman Turkish, Farsi or Urdu. Even worse, the cultural – intellectual –
religious sphere of Islam had been gradually corrupted by barbarizing elements
that gradually got momentum.
This pertains to
the nature of the Islamic Civilization that was born among nomads in order to
culturally unify them with sedentary peoples. Islam – as attempted by Muhammad
and Ali – was the cultural Aramaization of the Arabs, and in this way
Islamization meant Cultural Des-Arabization of the Arabs. The phenomenon
generated terrible cultural and religious ‘earthquakes’, and at the time of the
rise of the Islamic (non Arabic, and rather Anti-Arabic) Civilization, there
were sheikhs of Darkness who tried to turn Islam to Darkness, using
structurally in their treatises traditional Aramaean rationalist philosophical
methods; the most famous among them was Hanbal. He had limited effect during
his lifetime; but when after some centuries, the Crusaders generated a shock in
the terrorized Christian, Muslim and Jewish populations of the Eastern Roman
and Islamic Empires, a follower of Hanbal, Ibn Taimiya, had it easy to advance
an obscurantist, racist, and clearly more un-Islamic and anti-Islamic system
that made of the Islamic Enlightenment, Philosophy, Sciences and Art its
primary target, as it deliberately propagated the most venomous Barbarism in
the History of the Mankind. His system started expanding until it covered and controlled
the entire Islamic Caliphate from where it expanded further on, as it keeps
expanding even now.
When the Darkness
displaced Civilization within the Islamic Caliphate? This is the Date of Death
of the Islamic Civilization. We cannot fix precisely a specific date, but many
scholars agree on a day as the point-of-no-return, the moment at which the
darkness of the illiterate and barbaric sheikhs was imposed on the Sultan of
the Ottoman Empire.
1580: Islamic
Civilization declared Dead
This date symbol is
the destruction of the Istanbul Astronomical Observatory by the inhuman,
barbaric and illiterate followers of the disreputable Satanist Ibn Taimiya and
the sheikhs who propagated Darkness and Ignorance in their hatred against
Knowledge. Established by Taqi Al Din Efendi, the world’s leading Astronomer,
in 1543, the Istanbul Observatory was taken as model in the erection of the
Royal Danish Astronomical Observatory that was built by TychoBrahae. When in
1580 Taqi el Din predicted Ottoman victory over the Shah of Iran, and this
event did not occur, the criminal followers of Ibn Taimiya and the
bogus-Islamic theologians of Darkness provoked a manifestation of the ignorant
masses who destroyed the Istanbul Observatory with the same hysteria the
barbaric Arabic speaking masses of today demand the destruction of Israel. On
that date was issued the Certificate of Death of the Islamic Civilization and
Religion.
Point 7 – Formation
of Pan-Arabism / False Identity and Language for the colonized masses
This point is not
detached from point 5 (demolition of the Ottoman Empire); the latter was
targeted so that the colonial rulers embark on the formation of a bogus-nation
that would be permanently invalid and intellectually impotent. The different
peoples targeted would therefore be totally unable to reach, perceive,
establish, develop and subsequently take maximum benefit from their national
and cultural identity, whereas through other mechanisms and devices they would
turn out to be indelibly marked by a severe and most shocking complex of
inferiority, involving parasitic-like hatred of the colonial master and at the
same time immense self under-evaluation, servile docility to, thoughtless
mimicking and deification of the colonial masters, absolute admiration and adoration
of their supposed magnificent capacities, inane and immoral separation for the
country where they belonged to (Ottoman Empire), plus hatred, pathological envy
and betrayal of the Ottoman Empire.
The colonial
creation of a mass of illiterate humanoids, labeled ‘Arabs’, consisted in the
most monstrous strangling of
a) the Berberic identity of the inhabitants of today’s Mauritania, Morocco,
Algeria, Tunisia and Libya,
b) the Egyptian – Coptic identity of the inhabitants of today’s – permanently
non Arabic and non Semitic – Egypt,
c) the Kushitic – Meroitic and Nilo-Saharan identity of the inhabitants of
today’s Sudan,
d) the Yemenite (non Arabic) identity’s of the inhabitants of today’s Yemen and
Oman, and
e) the Aramaean identity of the inhabitants of today’s Syria, Lebanon, Jordan,
Palestine, Iraq (with the exception of the Kurds and the Turkmens), Kuwait,
Qatar, Emirates, and the northern confines of Saudi Arabia, and of the so
called Arabic speaking populations of today’s SE Turkey and SW Iran.
At the times of
Napoleon, in the vast surfaces of the Ottoman Empire that France and England
coveted, there were many languages and dialects evolving around Berberic,
Coptic, Nubian, Yemenite and Aramaic (in the respective areas). Turkish and
Arabic vocabularies were important components, as the first was the language of
the administration and the second the language of the religion, but Arabic was
already a dead language, and of course absolutely irrelevant of the various
local cultures, namely Berberic, Coptic, Nubian &Kushitic, Yemenite and
Aramaean.
If there had never
been a colonial interference and involvement, throughout the aforementioned
area, Berberic, Coptic, Nubian, Yemenite, and Aramaic would have been far more
widely spoken today, as the hysterical and criminal effort to eradicate them
would have occurred. In addition, there would be several other mixed languages
composed of the various linguistic components, and there Turkish would be a
very important constituent. If the Ottoman Empire had not lost its territories,
there would never have been this fabricated bogus-language of Modern Arabic.
The tools of the
“Mission Barbarisatrice de France”
The colonial French
formed immediately the class of their interlocutors on whom they exercised a
tricky mechanism: the quasi-illiterate pseudo-scholars of Al Azhar, a useless
relic of Darkness that had nothing in common with the level of that university
before 600 years, the few landowners and merchants, and the rising class of
their servile servants for whom – idiotically – France was the undisputed
leading force of progress.
They triggered the
fabrication of an academic form of modern Arabic language that could not be
identical to Classical Arabic of the Islamic Civilization Ages (but far poorer
and more limited), and at the same time could not be similar to the extremely
poor oral languages (which were amalgamation of various languages, mainly
Coptic, Turkish and Arabic). And of course, it was meant never to become a
mother tongue. The formation of the fabricated academic – journalistic Arabic
covered the span of almost a century, and was directed against the Coptic and
Turkish components that had to be expurgated. Due to the imposition of this
fabricated language, the oral languages were influenced to some extent. But in
order to hide the truth, namely that the Egyptians have absolutely no relation
with the Arabs, and that there is not a single drop of Arabic blood within the
Egyptian veins, the rising educational – academic – political class of
colonized Egypt was injected with the idea that the oral language is an
unimportant form of Arabic that must not be studied, but thoroughly and
insistently disdained. And until now, there was never a single study of the
oral language that was deprecated by those who use it, as this is the beginning
of the servitude, the ignorance and the self-misery.
Abysmal French
Hatred of the Coptic Civilization
Quite indicative of
the monstrous and inhuman plan of the French to disfigure, totally destroy and
disorient (arabize) Egypt is the fact that the Orientalist scholars built up
two (successive) Museums of Egyptian Antiquities in Cairo, and one Museum of
Islamic Antiquities, but no Museum of Coptic Antiquities.
Only the Copts
themselves with great effort and great honor did contribute as community to the
establishment of a Coptic Museum in Cairo. There is nothing strange in this. If
one reads a few excerpts of Coptic Annals, one realizes easily that before and
after the arrival of Islam in Egypt, the only, the main, the most diachronically
excruciating problem of the Copts was the Roman and the Constantinopolitan
perversion of Christianity and the inhuman political practices of the Roman
Empire. Certainly, the French distortion of the World History would not like
these pages diffused anywhere.
Pan – Arabism:
dehumanizing, barbaric behavioral system
As it can be
surmised through the aforementioned, Pan-Arabism has only very little to do
with the latter day Arabic Nationalism that rose as political ideology in the
1910s and later. It has mostly to do with the formation of false feeling of
national identity and the creation of a miserably low, lewd, vulgar, barbaric,
and ultimately villainous behavioral system that was provocatively triggered
through successive machinations by the colonial elite of France and projected
on the colonized masses, long before the English prevailed in Egypt (1880).
If this Brutal and
Criminal Societal Disfigurement of the detached Ottoman societies had not been
so meticulously undertaken by the French, there would not have been a chance in
the septillion for the British to convince the sheikh of Mecca to utter
betrayal during WW I.
Point 8 – Methodic
and perverse work of obliteration of the Berberic, Coptic, Aramaic and Yemenite
Languages, Cultures and Identities
The French ignited
the concept of arabization, as if an Aramaean of Syria could ever become an
Arab, which is an oxymoron. The modern disciplines of Humanities had not
advanced very much before 150 years, but still the American example was very
clear: an African American, who having forgotten his original language became
English native speaker, would never be (or be considered as) …. Anglo-Saxon.
In the African
Atlas region, the most underdeveloped and neglected parts were the provinces
where the arabization policies could not advance much. In Egypt, the Copts were
put in front of the dilemma ‘elimination in Egypt or safety through
assimilation in France’.
Among Arameans, the
most targeted nation as the most pivotal hindrance in the disreputable
arabization machination, the work took the iniquitous form of projecting other
– totally irrelevant and absolutely false – national names for parts of
Aramaeans that could be influenced through Vatican and missionaries.
False national
names for Aramaeans: “Chaldaeans”, “Assyrians”
Like this, some
Aramaeans were taught that they are descendants of the Chaldaeans (portrayed as
Babylonians, although the Kaldu were just an Aramaean tribe in Southern
Mesopotamia), whereas others were offered facilities and monies to be possibly
convinced that they were the offspring of the Assyrians who had all disappeared
as early as the last years of the 7th century BCE.
Like this, for the
first part in the World History, an entire people became the victim of national
– spiritual trichotomy, as two misguided parts of the same people (“Assyrians”,
“Chaldaeans”) have fallen victims of the malignant Anglo-French colonial plan,
causing national division and disaster.
Yet, if the
Aramaeans were united, they could convincingly explain to the Arabic speaking
populations of Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, etc, that they are not
Arabs but linguistically only arabizedAramaeans, and that the best they have to
do in order to achieve a coherent national and cultural identity is to learn
Aramaic and obliterate Arabic.
Key point to help
unveil the academic fathers of the Islamic Extremism
If you say this to
a criminal French Orientalist, he will say to you that the linguistically
arabized Aramaean cannot obliterate Arabic because he is Muslim. Through this
answer, you get immediately and clearly the full and complete revelation of the
Mystery of the Iniquity: the real creators of the Islamic Terrorism are the
Colonial French whose plans would all be nil, if suddenly the modern
bogus-Islam disappeared. Yet, the reality is simple: you don’t need Arabic to
believe in Islam. You need Farsi, Turkish, Urdu. Somali, Swahili, many
languages – but you don’t necessarily need Arabic.
The obliteration of
the genuine culture of the illegally detached from the Ottoman Empire peoples
took the form of unprecedented hatred and hysteria imposed through many
sophisticated ways on the ignorant and besotted elites of these countries, who
– through the machination of conflicts with the Ottoman authorities (provoked
by the French but unfortunately undetected by these Ottoman citizens) – saw in
France the savior whereas that pernicious country was the ultimate destroyer.
Prohibition of
Phoenicia as National Name – instead of forged ‘Lebanon”
Even today, the
ridiculous French Orientalists do not allow their Lebanese students, who
besotted enough think possible for them to go and study in France, to publicize
in the Museums in Lebanon the absolute Phoenician National Identity of that
country.
All the
inscriptions and the indications in all the Lebanese museums that shelter only
Phoenician and Aramaic antiquities give explanations whereby the national name
‘Phoenicia’ is criminally absent. This is the trash that disreputable
bogus-scholars, like my former professor at the EcolePratique des Hautes Etudes
IVeme section, Maurice Sznycer, imposed through utter blackmail on their
Lebanese students, who go to study in Paris in order to get a trash Ph.D. paper
“bon pour l’ Orient”.
Point 9 – Severe
distortion of the National Histories of the illegally detached from the Ottoman
Empire Peoples, matched with a multi-target confusion of the World academia
As the colonial
conspiracy prepared the stage for local elites to idiotically think that it
would be better for them to rely on the French than on the authorities of their
own Ottoman state, many Algerians, Egyptians, Lebanese, Syrians and others
started moving to France to study their History. There, the criminal and
mendacious French academia, in total contradiction with methods applied in other,
European, countries and students, they gave them a most distorted and broken
picture of their national – Algerian, Egyptian, Lebanese, Syrian and other –
History.
Basic element of
this distortion was the discontinuity; at times the past, Egyptian, Assyrian –
Babylonian, etc. was highlighted, then there were many confusing centuries of
non – identity (through the bias of the erroneous term ‘Hellenistic Times’ that
should be replaces by ‘Orientalistic Times’ because during that period Oriental
cultures and religions, ideologies and cults, philosophies and esoterisms were
diffused in Greece, Rome and throughout the Roman Empire), and then suddenly
everything in the Orient was turned into the Arabic – Islamic, which also a
very erroneous term).
Yet, the Late Antiquity,
when the Oriental cults and philosophies prevailed throughout the West
(Mithraism, Zervanism, Isidism, Hermetism, Anubism, Ostanism, Gnosticisms,
Chaldeanism, Manichaeism, the Cybele circle of cult, the Atargatis system, and
the Oriental Christian systems, Nestorianism, ‘Monophysitism’), consist in the
ultimate backbone of every Oriental land’s history, as developments that took
place in that period characterized the acceptance of Islam and the aspects of
its implementation in the lands in question.
Breaking the
continuity that brought Islam forth, the heinous and racist French academia
help promote Islamic Extremism, a system of genuine misinterpretation of Islam
– precisely through the bias of an-historicity, and de-historicity (as their
supposed ‘Islam’ comes from nowhere and goes to nowhere).
Point 10 –
Distorted representation of the Oriental and Islamic Past for average European,
Western and World readerships
Linked with the
aforementioned, the colonial academia prevented the correct information and the
adequate interpretation of data pertaining to Oriental, Christian Oriental, and
Islamic Antiquity from becoming widely available among Western readerships.
Who read a French
translation and an analysis of the grand opus of the Aramaean philosopher
Tatianus ‘To Greeks’, whereby the Great Aramaean trashes the supposedly
important Greek philosophers as miserable copiers of Oriental thought,
philosophy and wisdom?
Why are there in
Europe more translations and books about Pericles and not Assurbanipal? Simply,
because the hysteria of falsification and the hatred of the greatness were
matched with the pathological love of the lewd, the low, the vulgar and The
hideous. And an ignorant, tyrannical chieftain like Pericles (who ruled
tyrannically over the 75% majority of slaves, also neglecting the Athenian
women who were just ‘things’ to him) was thus preferred to an erudite Emperor –
Philosopher – High Priest – Librarian and Connoisseur of dead languages (of his
days: Sumerian).
Quite comically,
the issue entered into school books’ and encyclopedias’ maps; you read about
the Roman – Sassanid Persian rivalry! They do not show to you the Naqsh-e
Rustam relief with Valerian kneeling in front of Shapur III, but they offer you
a map of the adversary empires. Ludicrously enough the map starts with the
Iberian peninsula and ends somewhere in the middle of today’s Iran. Yet, if
they extended the map until Tibet and India, enough to show all the Sassanid
territories, you would realize that the Sassanid Empire of Iran was greater,
larger, bigger than the Roman Empire. Worse, located at the epicenter of the
East – West desert, land and sea routes of trade, Iran was the Central Empire
of the world, and ‘your’ Roman Empire was a marginal western story. This is the
reality that the average Europeans never learnt, as they have been long date
victims of the mendacious Orientalist academia of France and England.
If the criminal
colonial academia of late 19th century France did not act in this way, they
would feel that they ‘prove’ that the Sultan was superior to the Freemasonic
President of the French Third Republic, and to Queen Victoria. The question is
why other European nations with highly Humanist Traditions, the Germans, the
Italians, and many others, should follow the inhuman practices and plans of the
Anglo-French gangsters? As there many more reasons that generated the existing
chaotic gap between the European populations and the Muslim immigrants in
Europe, we will expand more on several forthcoming articles.
Note
Silence on Assurbanipal and focus on Pericles in the Western text books; one of
the secret reasons of the chaotic gap between Westerners and Muslims, both
equally misinformed by the colonial Orientalist elite of France and England.
No comments:
Post a Comment