Οι Ψευτομασώνοι, ο Ατατούρκ κι οι Ισλαμιστές: οι Τρομερές Αποκαλύψεις του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/οι-ψευτομασώνοι-ο-ατατούρκ-κι-οι-ισλαμ/
===================
Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient
Ρωμιοσύνη, Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή Αυτοκρατορία
Στην απάντησή του σε Τούρκο κεμαλιστή αναγνώστη πρότερου άρθρου του, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης καταγγέλλει την ανομία και τον σατανισμό των φιλο-ισραηλινών και φιλο-σιωνιστικών ψευτο-στοών και τα τρομερά προβλήματα που η διαστροφική και διεστραμμένη δράση τους προξενεί για την Ανθρωπότητα.
Αναδημοσιεύω εδώ την απάντηση – άρθρο του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη η οποία δημοσιεύθηκε αρχικά το 2007 κι αναδημοσιεύθηκε έκτοτε σε πολλά σάιτς.
Ο Ατατούρκ σε βαλς και σε ζεμπέκικο: η απόλυτη απόρριψη της αποικιοκρατικής, ψευτομασωνικής, σιωνιστικής, οριενταλιστικής διάκρισης του κόσμου σε ‘Ανατολή’ και ‘Δύση’. Η ιστορική αλήθεια οδηγεί στο σβύσιμο και στο κλείσιμο των γαλλικών ψευτο-πανεπιστημίων: η Αφρο-Ευρασία είναι Αδιαίρετη. Η δεύτερη φωτογραφία είναι από σκηνή ταινίας. Αλλά ο Κεμάλ Ατατούρκ ήταν γνωστός για την συμπάθειά του στον χορό αυτό και η διάθεσή του αυτή αποτυπώθηκε σε πολλά αγάλματα που διακόσμησαν πόλεις της Τουρκίας μετά τον θάνατό του (επειδή ενόσω ζούσε ο ίδιος, απαγόρευε κάθε διάσταση προσωπολατρείας).
Freemasonic History, Apostasy, Kemal Ataturk, Turkey and Islamists
By Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
http://www.centralclubs.com/you-know-that-t42796-36.html
16 May 2008
==========================
An inquisitive and pertinent mail sent by a reader let me draw the conclusion that more light should be shed on issues discussed in my earlier article entitled “Erdogan: Turkey’s Bani Sadr in a Sinister ‘Second Republic’?”. I publish here the integral text of the mail, and then my answer. Discussing Freemasonic attitude, behaviour, choices, beliefs, apostasy and iniquity are part of understanding daily developments in the surrounding world; they have little to do with the original faith of the predecessors of the International Freemasonry, as their beliefs and practices that have all gone with the wind.
Questions about the Freemasonic involvement in Turkey
Dear Prof. Dr. M. S. Megalommatis,
I found this article quiet difficult to understand, especially the meaning of ‘Second Republic of Freemasonic Soft Power ‘, but then I’m also ignorant to the working and intentions of the Freemasonry, especially regarding the relationship between Islamists and Freemasonry. (Before reading your various articles, I assumed it was only a secular counter-power to the Roman Catholic Church. But I understand better now why Kemal Atatürk closed down the Freemasonic Lodges of Turkey)
Do various Freemasonic Lodges of the world have the same intentions, or is it primarily the Freemasonic Lodge of France that is helping Islamists?
If I understood the article correctly, they do not wish Turkey to have a similar Islamic Revolution as Iran, which would be for her to become the ‘Second Republic of Theocratic Paranoia’ but instead, want Turkey to become the ‘Second Republic of Freemasonic Soft Power’?
Should the Islamic Revolution of Iran be considered as being helped by, but at the same time also being a failure of the Freemasonic Lodge of France’s ultimate plan?
Thank you.
Freemasonic Clash with Roman Catholicism, and the Rise of Secularism
Dear Culduz,
Thank you for your questions and interest!
Re-reading my article, I find you are right; it is somewhat ‘cryptic’ or – to put it in another way – I assume that the readers have a certain background in the subject, whereas this apparently is not the case. However!
Yes, you are right in your overall approach; what you say, namely that Free Masonry “was only a secular counter-power to the Roman Catholic Church”. But this is correct if said within certain historical limits.
If said in 1793, in 1810, in 1870, in 1905, in 1920, your statement sounds absolutely accurate and up-to-the-point.
But, what if said in 1740?
Secular?
There was nothing secular in 1740!
“Those who, living in 1740, envisioned a Secular Republic to be materialized after decades or half a century” you may say.
Hmm!
Assuming that the 1740 Free Masons would be in favour of …. a secular state is assuming a lot!
Actually, we have no evidence for something like that.
The evidence we have from Freemasonic involvement in European politics is precisely the opposite; the first states they created out of scratch, namely the United States of America (1774) and the Nouveau Regime of France (the First Republic – 1789), show the marked existence of religious, anti-Catholic of course, ideas, concepts, theories, and an undeclared, semi-declared, hinted at, hidden (you choose whatever you like) faith is the Transcendental.
I suppose you agree with me that the replacement of the Trinity God of the Roman Catholic Church by the Supreme Being (Etre Supreme) consists in an act of Faith. Arranging the 20th Prairial (8th June) as Fête de l’Être Suprême is a purely religious phenomenon. Faith itself is utterly religious, and the French State religion was a semi-declared form of the Freemasonic religion the existence of which ridiculously and cowardly Freemasons deny in our days.
Why Freemasons do not admit their religion exists, and is different from the rest.
Unadulterated historical truth is that the Freemasons were always afraid to explicitly and boldly declare their faith and religion. Contrarily to the pleasant narrations that they teach in the lower degrees, when admonishing a new member, Free Masonry was not established in the beginning of the 18th century. The origins of Freemasonry go back in History, and antedate the formation of the official Christianity. Their virulent opposition to the Catholic Church over the span of the last centuries represents a very brief period of Freemasonic – Catholic rivalry.
To put it correctly, this rivalry exists between two Priesthoods that procreated several religious, philosophical and ideological systems in various continents and in different historical moments; one of these priesthoods put all its stakes on the formation of the system that is currently known as Christianity with center at Rome (out of which came the Catholic Church).
The other priesthood opposed Christianity, and due to the fact that Christianity prevailed, it lost all its impact on the society and the political power. It underwent various transformations (from the Gnostics of the Late Antiquity to the so-called Western Manichaeans – a pejorative term introduced by their Christian rivals –, the Cathars, the Knights Templar, the Illuminati and the Rosicrucians) the last of which adopted the – supposedly innovative and neutral – term of Freemasonry.
Due to the colossal dimensions of the Clash between Freemasons and Catholics, the supreme class of the International Freemasonry (religious branch) has always been hesitant to unveil in public, to introduce, to launch its own religion that preserves only at the esoteric level to those initiated in the various degrees of Freemasonry, and more explicitly in the highest degrees.
This has its counterpart within Christianity whereby the Jesuits initiate their members in a vision and faith totally different than that of the average Christian believer, although not opposed; one should perceive this faith as “qualitatively higher”.
This shows precisely what has happened since the times of the Late Antiquity until now; two priesthoods that had part of their religion publicly diffused and part available for the initiated members engaged in total confrontation, whereby one was defeated and preserved its faith only at the clandestine level (that available for the initiated members).
The fight has been too important for the diachronic Freemasonry to risk unwise movements, an eventual revelation of a religion opposite to Christianity, and an eventual rejection by the masses. Many other parameters play a certain role in this regard, and as the early 19th century Freemasons were not happy with the lukewarm acceptance of a copy of their religion, i.e. the French State religion of 1793, they did not go ahead with the plan of publicly introducing their religion.
One has to admit that the early decades of the 19th century justified such a decision; it was not certainly the correct moment for the introduction of a new religion; philosophies, ideologies, political systems, intellectual and scientific developments and explorations, technological discoveries and economic booming were all far more attractive. And the greatest of the Freemason philosophers of the 18th century, Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot or Montesquieu, was not at the level of Basil of Caesarea, Origen, St Augustine, Mani, Celsius or Tabari.
Secularism – an imperative need of multi-cultural societies
However, my intention here is not to write the History of the Freemasonic clash with Catholic Christianity but to answer your questions as regards the Freemasonic involvement in Turkey, and more particularly in favour of Erdogan.
Before reaching that point it is important to bear in mind that the concept of the Secular Republic is absolutely Freemasonic, and does not consist in an ultimate target but in political means; it is the tool – according to the Freemasonic evaluation of it – of weakening, culturally, socially, intellectually, educationally, and therefore socially, economically, and politically, the Catholic Church and their supporters. The secular state is the reason for the rise of the high number of the non practicing Christians in the second half of the 20th century. To today’s Freemasons the Secular State has been a success, as it brought them in power. According to the original principles of Freemasonry, the Secular State is nothing important to consider, let alone laud.
Of course, it is correct that Kemal Ataturk was known for his Freemasonic affiliations, and his ideals were identical to those of the early 20th century Freemasons who, sticking to their unveiled faith, propagated the concept of secularism and the laic state.
Absence of Secularism means Rise of Islamic Terrorism
Of course, today someone does not need to be Freemason to see that a Secular state represents an imperative need for our multicultural societies. What slips the memory of many is the fact that our societies have changed tremendously over the last 80 years (as we speak of Ataturk). Few societies have remained absolutely uniform, and only to them a non-secular, religious, status could eventually apply. Again, even if there is an entirely mono-ethnic and uni-cultural society, established out of Christian Protestants or Muslim Sunnis, a religious state consists in direct oppression of those among the local populations who do not want to practice their religion. And this is very significant, because paranoid Western pseudo-Christians, by insisting on attacks against the Secular State – either in the United States or in Poland – trigger, either they want it or not, either they know it or not, the Islamic Terrorism rise.
This is precisely what Islamic terror promoting local groups and secret societies has devised in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan and other fanaticized societies of analphabetic masses: they try to impose strict practice on those, who – although Muslim – do not want to practice Islam. And they are the silent majority – to which the pathetic, useless, imbecile and wicked American and European politicians and diplomats do not even speak, sticking to their official interlocutors who all cheat and entrap the “Western enemy”.
Apostasy in Freemasonry
Going back to your early statement and to my point about its time limits, we have to check whether all Freemasons stick to their Secular ideal today. Well, we have to admit that the late 80s – early 90s ideological changes reflect earlier, parallel and opposite, movements within Freemasonry.
Currently, an Apostate Freemasonic Lodge preaches atheism, evolutionism, and social immoralism and nihilism; and another Apostate Freemasonic Lodge denounces the traditional faith of Freemasonry in order to preserve a portion of power and members in a changing world. Two different sorts of apostasy! You can attest their ramifications in the political life and the societies of many countries.
Kemal Ataturk and Rudolf von Sebottendorf
Notice that I speak of ‘earlier movements’; Kemal Ataturk most honorably closed down the deviated Turkish Freemasonic Lodges that ostracized the disciples of Rudolf von Sebottendorf, attempting to target an alliance with Pope Pius XII (Eugenio Pacelli – Pastor Angelicus) and Hitler in the same way today the Prostitute French Freemasonic Lodge extols the disreputable Satanism practiced by Jean Paul II, the bogus-Freemasonic Pope.
When you listen to the irrelevant and comical people of the Academie Francaise laud such a pope, you understand that their fear, guilt and iniquity definitely render them authentic disciples of the bogus-leader they are currently fabricating; they consider their iniquitous deeds as concealed, but they are well known and visible to many as afar as the four corners of the Universe!
As you get through the lines, I already gave you an answer to the question whether all the Freemasonic Lodges have the same intentions. As you see, this is not the case, and one could eventually grasp this through my adjective ‘Apostate’ for one or some Freemasonic Lodges; if one or some are ‘apostate’, there is good reason to think that others are not!
Apostate Freemasonic Lodge and plans for Turkey
This problem does however hinge on the influence and the impact of every lodge, and this can vary tremendously; as a matter of fact, there are lodges more involved in Transcendental Research and Operation, and lodges well versed into Politics and Finance (either opposing one another or not).
In this regard, if the most highly politicized lodge of France supports the anti-Secular conspiracy against Turkey, it is quite enough; you don’t need all the French lodges to do so!
And again, as you say in your penultimate paragraph “they do not wish Turkey to have a similar Islamic Revolution as Iran, which would be for her to become the ‘Second Republic of Theocratic Paranoia’ but instead, want Turkey to become the ‘Second Republic of Freemasonic Soft Power’”; this by itself is twice disastrous.
“Soft Power”: the most monstrous and inhuman Tyranny of all times
First. If the plan meets success (which is highly unlikely), instead of the existing Turkish Republic that is ruled by Turks in a democratic way, there will be the much desired by the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge ‘Soft Power’, which is the most monstrous and inhuman Tyranny of all times, plus in this case the absolute powers will be in Non-Turkish hands.
The truth is simple; there is no perfect democracy, and many forms of non-democratic systems can be more democratic than several nominally democratic systems.
What the miserable, Freemasonic puppet-journalists attack in Turkey, namely the central role played by the army in the establishment and the preservation of the Republic and the secular democratic system, is precisely what prevents the Apostate Freemasonic lodge from ruling Turkey by proxies.
The military certainly represent a non-controllable (through elections and referenda) part of the Turkish democratic system. The Freemasonic puppets accuse this as un-democratic; their concern is not the complete – 100% – as democratization of Turkey, as complete democratization does not exist anywhere in the world, and it will never be the case in societies larger than a 50000 people city.
They want to replace – in the non-controllable part of the Turkish democratic system – the military with the Freemasonic proxies. They think that a constitutional change will be enough to pull to carpet under the feet of the military, give more powers to the controlled (through the mass media and the Finance world) Erdogan government that will go ahead with further liberalization steps, selling to Freemasons the state run companies that are property of the Turkish people – not the French Freemasons.
Like this, calculating as the most imbecile beings in the world, they hope to install a totally controlled (by them) situation in Turkey. By the way, if one wants to analyze the pathology of the Apostate Freemasons’ sick and debased thought, one would result in publishing the most voluminous opus in the history of all sciences.
What one should carefully remember is that, for the international, eschatological plans of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge, the role of Turkey is a very limited one, much inferior to today’s Turkey’s role and stand, let alone the great potentialities that are always there. To minimize Turkey, they want to create a Kurdistan as they already control some Kurds, and they believe that, through further Turco-Kurdish clashes, they will control Kurds more effectively (expecting them to run to their proxies for protection).
Their iniquitous plan stipulates a dramatic increase of the Turkish homosexuals’ social role, a tremendous increase in drugs use, and all sorts of devious developments that absolutely dehumanize any society, not only Turkey.
Second, and more important: if the plan meets failure (which is highly likely), instead of them controlling Turkey, after the much desired (by them) destitution of the Turkish military, it will be the existing Islamists, who will just repeat the Iran 1979 – 81 old (but unstudied and unlearnt) story.
As you correctly understood, they tried to trigger events in Iran in 1979 (not the ‘Islamic Revolution of Iran’), but they turned against them, and they were able with great difficulty to save their Apprentice Proxy, the comical Iranian president, whose website (http://www.banisadr.com.fr/index.shtml) ranks no 945,110 this morning (down from 1,119,824, probably because of my reference to him as a museological curiosity)! This brilliant Freemasonic trash of a person (and personality) Erdogan should bring back in his mind once per hour at least, if he wants an honorable exit from this vain world of materialistic endeavors.
By Prof. Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Published: 7 August 2007
