The inevitable consequence of the
mistake is the disaster; the expected result of the oversight is the defeat;
the natural outcome of use is the uselessness; and the reasonable conclusion of
a long endured ascent is a precipitated descent. It is therefore only normal
for a flourishing state or empire to encounter putrefaction and decomposition
at the end. Even worse, when things are not clear, deceptive stories envelop
the truth, and people are not conscious of the real state of things…
Francophonie and BRICS+: the two maps show how France can reshape the world, by dropping the worthless Anglo-Saxon West and leading the decolonization and de-Westernization pledge of all Asiatics, Africans, Latin Americans, and many Europeans.
Contents
I. France, England, and
the rest of the world
II. The European Union
has been hijacked by England
III. The only enemy of
France is England
IV. The foundations of
a new worldwide strategy for France
1- No East and no West:
the world is one!
2- No North and no
South: the world is one!
3- Being not part of
the French culture and civilization, soft power serves only to destroy France
4- No migrants and no
refugees!
5- No extremist and no
moderate Islam!
6- Sign a Peace Treaty
with Germany
7- Identify France's
major allies: Germany, Russia, Iran, India and China
8- Set the Western
Orientalism upright!
9- Eliminate Hellenism
as a divisive trickery
10- Eradicate the
fallacy of Panarabism
11- Create a great number
of major regional allies by rectifying the mistakes of French colonialism
12- A secular
international community is not a faithless world
I. France,
England, and the rest of the world
After 200 years of
unprecedented rise and glory, Spain and Portugal were truly exsanguine. It was
the time of the Roi Soleil, when France, Holland, and England started their
meteoric ascent. It is essential for all to note that the Spanish and the
Portuguese colonials did not destroy any great historical empire of the
so-called 'Ancient World'; they clashed with them, but there was not a decisive
outcome. On the contrary, the three Western European maritime empires, which
were substituted to the Iberian sea powers, first inherited the newly acquired
lands of the arbitrarily baptized 'New World' and second attempted to destroy,
dismantle, and occupy the territories of all major empires of the Ancient
World, namely the Ottoman Empire, Safavid Iran, Mughal India, Romanov Russia,
and Qing China.
What was impossible to
happen at the military level was attempted at the cultural, academic,
intellectual, theoretical-ideological, and governmental-political level;
if the Mughal were
replaced by the English in South Asia;
if Qajar Iran was
superseded by the Western puppets that Orientalists baptized as 'Pahlavi';
if the Ottoman Empire
took 125 years (1798-1923) to be progressively decomposed;
- Russia, after 300
years of Romanov cleavage between pro-Western and pro-Eastern, was Sovietized;
and
- China, after more
than 250 years of intransigent Qing rule, was ravaged by the Xinhai Revolution
in 1911, falling successively to the hands of the Revive China Society, the
Kuomintang, and then to the Communists.
Accepting the Western
notion of 'nation', any related theory and political ideology or alternatively Marx,
Lenin, and Stalin are indeed forms of Westernization.
The sole markedly
different approach proved to be that initiated by Kemal Ataturk, who represents
a genuinely local reassessment of the Western educational, academic,
scientific, technological, and governmental progress and a critical, selective stance
toward issues that have been insidiously promoted and arbitrarily accepted in
the West over the past century, causing therefore the troubles and the ordeal
that we attest everywhere today. Contrarily to Stalin, the founder of the
Turkish Republic did not need to sojourn in Vienna in order write pertinent and
vital proposals for his own party.
Meanwhile, and quite
early, the USA was instituted in part of the English colonial territories in
North America at a time the French and the Spaniards still occupied the largest
part of today's area of the United States. But the new country came also with a
new system, which was fervently supported by many distinguished French fighters,
activists, and intellectuals; this consisted in a real challenge (not only to
then still existing empires of the Ancient World but) to then risen maritime
empires of France, Holland, and England.
To be consistent with
History, one has to take into consideration the fact that this internal
rivalry, conflict, antagonism, and hostility did characterize the Western World
over the past 250 years; I do not mean that the United States declared war on
Europe; the struggle was far more subtle and imperceptible because the promoters
of two diametrically opposed concepts of worldview, governance, social
organization, and spirituality clashed against one another by means of covert
war, infiltration, simulation, and deception, now prevailing here, now rising
to power there, while always diffusing this divide throughout the earlier
colonized lands. As a matter of fact, the diverse ideological masks that they
used to wear helped them conceal their identity and quite often confused their
opponents. In other words, the Western European colonialism ended up with a
rift spread (or reproduced) across the Earth.
But the invisible
forces, which set up the US in the second half of the 18th c. and underwent
many transformations for the needs of the clash with their (Western) enemies,
still exist; the same is also valid for their opponents. As they incessantly utilize
diverse states, governments, international bodies, political parties and
leaders, corporations, theories, ideologies, technologies and -in one word- all
possible means in their conflict against one another, it is to be expected that
they use stronger tools and arms in their ongoing antagonism. If a leading
country, which in the past was the locomotive of the historical evolution,
ceases to play the role that it used to, this state will be gradually left
aside.
II.
The European Union has been hijacked by England
This is to some extent
what happened to France; having been the driving force of historical
developments for centuries, the country appears to be by now exsanguine and
unnecessary. The same occurs also to England, to Germany, to Italy, to Holland
and to Spain, which were the main levers of world power for centuries. For
France to get disentangled from the present situation, two prerequisites are
demanded:
a- first, all French
has to understand that when France reached the peak of its power under Louis
XVI, there was no European Union; when Napoleon disembarked in Abuqir near
Alexandria, he did not arrive there as the representative of a group of
nations; and when his soldiers set fire in Moscow (14 to 18 September 1812),
there were no Portuguese, Danish, Italian, Hungarian, Finnish, German and
Polish allies among them.
In other words, France
must beforehand be liberated from the catastrophic myth of European Union. Do
not get me wrong! It is clear that, as projects, the European Coal and Steel
Community (ECSC) and later the European Community were not bad at all; but
every project -major or minor- that happens to be launched under the most
auspicious circumstances can turn out to be a nightmare if it is calamitously
hijacked by an insidious, stealthy and deceptive enemy. In fact, any
paradisiacal nectar can be transmuted to hellish venom.
b- second, no country
survived, let alone excelled, without having first identified accurately its
real enemy. Without proper and pertinent identification of their hidden but
real foe, countries disappeared from this world, leaving only the memory of
their phantasmagorical failure.
Consequently, all the
French will have to undergo a real process of deep self-criticism and reassessment
of the History of France in order to realize that
1- some of their
national and colonial achievements were not truly real (i.e. due to the French
genius and necessary to the French interests) but rather due to the fact that
they represented also the wish, and thus garnered the support, of a vicious
enemy metamorphosed to friend for this or that occasion.
Example: the French
mandate for Syria and Lebanon, under the terms, the conditions and the
circumstances it occurred, was more useful to the English than to the true, yet
unidentified, French interests in the region (more will be discussed below).
and
2- the real enemy of
France can never be identified with Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, Italy,
Spain, Mughal India, the Ottoman Empire or the United States; these countries
were only occasional or circumstantial rivals or opponents. Any time France was
in war with one of the aforementioned empires, kingdoms or states, it was
either the result of a subtle machination undertaken by France's true enemy or a
development that happened momentarily to be in accordance with the interests of
that inimical state, which was so easily identified by Captain Nemo, an
epitomized form of the French Genius, envisioned by Jules Verne.
III.
The only enemy of France is England
After all, every single
war occurred between France and any of the states referred to in the previous
paragraph did not last 100 years, but much less. Quite contrarily, the Hundred
Years' War (1337-1453) brought the French and the English face to face with one
another for more than a century. Both kingdoms followed different trajectories for
some time, but their colonial vocation pitched them against each other in what
is collectively called the Second Hundred Years' War (1689–1815).
Over the past 300
years, from the Carnatic Wars down to our days, England has pursued the same
Anti-French strategy and carried out all the related tactics. The fundamental
axes of London's worldwide master plan persistently involve the following
measures:
a- in Europe, the
English tried incessantly through machinations to impose a balance that would
never allow for the creation of a major continental power; it goes without
saying that their perfidious practices were mainly implemented against France
(1789-1870), Germany (1870-1945), and Russia (after 1945). Example: when
Napoleon III was able to achieve outstanding successes for France's colonial
empire, the English managed to mobilize the Prussians, triggering the Franco-Prussian
War; later, similar tactics were carried out against Imperial (and then Nazi)
Germany, whereas the myth about the Iron Curtain and the ensued so-called Cold
War plunged the international community into an unnecessary deception – all due
to English lies, hypocrisy and inhumanity.
b- in areas of colonial
competition, the English first followed the French and then attempted to erode
their authority at the local level in order to usurp power and supplant their
enemy; this practice eventually generated wars, as it occurred in India, various
other forms of conflict (Georges Clemenceau and Lloyd George clashed at the
Paris Peace Conference in 1919) or led to compromise (like the Crisis of
Fashoda). The fact that the two countries had regular relations and, after a
certain moment, a friendly connection ("Entente Cordiale") gave the
opportunity to the English to slowly infiltrate into the French establishment,
imperceptibly confuse the major decision makers, and effectively disorient them
from the targets that properly suited France's genuine interests – to the
benefit of England.
This situation damaged
France's interests greatly; it tarnished the country's image worldwide, and it dragged
France into a colonial quagmire in which Paris has been endlessly accused of
strategies, policies, practices and tactics that gravely harmed the interests
of various nations across the Earth. Even worse, pulled by an intense and
uncontrolled antagonism with London, Paris delivered a distorted interpretation
of the explorations, discoveries, researches, and studies undertaken as result
of, and in parallel with, the colonial expansion; this distortion of the past
and the heritage of so many nations suited only the interests of the
Anglo-Saxon racism, supremacism and imperialism. Quite unfortunately, this
situation turned France into a copy of English colonialism and destroyed Paris'
relations with all the colonized nations irrespective of the colonial metropolis,
as well as with other countries.
In spite of controlling
a sizeable part of Africa, Indochina, and a great number of islands in all the
oceans, and being influential in many parts of Europe, France failed (before
and after WW I) to prevent the establishment of a calamitous international
order which was initially conceived by the English, adjusted to the interests
of the City of London, and structured in a way to strangle all the other
nations, France included, in time. We attest the calamity of this international
order nowadays, and it cannot and will not change unless
- the US eliminates all
the tentacles of English infiltration not only as regards the so-called 'deep
state', i.e. the administration, but also with respect to their educational,
academic and intellectual system, thus turning the land to a genuinely
anti-colonial power and re-adjusting it as per the Founding Fathers'
principles, values and targets;
and/or
- France removes from
all aspects of social and governmental life the imperceptibly adopted
Anglo-Saxon racism, supremacism and imperialism and the disastrously impregnated
English colonial viewpoint over the world affairs, thus launching first the
most fervent intellectual, socio-governmental movement of de-Westernization and
decolonization in the world.
It may appear bizarre
to suggest to a so-called 'Western' country to lead the much needed worldwide
decolonization and de-Westernization process, but as it is, this consists in
the only means for the entire world to resolutely avoid once forever the rise
of a well-orchestrated but totally counter-productive and highly destructive
anti-Occidentalism (or anti-Western sentiment), which still plays into the
English colonial game, because without eliminating the roots of the Western
academic, intellectual, educational, cultural, socioeconomic and political
colonialism, it brings forth sterile clashes, calamitous conflicts, unnecessary
wars and an interminable flow of income for Wall Street / City of London
controlled corporations in an evidently low-risk environment where idiots fight
against imbeciles and fools kill cretins, thus ruining their countries.
IV.
The foundations of a new worldwide strategy for France
Consequently, France
has to envision how to effectively and beneficially demolish the myths, the
lies, the distortions, the concealment of truths, and the oversights that were
diffused in order to bring the global establishment to its present condition;
it is to be reminded that Paris was forced to contribute to this multifaceted
deception and fallacy, thus acting against the French local, regional, and
international interests.
1- No East and no
West: the world is one!
All the divisions of
the world must be considered as either wrong perceptions or deliberate fallacies
and as such eliminated. The division East-West is a catastrophic nonsense; what
differentiated Western Europe from the rest of the world does not constitute a
division between two otherwise nonexistent entities, namely 'East' and 'West'.
The false rereading of the Western European past that took place in very few
European lands (during the 14th–16th c.) was an unnecessary process, which
proved to be totally incompatible with the universal aspirations of many leading
French philosophers of the 18th c., notably Voltaire; but the universal
worldview had been earlier attested in many civilizations and cultures.
Consequently, instead
of foolishly dividing the world into parts that only appear to be opposite to
one another, French academics and intellectuals have to identify the analogies,
the similarities, the identical values and their diverse expressions between
the French and other traditions, cultures and civilizations across the Earth.
2- No North and no
South: the world is one!
Similarly, the division
North-South, which is a calamitous remnant of the so-called Cold War era and
the erroneous emergence of the arbitrarily named 'Third World', has to be
declared as meaningless and dangerous. The socioeconomic technological and
academic rise of countries like India, Brazil, Thailand, Malaysia, South Africa
and others fully demonstrates that more fundamental traits unite than divide
the geographically disparate countries of the various continents. Totally
derogatory as term, the appellation 'Third World' was indeed the embodiment of
the English colonial game against the entire mankind.
As a matter of fact,
widely used today, the term 'Global South' constitutes a so-wide range of
diverse countries that France can certainly be included; actually, it is always
preferable to participate in group to which you perhaps don't belong than to
oppose it, causing detrimental collateral damages and playing the game of a
perfidious and malignant enemy.
3- Being not part of
the French culture and civilization, soft power serves only to destroy France
Treacherously promoted
as 'element of Modern European values' and as constituent of the French
policy-making, the so-called soft power is a totally ahistorical and genuinely
Anti-French nonsense; there is no soft power praised in the Chanson de Roland,
there was no concern for this ludicrous notion at the time of Jeanne d'Arc, no
one evoked it as a principle during the French Revolution, and no French
soldier in Verdun deemed of it as a potential alternative in 1916.
As a matter of fact,
soft power is exclusively useful and malevolently beneficial to the ruling
forces of this world, because as tactics, it definitely condemns their
opponents into eternal inertia and disastrous inactivity, thus ensuring the
prolongation of the present contaminated and putrefied world order and the
gradual decomposition and elimination of their enemies. For France, soft power
is the ultimate death warrant.
4- No migrants and
no refugees!
Due to the adverse
demographic conditions that prevail in France, it is certain that the country
needs extra working force; all the same, this fact has nothing to do with the
criminally instituted secretive but ostensible operation "Send alien
refugees to destroy Europe". The needs of French economy are totally
different and absolutely unrelated to the purposefully orchestrated campaign by
which dozens of millions of unsuspicious Asiatics and Africans are transported
to Europe in order to generate all sorts of troubles. It is crystal clear that
establishing a link between a) Paris' need for many hundreds of thousands or
millions of extra workers and b) the unnecessary and unsolicited arrival of
fake and illegal refugees in Europe is sheer paranoia.
More specifically, the
aforementioned equation is a false dilemma and a viciously invented fallacy
that targets the existence of France and of several other Western states;
however, since I focus on French affairs in the present article, I will totally
disregard the issue of other European states. Actually, only a genuine idiot or
a perverse gangster or a heinous English diplomat would accept that, because
there is an ostensible need for numerous extra workers, France is 'obliged' to
welcome, let alone accommodate, millions of disqualifying, unspecialized, and
even hostile elements. In any case, the newcomers arrive only because they know
that they will get money in a most immoral, illegal and undeserving manner, due
to the calamitous infiltration of perfidious, anti-French, and anti-European English
agents.
Even worse is the case
of pseudo-Islamic militants, who have long been the subject of evil
Saudi-Qatari-funded propaganda, Muslim Brotherhood terrorist ideological
intoxication, totally distorted education, incommensurate complex of
socioeconomic inferiority, and paranoid political indoctrination in order to
stupidly believe that by means of lies, deceitful tricks, and covert hatred,
they will 'conquer' and eventually Islamize the West.
Willing to Islamize
other countries is a Satanic concept when the countries of the Muslims are
evidently the most anti-Islamic realms in the world, being infested with
homosexual 'princes', criminal 'kings', corrupt 'emirs', felonious
'presidents', ignorant 'imams' and degraded, obscurantist, and uncivilized
masses; the firm strategy of France, as a secular state, has to be the physical
elimination of every Muslim who intends to Islamize the country, conquer the
West, and does not accept the secular example and practices of Kemal Ataturk as
the only form of Islam in the 20th and the 21st c.
It goes without saying
that the French Constitution and the entirety of the existing legislation have
to be immediately readjusted in order to allow for every step needed in this
regard. All existing ghettoes on French territory must be declared
"National Territory under Alien Occupation", militarily invaded, and
all the alien elements mercilessly executed in public.
In alliance with other
major forces, France has to take drastic measures for the abrupt overthrow of
the current regimes of Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE,
Iran and other countries in order to overwhelmingly transform the region,
uproot the puppets of MI6 and England, and remove the persistent threat of the pseudo-Islamic
militants.
Nevertheless, after the
elimination of this primary threat, the need for extra workers will certainly persist,
and it has to be effectively and methodically addressed. That's why a totally
different French government will have to strike few agreements with China, India,
and other states, and acting on these bilateral deals, in most systematic
manner, welcome in France as many millions of foreign workers as they are needed.
Now, the modalities of the agreements will have to concern the details of
residence, communication, work, and payment, as well as the duration of the
contracts that the French companies or state or army will offer to all these
distinct, known, and well identified persons, who will search to improve their
standards of life by working in France.
5- No extremist and
no moderate Islam!
An important ingredient
of a) the perfidiously contrived, systematically diffused, and covertly imposed
-by the English academic colonial establishment- falsification of the
historical past, heritage and interconnection of numerous nations, b) the distortion
of the world perception skills and abilities of diverse nomadic or sedentary societies,
ethnic groups and religious communities across the Earth, and c) the methodic
destruction of the relationship between the French (and the continental
Europeans in general) and many nations in Asia and Africa was the academic,
intellectual and political misrepresentation of Islam. This evil stratagem
produced a double confusion, first among Muslims and second in the middle of non-Muslims.
The monstrously
antihuman stratagem subtly utilized the spiritual, intellectual, academic,
educational, economic and governmental decay of the Islamic world in order to
generate
a- among Muslims:
1- an intransigent
anti-Western stance – instead of a self-criticism;
2- a superficial enmity
toward colonials – in place of a resourceful rediscovery and efficient reassessment
of their own grand past and exquisite heritage; and
3- an unnecessary
(theological-ideological-political) radicalism based on total misunderstanding
and absolute ignorance of their own majestic legacy – rather than in-depth comprehension
and rejection of their own false ideas, mistakes and oversights (which were
formed during and because of the 4-century long decadence).
b- among non-Muslims:
1- a heinous
identification of Islam with the quasi-barbarian conditions of ignorance that
characterized the average Muslims of the time of decadence (down to our days) and
with the anti-Western hatred that was rightfully produced among the failing
(Ottoman, Safavid-Afshar-Qajar, and Mughal) elites due to their own lack of
self-criticism, rediscovery and recovery – instead of sincere, benevolent and
trustworthy delving into disregarded and/or forgotten Islamic literature,
wisdom, science and spirituality;
2- the calamitous
repetition of clerical, medieval, anti-Islamic rhetoric of deliberate
misinterpretation of Islam – in place of a perspicacious analysis of the
Islamic sources and a compassionate stance toward the 18th, 19th and 20th c.
Muslims, which would involve a determinant and resolute French / Western
assistance (to the Muslims) in the rediscovery the Golden Era of Islamic
civilization and the recovery of their own, Islamic, non-Western, identity,
character and manner; and
3- the viciously false
representation of Islam as the religion of Abu Bakr, Umar ibn al Khattab,
Uthman ibn Afaan, Amr ibn-al Aas, and many other warriors, who were fake and
false Muslims whose disastrous acts (could not lead but and actually) led to
the establishment of the pseudo-Islamic Caliphate of the Umayyad dynasty –
rather than the true religion of Ali, who was the designated heir, deputy, and
successor of Prophet Muhammad, who did not take part in the heretic,
pseudo-Islamic conquests (which were never demanded by either Allah or his last
messenger), and who never launched any attack against, or invasion of, another
land while he was the fourth caliph in Medina.
Though this malicious
stratagem, Muslims were deliberately and heinously pushed toward darkness
instead of being helped to come to the light of their own culture, religion and
civilization, whereas non-Muslims were forced to accept the anti-Islamic venom
of the Anglo-Saxon Evangelical lunatics or the pro-Zionist, pseudo-Christian extremists
and to fight against fictional enemies, like Don Quixote, because today's
Muslims simply do not represent the true, genuine Islam but its most decayed
form.
Engulfing two (2)
billion Muslims in fake intellectual, academic, educational and cultural
dilemmas, abject poverty, and deceitful schemes of colonial dependence
were the means through
which England robbed the rest of the world, accumulated illegal and
impermissible treasures, and kept bringing wars, mass killings, ruins and
genocides to gullible, unsuspicious, and innocuous governments, peoples and
countries.
In addition to the earlier
mentioned divisive schemes, the vicious stratagem "radical vs. moderate
Muslims" was launched during the last two decades of the 20th century in
order to confuse the Islamic world and all the rest as regards the intentions,
the purposes, the agendas, and the lifestyles of two groups, which -practically
speaking- do not exist and never existed anytime anywhere, but unfortunately
consist in lamentable automatons fabricated only for the scope of their total
extermination.
For this purpose, English
colonials (invariably originating from England, the US, Canada or Australia),
working at the local level, fabricated various academic-intellectual, economic
and political circles of indigenous elites that they arbitrarily labeled as
"moderate" and "radical", presenting them to the rest of
the world as supposedly true and genuine whereas they are not (and they have
never been).
What is called
"moderate Islam" is made out of various elites educated, formed and
accomplished after various Western models (English, American, French, and
Italian) in order to return to their respective countries, be hired in
important positions either in the public or the private sector, promote the
interests of the foreign country where they studied (except they were bought by
a rival state), and create a fortune and a family to further prolong their own
country's dependence on and docility to the colonial metropolis. In so doing,
these Muslims, who may have even taken courses of Islamic theology in young
age, are only nominally adepts of Islam, but essentially slaves of the colonial
-mainly Anglo-Saxon- West. In fact, they are agnostics or atheists, being
actually prone to political rationalism and utilitarianism to the extent that
they can 'justify' the world's most appalling crimes and present then as
'correct', 'decent' and 'acceptable' according to the 'Islamic principles' of
theirs. As they are entirely materialist, pathetically consumerist, and idiotically
capitalist of character and mindset, these calamitous elites function only as
an army of automatons-pawns of the Anglo-Saxon gangs that control the world,
dragging the international community to a disastrous nuclear disaster.
What is called
"radical Islam" is the army of successively radicalized ignorant and
uneducated idiots, who were impregnated with the unadulterated stupidity that,
"by reading the Quran and the Hadith, one knows Islam". So, you
understand that, when 1400 years of History (of a great number of nations,
cultures, and civilizations with widely diverse perceptions and interpretations
of Islam, literatures, philosophies, sciences and schools of spirituality) are
reduced to very few hundreds (or even fewer thousands) of pages, then the
ensuing ignorance, the hatred for the true knowledge and the traditional wisdom,
the mental rudeness, and the sentimental crudity lead to the most extreme
ideological fanaticism (which has nothing to do with religion) and to the full
utilization of those false believers by the worst enemies of Islam.
This second army of
useless automatons, which think that they know everything (but know nothing) and
believe that they gain the Paradise by killing humans is real dynamite in the
hands of the English, American and Israeli secret services. Actually, the
veracity of my present analysis is easily comprehended when one is able to
notice that these lunatics never attempted to exterminate, as they should have
done had they been true Muslims, all the devilish 'kings', 'presidents',
'emirs', rulers, generals, ministers, businessmen, academics, muftis, imams,
and all the other local chieftains who consciously work for the lethally
anti-Islamic interests of the Wall Street and the City of London.
Yet, both 'groups' have
as common origin the same teaching, the same preaching, the same sermon, and
the same -entirely false- interpretation of the Islamic history, culture,
civilization, and religion, which is
- neither the
traditional Ottoman, Safavid, Mughal, etc. doctrine;
- nor a readjustment of
those doctrines and a reassessment of the understanding of Islam as a spiritual
and historical phenomenon (ostensibly involving self-criticism); but
- a new, Western
ideology-based, system of viewing Islamic theology (and, through this
distortion, the Islamic religion) in a supposedly updated and politically asserted
manner, which was intentionally, meticulously and imperceptibly prepared by
19th c. Western Orientalists in a way to permanently engulf all Muslim
societies into a pernicious swamp of mental-intellectual-educational dependence
on the West, and into an infernal internal conflict around a mistakenly
perceived modernity and an erroneously viewed tradition.
For this reason it
appears as bizarre to many people in the West how pro-Western elites and
anti-Western militants in the Muslim countries can possibly coexist in the same
countries, e.g. Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan, etc. In fact, the so-called
'moderates' and the pseudo-Islamic 'radicals' constitute the two faces of the
same coin as they emanate from the same -terribly wrong- reading of the Islamic
heritage, and of the modernity.
Yet, the true, genuine
needs of all the Muslims -and of all the adepts of other religions in these
regions- have nothing to do with either superficial pro-Western choices or
thoughtless anti-Western standpoints; in fact, de-Westernization and
decolonization demand and impose resourcefully executed search for the local
and regional Islamic intellectual-academic-educational-scientific identity and
cultural-spiritual integrity. Today's Muslims not only failed to understand
that this immense undertaking is their top priority but they also proved to be
foolish enough to believe that they can survive without it.
But if we had
hypothetically brought into this debate three 17th c. scholars from Ottoman,
Safavid and Mughal backgrounds, they would have ominously rejected both,
'moderates' and 'radicals' muftis, sheikhs, ulemas and adepts.
I expanded particularly
on this topic, because it is a very serious issue in itself. It is highly
important even if we observe and examine it
- separately from the
grave trouble that the arrival of numerous illegal migrants has caused to
France and other Western European countries;
- apart from the preoccupying
issue that the presence of Muslims on French territory has generated; and
- independently from
the inevitable problem that the French colonization of many Muslim countries in
the past has created.
The Anglo-Saxon plan
providing for a frontal, terminal clash -between the Islamic world from one
side and the Zionist state of Israel and its Western allies from the other
side- must be outmaneuvered and cancelled not only for the military-industrial
complex to sell fewer arms and weapons systems -and thus see their income greatly
reduced- but also for all nations to live in peace and concord with one
another, canceling once forever the eventuality of religious wars.
In this regard, France
should situate its strategy with respect to the Islamic world within the
approach initiated already before one century by Kemal Ataturk (notably the
Nutuk, the famous, 36-hour long discourse pronounced from the 15th to the 20th
of October 1927 in the Grand National Assembly of Turkey in Ankara). In addition,
Paris should vigorously utilize at both, the national and the international
levels, and effectively capitalize on the academic-theoretical reassessment of,
interdisciplinary approach to, and groundbreaking conclusions about the
historical sources of the Early Islamic History, namely a grand opus which was
meticulously prepared and formulated by the numerous distinct scholars who
contributed to the voluminous "Le Coran des historiens". In fact,
this publication must serve as basis for the much needed, irrevocable
refutation of the villainous and devilish fallacy that the pseudo-historian
'prof'. Samuel Huntington miserably invented as regards the otherwise
nonexistent 'Clash of Civilizations'.
6- Sign a Peace
Treaty with Germany
Rejecting the aforementioned
schemes, France has to launch a new, great effort to reshape Europe and the
world on a non-colonial, fraternal and egalitarian basis totally void of the
slightest Anglo-Saxon trace, impregnation, distortion of truth, and/or bias.
The focus of a new French foreign policy has to first shift to Germany. It was
quite comfortable for many French presidents and governments of the Fourth and
of the Fifth Republics not to sign a post-World War II Treaty with Germany; but
it was calamitous for Paris, because it played into the same disastrous
Anglo-Saxon plan to perpetuate a situation in which Germany acted as
-practically speaking- a non-state. To properly understand the factual reality,
one has to first view WW I, WW II, the Cold War, and the post-1991 ordeal (not
as independent, sequential events but merely) as stages of the (launched in the
19th c. by colonial England) Great Game; this constitutes a catastrophic
onslaught on the mainland of World History, i.e. Asia, threatening with
extermination and extinction not only mankind but nature itself.
France has therefore to
take into consideration the fact that, as regards its major eastern neighbor,
Bonn, East Berlin, and Berlin have not been -under post-World War II
circumstances- the capital cities of a sovereign nation, and that all the German
politicians and statesmen after 1945 have been puppets of the 'allies' who
declared war on Germany, a country that has uninterruptedly been in state of
war with no less than 50 states since the theoretical 'end' of the theatrical
act 'WW II'.
A tragi-comical
condition of utterly melodramatic and emphatically pretentious, but
unreservedly useless functionality concerns organizations, such as OSCE and the
International Court in Den Haag, which generate unstoppably tons over tons of
lies, ridiculous falsehood, and preposterous assumptions; all this execrably
bureaucratic nonsense serves only one main purpose: to deceitfully camouflage
the truth about the historical process of the Great Game, fraudulently
disorient all the nations of the world, and treacherously make all major world
powers waste their time until the final, nuclear destruction falls -in due
course of time- on their heads without them expecting it.
Paris does not have the
time and the luxury to continue its present policy, because the plan has it
that France will be decomposed and ruined before Germany. The gradual decay and
the evidently forthcoming decomposition of the Western world cannot be a matter
of satisfaction in the hypothetical assumption that the country can be redressed
alone. For France to be saved, Berlin has to be a fully self-determined,
independent, and sovereign state free of foreign armies, NATO military bases, and
treacherous or hostile elements, which -by impersonating the German politicians
and statesmen, businessmen and academics- endlessly work to destroy the German
nation.
To shape a totally new,
groundbreaking strategy and drastic, fruitful action as regards Germany, an
avant-garde, national salvation establishment in Paris must take into
consideration only facts, namely:
1- Germany is nothing
but a zone of occupation of the Allies or, if you prefer, a UK/US firm with the
name Deutschland GmbH;
2- As no treaty or agreement has been signed since 1945, Germany is in state of
war with the UK/US-led (and -deceived) 50 allied states; and above all
3- Long before France
declared war on Germany on the 3rd September 1939, more than 6 years before the
inhuman theatrical spectacle WW II was officially launched, another entity
declared publicly war on Berlin in three distinct instances, namely
-on 1st February 1933:
the heinous colonial gangster Henry Morgenthau;
-on 24th March 1933: 'Judea' {which has nothing to do with the then Jewry (or
Jews) but describes a gang of financial fraudsters and colonial criminals, who -although
impersonating- hate the Jews, and all the rest}, as solemnly stated in the
English paper "Daily Express" ("Judea declares war on
Germany"); and
-on 7th August 1933, the agent of the World Jewish Economic Federation Samuel
Untermeyer, another representative of the anti-Jewish 'Judea'.
Totally disregarding
and effectively breaking down the present lawless disorder, which is shamelessly
presented as 'International Law' by the cruel gangsters who carry out the
systematized destruction of mankind, France must act immediately like a
lightning, surpassing Napoleon in his exploits, and thus conclusively help the
German Nation, sending as many forces needed for the Germans to terminally
overthrow the shameful, post-World War II regime of German subordination to the
Anglo-Saxon inhuman paranoids.
After establishing a
new free state in France and before screaming, as they will naturally have to
"Vive le Québec libre!", French masses have to enter Germany in
fraternity, cooperation, concord and determination to help their German
brethren instantly put an end to any NATO, US, UK and other foreign presence on
German soil. No Anglo-Saxon embassy or delegation must be left on German soil!
7- Identify France's
major allies: Germany, Russia, Iran, India and China
Establishing a
Franco-German tandem will help Paris re-integrate Europe into Asia. In this
regard, it is essential to realize that the Anglo-Saxon fallacies of
geopolitics and geostrategics have no scientific foundation and they were invented
only to fool the victims who would pay attention to them. In spite of its great
success overseas, which has to be maintained, France must fundamentally situate
its strategy in the unity, indivisibility, and cohesiveness of the Afro-Asiatic
landmass of which Europe is only one peninsula. France is by definition a
continental empire, and this is how Napoleon envisioned the historical mission
of the country. The reason for this is very simple: maritime empires never
existed; when they appeared, they were doomed to disappear; and their rise, if
lasting long, is predestined to inevitably bring the destruction of mankind.
Consequently, the
sustainable well-being, the inalienable fraternity, the permanent integration,
the solid continuity, and the effective synergy of all the true nations, the ethno-linguistic
groups, the tribes, and the communities have to be the irremovable concern of
France's world strategy. The truthful assessment of the geographical and historical
reality is the only means for the major continental states to ensure concord
and cooperation. Divisions among continental states that have been caused by
alien islanders and heinous maritime powers must be rigorously solved or
forcefully terminated; in fact, there cannot be enmity of a coastal state
against continental neighbors. The evilness of the stratagem "my enemy's
enemy is my friend" has to be once forever rejected, uprooted, and
prohibited worldwide.
The alliance of France
and Germany with Russia will be the foundation of the new, Continental Alliance
and the Euro-Asiatic Union which will have to be established as a first step
towards the foundation of a new, supreme international body, which will not
only terminate the deliberate and vicious continuation of the Anglo-Saxon Great
Game after 1945 under other masks ('Cold War' and 'New World Order') but also prompt
a de-colonized and de-Westernized world community in which Justice will be
combined with Knowledge, Truth will meet Temperance, and Fraternity will result
in Concord.
The complete
dissociation of every state from the local religious establishment, the
termination of all religious, racial, ideological, and political sectarianisms,
and the overwhelming rejection of the nonsensical pseudo-concept of
multi-alignment will enable Paris, Berlin, Moscow, New Delhi and Beijing to
launch the new international body, thus starting a new era totally void of
previous developments, circumstances, fallacies, schemes, wars, disasters and
ruins. The socioeconomic, governmental and organizational incorporation of the
New World Contract will have to be extended to intellectual, cultural,
academic, educational, scientific, and technological levels, thus putting a
tombstone on useless rivalry and catastrophic antagonism in terms of energy,
resources, finance, economy, arms race, and technological edge.
Conflicts or disputes,
like those between Russia and Ukraine, India and Pakistan, China and Japan,
Iran and Israel, etc. will have to be solved by excluding all external factors
as resolutely and as consistently as it is needed. It has to be revealed and
denounced that all these destructive events or counterproductive conditions
were generated only due to the interference of peripheral forces, notably the
UK and the USA. Their total exclusion from the Afro-Asiatic continent will be
conditio sine qua non for the successful implementation of the New World
Contract that will replace the worthless and nonsensical UN Charter. As a
matter of fact, a new organization and a new founding document were already
needed when the inhuman, evil alliance of the willing, namely the US-led
coalition, invade Iraq. When an international body cannot protect its
member-states, it ceases to exist; the sooner it disappears the better.
8- Set the Western
Orientalism upright!
Vladimir Lenin said
that "Marx stood Hegel's dialectic on its head"; now, the French
scholarly elite will have to "stand Orientalism on its head". As a
matter of fact, in spite of the pioneering, exploratory, and investigative work
of the 18th and 19th c. French scholars, decipherers, and erudite academics,
the Orientalist disciplines that offered access to original, contemporaneous,
and authoritative sources, which documented the greatest moments of the Antiquity
and the unequaled treasures of Human Spirituality and Intellect, have been
gradually hijacked by the defective Anglo-Saxon academia, deliberately
distorted, and preposterously adjusted to the Anglo-American colonial needs and
hidden prerogatives.
Instead of perceiving
the newly unearthed and deciphered documentation as common heritage of mankind
and acting accordingly, the English Orientalists wanted to viciously readjust (or,
if you prefer, rob) the material record, monstrously misinterpret it as per
their racist, supremacist, colonialist ideas and bogus theories, and -even
worse- keep the true, indigenous heirs of the ancient civilizations far away
and with minimal -or no understanding at all- of the world-shattering implications of the
discoveries as regards the imperative re-writing of World History.
What ensued was an
enormous colonial monster or, if you prefer, a counterfeit Orientalism at the
very antipodes of the leading early explorers, travelers, scholars,
decipherers, and authors; this rigid, morbid and sinister system was directly
opposed to their world conceptualization, their moral integrity, and their academic
decency. Contrarily to their humanist aspirations to actively share their
discoveries, newly acquired wisdom, and insightful comprehension of the past at
the local, regional and international levels, the scientific disciplines, which
were instituted following the digging, the decoding, and the access we gained
to genuine texts written before 2700, 3400 or even 4500 years, were gradually handled
and processed in a most anti-academic, conventional, and restrictive manner.
Worst of all, an
increasingly conservative approach and a misplaced reaction to the flood of new,
original material, which started being unearthed, led to racist concepts and absurdly
anti-humanist theories; these pseudo-intellectual schemes that have nothing in
common with the French Genius were invented in order to prevent the formulation
of conclusions that would tremendously change the incomplete, partly and
therefore erroneous idea we had (and unfortunately still have) about World
History. The era of pioneering Orientalist scholarship lasted until the first
decades of the 20th c.; Franz Cumont, with his leading-edge publications about
Mithraism and the diffusion and prevalence of Oriental religions within the
Roman Empire, was a perfect example.
Later,
-the lack of readiness
to readjust earlier ignorance, irrelevant assumptions, improper world views, and
untrustworthy narratives in the light of new, authentic textual documentation,
which antedated the hitherto extant records by 2000 or 3000 years,
-the false approach to the
conceptualization of World History,
-the absurd adoption of
posterior values and principles as universally valid, and
-the paranoid
motivation to view as the conjectural beginning of History a period of decay
and corruption, which occurred ca. 3000 years after the real start of Human
History,…
… led to a detrimental
intoxication of the academic scholarship. That's why earlier correct
conclusions started being progressively concealed, names of Orientalist series
were changed, and the Orientalist disciplines were kept at the margin of
scholarship, with minimal funding and even less interest for propagation-popularization
of academic discoveries.
The factors of the
Anglo-Saxon distortion of Orientalism struggled hard to minimize the impact that
the bulk of the published Orientalist documentation would have on the basic,
toxic doctrines of the European racism, colonialism, supremacism, and inhuman
bias. In doing so, they found minimal resistance; Martin Bernal with his
illustrious series on the Black Athena, Edward Said with his celebrated
Orientalism, and several other scholars successfully refuted numerous aspects
of the Anglo-Saxon counterfeit Orientalism. However, all these efforts were
partly and uncoordinated; even worse, they concerned only few aspects of the immense
and crucial problem, which affects all the sociopolitical and
educational-academic establishments across the Earth and therefore impacts
negatively on the multilateral perception of today's world.
In any case, it is not
up to an individual, albeit the best Orientalist, to solve this vast problem,
to refute the accumulated falsehood, and to overwhelmingly terminate the colonial
Anglo-Saxon version of fallacious Humanities. It is ostensibly the task of an
enormous college of Savants, who -acting similarly with those of Napoleon but this
time cooperating with Russian, Chinese, Indian, German, and other colleagues-
will put the much-deserved, irrevocable tombstone on the colonial and
discriminatory version of Orientalism, which is still being taught as
anti-scientific discipline and as inhuman Humanities across the Earth. It is
essential at this point to underscore that the counterfeit, colonial
Orientalism stands at the origin of every misunderstanding, confusion, miscommunication
and conflict that may exist between the so-called Western World and the rest of
the world. It also impacts very negatively on the relations among the adepts of
various religions.
The Anglo-Saxon
distortion of Orientalism was calamitous for the Jews. It helped confuse a
great number of Mizrahi, Sephardi and Ashkenazi Jews about their own cultural
identity, intellectual integrity, and historical consciousness; in fact, Jews
have always been an indissoluble part of the Orient. But in Western Europe and
North America, the rising Orientalist misinterpretation of the Orient turned
the 18th and 19th c. Jews into culturally-intellectually altered citizens and
subaltern beings, which were viewed as Oriental elements of the Occident. This
situation opened the way for even worse, more deeply anti-Jewish approaches,
theories and concepts, as per which the Jews would have to accept the most
heretic and pseudo-religious form of Christianity, i.e. Protestantism and its
onerous and venomous ramifications. This ferociously anti-Jewish movement of
Christian Zionists originates from this sickness.
Even Jewish
Orientalists ended up standing toward the ancient Oriental civilizations as
opposite inspectors and foreign explorers, whereas the Ancient Hebrews -and
consequently the Jews- originate from Mesopotamia, Egypt and Iran. As a matter
of fact, the Talmud is an entirely Oriental intellectual-spiritual legacy, as
it was written in Arsacid and Sassanid Iran. It cannot be 'combined' with the
colonially-fabricated, modern Anglo-Saxon world. In this manner, today's Jews,
either Zionist or not, were terribly deceived by Anglo-Saxon Orientalists like
Bernard Lewis (himself a Jew), who failed to realize that (not only the state
of Israel but) the entire Jewry would never be able to solve the problems that
they created in the Orient by arriving there (between the 1880s and 1948 to say
the least) as Westerners.
The Anglo-Saxon
distortion of Orientalism was calamitous for the Christians. The calamities and
the persecution of the Oriental Christians (Syriac Aramaeans, Copts, Armenians,
etc.), either Monophysites (Miaphysites) or Nestorians, must be entirely imputed
to the erroneous version of colonial, Anglo-Saxon Orientalism and all those fooled
diplomats and statesmen of other Christian states who failed to keep all the
Oriental Christian populations in the parts of the Ottoman Empire, Qajar Iran,
and Egypt that were home to them. The viciously anti-Christian plan of the
colonials was geared in order to trigger an unprecedented exodus of these
populations, so that they arrive in the West and become the cannon fodder for
the ferociously anti-Christian states and administrations that they would
serve.
Instead of these series
of genocides that the perfidy of London caused, France should have scrupulously
defended the national emancipation, self-determination, and independence of an
Aramaean state on the territory of today's Lebanon, Syria and Iraq with Syriac
Aramaic as the sole national language and with various ethnic and religious
minorities (Yazidis, Druzes, Alawites, Arabic-speaking Muslims, Shabak,
Mandaeans, Kurmanjis, Soranis, Ahl-e Haq, etc.). Based on the fundamental
principles of the French Enlightenment and Revolution, Paris should strongly
contribute to the nation building effort by developing a National History of
the Aramaeans.
The Anglo-Saxon
distortion of Orientalism was calamitous for the Muslims too. All the
calamities that have befallen on the Muslim world, and subsequently to other
parts of the world, are exclusively due to the abnormal and malignant version
of colonial Orientalism, which stands in total contrast to the ideals and the
principles of the 18th c. French philosophers, and also to the illustrious
Déclaration des Droits de l'Homme et du Citoyen de 1789. Imperceptibly deluded
by their English colleagues, the French Orientalists failed to realize that, by
tolerating, among ignorant Muslim theologians who traveled to the West in the
late 19th and the early 20th c., false, corrupt, and even nonsensical versions
of anti-Ottoman theological discourse based on total misperception of the Quran
and the Hadith, instead of a resourceful sell-criticism, an in-depth reassessment
of all the aspects of the Islamic civilization, and an innovative reinstatement
of Islam's foremost values, concepts and principles, they only tolerated the
formation and expansion of a multi-headed monster of pseudo-Islamic
sectarianism, politicization of the religion, and totalitarian obscurantism far
worse than the worst Muslim ruler.
The real task of every
French Orientalist would have to be
a- the
re-familiarization of the Muslims with their multifaceted heritage,
b- the re-discovery of
their own past, notably the Golden Era of Islamic Civilization (that they had
catastrophically for them and for all the rest forgotten),
c- the Islamic
emancipation and re-education of the Muslims, and
d- the identification
of the corresponding elements, matching points, and similar concepts between
the Islamic Civilization and the French Enlightenment.
The -differently
expressed (as attained within distinct social environments) but genuinely
identical- principles of the two cultural-civilizational entities (namely the
Islamic Civilization and the French Enlightenment in their original nature) would
then bring these two worlds closer in every sense, because the ensuing
interexchange would drastically impact on both of them in a most positive,
creative and fruitful manner, preventing at the same time the derailment of the
Western world toward the present degeneracy and the submergence of the Islamic
world into abject ignorance, detrimental obscurantism, lack of education, loss
of identity, externally imposed divisions, socioeconomic misery, disastrous
dependence on its most ferocious enemies, and externally manipulated extremism.
With respect to the
Islamic world, France -quite unfortunately- failed to understand that in
reality Napoleon did not lose in Waterloo, but when the French Orientalists
were gradually and imperceptibly dragged into the intentionally distorted
Anglo-Saxon misinterpretation of the Islamic ebullience for life, wisdom and
spirituality, which is at the origin of the Golden Era of the Islamic Civilization.
That's why France was not able to prevent the pseudo-Christian and anti-Jewish,
Satanic Evangelical scheme, which is the means by which the entire world is
being subtly coerced into the maelstrom of destruction and extinction. As a
matter of fact, the Anglo-Saxon colonial Orientalist trickery and the stage-management
of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are nothing more than the projection of
their own execrable misery onto the Muslims, the ensuing radicalization of several
Islamist groups, and the subsequently nefarious, but absolutely false, portrait
of Islam that they fabricated.
It is necessary to
underscore at this point that the Anglo-Saxon distortion of Orientalism was also
calamitous for the Parsis, the Hindus, the Buddhists, the Confucians, the
Taoists, and the indigenous African, Asiatic and other adepts of traditional
systems of spirituality, cult and religion.
9- Eliminate
Hellenism as a divisive trickery
If Classicism was a
matter of normalcy for the 17th c. Western European intellectual life, one has
to admit that -already at the beginning of the 20th c.- it consisted in an entirely
obsolete theoretical and academic system, following
a- the decipherment of
the Egyptian hieroglyphics and the Iranian and Assyrian-Babylonian cuneiform
scripts,
b- the access we gained
into millions of texts and documents of the original civilizations, which
constitute the first 'golden generation of mankind',
c- the discovery, study
and comprehension of the fundamental texts of Ancient Sumerian,
Assyrian-Babylonian, Egyptian, Hittite and Iranian Wisdom, and
d- the publication of the
most significant ancient records from Mesopotamia, Egypt, Anatolia, Canaan and
Iran.
The detailed knowledge
of the Oriental civilizations and our deep understanding of the everyday life,
activities, potentialities, achievements and world conceptualization of highly
civilized, wisely structured, intelligently constituted, and universally defined
societies of Mesopotamia, Egypt, Anatolia, Canaan and Iran drastically change
and irrevocably cancel the earlier, narrow, inadequate, and clearly deficient
worldview that the Western Europeans had formed starting with the Renaissance,
based on only Ancient Hebrew (Biblical),Ancient Greek and Latin sources.
Even more importantly,
the new discoveries, which were of unprecedentedly enormous dimensions,
constituted truly original and contemporaneous (with the events that they
detailed) sources – in striking contrast to the History of Ancient Israel, the
South Balkans (falsely named 'Greece'), and the Italian Peninsula, which was a
completely modern, clumsy, and therefore unreliable reconstruction based on
posterior and untrustworthy sources supposedly copied (but quite often
distorted, readjusted or even invented) sources, i.e. medieval manuscripts.
Even worse, the
unearthed and/or deciphered material totally annuls and fully ridicules the
nonsensical stories of the so-called Ancient Greek authors – or those
attributed to them by the medieval monks who 'copied' the manuscripts. The
fraud is of disproportionate dimensions if we only take as example the absurd
lies compiled by Diodorus Siculus (or his later copiers) with respect to the
Behistun inscription that Ctesias had read with the help -and in company- of
Persian courtiers and imperial administrators. Whereas the illustrious
inscription, in three deciphered cuneiform scripts (Babylonian, Elamite and
Achaemenid Iranian), details Darius' victory over his contenders, the fallacious
Sicilian author (not a historian) has attributed it to the Assyrian Queen
Shammuramat (Semiramis) -so to a totally different civilization, language and
script (Assyrian)- who lived and reigned no less than 300 years before Darius!
By preserving and
persisting on Hellenism, the colonial English fraudsters, either Hellenists or
Orientalists, turned the lights of the French Enlightenment and the French
Revolution into a darkness, which was able to distort and actually distorted
the quintessence of the French Genius and the principles that led to the
establishment of the First Republic during which there were no politics but
governance, no parties but popular participation, no corruption but honesty, no
lassitude but action, no swamp but firm land, fresh air, and humanely
innovative spirit.
The Fallacy of
Hellenism was absolutely necessary to the English colonials in order to
a- maintain their impermissible,
racist mentality, behavior, and mindset,
b- enact their ominous
and divisive schemes (of which I already spoke),
c- diffuse their sick
supremacism and therefore contaminate others, notably the French, the Germans,
the Russians, and the Italians,
d- generate the
conditions within which the fake, fabricated divide 'Judeo-Christian civilization
vs. Islam' would be set,
e- make their -fiercely
opposite to one another, but very naïve- victims (the heretic Evangelicals, the
pseudo-Christian Zionists, the Jewish Zionists from one side and the Muslims
from the other side) blindly, ferociously and ominously believe in their own,
eschatologically perceived, 'final' victory over the others (which is something
that not one true and faithful adept of Judaism, Christianity and Islam would ever
accept), and thus
f- prompt the ensuing,
cataclysmic nuclear disaster throughout the Afro-Asiatic continent.
To survive, France has
to get disentangled from the clutches of the ominous ghost of Hellenism, fully
reinstating Napoleon's vision of a universal empire in the light of the newly
acquired Oriental wisdom and Orientalist contributions and according to the
conditions and the requirements of the -apparently multipolar but not yet
decolonized and de-Westernized- world of our times.
10- Eradicate the
fallacy of Panarabism
Similarly with scholars
from other academic fields of the Humanities and the respective areas (which
were targeted with Western colonization), the French Orientalists have been
imperceptibly deceived by the perfidious Anglo-Saxon colonials, who instead of
objectively exploring, studying and describing the historical reality, pre-adjusted
their approach to their interests and distorted or concealed the truth in order
to trigger absurd discord and vicious conflicts at the local and regional
levels, thus turning entire regions (South Asia, Western Asia, and Africa) and
the diverse native populations into socially, educationally and intellectually
disabled communities with enormous complexes of inferiority and mistreatment,
which ended in fratricidal clash and unnecessary fracas.
The silly ideology and
pathetic intoxication of Pan-Arabism was elaborated in the early 20th c. by
ignorant, falsely and contortedly educated individuals, who pursued further 'education'
in the colonial capitals where they were subtly driven to absurd deformation of
historical understanding, calamitous delusion, and fake identity. But then,
turning their dreadful historical hallucination into an absurd political
ideology, they were able to destructively impact on their uneducated fellow
countrymen, after their return back home; this is how few individuals brought
the disaster that we have observed from Morocco to Yemen to Sudan over the past
century.
Pan-Arabism consists in
direct spiritual genocide as it totally destroys the genuine national identity
of hundreds of millions and generates a distorted and inhuman being with no
language, no historical continuity, no cultural integrity, and no true ethnic
consciousness; in other words, Pan-Arabism is the factory that produces
misfortunate humanoids ready for the butchery that the villainous and
perfidious Anglo-Saxon colonials have prepared.
As a matter of fact,
there are few Arabs and only in parts of the Arabian Peninsula; all those who
are deliberately and erroneously called 'Arabs' are mentally defective,
educationally incapacitated, academically disoriented, and socio-politically
deceived masses of automatons that have no past, no proactive sensation of
their historical heritage, no cultural proprioception, no vivacious awareness
of their identity and of what it entails, no 'sentimento storico' (feeling of
historicity), and a total, terminal inability to act -internationally and
geopolitically- as the undisputable descendants of their true ancestors. They
act as malfunctioning beings whose umbilical cord with their past has been
detrimentally cut by a vicious and merciless enemy. Suffice it to compare them
with Iran and the Iranian nation in order to understand the eroding and
destructive force of Pan-Arabism.
Instead of Arabs, there
are:
a- Berbers, Tuareg, and
other Hamitic African nations in Algeria, Morocco, Mauritania, Mali, Niger,
Chad and Libya;
b- Carthaginians
amalgamated with Berbers in Tunisia;
c- Copts, Nubians (in
the South), Berbers (in the Northwest), Beja (in the Southeast), and Bedouin
Arabs (in the Sinai Peninsula) in Egypt;
d- Nubians and other
Nilo-Saharan populations (in the North), Beja (in the East), Furis and other
Nilo-Saharan populations (in the West), and Eastern Cushitic populations that
are familiar to the Ethiopian Oromos (in the central part) of Sudan;
e- Aramaeans (either
Syriac Aramaic-speaking or Arabic-speaking) in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, SE Turkey,
SW Iran, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, Jordan, Palestine, Israel and NW Saudi Arabia
(irrespective of religion: Christians, Muslims, Druzes, Mandaeans, etc.), in
addition to the various ethnic-religious groups that are collectively but
mistakenly called 'Kurds' (namely the Zaza and the Kurmanji in Turkey, the
Kurmanji in Syria, the Bahdinani, Shabak, Yazidi, Sorani, Faili, Ahl-e Haq,
etc. in Iraq, and the Mokri, Gorani, Ardalani, Pehlevani, etc. in Iran);
f- Yemenites and Omanis
in Najran (which has been illegally occupied by Saudi Arabia), Yemen,
Hadhramaut (which was forced to become a Yemenite province), Dhofar (which was
constrained to remain in Oman) and Oman.
The only truly Arab
populations are located in the deserts of Saudi Arabia, and this is so because
over the ages countless Muslims traveled to the Hejaz and settled there and
arranged mixed marriages, thus overwhelmingly changing the demographic balance.
As regards the early Islamic times' Arabs who settled in various lands outside
the Arabian Peninsula, these were so few -if compared with the local
populations- that they truly vanished at the ethnic-genetic and the cultural
levels.
All the populations,
who happen to speak the diverse dialects of Modern Arabic in the aforementioned
lands, are not Arabs but natives, who due to the Islamization, at a certain
moment in the past, got linguistically Arabized, without however becoming Arabs
either at the ethnic-genetic or at the cultural level. That's why all these
states repeatedly undertook successive Arabization campaigns in order to
eradicate local languages, vividly cherished cultures, and an instinctive repulsion
toward any alien element of 'Arab'.
In fact, these
shameless and tyrannical processes were undertaken by colonially subservient
elements that obeyed the rules and the directives of their patrons. As far as
France is concerned, the slow infiltration of the colonial Anglo-Saxon
Orientalism started early (in the 18th c.) and that's why France appeared to be
the paramount beacon of the genocidal Arabization project, whereas this was
exactly the role that the English wanted the French play, and it ended in total
failure everywhere. Had all these populations been 'Arab', they would not have
needed the traumatic experience of the numerous Arabization campaigns, which
blocked any chance for a proper nation-building process to be launched.
For France to comeback
as a major worldwide power, only a fervent decolonization process can bring
groundbreaking results, effectively liberating all these nations from the
present entrapment into the colonial schemes and ingeniously positioning France
as the central factor of worldwide decolonization.
11- Create a great
number of major regional allies by rectifying the mistakes of French
colonialism
Removing the
aforementioned misperceptions, misrepresentations, oversights, and confused
views of several topics, France will have to embark on a new effort of
worldwide radiation by utilizing the bulk of the academic contributions of
French scholars and explorers and by readjusting everything to the constituent
elements of the French Enlightenment, Revolution, First Republic, and 'le
Premier Empire'. It will surely not be a military exploit or a political ruse,
but an overwhelming academic-intellectual-educational-scientific-cultural
effort to remove the present degeneracy and replace it with human ingenuity;
thus France will also put an end to the entire array of absurd concepts that were
diffused over the past 125 years.
France has to create
new, active and forceful groups of social, intellectual and academic pressure
that will serve as vital tools and crucial instruments for Paris to lead the
decolonization effort, which will open the path for France's exit from the EU
and NATO and parallel adhesion to the BRICS and the SCO.
By coordinating,
advancing and implementing the decolonization and de-Westernization agenda that
so many peoples and countries in Asia, Africa, Europe and America yearn for,
France will make the most far-fetched dreams of China, India, and Russia come
true; but at the same Paris will achieve
a- the dissolution of
the UK - with the secession of Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the Wales, and
the subsequent reunification of Ireland;
b- the dismantlement of
Canada - with the annexation of the Québec libre;
c- the obliteration of
Australia - with the gradual takeover by Indonesia and the ensuing
transformation of the austral landmass into an additional province of Jakarta;
and
d- the annulment of the
United States – with the secession of Texas and its merge with Mexico.
In France's grand
demarche for de-Westernization and worldwide emancipation, Paris' major
regional allies have to be:
i- in Africa: Algeria, Nigeria, Congo. Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, and Congo;
ii- in Asia: China, India, Russia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Iran
and Iraq;
iii- in America: Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Peru;
iv- in Europe: Germany, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia and Albania;
It goes without saying
that in its decolonization effort France will have to
1- totally disrespect
the current lawless system of the so-called international law;
2- overwhelmingly
disregard the present borders wherever the needs of the French
de-Westernization and worldwide readjustment project impose a different action;
3- resolutely overlook
the existence of states which did not have to exist in the first place, such as
Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Morocco, Mali,
Niger, etc.;
4- fervently support
the demand for national liberation, self-determination, and independence of
various nations, namely the Berbers, the Tuareg, the Beja, the Oromos, the
Afars, the Baluch, etc. and proactively help them achieve their goals as soon
as possible; and
5- systematically demolish
and delete the previous, colonial Anglo-French consensus in Africa.
A completely new French
establishment has to replace the current destructively deceived (by the
Anglo-Saxon perfidy), entirely defeatist, and gravely anti-French regime, which
is fully unrepresentative, utterly worthless, and ostensibly ailing. As soon as
they come to power, they must have no dreams. There is no international law, and
there has never been a shred of it. This ridiculous term is a pseudo-notion; its
comical appendices and clownish paraphernalia consisted always in an
Anglo-Saxon trickery, a jargon, and a scarecrow useful only to deceive rivals,
fool allies, and blackmail pawns.
There was no
international law at the time of the Carnatic Wars.
There was no
international law at the time of the American Revolution.
There was no
international law at the time of the French Revolution.
There was no
international law at the time of the campagne d'Égypte.
There was no
international law at the time of the Franco-Prussian war.
And there is no
international law now.
As a matter of fact,
the History of Mankind is plainly summarized and irrevocably concluded in the
following statement: any possible act is unquestionably permissible to anyone,
to any country, to any people, and to any new establishment that wants to put a
conclusive end to the Anglo-Saxon colonial pestilence; the sooner one realizes
this, the better.
The root of all the
problems of today's France is the absurd acceptance of a norm that was invented
in order to destroy France and all the major continental peoples and states. Only
people and establishments able to discern clearly and decide resolutely,
irrespective of the cost and the damages, will be able to survive in the years
ahead. Every day that allows the present illegal, unrepresentative, worthless and
destructive regime to stay in place is a day closer to the terminal burial of
France.
12- A secular
international community is not a faithless world
For France to survive
in the years to come, the French state must remain the product of so many
intellectual, social, or military battles. If the principles, the ideals, and
the practices that made of France the country we all know are forgotten or
disregarded, the Hexagon will simply cease to exist. Conventionalism,
conformity, conservatism and bigotry have no place in any French
decision-making venue, and by definition they cannot be tolerated in any scene
and at any level.
If France, the French
people, and the Jacobins became a superb tool at the hands of Napoleon, this is
due to the resolute anticlericalism that stimulated and invigorated the
pioneers of the Enlightenment, who intended to remove the darkness of the
Jesuits and the Vatican. The «fête de l'Être suprême» is the supreme stage of
every secularism. This fact fully demonstrates the reality of all secular
establishments; the concept of the laic state does not exclude but on the
contrary it effectively includes the human perception of the Divine, the
popular piety towards God, the communal devotion to the supreme divinity, as
well as the public acceptance of the numinous dimension of all the members of
the society. A secular or laic state is not the bastion of the atheists, nor
the domain of the godless; simply, it is the realm in which no doctrinal, no theological
and no religious differentiation can possibly play a role in the organization
and the governance of the country.
With the «fête de
l'Être suprême» at the epicenter of the spiritual, intellectual, social and
governmental life, France was closer to the Caesaropapist model of empire, like
the Eastern Roman Empire under Justinian I or the Abbasid Caliphate under Harun
al Rashid than to the ominous and repugnant Papo-Caesarist example of Clovis I
and Charlemagne. This may sound as a historical consideration, but it has a
direct impact on our world: it consists in the only way to cancel the madness
diffused worldwide through the preposterous and treacherous book of Prof.
Huntington about the bogus Clash of Civilizations. A world for all is neither
the place of intransigent theological dogmatism nor the venue for any sort of
woke agenda and forms of sick sectarianism.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Download the article in PDF:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2025/11/21/frances-survival-requires-englands-destruction/
https://archive.org/details/frances-survival-requires-englands-destruction
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/ecrXXUDfku?
https://www.patreon.com/posts/144611207
https://online.fliphtml5.com/qynhg/yiot
https://anyflip.com/fdfzl/tupv
https://pubhtml5.com/jxyro/tpzx/
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_15268
https://www.academia.edu/145195536/Frances_survival_requires_Englands_destruction
No comments:
Post a Comment