Time to win the
Empire or lose the State
Secular Governance
is invariably the Quintessence of all Iranian and Islamic Empires
Contents
I. Iran: the Pivot
of World History
II. Falsehood
Diffused, Heinous Acts Performed, and Intentional Destruction of Mankind
Undertaken by the Western Colonials
III. Iran &
Aniran or Center & Periphery or Truth & Lie: a 2600-year Long History
A.
Achaemenid Zoroastrianism vs. Mithraism: Caesaropapism vs. Papo-Caesarism or
Monotheism vs. Polytheism
B. Alexander the Great as Macedonian
King, Egyptian Pharaoh, and Iranian Emperor: a Monotheist against Mithraism
C. The Division of Iran among the
Arsacid Parthians and the Diadochi
D. The 'Imperium Romanum' and the
Greco-Roman Civilization: a Barbarous Pseudo-Empire and a Divisive, Worthless
Legacy
E. The Orientalization of the Roman
Empire -and of the West in general
F. Manichaeism and Mani, the
Greatest Man of All Times
G. Kartir,
the Eradication of Manichaeism in Iran, and its Prevalence in the Roman Empire
H. Why the
Roman Elite imposed the Composite -Memphitic Egyptian & Mithraic Iranian-
Dogma of 'Christianity' instead of Manichaeism
I. Islam
and the Mythologization of the so-called 'Arab Conquests'
J. The
Falsehood of the Western Orientalists about Islam, Christianity, and the Use of
Force in the Diffusion/Imposition of a Religion
K. The
Falsehood of the Western Orientalists about the Arrival of Islam in Iran
IV. The Irrevocable,
Overwhelming and Infinite Iranization of Islam in Asia and Europe, and the
Attempt of Unification of Christianity and Islam
A. Bayt al Hikmah: the incorporation
of all scientific, academic and intellectual schools and traditions into a
unified, universal, original, and exemplar house of sciences
B. The
inevitable return of Iran: the useless and fake Islamic Caliphate ultimately
supplanted by the Iranianates (wrongly named 'Persianates')
C. The
Iranization of all Turanians, Slavs included, heading to the South (the
So-called Indian Subcontinent) and the West (the Bogus-continent of Europe)
D. The
Unification of the Iranian and the Eastern Roman Worlds, and the First
Barbarous Onslaught against them: the Anti-Christian Crusades
V. The Enduring,
5-century Long Western Assault on Iran
VI. Iran as
Lighthouse to Nations at the End of Times
I. Iran: the Pivot
of World History
Iran was always there; long before
Abraham, long before the Hebrew Bible, long before the Jewish Talmud. It was
the reason for everything. It is a little hard to grasp how immense this land
is:
- these are the Mountains of Zagros
that separate the plateau from Mesopotamia where the Achaemenid Empire was born
as substitute to the already gone Sargonid Assyrian monotheists and as
replacement of the Nabonid Babylonian polytheists; Kurosh (: Cyrus) was not
only the liberator of the exiled Jews (a minor detail in World History), but
also -and above all- the "Emperor of the Universe", as he made his
the supreme imperial title of so many Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian and
Assyrian noble rulers of universal-ecumenical convictions and paradisiacal
faiths;
- this is the plateau that offers
you access to the Indus Valley and Delta in the East, to the Amu Darya (Oxus) River
and Turan (: Central Asia) in the Northeast, to the Caucasus Mountains in the
Northwest, to the Hindu Kush and the Pamirs in the East, and to the 'Lower Sea'
(: the Persian Gulf) in the South. You can therefore call Iran the primordial Pentagon;
- this is the Alborz Mountain range
that starts in Arasbaran ('the banks of the Aras / Araxes River) in the West,
reaches the Alabagh Mountain range in the East, and thus separates the plateau
from Darya-ye Khazar (the Caspian Sea), being at a time, the dwelling (Qale-ye
Babak) of Babak
Khorramdin and his followers, the Khurramites, and the abode (Qale-ye Alamut)
of the Nizari Ismaili Hassan-i Sabbah, the Elder of the Mountain, while also serving
at all times as the palatial domain of the atemporal, legendary King Kay Kawad
(or Kayqubad) whom the Divine Grace (the invincible Rustam) brought to Isfahan
as Shah of Iran and Emperor of all humans.
- these are the splendorous lakes of
Urmia and Hamun of which the former is located at the northwestern confines of
the plateau, being known as Chichast ('glittering') in Old Achaemenid Iranian, and
the latter is situated at the southeastern extremities of the highlands, near
Zabol, being considered as "the keeper of Zoroaster's seed". Since the
Holy Land of Iran is unique in every sense, it has a crucial eschatological
mission to inevitably play, when the restoration of the celestial order and the
appearance of the new sky are nigh; it is then that virgin maids -after a
ritual bathing in the Lake of the End- will give birth, according to the
Zoroastrian sacred texts, to the saviors of mankind, who are all reflections of
the primordial Saoshyant.
- these are the silk-, spice-, and
perfume-routes that linked Egypt to Central Asia, Mesopotamia to China, and
Anatolia to India, bringing Sumerians to the Indus River Valley, Elamites to
the Deccan (as ancestors of the present day Dravidians), Mithraic Magi to Anatolia,
the Balkans, Rome and Western Europe, Mazdaean mobedan mobed (high priests) to
Tibet, Nestorian Christian priests to Siberia and Mongolia, Manichaean Elects (in
Syriac: mšamšānē) to China, Turanian Tengrists to Africa, Parsis to Gujarat, Dawoodi
Bohra Muslims from Egypt to Maharashtra (India), Buddhists to Caucasus Kalmykia,
and so many others to the most faraway places across Terra Firma.
Iran has its memories. The story of
the Ayatollahs is a recent one, less than half a century old. That's yesterday
in this part of the world. But however far back you may go, all Iran's
recollections have several things in common.
There's always God, for instance; or,
if you prefer, Ahura Mazda or Mehr (Mithra) or Zurvan or Allah – the diverse
names of God (or god) that humans believed in so different manners and respectable
(or lamentable) practices.
It seems to have been quite
impossible to live around this plateau and not to have visions of eternity. How
can it be otherwise? This ground is the living legacy of Sumer, Akkad, Assyria
and Babylon; this sacred land is the undisputed center of the Earth. In this
high place, the Avesta for first uttered; in this pure field (to use a description
of Jalaluddin Rumi), Arzhang, a major sacred text of Manichaeism was composed
as the first non-Egyptian scripture consisting of passages and images (that's
why it is also known as the 'Book of Images'). Iran is the blessed space that
features more paradises than any other territory, since all the Achaemenid,
Arsacid and Sassanid shahs found it necessary to entertain gardens in
remembrance of the environment in which the Primordial Man Keyumars (Gayomart /
Gaya Maretan in the Avesta, namely 'mortal life') lived. And what reflects the
eternity of the original Paradise in our hearts better than the Mosque of the
Shah in Isfahan (constructed from 1609 through 1630 under the Safavid Shah
Abbas I, the Great), the only edifice in the world, which -due to its refined
decoration- makes you feel that you are not in a building but in an infinite
garden?
Many foreigners, past or present,
felt that in Iran there is always mystery or that you never quite know or that
you may wind up with a few questions that no one can answer. Nevertheless, the
answers are spelled out, but no one can hear them except for those who are
ready to undergo the initiation that everyday life in Iran offers. It is vain
to intend to understand the world without living in Iran; and it is futile to
live in Iran without ever becoming spiritually, intellectually, mentally, and
sentimentally Iranian. But then, if you undergo this exquisite and elsewhere
unavailable process of initiation, for you there will be no mystery, as the
luminous Khvarenah of the Kiani will plainly enlighten the One and the many,
sending to your soul vibrant reflections of transcendental wisdom. As the
Avesta stipulates, Khvarenah is what "divinities and mortals alike should
strive for". This is nothing more and nothing less than divine presence
manifest or, if you prefer, what several Talmudic texts and rabbinic literature
in general name "Shekhinah", a term that does not exist at all in the
Old Testament, because apparently the destitute Jews learned about it in Iran.
It is ostensibly difficult for
Western average people and scholars alike to accurately perceive Iran and to
comprehend the Iranian Genius in its original terms. No author confirms this
fact better than Voltaire; no Western philosophical text demonstrates the
Modern Western incapacity better than Voltaire's masterpiece "Le Monde
comme il va" (The World as it goes). In fact, Voltaire's Persepolis is merely
a projection of Paris or eventually of the Western society onto the illustrious
Achaemenid capital. According to the plot, the Scythian Babouc is divinely entrusted
with the observation of the local morals and the evaluation of the prevailing
corruption only to finally recommend its preservation, and not its destruction,
to the Celestial Angel Ituriel.
That's
why Ituriel "résolut de ne pas même songer à corriger Persépolis, et de
laisser aller le monde comme il va, car, dit-il, si tout n’est pas bien, tout
est passable" {the "angel" (!! ?? !!) "resolved not even to consider
correcting Persepolis, and to let the world go as it goes, for, he said, if
everything is not good, everything is tolerable"}. Iran, thank God, has
always been totally void of this rational, utilitarian sickness…
One more thing! Attempting and failing
to fathom Iran, Western mystics, scholars, intellectuals and statesmen question
secondary points and minor details, offering once more their own, absurd
responses and nonsensical conclusions. Examining trends, monuments, tendencies,
and materializations, without first assessing the Iranian principles and values
and subsequently comprehending moral measures, spiritual virtues, and cultural
traditions, they ask:
- Why is it that everything was
always so big, outsized, larger-than-life?
Yet, it would be possible for
Western academics to realize that it is not in Iran where everything is so
sizeable and monumental, but it is in the West where the integrity of the
Orient (in its Asiatic or African forms) is defiled, the splendor of the Oriental
Genius is misconstrued, the magnificence of the Oriental Arts is profaned, the
quintessence of Oriental Spirituality is eluded, and the rectitude of the historical
Oriental Sciences is distorted in a vile, biased and sectarian manner.
Then, failing to access the essence
of the Iranian heritage and tradition, Western intellectuals seem to wonder:
- Vanity? Perhaps! Or visions! Vanity
was always mixed up with vision.
Nonsensical approaches, typically
reflecting the misery of the Western story-telling (or propaganda if you
prefer), the wretchedness of the European acrimony, and the rapacity of the
European armies, diplomats and statesmen!
It will always be impossible for the
barbarian to understand the civilized, for the villainous to comprehend the virtuous,
for the vulgar to acknowledge the noble, for the depraved to accept the heroic,
for the dead to see the alive, and for the evil to regard the divine.
And all this is part of the story of
the Ayatollahs, too; this is so because, all accounts made, they were not an
Iranian product but a Western fabrication.
But it's Iran that remains the
original fact.
Iran and, of course, the wasteland
of the West!
II. Falsehood
Diffused, Heinous Acts Performed, and Intentional Destruction of Mankind Undertaken
by the Western Colonials
Writing a Contrasted History of Iran
and the West would entail a voluminous series of books to prepare and
elaborate; the apparent lack thereof underscores only one fact: revealing
academic conclusions to the great public and making a worthwhile and
trustworthy comparison between these two worlds are truly embarrassing
perspectives for the powers-that-be.
This contrast would not only prove
that Iran was always the center of World History and that the so-called West
constituted the dark, barbarous and troublesome margin, but it would also
highlight the undeniable fact that Iran consisted in the orderly realm of Truth
whereas the Roman Empire and the Medieval and Modern Western Europe formed a
useless and chaotic area of Falsehood. All the same, reflecting Mithraic
narratives, which were promptly, resolutely and abhorrently rejected in Iran, and
developing a replica of Manichaean world conceptualization, science and
eschatology, which were duly, resolutely and brutally thrown out of the sacred
plateau, the Western Darkness, Morbidness and Evilness managed to penetrate
Iran during the last 4-5 centuries.
Ever since, the primary concerns of
all the Western European colonials, diplomats, academics, military officers,
and financiers, and of all, inhuman and anti-Christian Catholic and Protestant
missionaries, have revolved around the following six (6) persistent evildoings:
a) the firm, studious, and
meticulous establishment of a heinous and wicked distortion, namely a viciously
fallacious, sectarian and biased narrative of the World History; this has
successively permeated the pernicious constructs of 'Renaissance',
'Classicism', 'Hellenism', 'Greco-Roman world', and 'Judeo-Christian
civilization'.
b) the worldwide diffusion, imposition,
and promulgation of the aforementioned falsehood and forgery as the only
permissible account of reality (i.e. a totally virtual reality); this cruel
attempt is the core of what is called 'colonialism'.
c) the intentional, systematic,
multi-layered, and highly customizable (at the local level) deception of
- the undeservedly targeted rulers
of all non-Western states -those of tribal entities included-,
- all the locally selected colonial
pawns and stooges, and
- all the non-Western 'students' of
the criminal Western 'universities', who were gravely intoxicated in those
institutions, being indoctrinated with absurdities, lies, profanities, and
forgeries that were incompatible with their respective principles, morals, values,
traditions, worldviews and cultures; this paranoia of Western deceit, trickery,
dishonesty, fraud and prevarication persistently and remorselessly disseminated
worldwide for 4-5 centuries is the real essence of the malicious phenomenon of colonialism.
d) the malignant, deceitful, and
deliberately calamitous advices given, orders dictated and/or threats issued
against all the aforementioned, targeted individuals;
e) the subsequent, inevitable decay,
destruction, and dismantlement of all the heinously attacked states and disgracefully
assaulted societies across the Earth; and
f) the shameless introduction and
treacherous enforcement -everywhere humans happen to live- of their purposefully
false science, inherently antihuman technology, contaminated mindset, sick
social norms, devilish governance, pyramidal hierarchy, secretive behavior, lewd
manners, and lecherous hatred of the Human Being.
III. Iran &
Aniran or Center & Periphery or Truth & Lie: a 2600-year Long History
With the
rise of the Achaemenid Iranian Empire (550-330 BCE), a 2-millennium long
Mesopotamian universalist-ecumenical tradition of divine rule, imperial
governance, spirituality, and monotheistic faith, which had started with the
first Emperor of the Universe (in Akkadian-Assyrian-Babylonian: šar kiššatim)
Sargon of Akkad (reign: 2334-2279 BCE), was reinstated within a new, far wider
context.
A.
Achaemenid Zoroastrianism vs. Mithraism: Caesaropapism vs. Papo-Caesarism or
Monotheism vs. Polytheism
The
innovations of Darius I (522-486 BCE) were groundbreaking in terms of secure
communication, royal roadway system between Susa and Sardis (2700 km), state postal
service (chapar khaneh in Iranian), geographical explorations, trade
facilitation, and integration of different earlier regional networks into the
first comprehensive, multimodal, worldwide transportation grid. They ushered
mankind into the Late Antiquity (539 BCE – 750 CE), namely a new era that
lasted until the rise of Islam (622 CE) and the formation of the first empire,
which was the first to unite all lands between the Atlantic coasts of Africa
and the borders of China: the Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258 CE). The series of
developments that led to the creation of the first worldwide science, the
advent of an unprecedentedly multinational spiritual-scientific establishment
in Baghdad (Bayt al Hikmah/House of Wisdom), the formation of the foremost
multicultural, multilingual and multi-religious, secular society between the
Atlantic Ocean and China, and the emergence of the first superpower in World
History revolved around Iran.
Staunch
defender of the Zoroastrian monotheism, Darius I was consequently the enemy of
the dark forces of Mithraism and had to fight heroically at the beginning of
his reign against Gaumata and the Mithraic polytheists. These counterfeit
evildoers intended to corrupt the Zoroastrian faith, write the Avesta down
(which would be an abominable sacrilege), and subsequently 'interpret' it in an
incredible multitude of worthless theological texts; in other words, they would
distort it through the bias of the so-called 'Word'. If successful, the Magi of
Mithras would ultimately propagate a putrefied cult of sentimental narratives
able to make them recurrently garner the spiritual potency of the average
people, condemn them in abject dependency and mental slavery, and progressively
rule the world from the Iranian plateau. But if this evil plan was
materialized, the Khvarenah would leave that land once forever, and Iran would
simply cease to exist.
By
vanquishing them, Darius I preserved the good sense of Iran. Thank God, the
Magi were kicked out of Iran, pretty much like they had been ejected from
Central Asia several centuries earlier. The imperial priests preserved the
Zoroastrian faith, by merely subordinating Mithra to the only God Ahura Mazda
and by turning him into the solar aspect of the Divine. However, Mithraic Magi
spread across Mesopotamia, Syria, Egypt, Anatolia, Caucasus, the Balkans, Rome,
the Italian peninsula, and also throughout Europe. For the Achaemenid
courtiers, all those faraway lands mattered little, as they were the barbarous
circumference known as the Aniran (or Aneran, namely the non-Iran). What
mattered was Iran, the center of the world, and for this reason, they duly demonstrated
the utmost ferocity in exterminating the Mithraic priests, persecuting their
idiotic and pathetic followers, and eliminating degeneracy in every sense.
Ruthless, the Mithraic Magi hit back
by diffusing lies and confusion about Zoroaster, his life and his faith, hiding
their malignant will to establish a "Papo-Caesarean" or
"theocratic" state, preaching their ridiculous narratives about
Mithra as supposedly part of the Zoroastrian faith, making strong bonds at the
local level with devious priests of earlier polytheistic beliefs, and deceiving
monotheists with their counterfeit universalism (or ecumenism) and their
mystical, solar concept of Trinity (Cautes, Mithra and Cautopates), namely that
Mithra was One and Three at the same time. For instance, the detrimental
confusion about Zoroaster that can be attested in Ancient Greek and Latin texts
is entirely due to disorientation and contradictory stories spread first among
Ionians by the black magicians of Mithraic Satanism.
Trying to proceed westwards and make
of a strong kingdom their base, the Mithraic Magi never ceased their attempts
to bring down the entirely Caesaro-papal model of state that the Achaemenid
Empire was; the predominance of the King over the high priest was the
cornerstone on which Iran was established as universal-ecumenical state and as
heritage of three (3) millennia of Mesopotamian monotheism. The King is divine,
not the high priest; and every eschatology speaks always of a King Savior and
Messiah – not a high priest savior or messiah. In every religion, priests exist
in order to postpone and eventually cancel the appearance of the Royal Redeemer
of the End, because he is the Only able to usher mankind into the New Celestial
Era.
After two (2) centuries of
interminable internal conflict between Zoroastrian faith and Mithraic
wickedness, the Achaemenid Empire was about to collapse. It was then that a
great man of Macedonian royal descent and Egyptian monotheistic initiation gathered
a sufficient number of soldiers to invade and re-establish Iran, uprooting the
malignant and devilish Mithraic priesthood: this was Alexander the Great whose
exploits are far more accurately illustrated in Oriental texts than narrated in
profane, forged, and derogatory Greco-Roman literature. It is extremely
disturbing and totally fallacious to go through those posterior, untrustworthy
accounts that dare turn a splendorous Initiate and divine King into a brave
soldier and intrepid fighter. This topic would necessitate a book to describe in
brief, but it cannot be further discussed within the limits of the present
article.
B. Alexander the
Great as Macedonian King, Egyptian Pharaoh, and Iranian Emperor: a Monotheist against Mithraism
Alexander the Great was an Iranian
Emperor, who carried out considerable changes in order to duly eliminate the
root of the evil that had endangered the Universe (Oecumene) by contaminating
the spiritual virtues of Iran; he transferred his capital to Babylon to better
control and eventually destroy once forever the old devilish center of
polytheism and deviance, which had apparently empowered the Mithraic Magi by
offering a well-elaborated background of polytheistic patterns (a counterfeit
Ishtar-ism, a necrolatrous Nergal-ism, a vicious Tammuz-ism, and an abhorrent
Marduk-ism) that had been geared millennia ago to serve as spiritual,
intellectual and cultural traps and lethal swamps for the entire mankind. It
was clear that the Babylonian religious-theological thematic had considerably strengthened
the very rudimentary stories of the early Mithraic Magi.
Alexander's marriage with the
Sogdian princess Roxanne (Old Iranian: Raṷxšnā; Farsi: روشنک/ Rawšanak) bears witness to his strong monotheistic drive that
was the consequence of his Egyptian initiation and Pharaonic titulature; it was
normal for the Macedonian King and Iranian Emperor to form strong bonds with
the peoples of Eastern Iran and the nomads of Turan, who were the staunchest
defenders of the monotheistic faith and the Zoroastrian spirituality.
The arson of Parsa (Persepolis), the
main Achaemenid capital, was the deed of the followers of Mithraic Magi, and we
have good reason to reject the fallacious and therefore totally untrustworthy
literature produced by Western colonial scholarship that absurdly attempts to
project modern nationalistic, pseudo-patriotic, and racist concepts, approaches
and thoughts onto an era, a king, and an army overwhelmed by passionate
universalism and known for an their enthusiastic devotion to Oriental concepts,
values, virtues, science, art and wisdom. It is quite sufficient at this point to
state that the most genuine sources about the life of Alexander bear witness to
his love for the land that he tried to save, reunite and preserve. Vengeance,
rancor and malice are attributed to Alexander and his army only within the
fraudulent, heinous and surely unreliable texts written under the evident
impact of the Mithraic Magi who settled in Western Anatolia, South Balkans,
Rome, and the Western confines of the Roman Empire long before compositions
like Anabasis were forged.
The assassination of Alexander the
Great, the long lasting wars of the pretenders to his throne, and the terminal
division of Iran (into Syria, Egypt, Anatolia, Balkans and Bactria) were due to
the noxious targets and the dreadful deeds of the Mithraic Magi whose principal,
yet secret attempt would have never been successful, if the empire of Kurosh I
the Great, Darius I the Great and Alexander the Great had survived. As a matter
of fact, if the entire Oecumene was organized in one imperial state from
Illyria and Cyrene to Central Asia and Northern India, Rome would never become
able to expand and form a useless and failed state around the Mediterranean.
The reason for this is simple: only counterfeit empires can be instituted and
temporarily maintained in the periphery of the surface of the Earth, whereas
the sole real center of the world is the area of Achaemenid Iran (from the
Balkans and Libya to China). To obscure this fact, all the fraudulent lies
about the so-called 'conquests' of the Great Initiate were systematically,
incessantly, and malignantly spread. The historical truth is entirely
different: he actually did not invade any land. He merely substituted the last
Achaemenid Shah of Iran with himself; to get our facts right, we have to admit
that the territory controlled by Darius I was indeed larger than the state of
Iskander Dhu'l Qarnayn.
C. The Division of
Iran among the Arsacid Parthians and the Diadochi
In spite of the ambitions with which
the Seleucid, Ptolemaic and Attalid empires were launched, despite the immense
effort Macedonians and Ionians rulers and scholars made to comprehend the
Oriental Genius in most of its aspects (Egyptian, Babylonian, Iranian,
Phoenician, Aramaean, Anatolian-Cappadocian, Indian), and notwithstanding the
immense work that was done in cities like Antioch, Alexandria and many others -notably
translations of Oriental wisdom, epics and historical texts into a mixed
language (Ionian, Attic and Macedonian), which became rather known as
Alexandrine Koine)-, the three Oriental empires, the Macedonian and the
Illyrian kingdoms, Carthage and Rome entered into a calamitous series of
interminable wars among them. The honest, truthful and comprehensive history of
all the wars, which took place, involving all the aforementioned parts, between
Alexander's death (323 BCE) and the arrival of Octavian in Alexandria (30 BCE)
has not yet been written. The so-called partition of Babylon and the 'wars of
Diadochi' are not unrelated to the ensuing conflicts, which were triggered.
The rise of the Parthian Arsacid
Empire as the definite successor to Achaemenid Iran rapidly reduced the
Seleucids west of Tigris and restored moral order, peace and faith across a
sizeable part of the universal-ecumenical empire. As a matter of fact,
Antiochus I Soter (: Messiah) was the last king to use the traditional Mesopotamian
and Iranian imperial title "Emperor of the Universe", as the
Antiochus Cylinder testifies. The Arsacid Parthians (250 BCE – 224 CE) reinstated
the original values of Zoroastrianism, emphasized on moral attitude in life,
and thus generated a separate religious form or stage that we can define as
Zendism. Despite the persistence of Mithraism in several peripheral lands
(Armenia, Pontus, Commagene, Syria, etc.), we have to admit that the Mithraic
Magi once again failed to take control of Iran.
The gradual rise of the Roman
Republic and the progressive annexation of kingdoms in Africa, Europe, and Asia
led to the beginning of the Roman–Parthian Wars, which were continued during
the Sassanid times (224-651 CE), before being subsequently transformed into
conflicts between the Eastern Roman Empire and the Islamic Caliphates.
The western parts of Iran
(Syria-Palestine, Egypt-Cyrene, Anatolia, and Balkans), which were integral
part of the empire during the Achaemenid times and the reign of Alexander, were
divided among the Diadochi and separated from the central and eastern
provinces, which were reconstituted by the Arsacid Parthian rulers. This fact was
indeed a disastrous oxymoron, as it did not reflect any spiritual, cultural,
ethnic or imperial differentiation, divergence or disparity. In fact, Phrygia,
Cappadocia, Osrhoene, Commagene, Pontus, Armenia, Phoenicia, Syria, and
Palestine remained as Iranian as Mesopotamia, Adiabene, Characene, Persia, Carmania,
Bactria, Sogdia, Arachosia, Gedrosia and Punjab (Pentapotamia). The calamitous rupture
was merely a matter of anti-Iranian malevolence, which was subtly carried out
by Mithraic Magi in the West, and divisive lineage, which was claimed (or
tried) to be 'royal', but was not.
D. The 'Imperium
Romanum' and the Greco-Roman Civilization: a Barbarous Pseudo-Empire and a
Divisive, Worthless Legacy
The aforementioned development was
followed by an even more abnormal oddity. Rome, although a Res Publica (i.e. a
tiny city-ethnic state), started having -by means of gradual military
expansion- imperial aspirations or ambitions. But an Empire can never be the
result of military triumphs; it is always a matter of foremost spirituality,
universal-ecumenical conceptualization of the Human Being, imperial morality,
and subsequent military implementation. At times, it can also be an issue of
Translatio Imperii. However, this could not concern the quantitative but otherwise
meaningless Roman expansion; similarly, it could not evoke the irrelevant if
not villainous claims to the counterfeit, anti-Hittite, bogus-throne of Taruisha/Wilusa/Troy;
last but not the least, it could not be associated with the fake and
preposterous transformation of the most vulgar and repugnant Res Publica into
an abominable pseudo-Imperium.
Many Roman senators, generals, and emperors
attempted to invade Iran, but they all failed. Trajan was the most successful
among them, as he reached the southwestern coasts of the Caspian Sea (in
Caucasus Albania) and the head of the Persian Gulf, but his territorial gains
were temporary. There was a tendency in Rome to emphasize the city's imperial
ambitions, but it was preposterous for Romans to think that epic poets can turn
an unimportant city into a true, accomplished
and sophisticated empire. Someone should have said to those unfortunate guys,
the likes of Virgil and Ovid, that the real epics precede -not follow- the
formation of a real empire. Universalism-Ecumenism emanates from a majestic spiritual
endeavor; it cannot result from a hollow pseudo-religion based on absurd
divinization of soldiers, on petty practices of black magic, and on debased
mythologies composed to lead only to corruption, prostitution, homosexuality,
pedophilia, and incest. There is absolutely no Empire, when the elites of a
vast state live in the execrably degenerate manner of the Roman magistrates and
potentates, who were genuinely incapacitated to fathom the Divine and
comprehend what it takes to make of a sizeable state a true
universal-ecumenical Empire.
Compared to Arsacid (and later
Sassanid) Iran, Rome constituted ostensibly the barbarous, inhuman, and
wretched periphery of Aniran, and as such it was perceived, described and
rejected. In fact, having a low and worthless past and relying on a trivial legacy,
which is what the colonial Western academics and forgers describe as
'Hellenism' or 'Greco-Roman Antiquity', Rome could never become (and actually never
became) a real Empire. The sacredness of the divine ruler was fake and
therefore nonexistent in Rome.
To the worthlessness of the
so-called 'Greco-Roman heritage' bears witness an undeniable fact that many
modern scholars deliberately conceal. Contrarily to the well-known and
recurrently documented activities of systematic translation of numerous
Oriental texts into Alexandrine Koine, an endeavor that took place in several
libraries, temples and associated institutions during the
Arsacid-Seleucid-Roman times, no translation from Ancient Greek and Latin to
Oriental languages took place at those days.
Aramaeans, Egyptians, Babylonians,
Persians and other Iranians certainly did not need to read Hesiod, Homer,
Virgil, Ovid, Aeschylus, and Euripides because their tradition, heritage and
civilization was spiritually and morally higher. Seneca the Younger, Quintus
Ennius, Aristophanes or Plautus were ostensibly worthless to them, because
these poets represented only negative aspects of ignoble cultures to them. And apparently,
Herodotus, Thucydides, Tacitus, and Livy were considered as too unreliable for
an effort to be undertaken as regards the translation of their works into
Coptic, Syriac Aramaic, and Middle Persian.
As a matter of fact, what is
presented by modern Western intellectuals and colonial academics as valuable
part of their supposed heritage does not represent any real historical
continuity but consists in a purely modern construct. Only by avoiding a
systematic contrast and comparison, by concealing the historical reality,
namely the fact that their own Christian ancestors had totally rejected that supposedly "valuable part", and by
marginalizing -if not prohibiting- the diffusion and the popularization of Oriental
heritage in the West, the vicious academics of the Western world persist in
spreading and publicizing their pathetic modern construct that they present as
true, whereas it constitutes a preposterous and racist fallacy.
Average people and scholars,
governments and international bodies across the Earth have to denounce and
reject this madness, which consists in an enormous attempt of culturally overhauling
all other nations, Westernizing the entire world, and leading mankind to
extinction. The undeniable fact is that the Greco-Roman past and the associated
literature were worthless for all the civilized nations of the Orient. And for a
very good reason; Oriental sages, wise elders, mystics, scholars and high
priests considered these texts and accounts as forged, false and untrustworthy
or entirely marginal, trivial and useless.
And this was quite well known to
Roman authors of the early period of the Roman Empire like the Anatolian Dio
Chrysostom, who details -in paragraph
37 (out of 154) of his 11th discourse- his conversation with an aged Egyptian
priest at Onuphis {this location belonged to the fourth ('twenty first') 'nome'
(: district) of Egypt, being currently situated at ca. 10 km from Tanta in the
Western part of Delta (Mehallet Menouf)}. But it has been deliberately and criminally
hidden by the colonial academic forgers from worldwide modern readership in
order to preserve, diffuse and impose worldwide the fallacious and racist
Western story.
E. The
Orientalization of the Roman Empire -and of the West in general
The contact of the Romans with the
Parthians and the ensuing dispute about the western parts of Iran
(Syria-Palestine, Egypt-Cyrene, Anatolia, and Balkans) had an immense impact on
Rome and all the peoples who were subjugated by the Romans, either they were of
Oriental cultural background or not. This consisted in another major historical
development and groundbreaking process that today's paranoid academics of the Western
bogus-universities try to scrupulously hide, although numerous Western scholars
and pioneering explorers of the 19th and the 20th c. discovered, explored,
analyzed and described it.
As the Romans managed to occupy the
western parts of Iran, they were subsequently exposed to Oriental nations,
cultures, and religions; this development triggered an unprecedented cataclysm
of Oriental cults, doctrines, faiths, mysticisms, esoteric teachings, messianic
beliefs, lifestyles and cultures throughout the entire Roman Empire and beyond
its borders in Europe. Isis, Osiris, Horus, Seth, Nephthys, Anubis and a
multitude of Ancient Egyptian concepts, mysteries, and practices, Mithra,
Anahita, Verethragna, Zurvan, and a vast range of Mithraic narratives and
initiation rites, the cults of the Anatolian Cybele (an emanation of the
Mesopotamian-Hittite Kubaba) and of the Phrygian-Thracian Sabazios, the rituals
of the Phoenician Astarte and Adonis, the wisdom of the Chaldaean sages and
mystics, the magical sciences of the Ostanes Order of Iranian alchemists, and a
great number of composite spiritual-theological systems -elaborated by diverse
multilingual erudite savants, initiates and preachers (widely known as 'Gnostics')-
were diffused across the Roman Empire and prevailed as creeds, rites, and
groups of devotional observance. The Oriental cults erased all the earlier
local religious practices and traditions.
The Orientalization of the Roman
Empire -and the West in general- obliterated what was left from
- the nonsensical lifestyle of the
tiny barbarous cities-republics,
- the filth of the 'interests'
discussed in the agoras and the senates,
- the verbose and idiotic
assumptions of the ignorant philosophers who found it possible to perceive and
describe the Divine through thought and dialogue (and not by means of practical
spiritual exercises), and
- the silly theatrical performances,
which entrapped every local victim into vicious sins and pathetic -and
therefore calamitous- lifestyle.
The emergence of the Sassanid
dynasty in Iran (224 CE) was entirely due to the resolute decision to overwhelmingly
reinstate the Achaemenid values and fully reconstitute the universal-ecumenical
empire in its complete form, thus taking the western parts (Syria-Palestine,
Egypt-Cyrene, Anatolia, and Balkans) back. However, the new dynasty, which
fostered military force instead of commercial gains, heroic narrative rather
than moral admonition, and strict religious orthodoxy in place of multicultural
tolerance, had to first face an enormous challenge. In fact, the Sassanids were
coerced by fate to confront a major threat that could be lethal for Iran: Mani
and his religion, Manichaeism.
F. Manichaeism and
Mani, the Greatest Man of All Times
Mani
(216-274 CE) is by far the most important man who has ever lived on Earth. By
taking into account facts of his life, his background, his documented
activities and travels, and his works, by evaluating his spiritual experiences,
mental inquiries, intellectual explorations, religious investigations, and
subliminal explorations, and by assessing his ingenious conceptualization of
the spiritual and material universes, his disruptive ontological approach, his
unprecedented elaboration of the successive stages of Cosmogony, his
cosmological narratives, his moral admonitions, and last but not the least, his
eschatological teleology, we can realize that he was not just the founder of a
religion -a very intricate, well thought, and fully substantiated system of
faith-, but also the comprehensive enactor of a worldwide dogma able enough to
absorb Zoroastrianism, Buddhism and the Jewish-Christian religious tradition,
which was then under formation.
All the
aforementioned deeds and many more, notably public performances of spiritual
order, involving levitation, healing, teleportation, etc., were accomplished at
the age of 26, when Mani (in 242 CE) presented personally to Emperor Shapur I
(215-270, reign from 240) his book Shabuhragan (lit. "Dedicated to Shabuhr"),
which is one of the seven sacred books of the Manichaean religion.
In fact,
Mani attempted to incorporate the preaching of Zoroaster, Buddha and Jesus into
a new system, assimilate elements of their teachings, and therefore create an
all-human religion (namely what many people today would call a 'global'
religion). This would eventually suit the needs of a universal-ecumenical
empire; but unfortunately, it would effectively catapult to the center of the
historical evolution a counterfeit Iran at the very antipodes of the Achaemenid
Empire.
Despite
the apparently splendid position that Zardosht (Zoroaster) occupies in Mani's
religion (pretty much like the Luminous Jesus and Buddha), Manichaeism
constitutes the exact and plain inverse of the Achaemenid orthodoxy, because it
defines the Human Being as a flawed and impotent creature doomed to disappear
in a long lasting conflagration. There is no salvation in Manichaean
eschatology or, to put it more accurately, the salvation is the extinction.
The
present article is not an analysis of the spiritual foundations of Manichaeism,
but I have to underscore and denounce the fact that, only because fraudulent
Western academics categorize both religions as 'dualist' (which is very false),
people in the Western world fail to understand the terrible gap that separates
Zoroastrianism from Manichaeism.
G.
Kartir, the Eradication of Manichaeism in Iran, and its Prevalence in the Roman
Empire
Thank God,
many Iranians and primarily the Zoroastrian modedh (priests) sensed and comprehended
the tremendous opposition between the two dogmas, and reacted vehemently.
Kartir, a most outstanding mystic and high priest, managed to totally deflect
the imperial decision making and terminate the religious tolerance shown by
Shapur I and Hormizd I (270-271), as soon as Warahran I (also known as Bahram
I; reign: 271-274) rose to the throne.
Then, a
ferocious persecution was launched against the Manichaeans, Mani was crucified,
and the Zoroastrian faith was reinstated with impressive focus on the heroic
exploits that every Shah had to undertake while combating the evil and on the
legendary battles in which Iran had to be permanently engaged. That's why the
form that Zoroastrianism took under the Sassanids constitutes a distinct
denomination (Mazdeism or Mazdayasna), which preceded Parsism, namely the
Zoroastrian faith attested during Islamic and Modern times.
Mani's
corpse was flayed and hung up at the city gate of Gondishapur (also spelled as Gundeshapur
and Jondishapur), which was a vast university, library, research center, pioneering
hospital, and translation center. The indelible brutality, which was reported
and discussed by many Muslim historians, more than 500 years after the event,
took place in order to terrify Mani's followers and the supporters of his
counterfeit spirituality, religion and science.
By the end
of the 3rd c. CE, Manichaeism was effectively uprooted in the epicenter of the
Sassanid Empire (Mesopotamia and the Iranian plateau), but Mani's preaching,
faith and sacred books had already spread to Central Asia, China, India,
Anatolia, Egypt, Northwestern Africa, and generally speaking, throughout the
Roman Empire. This was an additional layer of Orientalization of the Roman
Empire.
Many
sacred books of the Manichaeans have been preserved in locations far from the
central provinces of Iran, and in languages as different from one another as
Chinese from Coptic. The overwhelming diffusion of Manichaeism in Alexandria,
Egypt and North Africa triggered the Manichaean persecution, which was much
more ferocious than that undertaken against the Christians few years later.
With the famous edict "De Maleficiis et Manichaeis" (issued on the
31st March 302 CE), the Roman Emperor Diocletian demanded from the proconsul of
Africa to uproot the religion from Alexandria , eliminate the religious
leaders, close down their shrines, burn their books, and impose harsh penalties
for the followers.
However,
the prevailing spiritual and intellectual trends among the outright majority of
all the populations throughout the Roman Empire revolved around the search for
salvation, the demand for liberation from the ominous filth of the immoral
elites, the urgent call for the elimination of the widespread sexual
abomination, and the request for the replacement of the nonsensical
philosophical verbosity with sagacious transcendental silence. It was therefore
only normal that a very elaborate dogma with marked eschatological patterns and
stressed soteriological narratives like Manichaeism persisted. The worthless
rationalism, the provocative materialism, and the silly eloquence of the ruling
class had to imperatively be substituted by faith, spiritual devotion, moral
austerity, and fraternally organized communal life of the faithful. The
soldiers, the farmers, and the slaves had to supersede the privileged, but the
transformation had to be far more overwhelming, because the persona or, if you
prefer, the ego of every being had to be terminally eliminated. In Manichaeism,
humans have to passionately desire their annihilation.
It is not
within the scope of the present article to examine why Roman Christianity was
finally chosen in the early 4th c. CE by the then rising new ruling class
instead of Manichaeism. As a matter of fact, there was Jesus in Manichaeism (or
to be exact Mani's dogma featured two diametrically opposed beings with that name),
whereas the underlined story in Roman Christianity was entirely Manichaean.
H.
Why the Roman Elite imposed the Composite -Memphitic Egyptian & Mithraic
Iranian- Dogma of 'Christianity' instead of Manichaeism
Perhaps
within a persistently changing spiritual-religious-intellectual-royal-cultural
environment like that of early 4th c. CE Rome, it was thought or believed that
the ever transforming Christian narrative and cult could be far more flexible
and far more versatile than a so comprehensive and so clearly delineated system
as that of Mani. Due to this specific trait, the Christian collection of
stories and the associated adoration (religious feasts, liturgies and litanies)
could progressively incorporate both, Mithraic legends detailing the miracles
of Mithra-Savior (which would be attributed to Jesus-Savior) and the extremely
malefic Egyptian Theban pattern of Trinity (Amun, Mut and Khonsu) as it was elaborated
by the Memphitic school of theology (i.e. the earliest form of the devious
Marianism of the Catholic heretics).
These
possibilities (of which not all were finally effectuated, as it is well known)
made of the malleable Christian story the most suitable religion for the new
Roman elite from whom Constantine the Great achieved to get dissociated by
founding Nova Roma (New Rome - Constantinople) in the East.
Totally
unrelated (not only to Jesus himself but also) to the texts of the Gospels, the
Western Roman version of Christianity ended up as a composite Mithraic Iranian
and Memphitic Egyptian narrative projected onto the supposed life of Jesus, while
also being fully marked by the Manichaean world perception, system of thought,
and approach to eschatological parameters. For the rest, all the variant
Christian sects and denominations attested until the 7th c. CE were the mere
result of different reading and interpretation; we cannot therefore limit the
Manichaean structures of faith and intellect only to St Augustine, because they
were evidently attested in the cult and occult practices of Western Roman monks
and in the form of society that was instituted across the territory of the
Western Roman Empire before and after its collapse.
On the
contrary, Manichaeism was effectively and totally eliminated across the lands
of the Eastern Roman Empire where the Cappadocian Fathers of the Church offered
a far more credible and convincing account of the Christian Trinity (God the
Father, Jesus-Savior, and the Holy Spirit) among Christians. The recurrent
association of diverse faiths, heresies or sects with the 'Manichaeans' in the
Eastern Roman Empire was only a matter of deliberate denigration and systematic
defamation. Neither the Paulicians nor the Bogomiles could truly be considered
as potentially relevant to the Manichaean doctrine in any sense. The
eradication of Manichaeism from Sassanid Iran and the Eastern Roman Empire can
be viewed as a positive development for the divided parts of the Achaemenid
Empire. Actually, it was not a coincidence that after almost 400 years of wars
against Rome first and Constantinople later, the Sassanid armies invaded
Anatolia, Syria, Palestine and Egypt in the early 7th c. CE. This was the real
raison d'être of the empire launched by the family of Sassan.
I.
Islam and the Mythologization of the so-called 'Arab Conquests'
Manichaeism
was subsequently rejected and disparaged across the territory of all the
Islamic Caliphates. The diffusion of the preaching of prophet Muhammad outside
the Arabian Peninsula was a matter of pre-arrangement with the Monophysite (Miaphysite)
Aramaeans of Damascus and Syria-Palestine in general, who consisted in the
outright majority of the local populations. The long lasting Eastern Roman –
Sassanid Iranian wars were truly detrimental to them and with little effort,
they could become independent from Constantinople, kicking the Eastern Roman
garrisons with the help of a small army.
It was
apparently beneficial to them to pay taxes to the new state, which had
initially its capital in Yathrib (Medina), in spite of the tiny religious
differences, than to face the heavy Constantinopolitan taxation imposed by
emperors whom the Monophysites considered as heretic. The same would be also valid
for the Copts of Egypt few years later. Furthermore, the contribution of the
Nestorian Aramaean inhabitants of Sassanid Iran to the aforementioned development
was ineluctable, because their faith had been repeatedly persecuted by the
Sassanid emperors, who were not all smart enough to distinguish the
Chalcedonian differences and duly utilize the Nestorians against their rivals,
the basileis.
The
mythologization of the so-called 'Arab Conquests' consists in a valuable tool
in the heinous hands of the criminal colonial academics of Western Europe and
North America. There were no conquests and the developments were not geared by
'Arabs'. The fact that after so many centuries of wars the two rival empires
were exsanguine has been repeatedly stated and highlighted; although this is
true, it does not however help much in understanding what happened at the time.
Without
the determined support and commitment that Aramaean Monophysite or Nestorian
Christians showed to the early Muslim rulers in the vast region of today's SE
Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and UAE, and
lacking the backing that the Copts of Egypt granted to the arriving Muslim
armies, the initial gains would be lost (to the caliphs), the Eastern Roman
territories up to Euphrates and Upper Egypt would be soon re-captured by the
Constantinopolitan garrisons, and the Sassanid Iranian lands would be seized
again by the successors of Khusraw (Chosroes) II. There was opposition indeed
to the invading armies and to the early Caliphates; but it was expressed only
by the rather tiny local minorities whose ethnic origin, religious faith, rank,
and material interests were linked to the Constantinopolitan elites (from one
side) and to the Tesifun/Ctesiphon and Istakhr imperial circles (from the other
side).
The monstrous
lies about the absurd fallacy of the 'Islamic Conquests', which were produced
by the criminal colonial academics of Western Europe and North America, were
successfully diffused among ignorant, uneducated and silly Muslims, as well as
amid heinous, illiterate and pathetic Westerners (namely heretic, false and
even fake Christians) in order to duly and fully empower the Western political,
diplomatic and military elites to control the two distinct, oppositely
disoriented, and totally cheated masses of people, to subtly and detrimentally
utilize them for their calamitous goals, and to ultimately shape all the
developments that took place during the last 200-250 years in sizeable parts of
Asia, Africa, and Europe.
J.
The Falsehood of the Western Orientalists about Islam, Christianity, and the Use of Force in the
Diffusion/Imposition of a Religion
As
far as Muslim populations are concerned, the said fallacy generated
a- a
deeply misleading and utterly wrong comprehension of the Islamic spirituality, culture,
sciences, arts, and religion – in striking contrast with the earlier perception
and comprehension that Muslim nations had of the Islamic heritage and of their
pre-Islamic past (here it is to be added that, throughout the pre-colonial
period 622-1798, Muslims' perception and comprehension of their History varied
and evolved through different stages);
b- an
idiotic dissociation of the Islamic sciences, arts, culture and spirituality
from the religion of Islam, which is impermissible to all Muslims and
incompatible with the moral-cultural-ethnic identity of every Muslim (in fact,
all Muslims have been fully stripped of their true identity);
c- a
pathetic disregard and an intolerable indifference of the outright majority of
Muslims for the largest part of the Islamic History and historiography, for the
quasi-totality of the Islamic sciences, for the markedly diverse aspects of
Islamic literature, and for any genuine, void of theological nonsense and
jurisprudential vanity, form of Islamic spirituality - which consolidated the
new, fake, identity among Muslims, causing cultural disruption and historical
discontinuity;
d- a
totally false identification of the religion of Islam with military conquests,
which is a viciously invented falsehood that has been recurrently diffused
among Muslims and ultimately generated among Muslims a new, fake, identity that
was entirely deprived of historicity;
e- the
terminal ignorance of the true, historical Islam by the spiritually,
culturally, intellectually, religiously, socially, politically and behaviorally
disfigured Muslims of today.
I need now
to underscore the fact that the aforementioned fallacy brought about a new,
totally fake and absolutely anti-Islamic, identity of Muslims at the antipodes
of what Muslims had been throughout the ages.
Even
worse, this new, entirely forged and viciously false, identity of Muslims was
subsequently and systematically projected (by the vicious colonial academics
and the 19th c. Western European Orientalists) onto the true, historical
Muslims, as they have been documented throughout History according to
trustworthy sources. The heinous endeavor consisted in the final stage of the vile
forgery; after disfiguring the modern Muslims, effectively cutting their bond
with their heritage, they distorted their past, and they made today's fake
Muslims believe as their past a very false representation of it. Then, they
exported this fraudulent product to their own countries, namely the populations
of the Western European and North American countries.
As
far as Western populations are concerned, the said fallacy generated
a- a
dreadful fear of Islam, a picture of supposedly real, dark and ignominious Muslim
enemies, and a distressful feeling of being permanently attacked, sieged,
threatened, and forced to fight in order to survive (this panic blinded all
Western populations and fully incapacitated them in terms of a possibly
objective, neutral and impartial assessment of the situation);
b- a
monstrous distortion and a pathetic ignorance of the Islamic History and
civilization, involving sciences, arts, architecture, literature, culture and
spirituality, which has been merely the extension of the misrepresentation and
misinterpretation of Oriental History, namely the civilizations of the Sumerians,
the Assyrians, the Babylonians, and the Aramaeans (Aram Nahrain) in
Mesopotamia, as well the civilizations developed in Egypt, Cush (Ancient Sudan,
i.e. the historically true Ethiopia), Hittite Anatolia,
Achaemenid-Arsacid-Sassanid Iran, Canaan-Phoenicia, Carthage and the African
Atlas, which are all of the origin of every culture and civilization formed in
Europe;
c- a
totally false identification of the religion of Islam with military conquests
and use of force in the diffusion/imposition of a religion, whereas it is
crystal clear that the rise and the imposition of Christianity within the Roman
Empire generated more killings, persecutions, and carnages than the
spread/enforcement of Islam across the regions where it was accepted following
military invasions (this has to be stated because in many parts of the world,
Islam was introduced peacefully). In fact, taken into consideration in both
dimensions, i.e. a) eliminating the followers of the various pre-Christian
religions and cults throughout the Roman Empire and b) exterminating the
adherents of numerous groups of faiths that were peremptorily declared as
heretical, it is undeniable that mass killings, brutality in oppression,
ferocity in persecution, and deprivation of religious freedom occurred far more
often and to far greater extent in lands where Roman Christianity was
instituted than in territories claimed by the Caliphates.
d- an
astounding confusion between the terms "Christianity" and
"West"; it is true that the Eastern Roman Empire opposed the Muslim
armies in Syria, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, Egypt and Carthage. It is also true
that some opposition was organized against the Muslim armies in the African
Atlas and the Iberian Peninsula, before the Frankish kingdom was engaged in
battles against the attacking armies. But in our times, there is no similarity
and there cannot be any comparison between the past fights and the present
disputes, because today's absurd, useless and evil Western countries are deeply
anti-Christian territories where Christianity has been widely persecuted and
effectively uprooted. The shame of all the lawless legislations of Western European
and North American states is such that all the ancestors of today's
de-Christianized populations of the said countries would prefer to adhere to
Islam, if they were tyrannically forced to accept prostitution, transgenderism,
homosexual marriages, anomalous education for their children, deliberate
killings of fetuses (euphemized as 'abortion'), and truly absurd and criminal
laws on adoption that facilitate pedophilia. Consequently, Westerners can
certainly reject Islam because this is the right of every person, but they
cannot do this in the name of Christianity, as they have no right to evoke a
religion that they tried to uproot. When a Western diplomat speaks about the
rights of Christian minorities in other countries, notably Islamic, the
underlined story is his secret, heinous and evil desire to turn those
Christians (who remained Christian for centuries and millennia) into
anti-Christian transvestites, prostitutes and other wreckages of the Western
world.
e- the
terminal misperception of today's Muslims (by average Western people), which
functions complementarily to the lethal delusion that Western populations have
of themselves, namely that they are 'Christian', whereas they are not and they therefore
have not a shred of Christianity to defend.
K.
The Falsehood of the Western Orientalists about the Arrival of Islam in Iran
In Iran,
the mythologization of the so-called 'Arab Conquests' offered -to the criminal
colonial academics of Western Europe and North America- the chance to provoke a
destructive multi-division, which functioned at many different levels (educational,
social, academic, intellectual, political) and caused …
1-a deep
rupture between
a- the
Iranians
and
b- the
so-called 'Arabs', who are not ethnically or culturally Arabs but Aramaized
Babylonians and linguistically Arabized Aramaeans (in the area of the SE
Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, SW Iran, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE),
Copts (i.e. Egyptians of either Christian or Islamic religion), Berbers (in
Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and Mauritania), Cushites and Nilo-Saharans
(in Sudan), and Yemenites-Omanis {i.e. the ethnically and culturally unrelated
to the Arabs (of Hejaz) populations of Yemen, Hadhramawt, Mahra, Dhofar and
Oman};
2-a troublesome
rancor between
a- the
Iranians, who -attracted to the nonsensical and vicious, modern Western constructs
known as 'the ideology of nationalism' or 'the political philosophy of
patriotism'- made of their pre-Islamic heritage, past and civilization the core
of their disastrously superficial and drastically misperceived identity,
and
b- those
among the Iranians, who believe that the primordial essence of their national
character and life is Islam as preached by prophet Muhammad and Ali ibn Abu
Taleb, first imam and fourth caliph;
3-an
odium-producing misreading of the Islamic History (according to which Iran
underwent a humiliating defeat and a historical interruption because of those
truly fake and ultimately nonexistent 'Arab Conquests'), which is a
ramification of the aforementioned rupture and rancor;
4-a socio-political
confusion-generating misperception of Modern Politics in Iran as per which the
deeply anti-Iranian practices of Westernization constituted indeed a
'liberation' and a long-awaited comeback of pre-Islamic Iran as an abandonment
of the Islamic faith (this misunderstanding has spread among the subtly
deceived Iranian 'nationalists');
5-a
totally false and absolutely calamitous identification of the 25-century long
concept, heritage, way of life, and native sentiment of Iranian
universalism-ecumenism with the filthy Western caricature of Iranian
'nationalism';
6-an
equally disastrous coloration of the 25-century long concept, heritage, way of
life, and native sentiment of Iranian universalism-ecumenism and their
description as 'anti-Islamic', which is entirely absurd and ahistorical;
7-the
concealment of the true identity of Achaemenid Iran as the main heir of the Sumerian-Assyrian-Babylonian
Mesopotamian legacy, which formed the riparian bed on which flowed World
History;
8-the
concealment of the extensive Iranization of Islam, which entirely transformed
the early faith that was preached by prophet Muhammad, placing it within the
universal-ecumenical context that it deserved.
What all the
Iranians, all the Parsis, all the Muslims, and all the rest failed to learn,
because of the fallacy of the nonexistent 'Arab Conquests' is that without
Iran, Islam would have been entirely uprooted in Asia and worldwide forgotten.
(to be continued)
====================
Download the article in PDF:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2026/02/28/iran-2026-the-pivot-of-world-history-assaulted-by-the-barbarians-of-the-west-i/
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_15672
https://archive.org/details/iran-2026-the-pivot-of-world-history-assaulted-by-the-barbarians-of-the-west-i
https://www.academia.edu/164892900/Iran_2026_the_Pivot_of_World_History_Assaulted_by_the_Barbarians_of_the_West_I
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/C50n7_Lvge?
https://online.fliphtml5.com/qynhg/izmz/
https://anyflip.com/fdfzl/hino
https://pubhtml5.com/jxyro/gvyp/
https://www.patreon.com/posts/iran-2026-pivot-152023843
No comments:
Post a Comment