Россия, Украина и мир-II: 5000 лет русской азиатской идентичности против 500 лет англо-французского
расизма и колониализма
ul iššakkan salîmu balu mithuṣi
ul ibbašši ṭûbtu balu šitnuni
The peace is not
established without conflict
The good relations
don't come without rivalry
Epic of Tukulti
Ninurta (13th c. BCE)
Мир не устанавливается без конфликта
Хорошие отношения не бывают без соперничества
Эпос о Тукульти Нинурте (13 век до н.э.)
The times when peace
and war alternated and rivalries were transformed into friendly relations
between kingdoms have gone; we don't live anymore in times similar to those of
the great Assyrian Emperor Tukulti Ninurta I {lit. 'My trust is in Ninurta'
(i.e. the divine concept of the Messiah for the Ancient Assyrians); reign:
1243-1207}. Those who are able to understand that World War I, World War II,
and the Cold War were mere phases of the Great Game (Война теней or Большая игра)
can now conclude that the Mankind entered into an undeniably eschatological
clash that can only deteriorate down to the End.
All the perspicacious
observers and the astute commentators do not waste their time in silly
'geo-political analyses' and 'financial charts' or econometrics, because they
know that these bogus-sciences are entirely fake and deceitful. On the other
hand and more importantly, eschatology is not relevant of religion (let alone
theology) but does indeed hinge on Moral; the good, the just and the virtuous
inherently disregard the evil, the promiscuous and the wicked. This is in their
nature. Contrarily, the iniquitous, the vile and the abominable cannot accept
the existence of the Good.
It is therefore
inevitable that Russia 'disturbs'; not because Putin and Medvedev are angelic
beings, but due to
a) the nature of Russia
as the Land par excellence and
b) the character of
Russians as the highest quality people of consciousness.
Contents
I.
The Western Anti-Russian Bias
II.
Skillful Western European Falsification of Russian History
A.
Erroneous contextualization of Archaeology of Northern Asia
B.
Deliberate use of overlapping terms: Northern Asia, Siberia, and Scythia
C.
Prehistory and Ancient History of Northern Asia are subject to modern borders
and to the meaningless attempts for 'national archaeology'
D.
Failure to discern Northern Asia in its entirety and true dimensions
E.
Deliberate, multifaceted distortion of the Asiatic Turanian Migrations
F.
Minimization of the cataclysmic presence and prevalence of the Turanian nations
throughout Eastern Europe
G.
European academia-backed biases: malignant disregard of the spiritual value of
Kievan Rus, and absurd focus on ethnic, racial and linguistic
considerations
H.
Erroneous focus on Kievan Rus and disastrous neglect for Volga Bulgaria
I.
Concealment of the historical reality of the Turanian ('Tatar-Mongol') period
Содержание
I. Западный антироссийский уклон
II. Умелая западноевропейская фальсификация российской истории
А. Ошибочная контекстуализация археологии Северной Азии
B. Умышленное использование совпадающих терминов: Северная Азия, Сибирь и
Скифия.
C. Предыстория и древняя история Северной Азии подчинены современным
границам и бессмысленным попыткам «национальной археологии»
D. Неспособность различить Северную Азию во всей ее полноте и истинных
размерах
E. Умышленное, многогранное искажение азиатско-туранских миграций.
F. Минимизация катастрофического присутствия и распространенности туранских
народов по всей Восточной Европе.
G. Предубеждения, поддерживаемые европейскими академическими кругами:
пагубное пренебрежение духовной ценностью Киевской Руси и абсурдная
сосредоточенность на этнических, расовых и языковых соображениях.
H. Ошибочное внимание к Киевской Руси и пагубное пренебрежение к Волжской
Булгарии
I. Сокрытие исторической реальности туранского («татаро-монгольского») периода
I am not racist either
in my conviction or in my expression; Russians are not a Slavic-speaking,
Christian nation of Eastern Europe, which was incepted before 450 years. This
biased and utterly false definition belongs to the Anglo-French rascals and
their inhuman wickedness. Russians are the multiethnic, multilingual, multi-religious,
and multicultural nation that lives within and outside the borders of Russian
Federation.
I.
The Western Anti-Russian Bias
The English, the French
and the Dutch are ethnically and culturally unrelated to Ancient Romans; but
they intentionally usurped the Roman Heritage while also distorting it.
Even more
preposterously, the English, the French and the Dutch inhabit only a small part
of the lands ruled by the Ancient Romans; but they deliberately attempted to
take control of the lands of the Roman Empire (and of many other territories),
and they did so by means of colonies, proxies, regime change, and history
falsification. This was instrumental for their need to lay a claim to the
heritage of the Roman Imperial.
Contrarily to them,
today's Russians are ethnically and culturally related to the Turanian
(Turkic-Mongolian) nations, the Chinese, the Iranians, the Caucasians, and the
Northern Indians, i.e. all the major Asiatic nations with which they have
interacted for millennia.
Even more importantly,
today's Russians inhabit the lands from where all the ancestors of the
aforementioned nations emigrated to conquer the lands in which they dwell
nowadays. Viewed diachronically, Russians (in both usages: Россияне and Русские)
did not truly invade the lands south and east of Moscow ('Muscovy') and later in
Sibir (Сибирь/Siberia), North-Northeast Asia, and Central Asia, neither did
they assume colonial control over those territories. This is a fallacious
reading of History; this preposterous intellectual forgery was indeed
conceived-elaborated in and propagated first from the heinous and criminal
academic institutions of France, England, and Holland. Interesting reading:
https://www.gazeta.ru/science/2016/11/17_a_10341575.shtml?updated
https://dzen.ru/a/ZApJNqjBN01i_kOx
https://juic.livejournal.com/166659.html
https://kulturologia.ru/blogs/091219/44873/
In fact, what has long
been described as 'Russian Conquest of Siberia, Caucasus and Central Asia' is
an effective attempt to reunify and pacify all the various peoples that had
been endlessly roaming in the northern part of the so-called Euro-Asiatic
landmass.
In reality,
what Genghis Khan achieved
in a most formidable and spectacular manner in the 1100s and the 1200s,
what Genghis Khan's
descendants, and in particular Kublai Khan (志祖 /元世祖:
Shizu of Yuan), attempted to ensure by dividing their forefather's empire in
the 1200s and the 1300s,
what Timur (Tamerlane)
managed to accomplish by establishing an empire from Ganges River to Moscow and
from Western Anatolia to the Altai Mountains in the 1300s and the 1400s, ….
… Ivan the Terrible,
the Stroganovs (Строгановы), and the Romanov (Романовы) were successful to
implement in the 1500s through the 1800s.
This consisted in an
unprecedented achievement and a uniquely outstanding feat, if we take into
consideration the countless invasions, the incessant incursions, the endless
wars, and the detrimental destructions that used to happen for thousands of
years between the Kamchatka Peninsula in the East and Scandinavia and the
Iberian Peninsula in the West.
However, this colossal
achievement of pacification did not correspond to the evil targets of the inhuman
maritime powers of France, England and Holland; quite contrarily, it damaged
their interests irreparably. That is why these criminal states wanted to irrevocably
negate the miraculous Russian triumph; and before they managed to demolish it
in deeds, they have tried to destroy it in words. This is how and why the
Western falsification of the Russian History started. Misperception and partial
approach are at the origin of the racist portrayal of Russia by the Western
academia.
Whereas the Western
European sea powers usurped the Roman past, which does not belong to them,
their political and academic elites do not want to accept that Czarist, Soviet
and Republican Russia represents the summation of 5000 years of Asiatic
civilization, the aggregation of a Turanian-Slavic confederacy, and the paramount
example of peaceful multiculturalism.
Few people realize
today that, even if the inhabitants of Ukraine did not speak a Russian dialect
(which is what is now called Ukrainian 'language'), the colonial powers of the
West would find other victims to hire due to their bribery, corruption, false
promises, and other evil techniques.
It is not the
'Ukrainians' that the criminal Western powers want to defend; not at all! This
is a nave approach. London, Paris, Rome and Washington D.C. fabricate, show,
support and promote the 'Anti-Russians'. If they did not find elements of the
local, Ukrainian, elite to first fool, second upend, and third utilize, they
would pursue their tactics elsewhere.
It is not the 'Ukraine'
that the criminal Western powers want to defend; not at all! This is a nave
approach. London, Paris, Rome and Washington D.C. soil the Earth with the blood
of innocent people caught between the two halves of a vice. The desecration of
the land plays an extremely important role in the schemes of the sea powers.
Any person, who fails to comprehend the evil spiritual agendas that secret
organizations of the West (namely the Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the
Zionists) want to implement, cannot have a clue of what this conflict and the
forthcoming wars are all about.
(Note: If some readers
find it odd that I use the definite article before the name of that land on the
first line of the previous paragraph, they must come to terms with the fact
that this was the original and correct usage in English in this regard. This in
turn makes it automatically clear that Ukraine is not a nation, but a piece of
land. These populations were actually never considered to be a nation before
the 1990s. As a matter of fact, the definite article is prefixed to names of
regions. About the topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Ukraine#English_definite_article)
One should not confuse
between the smokescreen (mainstream media and all the types of political
discourse) used for the useful idiots (the atheists, the materialists, the
evolutionists, the modernists, the consumerists, the rationalists, the
fanatics, the agnostics, and the extremists) and the upper part of the ruling
elites of the Western countries. They are aware -only too well- of their
lawlessness, their iniquity, and their forthcoming end, and they try to
effectively dissipate their sea (i.e. diabolical) nature, nonsensically
shifting the focus on factoids, fake dilemmas, nonexistent concepts, and an
enormous array of misinformation paraphernalia, involving false maps, memes,
figures of speech, and associated techniques.
II.
Skillful Western European Falsification of Russian History
In the previous, first
article of the series, I explained the reasons and the targets of the
systematic academic effort of the Western European powers to portray Russia as
a European country and nation, also stating where it all leads. The article is
here:
Russia, Ukraine and the
World-I: 'Moscou, les Plaines d'Ukraine, et les Champs-Élysées'
Russian Special
Operation in Ukraine: One Year after – 24 February 2023
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2023/03/14/russia-ukraine-and-the-world-i-moscou-les-plaines-dukraine-et-les-champs-elysees/
In the present article,
I will enumerate the critical points of Western European falsification of
Russian History on which the Western Anti-Russian bias is founded.
A.
Erroneous contextualization of Archaeology of Northern Asia
By limiting the study
of prehistoric and early historical periods within modern borders and by
classifying the material record as per modern, otherwise nonexistent terms,
Western archaeologists prevent the adequate exploration of vast spaces within
which human activities, cultures and civilizations were boundless because
simply the modern (Western European) concepts of 'state' and 'borders' are
worthless filth. In the links below, you get a brief impression of the
intentional confusion created around the topic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Asia#History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_Mongolia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_China#Prehistory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Central_Asia#Prehistory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Russia#Prehistory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Tibet#Prehistory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_nomads
Deliberate confusion does
not prevail only in Archaeology; it is also omnipresent, when it comes to
Linguistics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ural-Altaic_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleosiberian_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Uralic_language
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolic_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Para-Mongolic_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungusic_languages
Irrelevant, racist literature:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_North_Eurasian
B.
Deliberate use of overlapping terms: Northern Asia, Siberia, and Scythia
By using terms that are
misplaced in time and by recurring to names attested in later historical
sources, Western historians prevent the accurate understanding and the
comprehensive representation of numerous human societies, cultures, movements, and
migrations; the ensuing conclusions are therefore fragmentary and vague. The
name of the Scythians is first attested in Assyrian-Babylonian and Achaemenid
Iranian cuneiform texts in the 7th–6th c. BCE, but the lack of detailed
topographical information makes the use of the term uncertain.
Similarly, the name of
Siberia (Sibir), which was a Turanian Muslim khanate formed after the
dissolution of the enormous empire of Genghis Khan, cannot be used in
replacement of the correct term 'Northern Asia', because Siberia represents
only a small part of the Eurasiatic landmass' northern circumference. The end
result entails the abysmally wrong theory of Pan-Indo-Europeanism and the
assumption that the Aryans (or Indo-Iranians, Indo-Europeans) are distinct from
the Turkic or Turanian nations. Then, the preconceived, mistaken and absurd
linguistic models are projected onto the diverse archaeological findings only
to lead historians and explorers to the bogus-historical narrative, as per
which no Turanians reached, lived in, and civilized Europe. The links below
reveal only a small part of the erroneous schemes of the Western European
academia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Siberia#Prehistory_and_antiquity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistory_of_Siberia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberia#Etymology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andronovo_culture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%C5%A1kuza
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythian_campaign_of_Darius_I
C.
Prehistory and Ancient History of Northern Asia are subject to modern borders
and to the meaningless attempts for 'national archaeology'
By persistently
implementing a fragmentary approach to archaeological-historical research, by
disaggregating European Bronze Age cultures from the wider Asiatic landmass (of
which Europe is merely a marginal peninsula), and by aptly utilizing the
so-called Kurgan hypothesis to 'demonstrate' that the Indo-European fallacy
exists, the colonialist and racist academia of Western Europe set the
foundations of the falsehood that makes of Russia an 'Eastern European modern
nation'. The dire results involve the division lines between the Russians and
the Turanian nations, the dissociation of Russians from the great Asiatic
civilizations (Mesopotamia - Anatolia, Iran, Indus River Valley, and China),
and the removal of Central Asia from its rightful position as the very
epicenter of World History. About;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Europe#Prehistory_of_Europe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_Europe#Chalcolithic_(Copper_Age)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurgan_hypothesis#Kurgan_culture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurgan_hypothesis#Stages_of_culture_and_expansion
D.
Failure to discern Northern Asia in its entirety and true dimensions
Northern Asia has
always been the pathway crossed by countless nomads, tribes, clans, families
and armies, which sought to either find refuge in the West, i.e. the marginal
confines of the Earth, or chase renegades and lawless fugitives there. This is
how diverse Asiatics ended up in the faraway periphery that is now called
'Europe'. This fact and the innumerable details of the process are at the
origin of what is called Christian-Muslim, Turco-Mongol tradition. However, the
racist Western academia, by failing to see Northern Asia in its correct
dimensions, generated fake divisions between 'Slavs' and 'Turanians',
deceitfully and criminally identifying the former with Christianity and the
latter with Islam. That's nonsense!
Nestorian Christianity
was a major religion in Central Asia, China, India and Northern Asia. More
particularly, there were many Turanian and Mongol adepts of Nestorianism,
notably Dokuz Khatun, the wife of the Great Emperor Hulagu. This means that the
so-called 'Turco-Mongol tradition' existed in reality as early as the 2nd
millennium BCE, in spite of the deceitful scheme of the Western academia to
describe it merely as a later phenomenon dating back to the 12th and the 13th
centuries CE! About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turco-Mongol_tradition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doquz_Khatun
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_the_East
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_Steppe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_eastern_steppe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_central_steppe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_western_steppe
E.
Deliberate, multifaceted distortion of the Asiatic Turanian Migrations
The term 'Barbarian
Invasions' consists in heinous vocabulary and compact historical falsehood; it
does not only reveal the incorrigibly racist mindset and mentality of the
Western European academics and intellectuals, but it also involves a very systematic
concealment of the true dimensions and the correct duration of the World
History's most seminal phenomenon. The fallacious representation of this
millennia-long event by Western colonial historians is fragmentary and
occasional. Whereas this truly momentous historical event generated numerous
states, produced diverse cultures, terminated several empires, and facilitated
the diffusion of diverse religions, the rancorous, biased Western scholars
persistently avoid offering compulsory courses about it. Instead, they
intermittently discuss it as an annex of Iranian, Roman or Chinese History.
This is an outrage.
At the end, people get
the extremely wrong impression that the Asiatic Turanian Migrations occurred in
irregular intervals, whereas they constituted an endless development until the
formation of modern states. In fact, there is no such period as 'Migration
Period'; the History of Mankind is a permanent migration. Furthermore, many
important nations whose migration was recorded in different historical sources
almost never appear in the title of a university seminar in spite of the
existence of vast documentation.
In addition, an
enormous amount of false maps offer a transvestite version of the historical
reality. Few examples of distortion can be found here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_human_migration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period
Presenting
World History as the history of settled populations is the quintessence of
racism.
F.
Minimization of the cataclysmic presence and prevalence of the Turanian nations
throughout Eastern Europe
In fact, from the time
of the Turanian Pazyryk culture (Пазырыкская культура / 600-300 BCE; in the
Ukok plateau of the Altai Mountains), which was erroneously defined as
'Scythian' by the racist Western European academics, an endless process of
migrations created, strengthened, weakened and demolished kingdoms and other
types of state in Central and Western Asia and as far as Central Europe.
Actually, the plains of
Eastern Europe were already inhabited by Turanian nomads as early as the first
years of the Roman Empire; later, the rise of the Turanian Rouran Khaganate (330–555
CE) in Central and Eastern Asia triggered numerous successive migrations
because fleeing nomads forced semi-nomads and other migrants to move further to
the West. The trajectory followed by the Turanian Tiele (Dili) tribes must have
been extremely embarrassing for the disreputable liars of filthy institutions
like the universities of England and France; in and by itself, it reveals much
– and in full rejection of their interpretational schemes.
With the establishment
of the Avar Khaganate (587-825), the rise of the First Turkic Khaganate
(552-603), the formation of the Old Great Bulgaria (632-668) in the area of
modern times' Novorossiya and in the territory of the Donetsk and Luhansk
People's Republics, and with the settlement of the Cuman and Kipchak nomads
throughout the plains of Ukraine and Russia, massive Turanian populations
already inhabited a very large part of Europe. The process only intensified
during the Western Turkic Khaganate (581-742), which functioned also as a
secure passage from Central Asia to Eastern Europe for many nomadic populations.
Impartial and honest
scholars do not need to wait until as late as the 12th and the 13th centuries
in order to make state of the arrival of Turanian / Tatar-Mongol populations in
Eastern Europe; however, the racist Western European academics do not cover
this topic but rather avoid referring to the said period. Unfortunately, this
period is rather presented in a summarizing form. The following topics should
be taken into account, when one examines closely the History of Eastern Europe
from the 1st to the 9th c. CE:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pazyryk_culture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuezhi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_Huns
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiongnu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huns
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars#Etymology_and_origin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rouran_Khaganate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiele_people
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrk_civil_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hephthalites
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Great_Bulgaria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Turkic_Khaganate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Turkic_Khaganate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Turkic_Khaganate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokhara_Yabghus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Turkic_Khaganate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tocharians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumans
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kipchaks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pechenegs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumania
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimek%E2%80%93Kipchak_confederation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Turkic_Khaganate
Also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novorossiya
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novorossiya_(confederation)
G. European
academia-backed biases: malignant disregard of the spiritual value of Kievan
Rus, and absurd focus on ethnic, racial and linguistic considerations
Today for Russians, it
is not Kievan Rus that matters most; it's Volga Bulgaria. All Russians know
very well that, when Ivan the Terrible attempted a series of conquests and
carried out a unification effort, he basically wanted to bring peace to a vast
territory which had already been united under Genghis Khan only to be divided
again among his children and grandchildren. In a way, the closest possible
parallel to Ivan IV's effort was Timur's triumph. None of these two conquerors
undertook a religious war. The famous Oprichnina operation fully demonstrates
that Ivan IV killed more Christians than Muslims. About: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oprichnina
It was only later that
the historical link to the Kievan Rus became preponderant among the elites of
the multiethnic, multilingual and multicultural kingdom of Russia. One has also
to admit that this Russian link -for many long centuries- was never challenged
by any ethnic group, social stratum, or religious/royal authority throughout
the territory of Ukraine. The link to Kievan Rus, although historically valid
and linguistically arguable, did indeed represent only one of the numerous
imperial aspirations that the rising power of Moscow claimed to possess, namely
the eschatological.
In other words, it was
not an ethnic or national declaration but a spiritual-imperial-ecumenical
assertion. And it was quite solemn. Muscovy, as a continuation of the
multiethnic state of Kievan Rus, was not the reconstitution of the same state,
but a continuity from the spirituality of Vladimir the Great (Владимир
Святославич /958-1015; ruled after 980), who was married with (the daughter of
the Eastern Roman Emperor Romanos II and the sister of the Eastern Roman
Emperor Basil II) Anna Porphyrogenita (Анна Византийская - Άννα Πορφυρογέννητη /963-1011;
princess consort after 989), introduced Eastern Roman Orthodox Christianity in
his state, and also adopted Eastern Roman Law (Codex Justinianus/Code of
Justinian, formally Corpus Juris Civilis: "Body of Civil Law"). About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kievan_Rus%27
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianization_of_Kievan_Rus%CA%B9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_the_Great
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Porphyrogenita
Kievan Rus was a
multiethnic principality without ecumenical ambitions; but Christian Orthodox
Muscovy postured as Third Rome, after the Fall of the Eastern Roman Empire
(1453), therefore in absolute opposition to, and detrimental rejection of, the
schismatic church of Rome whose pope had been excommunicated (1054) by the
Patriarch of Constantinople Michael I Cerularius.
The aforementioned
facts are enough for any honest explorer to understand that the true importance
of Kievan Rus lies in spirituality, and not in the ethnic continuity. Any state
that lays claim to Kievan Rus must therefore reject the schismatic Catholic Church
in order to be possibly taken seriously. Today's Russians and Ukrainians are
racially / ethnically unrelated to the ethnically diverse populations of Kievan
Rus. Russians are the offspring of the numerous ethnicities that were
amalgamated over the centuries throughout the space between the river Dniester
and the Kamchatka Peninsula, whereas Ukrainians are Russians with linguistic
particularities due to the fact that the westernmost parts of the Russian
imperial territory had been partly occupied by Poland-Lithuania (formally the Kingdom
of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania; 1569-1795) and Austria-Hungary.
However, any
association with the heretic orders that rule Vatican and the Catholic Church,
any relationship with the modern, anti-Christian states of England, France,
Holland, and the US, and any tolerance towards (let alone adaptation to) the
lawless laws, the blatant immorality, the sexual debauchery and the inhuman
anomaly that prevail in the Western world make any claim to Kievan Rus absurd,
invalid and ludicrous. In fact, the present pseudo-state of Ukraine is at the
very antipodes of the Kievan Rus in every sense.
H.
Erroneous focus on Kievan Rus and disastrous neglect for Volga Bulgaria
As I already said, when
it comes to the History of Russia, Volga Bulgaria is definitely more crucial
than Kievan Rus for the Russians today. This is so because it highlights the
Turanian nature of the Slavs; it underscores Islam's anteriority over Orthodox Christianity
in Eastern Europe, and it also emphasizes the historical reality of the
extensive ethnic amalgamation that took place in Eastern Europe for over more
than two millennia. These conclusions are not new, and I am not the first to
explicitly state these truths, but it will be essential for the Russian
establishment to make of them the standard-bearer of the country's sovereignty
and the pinnacle of the national positioning worldwide.
Volga Bulgaria was
apparently inhabited by Turanian populations and its capital was located at
Bolghar (Болгар), 180 km north of Kazan and more than 900 km east of Moscow. Yet,
one of the foremost Muslim geographers, scholars, and leading magistrates of
the Abbasid Caliphate, Ibn Khordadbeh (ابن خرداذبه; 820–913) wrote in his grand opus 'Book of Roads and Kingdoms'
(كِتَاب
ٱلْمَسَالِك وَٱلْمَمَالِك/Kitab
al Masalik wa 'l Mamalik) that the ruling title of the khan of Volga Bulgaria
was "King of Saqaliba", i.e. 'king of (all) Slavs".
The Iranian Muslim potentate
was writing in Baghdad, but exactly the same details can also be found in the
famous report ('Risala'; الرسالة
/ كتاب
إلى ملك الصقالبة)
that was composed by Ahmad ibn Fadlan, who was not just a mere traveler but the
official delegate of the Abbasid Caliph to the court of Almış, the Great Khan
of the Bulgars. Ibn Fadlan, who was invited by the Khan to preach Islam in his
kingdom, and was the first to do so in Eastern Europe in 922, called the Great
Khan the 'King of Slavs', clearly denoting this ruler's prominence among all
the Slavs. This means that Islam was diffused in Eastern Europe no less than 67
years before the prince Vladimir of Kiev accepted Orthodox Christianity.
It is quite interesting
that the manuscript with the report composed by Ibn Fadlan was found in Mashhad
(NE Iran) by the great Bashkir Turanian scholar, intellectual, activist Ahmed
Zeki Velidi Togan, one of the most prominent Jadid thinkers. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Eilki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alm%C4%B1%C5%9F
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_ibn_Fadlan#The_embassy
https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/أحمد_بن_فضلان
https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/ابن_فضلان
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%B0bn_Fadlan
https://www.librarything.com/work/2153225
https://www.academia.edu/37700548/The_Book_of_Ahmad_b_Fadlan_كتاب_أحمد_بن_فضلان_Книга_Ахмада_ибн_Фадлана_2016_Russian_translation_
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volga_Bulgaria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Khordadbeh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Roads_and_Kingdoms_(Ibn_Khordadbeh)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolghar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bil%C3%A4r
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saqaliba
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batu_Khan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Volga_Bulgaria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Kievan_Rus%27
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Kiev_(1240)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battles_of_the_Mongol_invasion_of_Kievan_Rus%27
https://thestrip.ru/en/materials/etot-narod-otnositsya-k-tyurkskoi-yazykovoi-gruppe-tyurskii-mir-kak/
https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42602705
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lev_Gumilev#Ideas
https://imrussia.org/en/nation/613-split-science
It is however
preposterous to see Western scholars like Hélène Carrère d’Encausse, illustrious
Sovietologist and permanent secretary of the Académie Française, speak about
Batu Khan, Genghis Khan's grandson, and state that he pillaged Kiev(1240),
while shamelessly hiding the fact that the great Turanian conqueror also invaded
and demolished the Muslim kingdom of Volga Bulgaria; in fact, Batu destroyed
Bolghar in 1236 before proceeding to the West and unifying those divided territories
under his pacifying rule.
Even more outrageous is
the attempt of the French academician to intentionally misinform her readers
and audience by saying that only after the Turanian (the term Tatar-Mongol
being inaccurate) conquest of Eastern Europe, Islam was diffused in that vast
region for the first time ("La population installe l'islam"; 07:43/ «Les voyageurs au fil
des siècles. Découverte de l’espace russe» by Hélène Carrère
d’Encausse: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kodw9azYVUI). The truth is that the outright
majority of the Eastern European populations were already Muslims for more than
300 years before the thunderous and superb conquests of the illustrious
offspring of Genghis Khan.
I.
Concealment of the historical reality of the Turanian ('Tatar-Mongol') period
The fallacy of the
so-called 'Tatar-Mongol Occupation of Russia' and its 'annex', namely the
pretended 'Russian Liberation from the Tatars', complete the wicked assemblage
of distorted facts, misinterpreted events, delusional factoids and gibberish
discourse that the racist Western European academics teach as "Russian
History" in their vicious universities. In fact, there is no 'Mongol' but
Turanian presence throughout Eastern Europe; but this started more than seven
(7) centuries before the destruction of Kievan Rus by Batu Khan. The so-called
Mongol invasions were simply an internal Turanian affair. There were no
anti-Christian feelings during the conquest of Kievan Rus, pretty much like
there was no anti-Muslim sentiment during the invasion of Volga Bulgaria.
'Tatar-Mongol' is a
charlatanesque term deliberately used in order to diffuse wrong impressions and
erroneous conceptualization of the historical events; the invading armies were
Turanian. The local populations in Volga Bulgaria, Cuman-Kipchak confederation,
Kievan Rus, Christian Alania, Vladimir-Suzdal, and Khazaria were predominantly
of Turanian origin too. How could one scholar possibly speak of a 'Turanian
occupation of Turanians'? This would be an oxymoron.
For this reason, the
Western European factories of falsehood, which pretend to be 'centers of
learning', produce fake names in order to plunge the non-specialists and the
credulous victims of their propaganda into endless confusion, thus positioning
their deceitful narrative. One can describe the Turanian invasions of Genghis
Khan and his descendants as a 'civil war' among Turanians or even as fratricidal
clashes that spanned across Asia (with Europe being just an Asiatic peninsula).
However, these events, in spite of the great number of casualties, were in
reality merciless conflicts of tribal leaderships; the causes for them were
issues of spiritual purity, moral integrity, Turanian identity, and imperial
honesty.
The racist historians
and the biased intellectuals of the Western European countries lack the
academic ability, the free will, and the fair judgment to view things as they
truly happened and in the way their champions felt them at the time. By
continually projecting their immoral mindsets, worthless values, and conceited
character, they get a shallow understanding of each historical development, and
they always fail to fathom that it did not happen as they could expect or even
imagine. Then, when the historical facts have to be distorted enough in order
to be adjusted to the criminal agendas of the Western European elites and the colonial
governments, their bigotry and partiality reach the level of madness.
The myth of the
'Tatar-Mongol Occupation of Russia' is the key ruse point of the racist Western
historiography about Russia. This is the result of the discriminatory theory of
racial purity. This approach was subtly diffused among Russian academic,
intellectual and political elites over centuries; it forces Russians to believe
that they were initially a small country which later expanded. This is wrong.
Nations are not races with racist elites, but cultural communities organized in
culture-based states that are open to all the inhabitants, and secret
organizations have no right to exist.
Russians must not feel
closer to Kievan Rus than to Volga Bulgaria and the other Turanian states of
Asia and Europe that stretched at the time over today's Russian territory;
preponderantly, Russians are ethnically the offspring of all the Turanian
khanates and nations, which were formed throughout the territory of Russia and
several adjacent states. Slavicization (Russification) came later. Studying the
topic of the Turanian invasions, Russians should not feel sentimentally linked
to Kievan Rus. Their ancestors were truly on both sides of the war.
The 16th c. pledge made
to Kievan Rus by the Muscovite authorities was entirely spiritual and
eschatological, not ethnic – let alone political. This must become crystal
clear, because it will play a decisive role in the much needed, forthcoming
victory of Russia and annexation of Ukraine. Russians today must emancipate themselves
from the czarist need for a European Russia; they have to envision their remote
past as an all-encompassing heritage,
As intentionally racist
fabrication of the Western academia, the so-called 'Tatar-Mongol Occupation of
Russia' is fully refuted and utterly invalidated by historical facts and
sources that the disreputable professors of English, French, Dutch, Belgian, American,
Canadian, Australian and other universities do their ingenious best to hide. In
fact, from the middle of the 13th to the middle of the 16th c., there were no
religious fanaticism, ethnic enmity and social divisions throughout Eastern
Europe.
On the contrary, after
the incorporation of the Kievan Rus, there were frequent mixed marriages at all
levels; as they were fluent in Turkic dialects, numerous Rus princes quite
often got unreservedly married with Turanian princesses, thus getting the favor
of their Emperor of the Golden Horde. There was no rancor and no hatred from
the Christians against the Tengrists and the Muslims and vice versa, in
striking contrast to what the villainous Anglo-French scholars ruthlessly
attempt to represent, further drawing their lines of division. One can publish
endless series of volumes, stating facts and referring to historical sources
that totally discredit the criminal Western European academics, their vicious
fallacies, and their murderous pseudo-historical divisive lines.
A typical example is
the case of the prince Yuri Danilovich (Юрий Данилович; 1281-1340/prince of
Moscow/Muscovy after 1303), who was vassal of the Sultan Giyas al-Din Mohammed
Öz Beg (غیاث
الدین محمد
/Султан Гийас ад-Дин
Мухаммед; 1282-1341; reigned after 1313/also known as Özbeg Khan /Узбек-хан / اوزبیک خان), the great emperor of the Golden Horde. Giyas al-Din Mohammed
was born Tengrist, but accepted Islam before being coronated. Yuri Danilovich
managed to get married with the emperor's sister Konchaka (Кончака; died 1318),
who was authorized to become Christian Orthodox; Yuri Danilovich's loyalty to
the Golden Horde -at the very moment the vast empire adopted Islam as official
religion- fully shows that at the time everything was very different from the
vicious, divisive narrative that Western academics have ceaselessly and shamelessly
have propagated. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Özbeg_Khan
https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/اوزبیک_خان
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Узбек-хан
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Кончака
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yury_of_Moscow
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Юрий_Данилович
Due to the fact that
Rus/Slavic-Turanian Christianity was the Orthodox faith (and not the schismatic
Catholic heresy), the two more systematized faiths were viewed as they truly
are, i.e. quasi-identical, and this facilitated the conversions from either
side. In this regard, a typical example is Tsarevich (Czarevitch) Peter
Ordynsky (i.e. Peter of the Horde; Пётр Ордынский/died 1290), who was also
known as Peter Rostovsky (Пётр Ростовский) or Dair Kaydagul Orda-Ichinov (Даир
Кайдагул Орда-Ичинов); great-grandson of Genghis Khan, nephew of Batu Khan and Berke
(or Birkai) Khan (Бәркә хан;
died 1266), the prince of the Golden Horde was the son of prince Orda-Ejen (or
Orda Ichen) and grandson of Jochi. He accepted Christianity; he was baptized
Peter and he saw formidable spiritual visions. Then, Bishop Ignatius of Rostov {Игнатий
I (епископ Ростовский); died 1288} solemnly declared Peter Ordynsky and Boris
Vasil'kovich brothers under the vaults of the church; the latter was the vassal
-to the Golden Horde- prince of Rostov. Before dying, Peter Ordynsky became a
monk and established a monastery; he was early canonized in 1547. About:
https://ok.ru/group2yamirova/topic/160311655925760
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Пётр_Ордынский
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Борис_Василькович
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Борис_Василькович#Князь_Борис_и_Петр_Ордынский
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Игнатий_I_(епископ_Ростовский)
https://stjohndc.org/en/orthodoxy-foundation/saints/venerable-st-peter-prince-golden-horde
https://pravoslavie.ru/72184.html
https://travelerscoffee.ru/tr/fertilizer/tatary-na-sluzhbe-rossiiskoi-imperii-alina-kabaeva-i-drugie/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berke
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Орда-Эджен
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orda_Khan
https://thestrip.ru/en/glaza/chto-oznachaet-vyrazhenie-poskrebi-russkogo-naidesh/
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rostovskoe-duhovenstvo-i-mongolskie-vlasti-pri-episkope-ignatii
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Игнатий_I_(епископ_Ростовский)
Deceitfully written
text by a supposedly Slavophile pseudo-Orthodox liar of … Anglican/Quaker
background (!!):
https://heavyangloorthodox.blogspot.com/2020/06/righteous-peter-jonon-of-golden-horde.html
Other illustrious cases
of noble intermarriages between Christian Rus princes and Turanian imperial
families involve Gleb Vasil'kovich (Глеб Василькович; 1238-1278), who was the
first prince of Be;loozero (Белозерское княжество; 1238–1486), another small
vassal state of the Golden Horde, and St. Fyodor the Black (also known as Theodore
Rostislavich / Феодор Ростиславич Чёрный; ca. 1233-1299), another vassal of the
Golden Horde and ruler of Smolensk and Yaroslavl, who was later (1463)
canonized. The former got married with one of the daughters of Sartaq Khan (Сартак),
who was the oldest son of the conqueror Batu Khan; and the latter wedded the
daughter of Möngke Temür (or Munkh Tumur/ Мангутемир; died in1280), who was the grandson of Batu Khan.
About:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Глеб_Василькович
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Сартак
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sartaq_Khan
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Фёдор_Ростиславич_Чёрный
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_the_Black
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Менгу-Тимур
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mengu-Timur
I will continue in the
next article of the series; but at this point, I have to conclude that for the
Russians the only path to victory involves
a) an accurate
perception of their historical identity as a non-European, Asiatic Empire, and
b) a resolute rejection
of the misperceptions, the inaccuracies, the distortions and the divisive
sentimentalism that Western colonial historians and academics projected onto
them in order to confuse them and make them unable to exploit in the best
possible manner the chances that History offered to Northern Asia.
Napoleon I Bonaparte,
who failed to win over the Russians, knew it, understood it and said it; but
today's criminal Western regimes do their best to hide the statement.
"Dig up a
Russian and you will find a Tatar!"
Today's Russian
leadership must make the big leap; in it, they will have to combine
- Genghis Khan's
military acumen,
- Tamerlane's martial
ingenuity,
- Ivan IV's imperial
tenacity, and
- Nikolai II's pledge
to Kievan Rus-Third Rome.
But all these mental
faculties, personal advantages, and moral challenges will need to be backed by
the adamant spirituality and the concealed forcefulness that typified Stalin
only 70 years ago.
Yet, it will be up to
the forthcoming Last Czar to manifest the vitality that will irrevocably remove
the Anglo-French perfidy and the Roman outrage from the surface of the Earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment