Οι Ψευτομασώνοι, ο Ατατούρκ κι οι Ισλαμιστές: οι Τρομερές Αποκαλύψεις του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη

ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ” 

Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 13η Φεβρουαρίου 2019. 

---------------------------------- 

Οι Ψευτομασώνοι, ο Ατατούρκ κι οι Ισλαμιστές: οι Τρομερές Αποκαλύψεις του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη

https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/οι-ψευτομασώνοι-ο-ατατούρκ-κι-οι-ισλαμ/  

===================     

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Ρωμιοσύνη, Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή Αυτοκρατορία

Στην απάντησή του σε Τούρκο κεμαλιστή αναγνώστη πρότερου άρθρου του, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης καταγγέλλει την ανομία και τον σατανισμό των φιλο-ισραηλινών και φιλο-σιωνιστικών ψευτο-στοών και τα τρομερά προβλήματα που η διαστροφική και διεστραμμένη δράση τους προξενεί για την Ανθρωπότητα.

Αναδημοσιεύω εδώ την απάντηση – άρθρο του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη η οποία δημοσιεύθηκε αρχικά το 2007 κι αναδημοσιεύθηκε έκτοτε σε πολλά σάιτς.

Ο Ατατούρκ σε βαλς και σε ζεμπέκικο: η απόλυτη απόρριψη της αποικιοκρατικής, ψευτομασωνικής, σιωνιστικής, οριενταλιστικής διάκρισης του κόσμου σε ‘Ανατολή’ και ‘Δύση’. Η ιστορική αλήθεια οδηγεί στο σβύσιμο και στο κλείσιμο των γαλλικών ψευτο-πανεπιστημίων: η Αφρο-Ευρασία είναι Αδιαίρετη. Η δεύτερη φωτογραφία είναι από σκηνή ταινίας. Αλλά ο Κεμάλ Ατατούρκ ήταν γνωστός για την συμπάθειά του στον χορό αυτό και η διάθεσή του αυτή αποτυπώθηκε σε πολλά αγάλματα που διακόσμησαν πόλεις της Τουρκίας μετά τον θάνατό του (επειδή ενόσω ζούσε ο ίδιος, απαγόρευε κάθε διάσταση προσωπολατρείας).

Freemasonic History, Apostasy, Kemal Ataturk, Turkey and Islamists

By Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

http://www.centralclubs.com/you-know-that-t42796-36.html

https://www.academia.edu/25609316/Freemasonic_History_Apostasy_Kemal_Ataturk_Turkey_and_Islamists_by_Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

16 May 2008

==========================

An inquisitive and pertinent mail sent by a reader let me draw the conclusion that more light should be shed on issues discussed in my earlier article entitled “Erdogan: Turkey’s Bani Sadr in a Sinister ‘Second Republic’?”. I publish here the integral text of the mail, and then my answer. Discussing Freemasonic attitude, behaviour, choices, beliefs, apostasy and iniquity are part of understanding daily developments in the surrounding world; they have little to do with the original faith of the predecessors of the International Freemasonry, as their beliefs and practices that have all gone with the wind.

Questions about the Freemasonic involvement in Turkey

Dear Prof. Dr. M. S. Megalommatis,

I found this article quiet difficult to understand, especially the meaning of ‘Second Republic of Freemasonic Soft Power ‘, but then I’m also ignorant to the working and intentions of the Freemasonry, especially regarding the relationship between Islamists and Freemasonry. (Before reading your various articles, I assumed it was only a secular counter-power to the Roman Catholic Church. But I understand better now why Kemal Atatürk closed down the Freemasonic Lodges of Turkey)

Do various Freemasonic Lodges of the world have the same intentions, or is it primarily the Freemasonic Lodge of France that is helping Islamists?

If I understood the article correctly, they do not wish Turkey to have a similar Islamic Revolution as Iran, which would be for her to become the ‘Second Republic of Theocratic Paranoia’ but instead, want Turkey to become the ‘Second Republic of Freemasonic Soft Power’?

Should the Islamic Revolution of Iran be considered as being helped by, but at the same time also being a failure of the Freemasonic Lodge of France’s ultimate plan?

Thank you.

Freemasonic Clash with Roman Catholicism, and the Rise of Secularism

Dear Culduz,

Thank you for your questions and interest!

Re-reading my article, I find you are right; it is somewhat ‘cryptic’ or – to put it in another way – I assume that the readers have a certain background in the subject, whereas this apparently is not the case. However!

Yes, you are right in your overall approach; what you say, namely that Free Masonry “was only a secular counter-power to the Roman Catholic Church”. But this is correct if said within certain historical limits.

If said in 1793, in 1810, in 1870, in 1905, in 1920, your statement sounds absolutely accurate and up-to-the-point.

But, what if said in 1740?

Secular?

There was nothing secular in 1740!

“Those who, living in 1740, envisioned a Secular Republic to be materialized after decades or half a century” you may say.

Hmm!

Assuming that the 1740 Free Masons would be in favour of …. a secular state is assuming a lot!

Actually, we have no evidence for something like that.

The evidence we have from Freemasonic involvement in European politics is precisely the opposite; the first states they created out of scratch, namely the United States of America (1774) and the Nouveau Regime of France (the First Republic – 1789), show the marked existence of religious, anti-Catholic of course, ideas, concepts, theories, and an undeclared, semi-declared, hinted at, hidden (you choose whatever you like) faith is the Transcendental.

I suppose you agree with me that the replacement of the Trinity God of the Roman Catholic Church by the Supreme Being (Etre Supreme) consists in an act of Faith. Arranging the 20th Prairial (8th June) as Fête de l’Être Suprême is a purely religious phenomenon. Faith itself is utterly religious, and the French State religion was a semi-declared form of the Freemasonic religion the existence of which ridiculously and cowardly Freemasons deny in our days.

Why Freemasons do not admit their religion exists, and is different from the rest.

Unadulterated historical truth is that the Freemasons were always afraid to explicitly and boldly declare their faith and religion. Contrarily to the pleasant narrations that they teach in the lower degrees, when admonishing a new member, Free Masonry was not established in the beginning of the 18th century. The origins of Freemasonry go back in History, and antedate the formation of the official Christianity. Their virulent opposition to the Catholic Church over the span of the last centuries represents a very brief period of Freemasonic – Catholic rivalry.

To put it correctly, this rivalry exists between two Priesthoods that procreated several religious, philosophical and ideological systems in various continents and in different historical moments; one of these priesthoods put all its stakes on the formation of the system that is currently known as Christianity with center at Rome (out of which came the Catholic Church).

The other priesthood opposed Christianity, and due to the fact that Christianity prevailed, it lost all its impact on the society and the political power. It underwent various transformations (from the Gnostics of the Late Antiquity to the so-called Western Manichaeans – a pejorative term introduced by their Christian rivals –, the Cathars, the Knights Templar, the Illuminati and the Rosicrucians) the last of which adopted the – supposedly innovative and neutral – term of Freemasonry.

Due to the colossal dimensions of the Clash between Freemasons and Catholics, the supreme class of the International Freemasonry (religious branch) has always been hesitant to unveil in public, to introduce, to launch its own religion that preserves only at the esoteric level to those initiated in the various degrees of Freemasonry, and more explicitly in the highest degrees.

This has its counterpart within Christianity whereby the Jesuits initiate their members in a vision and faith totally different than that of the average Christian believer, although not opposed; one should perceive this faith as “qualitatively higher”.

This shows precisely what has happened since the times of the Late Antiquity until now; two priesthoods that had part of their religion publicly diffused and part available for the initiated members engaged in total confrontation, whereby one was defeated and preserved its faith only at the clandestine level (that available for the initiated members).

The fight has been too important for the diachronic Freemasonry to risk unwise movements, an eventual revelation of a religion opposite to Christianity, and an eventual rejection by the masses. Many other parameters play a certain role in this regard, and as the early 19th century Freemasons were not happy with the lukewarm acceptance of a copy of their religion, i.e. the French State religion of 1793, they did not go ahead with the plan of publicly introducing their religion.

One has to admit that the early decades of the 19th century justified such a decision; it was not certainly the correct moment for the introduction of a new religion; philosophies, ideologies, political systems, intellectual and scientific developments and explorations, technological discoveries and economic booming were all far more attractive. And the greatest of the Freemason philosophers of the 18th century, Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot or Montesquieu, was not at the level of Basil of Caesarea, Origen, St Augustine, Mani, Celsius or Tabari.

Secularism – an imperative need of multi-cultural societies

However, my intention here is not to write the History of the Freemasonic clash with Catholic Christianity but to answer your questions as regards the Freemasonic involvement in Turkey, and more particularly in favour of Erdogan.

Before reaching that point it is important to bear in mind that the concept of the Secular Republic is absolutely Freemasonic, and does not consist in an ultimate target but in political means; it is the tool – according to the Freemasonic evaluation of it – of weakening, culturally, socially, intellectually, educationally, and therefore socially, economically, and politically, the Catholic Church and their supporters. The secular state is the reason for the rise of the high number of the non practicing Christians in the second half of the 20th century. To today’s Freemasons the Secular State has been a success, as it brought them in power. According to the original principles of Freemasonry, the Secular State is nothing important to consider, let alone laud.

Of course, it is correct that Kemal Ataturk was known for his Freemasonic affiliations, and his ideals were identical to those of the early 20th century Freemasons who, sticking to their unveiled faith, propagated the concept of secularism and the laic state.

Absence of Secularism means Rise of Islamic Terrorism

Of course, today someone does not need to be Freemason to see that a Secular state represents an imperative need for our multicultural societies. What slips the memory of many is the fact that our societies have changed tremendously over the last 80 years (as we speak of Ataturk). Few societies have remained absolutely uniform, and only to them a non-secular, religious, status could eventually apply. Again, even if there is an entirely mono-ethnic and uni-cultural society, established out of Christian Protestants or Muslim Sunnis, a religious state consists in direct oppression of those among the local populations who do not want to practice their religion. And this is very significant, because paranoid Western pseudo-Christians, by insisting on attacks against the Secular State – either in the United States or in Poland – trigger, either they want it or not, either they know it or not, the Islamic Terrorism rise.

This is precisely what Islamic terror promoting local groups and secret societies has devised in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan and other fanaticized societies of analphabetic masses: they try to impose strict practice on those, who – although Muslim – do not want to practice Islam. And they are the silent majority – to which the pathetic, useless, imbecile and wicked American and European politicians and diplomats do not even speak, sticking to their official interlocutors who all cheat and entrap the “Western enemy”.

Apostasy in Freemasonry 

Going back to your early statement and to my point about its time limits, we have to check whether all Freemasons stick to their Secular ideal today. Well, we have to admit that the late 80s – early 90s ideological changes reflect earlier, parallel and opposite, movements within Freemasonry.

Currently, an Apostate Freemasonic Lodge preaches atheism, evolutionism, and social immoralism and nihilism; and another Apostate Freemasonic Lodge denounces the traditional faith of Freemasonry in order to preserve a portion of power and members in a changing world. Two different sorts of apostasy! You can attest their ramifications in the political life and the societies of many countries.

Kemal Ataturk and Rudolf von Sebottendorf

Notice that I speak of ‘earlier movements’; Kemal Ataturk most honorably closed down the deviated Turkish Freemasonic Lodges that ostracized the disciples of Rudolf von Sebottendorf, attempting to target an alliance with Pope Pius XII (Eugenio Pacelli – Pastor Angelicus) and Hitler in the same way today the Prostitute French Freemasonic Lodge extols the disreputable Satanism practiced by Jean Paul II, the bogus-Freemasonic Pope.

When you listen to the irrelevant and comical people of the Academie Francaise laud such a pope, you understand that their fear, guilt and iniquity definitely render them authentic disciples of the bogus-leader they are currently fabricating; they consider their iniquitous deeds as concealed, but they are well known and visible to many as afar as the four corners of the Universe!

As you get through the lines, I already gave you an answer to the question whether all the Freemasonic Lodges have the same intentions. As you see, this is not the case, and one could eventually grasp this through my adjective ‘Apostate’ for one or some Freemasonic Lodges; if one or some are ‘apostate’, there is good reason to think that others are not!

Apostate Freemasonic Lodge and plans for Turkey

This problem does however hinge on the influence and the impact of every lodge, and this can vary tremendously; as a matter of fact, there are lodges more involved in Transcendental Research and Operation, and lodges well versed into Politics and Finance (either opposing one another or not).

In this regard, if the most highly politicized lodge of France supports the anti-Secular conspiracy against Turkey, it is quite enough; you don’t need all the French lodges to do so!

And again, as you say in your penultimate paragraph “they do not wish Turkey to have a similar Islamic Revolution as Iran, which would be for her to become the ‘Second Republic of Theocratic Paranoia’ but instead, want Turkey to become the ‘Second Republic of Freemasonic Soft Power’”; this by itself is twice disastrous.

“Soft Power”: the most monstrous and inhuman Tyranny of all times

First. If the plan meets success (which is highly unlikely), instead of the existing Turkish Republic that is ruled by Turks in a democratic way, there will be the much desired by the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge ‘Soft Power’, which is the most monstrous and inhuman Tyranny of all times, plus in this case the absolute powers will be in Non-Turkish hands.

The truth is simple; there is no perfect democracy, and many forms of non-democratic systems can be more democratic than several nominally democratic systems.

What the miserable, Freemasonic puppet-journalists attack in Turkey, namely the central role played by the army in the establishment and the preservation of the Republic and the secular democratic system, is precisely what prevents the Apostate Freemasonic lodge from ruling Turkey by proxies.

The military certainly represent a non-controllable (through elections and referenda) part of the Turkish democratic system. The Freemasonic puppets accuse this as un-democratic; their concern is not the complete – 100% – as democratization of Turkey, as complete democratization does not exist anywhere in the world, and it will never be the case in societies larger than a 50000 people city.

They want to replace – in the non-controllable part of the Turkish democratic system – the military with the Freemasonic proxies. They think that a constitutional change will be enough to pull to carpet under the feet of the military, give more powers to the controlled (through the mass media and the Finance world) Erdogan government that will go ahead with further liberalization steps, selling to Freemasons the state run companies that are property of the Turkish people – not the French Freemasons.

Like this, calculating as the most imbecile beings in the world, they hope to install a totally controlled (by them) situation in Turkey. By the way, if one wants to analyze the pathology of the Apostate Freemasons’ sick and debased thought, one would result in publishing the most voluminous opus in the history of all sciences.

What one should carefully remember is that, for the international, eschatological plans of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge, the role of Turkey is a very limited one, much inferior to today’s Turkey’s role and stand, let alone the great potentialities that are always there. To minimize Turkey, they want to create a Kurdistan as they already control some Kurds, and they believe that, through further Turco-Kurdish clashes, they will control Kurds more effectively (expecting them to run to their proxies for protection).

Their iniquitous plan stipulates a dramatic increase of the Turkish homosexuals’ social role, a tremendous increase in drugs use, and all sorts of devious developments that absolutely dehumanize any society, not only Turkey.

Second, and more important: if the plan meets failure (which is highly likely), instead of them controlling Turkey, after the much desired (by them) destitution of the Turkish military, it will be the existing Islamists, who will just repeat the Iran 1979 – 81 old (but unstudied and unlearnt) story.

As you correctly understood, they tried to trigger events in Iran in 1979 (not the ‘Islamic Revolution of Iran’), but they turned against them, and they were able with great difficulty to save their Apprentice Proxy, the comical Iranian president, whose website (http://www.banisadr.com.fr/index.shtml) ranks no 945,110 this morning (down from 1,119,824, probably because of my reference to him as a museological curiosity)! This brilliant Freemasonic trash of a person (and personality) Erdogan should bring back in his mind once per hour at least, if he wants an honorable exit from this vain world of materialistic endeavors.

By Prof. Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Published: 7 August 2007

Turkey and China: an Alliance to Conquer the World – I

 Part I: Turkey must withdraw from NATO and become Member State of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization at once!

 

 

The forthcoming death of the West is inevitable. The monstrous and inhuman conquistadores, who went out of Spain to commit genocide in Mexico and Peru, the barbarian Portuguese, who left their land to make war on the civilized and peaceful Somali and other East African Muslim sultanates, the primitive French, who moved out of their cursed land to invade the world for the benefit of their incestuous bogus-kings, the savage English, who turned their useless island into a butchery of other nations (Scots, Welsh, etc.), before attempting to colonize the Earth, and the vulgar Dutch, who -being unable to live in their Nether Lands- turned the islands of the Indonesian nations into a real Nether World on the surface of the Earth, are about to get extinguished as nations and demolished as states. And English will soon cease to be an international language. No one needs it; Chinese Mandarin is richer, better and more eloquent.

 

The corrupt, sick and evil nations of France and England, after enslaving numerous nations in their territories-cemeteries (Basks, Catalans, Occitans, Corsicans, Bretons and Alsatians in France; Irish, Scots and Welsh in England), set up a long plan, stretched over centuries, and achieved to successively destroy the Mughal Empire of South Asia, the Safavid-Afsharid-Qajar Empire of Iran, and the Ottoman Empire. Their plan would have been completed, had not the greatest statesman of the 20th century, Kemal Ataturk, prevented them from doing so. The existence of the secular state of Turkey means -for the Satanic capitals Paris and London- that the barbaric targets of their academies, administrations, diplomacies, and armies have not been accomplished.

 

The same evil colonial empires, mobilizing others after the typical manner of hyenas and wild dogs, attempted to also invade the Qing Empire of China. Their 'allies' in the project, namely Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Japan and US, were gullible enough to be cheated by the French and the English by means of 'sharing a big pie'; this is so because the completion of the evil plan would surely be beneficial to the naïve allies of the Paris and London criminals, but it would catapult England and France to world dominance. At the end, similarly with what occurred in Asia's westernmost confines thanks to Kemal Ataturk, the colonial forces failed to occupy China; despite all the Unequal Treaties (不平等條約), the Concessions and the Boxer Protocol (辛丑各國和約), which involved England, France, Japan, Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, the US, Holland, Belgium, and Spain (indemnity was paid by China also to Portugal, Sweden and Norway!), the historical nucleus of continental China remained independent.  

 

Consequently, thanks to only Turkey and China, the colonial powers failed to achieve their targets in Asia; quite contrarily, in Africa, they colonized the entire Black Continent, due also to the cooperation with their local criminal stooge, the Amhara-led Abyssinia, which annexed the kingdoms of the Oromos, the Kaffas, the Sidamas, the Hadiyas, the Afars and many other African nations, notably the Ogaden Somalis. One has however to bear in mind that the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians are not Africans but, being Semitic of origin, they originate from Yemen.

 

Drawing on anti-colonial traditions, convictions and struggles, but being too unsophisticated to possibly resist the European colonial powers' infiltration, the United States was gradually transformed, during the 19th c., from beacon of anti-colonialism to a colonial instrument that diffused darkness, lawless laws, inhuman theories, monstrous ideas, and savage practices worldwide.

 

As Germany and Italy participated in the colonial competition only briefly and only because of their rightful antagonism with France and England, one cannot take them as historical colonial powers. Germany does not belong to the West, but has been after 1945 under permanent Western occupation, and the present political system does not represent the German identity and the wishes of the German nation. The eternal return of the Drang nach Osten every now and then, as fundamental concept of the German intellectual, cultural and spiritual identity, constitutes full proof of the fact that Germany is an Oriental nation. Wagner,  Goethe, Fichte, Athanasius Kircher, Friedrich II von Hohenstaufen, and Friedrich I Barbarossa have nothing Western in them. Italy may be the cradle of Renaissance, but in the 3-millennium long History of Rome and the Italian Peninsula, this must be considered as a deviation and an exception; as a matter of fact, the Roman Empire competed for hundreds of years with Arsacid and Sassanid Iran for prevalence in the Orient. An unprecedented cataclysm of Oriental cults, religions, cultures and theories swept the Roman Empire during and after the 1st c. BCE, duly obliterating every notion of the Roman Republic and every element of non-Oriental (i.e. barbaric) nature. Christianity is an Oriental religion par excellence.

 

Today, the Western World, after diffusing its 5-century long falsification of the historical past, scientific forgery, theoretical aberration, ideological distortion, cultural abnormality, socio-political corruption, economic ravenousness (all the colonial countries' achievements are due to wealth stripped from other nations), and overall inhumanity, is doomed to implode, explode and disappear. Deeply plunged in internal strives that reflect the opposite concepts, spiritual practices, material targets, and worldwide agendas of the Western World's major components and secret orders, the West is predestined to disintegrate and go extinct. Little matters whether France and England will collapse differently from, or prior to, the US. Their situation is very well known to the panicked gangsters, who rule these states that are engulfed in a multitude of internal and external conflicts. That's why the colonial masterminds, in their confrontation with one another and with all the other sound nations of this world, try persistently and desperately to do what they have always done: export their problems, conflicts, mental sickness, moral corruption, and inhuman monstrosity, thus triggering worldwide chaos and disasters.  

 

Only an idiot and a liar believe that the derelict states of US, England and France will longer exist. However, although in such miserable state, the various criminal cliques that rule these countries are still highly dangerous. This is so because they will try to destroy states and spread a conflagration of wars in order to survive; this is surely a delusion, but the entire world may face a nuclear conflagration until these evil states and ruling classes get lost.

 

All Turks must imperatively shift their thought from the silly stereotype "Kemal Ataturk wanted Turkey to be a Western or Western European country, state and society"; this is a lie. He did not. In 1919, when Kemal Ataturk started his gigantic feat, he wanted to make of the new state, which he finally launched officially in 1923 with Turkey's First Constitution, a powerful, modern and technologically advanced state that would at the same time enable the Turkish nation to preserve its Anatolian historical continuity, moral integrity, and cultural identity.  

 

Right or wrong, at the time of Kemal Ataturk, the technologically and militarily advanced countries of the world were located in Central - Western Europe and North America. In only two decades, the ashamed, defeated, backward and useless Ottoman Empire was spectacularly transformed into a victorious, expanding, advanced, well-systematized Turkey that fostered discipline, order and national unity because of the existence of one party only. Women were socially equal to men in Ataturk's Turkey and therefore voted in elections, two years before women were endowed with this privilege in corrupt and perverse France. It is therefore quite clear that 'modernization' was not meant as 'westernization' in Ankara.

 

In this regard, the distinguished Prof. Erol Manisalı, widely considered as Turkey's foremost Kemalist but in reality consisting in Turkey's most genuine interpreter of Kemal Ataturk's mindset, concepts, choices and decisions, reminded Ataturk's true words to everyone in an excellent article that was recently published (1/12/2020) in Turkey's most acclaimed newspaper Cumhuriyet under the meaningful title "Erdoğan’ın 'Avrupa çıkışı'nın arkası" (Behind Erdogan's 'European exit'). After a brief but very convincing analysis, the venerable academician made a sentence only to include a most crucial statement made back in the 1920s by Kemal Ataturk: «"İstikametimiz Avrupa değil, bilim ve çağdaş uygarlık değerleridir" dedi». («"Our destination is not Europe, but science and contemporary civilization values", he said»). https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/erol-manisali/erdoganin-avrupa-cikisinin-arkasi-1795152

 

Post WWII Europe abandoned the values of contemporary civilization and now, along with America, will get decomposed and disappear. Kemal Ataturk would never accept homosexual marriages, adoption of children by so-called homosexual couples, and all the other evil notions and inhuman concepts of the American 'Democrats', Western European libertarians, cosmopolitan leftists, and cultureless Marxists.

 

Today, in striking contrast with the decayed colonial states of US, France and England, China is the embodiment of technological advance, anti-colonial struggle, cultural value preservation, historical heritage promotion, and unbiased academic life. Starting with Deng Xiaoping (邓小平), the Chinese realized that they should act in the manner Kemal Ataturk did six (6) decades earlier as regards earlier forms of Western non-hereditary states. They therefore selected and retained those among the elements of Mao's Marxism-Leninism that could be locally adaptable, culturally adjustable, and consequently useful to the Chinese tradition, heritage and identity.   

 

In the beginning of the 21st c., China and Turkey are the world's most solidary empires; the two states are complementary to one another in a unique, historical, cultural and geo-strategic way. Turkey is the most indispensable state for the promotion of China's universal interests in the western confines of the Afro-Eurasiatic landmass. China is the most indispensable state for the promotion of Turkey's Pan-Turanian and Pan-Islamic interests worldwide. As both empires can expand and triumph worldwide only on the basis of Kemal Ataturk's concept of and approach to governance, Turkey can evidently help China with the modernization of the education, culture, mentality and way of life of Uighurs, who did not have until now the chance to understand Islam in the way Kemal Ataturk did and organize their education, cultural life, and socio-economic advance accordingly.

 

Pretty much like China, Turkey cannot tolerate the present state of fragmentation in Western Asia, i.e. the former territories of the Ottoman Empire that the colonial gangsters of the West baptized with the nonexistent term "Middle East".

 

Pretty much like Turkey, China cannot tolerate the present state of fragmentation in the inner, central parts of Asia, i.e. the vast territories of former Timurid Turanian empires that were pulverized due to multiple colonial schemes only to be terribly transfigured and misrepresented by English and French colonial academics and Orientalists, who invented the meaningless term "Central Asia" for these lands of high civilization. Central Asia is Turan.  

 

Pretty much like Kemal Ataturk was a paradigm for Deng Xiaoping's elimination of useless theories that contradict World History, distort Human Culture, prevent peaceful development, and guarantee worldwide advance for all the nations, today's China must become the perfect example for all Turks, who must unite in a new, single party, composed of all tendencies, return to Ataturk's practices, and come up with Türkiye Cumhuriyeti 2.0, namely reinstate the Constitution of 1923.

 

If all Turks unite into a new, one-party Republic like at the time of Kemal Ataturk, it is certain that Turkey's worst enemies (France, England, US, Israel) will immediately realize the catastrophic consequences that such an act will have for their existence. Before the idiotic Brussels bureaucrats interrupt Turkey's contacts and negotiations with EU (https://www.ab.gov.tr/), Ankara must issue an announcement declaring the negotiations as forever terminated and all hitherto valid agreements as canceled {the infamous Customs Union agreement (1995) included}.

 

Turkey will complete 70 years of NATO membership only at expense of its territorial integrity, internal stability, and national safety. The different groups of power that determine NATO long-term decisions and practices have great differences among them and they are in permanent and terrible clash against one another, because their agendas differ greatly either worldwide or specifically, about the future of NATO. However, the common denominator of all agendas and schemes is the destruction of Ankara, the dismemberment of Turkey, and the subsequent formation of Greater Kurdistan, Greater Armenia, one Turkish secular state in Western Anatolia, a Turkish religious state in Central Anatolia, one moderate Muslim Turkish state in Thrace, and one Christian Orthodox religious state in the "island of Constantinople".

 

This will be a geographical reality in case a totally idiotic or treacherous government in Ankara goes ahead and self-disastrously implements the paranoid Istanbul Canal plan (creation of an artificial canal between the Black Sea and the Marmara Sea, beyond the western suburbs and outskirts of today's Istanbul (Lake Küçükçekmece). This shows that the Treaty of Sèvres represents something much more important than just the English, French and Italian caprices in the aftermath of WW I. Six states instead of one is the punishment that awaits states that were ruled by ignorant idiots, who were not qualified even to be shoeshine boys for their whole lives long. The only way for Ankara to avert its forthcoming split and final elimination is to leave at once the place where all Turkey's enemies are gathered: NATIO.

 

In 2021, Turkey must suddenly, unilaterally and unequivocally withdraw from this wasp nest and instantly become member state of SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization).

 

The reasons that force Turkey and China to become today's world's closest allies are numerous. The common targets that Ankara and Beijing must set encompass everything from elimination of lethal threats to worldwide prevalence to the long awaited Pax Turco-Sinica! The present world needs to be erased from the surface of the Earth and China and Turkey are up to the task!

 

The present article is the first of a series that will help all Turks-Turanians-Muslims and all Chinese understand that the merge of the two worlds, the Chinese and the Turco-Islamic spheres, is the only means of survival for the entire Mankind, enlightened by the Oriental Light that today only China and Turkey still represent, preserve, protect and radiate.