Russia, Ukraine and the World-I: 'Moscou, les Plaines d'Ukraine, et les
Champs-Élysées'
Russian Special
Operation in Ukraine: One Year after – 24 February 2023
Россия, Украина и мир-I: «Москва, равнины Украины и Елисейские поля»
Российская спецоперация в Украине: год спустя - 24 февраля 2023 г.
Содержание
I- Историческая
справка
II- Западный
колониализм против России: проекция фальшивых концепций и исторической лжи на
российские элиты
III- Западный
уклон: европеизация России как дерусификация
IV- Где
заканчивается заблуждение европейской России?
V- Ложная
идентичность для россиян означает поражение в большой игре (в Войне теней)
VI- Падение
Романовых: из-за ложной концепции «России как европейской империи»
Contents
I- The Historical Background
II- Western Colonialism against
Russia: Projection of Fake Concepts and Historical Falsehood onto Russian
Elites
III- Western Bias: Russia's
Europeanization as De-Russification
IV- Where does the Fallacy of
European Russia End?
V- False Identity for Russians means
Defeat in the Great Game
VI- The Fall of the Romanov: due to
the False Concept of 'Russia as a European Empire'
Before almost 60 years, a famous French song offered the most convincing, artistic yet not academic, proof of the indivisibility that characterizes Moscow and the plains of Ukraine; it was the famous hit 'Nathalie' performed by Gilbert Bécaud (1964). The verses described the case of a flirt between a male French tourist and a female Russian guide.
So legendary this song became, thus breaking the ice of the aptly stage-managed Cold War (just like France under Charles de Gaulle had superbly withdrawn from the otherwise useless NATO 'alliance' one year earlier: on the 21st July 1963) that the famous but purely hypothetical Café Pouchkine (café Pushkin), mentioned in the song's verses as a meeting point for the French tourist and Nathalie, became real in 1999 (Ресторан «Кафе Пушкинъ»).
Actually, it was there that Chirac encountered Putin and created a political friendship that marked the 2000s.
About:
https://kalinareynier.wixsite.com/articles-datcha/post/2015/09/29/nathalie-au-caf%C3%A9-pouchkine
https://kalinareynier.wixsite.com/articles-datcha/post/2019/12/03/le-caf%C3%A9-pouchkine-de-la-fiction-%C3%A0-la-r%C3%A9alit%C3%A9
https://www.leparisien.fr/politique/entre-chirac-et-poutine-une-estime-reciproque-30-09-2019-8162751.php
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Кафе_Пушкинъ
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caf%C3%A9_Pouchkine
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathalie
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathalie_(chanson)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathalie_(song)
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Деланоэ,_Пьер
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Delano%C3%AB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Delano%C3%AB
https://fr.rbth.com/lifestyle/83582-jacques-chirac-liens-russie
Gilbert Bécaud, Nathalie - Жильбер
Беко, Натали
https://ok.ru/video/440517200493
And it is this song that makes state
of the geographical and historical unity that exists between the Red Square and
the plains of Ukraine; when the verses describe the bond between the French
tourist and Nathalie, the respective backgrounds are narrated in order to offer
a spectacular impression of the two lands. In this metaphor, the French tourist
is represented by the illustrious Champs-Élysées Avenue in Paris, whereas Moscow
and the plains of Ukraine speak for Nathalie.
"Moscou, les plaines d'Ukraine
et les Champs-Élysées, οn
à tout melangé et l'on à chanté" (Moscow, the plains of Ukraine, and the
Champs Elysees; we got them all mixed up and we sang).
I- The Historical
Background
Now, this song appears to be the lost
ruin of a remote past; however, this impression is entirely false, being due to
the excessive propaganda made as regards this subject. Ignorant rascals
promoted to 'authors' or 'intellectuals', criminal liars masqueraded as
'journalists' or 'geopolitical experts' produced an enormous volume of
nonsensical trashy literature in support of the undeniable UK-US-NATO involvement
in the purely Russian land named Ukraine.
If Ukraine consists today in the
greatest threat to worldwide peace, this is due to the lack of proper reaction
against the incessant evildoing, which started as early as the 1990s. In fact,
many people are presently able to fathom that the times of Adenauer and de
Gaulle are definitely bygone for Europe; this is due to numerous grave mistakes
which were made by the rather mean and apparently incompetent people who
succeeded these great statesmen. That is why the assessment of what happened in
Ukraine is rather an effort of meditation à la recherche du temps perdu (in
search of the lost time/в поисках утраченного времени).
The problem with the examination of the root causes of the present Ukrainian quagmire is the fact that, if we widen the context of our search, the origin of the trouble appears to be even older. Then, the beginning of the ordeal goes back to the time of Yeltsin, Gorbachev, Khrushchev, Nicholas II Romanov, and Alexander II or rather Peter I (the Great), the boyar (aristocrat) Vasily Golitsyn (1643-1714; Василий Васильевич Голицын) and the Treaty or Perpetual Peace (Вечный мир; 1686), when Russia recovered Kiev from Poland.
Vasily Golitsyn
Background:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Perpetual_Peace_(1686)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Golitsyn_(1643)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Polish_War_(1654%E2%80%931667)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_the_Great
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexis_of_Russia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Romanov
Similarly, we can go back in time incessantly transposing the problem; we can reach the time of Michael of Russia (Михаил Фёдорович Романов; 1596-1645), Filaret (Feodor Nikitich Romanov/ Фёдор Никитич Романов; 1553-1633), Boris Godunov (Борис Фёдорович Годунов; 1552-1605), Nikita Romanovich (Никита Романович; 1522-1586), Ivan IV Vasilyevich (known as The Terrible/Иван Васильевич Грозный; 1530-1584), Ivan III of Moscow (Иван III Васильевич; 1440-1505) who got married with Zoe (renamed Sophia Palaiologina/Софья фоминична Палеолог; 1449-1503), the niece of the last Eastern Roman Emperor with the blessings of the great enemy of Orthodox Christianity, the Pope Paul II.
Sophia Palaiologina
Background:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_of_Russia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarch_Filaret_of_Moscow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Godunov
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikita_Romanovich_Zakharyin-Yuriev
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_the_Terrible
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_III_of_Moscow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Palaiologina
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Paul_II
However,
this method is futile; even if we go back to the time of the so-called Vasily I
of Moscow, who was merely a prisoner of the Emperor Tokhtamysh, the ruler of
the Blue and White Hordes (Тухтамыш/Tuqtamış, توقتمش; 1342-1406),
when Moscow (or Muscovy) was merely a Tatar village, if we refer to the days of
Dmitry Donskoy (Дмитрий Иванович Донской; 1350-1389) and if we direct attention
to the period of Daniil Aleksandrovich (Даниил
Александрович; 1261-1303), the youngest son of Alexander Yaroslavich Nevsky (Александр
Ярославич Невский; 1221-1263) 'prince of Kiev', we consistently encounter
scarce documentation, later sources, excessive postulation, false
interpretation, intentional distortion, concealment of intentions and facts,
undeniable destruction of the material record, sectarian historiography, biased
narratives, and -in one word- complete reconstruction of the historical
evolution.
Background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_I_of_Moscow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokhtamysh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitry_Donskoy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_of_Moscow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Nevsky
Vasily I of Moscow (Василий I Дмитриевич) and Sophia Palaiologina represented on the vestment (sakkos) of Photius (14th c.–1431), metropolitan of Kiev (in Moscow)
The Emperor of the Blue and White Hordes Tokhtamysh as represented in a miniature of the Chronicle of Ivan the Terrible
Tamerlane advancing against Tokhtamysh
But there
was no Ukraine at the time of the Kievan Rus kingdom; no land, no country, no
people and no language of 'Ukraine'. In fact, any person well versed in Slavic
and Russian linguistics knows that this word originates from the term 'krai',
which denotes basically an administrative division in Modern Russian. Present
in most Slavic languages, 'krai' means 'edge', 'territory' or 'region'; in
Czech, it is okraj.
'Ukraina'
means then the border areas or the confine / periphery of a land.
https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/край
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krai
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krais_of_the_Russian_Empire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krais_of_Russia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Ukraine
There were
no Ukrainians at the time of the Kievan Rus kingdom (882-1240) for a very good
reason: there were no 'Russians' properly speaking. The amalgamated populations
of the rather tiny state varied; they were basically Turanian, Slavic, Teutonic
(: German) and Scandinavian. The entirely fake History of Eastern Europe, as it
was fabricated by Western European and North American universities over the
past 200-300 years, involves a great number of disinformation tools. The three
main subjects that the colonial forgers of England, France and America worked
laboriously to effectively conceal are the following:
- the
overwhelming presence of Turanian peoples in Eastern Europe eclipses by far the
existence of nomads and settlers of other origin;
- the early
Slavic populations (Saqaliba) were considered by all historical Islamic authors
as integral part of the Turanian nations;
- the
diffusion of Islam in the wider region of today's Ukraine and European
provinces of Russia antedates the propagation of Christianity in the same
lands; and
- the
fallacy of Europe as a continent.
With respect
to the aforementioned three circles of topics, numerous academic terms have
often been deliberately used in order to distort the truth in front of the eyes
of non-specialized readership. Even worse, scores of scrupulously forged, fake
maps have also been produced and they are abundant in books, scholarly reviews,
mass media, and the Internet, whereas in many cases, simply they are absent,
because they gravely disturb the fabricated myths and the vicious lies that
Western Europe's criminal academics and disreputable universities intend to
present as 'History'. Examples:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kievan_Rus%27
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kievan_Rus%27#/media/File:Location_of_Kyivan_Rus.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kievan_Rus%27#/media/File:Muromian-map.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kievan_Rus%27#/media/File:East_Slavic_tribes_peoples_8th_9th_century.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kievan_Rus%27#/media/File:Varangian_routes.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Ukraine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volga_Bulgaria#/media/File:Volga-Bulgaria.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saqaliba
II- Western
Colonialism against Russia: Projection of Fake Concepts and Historical
Falsehood onto Russian Elites
The
aforementioned reality heavily impacts all forces, regimes and governments,
scholars and journalists involved in the present conflict. This is so because,
before they became active parts in the ongoing military confrontation, they
were entirely formed educationally-intellectually-academically-culturally-ideologically
by means of an enormous amount of forged concepts and historical distortions
(i.e. of so-called 'myths') that they unconsciously accepted and calamitously
believed and which led them to the decisions and the acts that caused the
Ukrainian quagmire. In other words, the Western anti-Russian racism and the
intention of the Western colonial centers to effectively colonize Russia
existed since the late 15th and the 16th centuries; simply this attempt would
not be materialized at the military level but otherwise.
Even more
troublesome is the fact that these destructive concepts and distortions are not
only a matter of our time, but also of the historical past (the last 500-570
years). In other words, this affair concerned many generations of Russians, who
lived and acted, decided and performed under the impact of concepts forged and
distortions made by Western European and North American scholars, diplomats,
statesmen, agents and intellectuals. I don't mention the Ukrainians at all
here, because simply they are Russians, either they like it or not; in
addition, the negation of the Russian identity of the populations that inhabit
the plains of Ukraine is the last propagated Western fallacy and crime.
The victims
of the said propaganda can easily understand the veracity of my previous
statement, if they search in every historical book, every encyclopedia, every
scholarly publication, every review, magazine and newspaper published before
1910 worldwide in order to find the term "Ukrainian nation" or
"nation of Ukraine"; after a long effort, they will fail, because
simply there was never an Ukrainian nation and not one government accepted such
a nonsense before 1910. But this is another issue.
Speaking
about generations of Russians confused and deceived by Western lies and
historical falsehood, I imply mainly that the 'myths' of yesterday generated
the wrong decision-making of today, and the misperceptions of today trigger the
mistakes of tomorrow. There has therefore been a chain of lies (diffused by the
Western powers and believed in Russia) and mistakes (made by the Imperial,
Soviet and Republican establishments) that has lasted for about five (5)
centuries. In fact, it antedates the Romanov dynasty and it foregoes the birth
of Ivan IV the Terrible.
This topic
is not easily identified, let alone understood, by today's Russian academic,
educational, intellectual and political establishment. And it constituted
always an unknown and unscrutinized point that led to divisions, defeats,
troubles or -even worse- failures to exploit splendid opportunities. So serious
it is that it affects the Russians' perception of their true national and
imperial identity. Why? Because this was the foremost target of the pernicious
Western colonial establishments as regards Russia.
All these
distortions and falsifications undertaken by the major centers of power in
Western Europe (Rome, Paris and London) have indeed a common denominator; this
was the Western colonialism, namely the conquest of the world, and the imposition
of vicious and evil intellectual, pseudo-religious, academic, educational,
scientific and sociopolitical establishments, which totally dismantle and utterly
destroy the local culture and civilization, faith and spirituality, traditions
and behavioral systems (the way of life) wherever it is spread. As this
reproach hinges on the criminal acts of the Spaniards, the Portuguese, the
Dutch, the French and the English that are known as the main colonial powers,
many will react pretending that Muscovy/Russia was never colonized.
This is
exactly what Russians never paid attention at! In fact, what I state consists
in a very subtle form of intellectual, academic, artistic, educational,
scientific, ideological, socio-behavioral and imperial/political colonialism.
In fact, the Western colonial establishments composed myths and elaborated
falsifications that they subsequently projected onto the Russians without them
realizing the trap, because they were nominally independent and eventually a
militarily formidable state. The reason for this enduring but unnoticed
development is double:
- first, the
trap appeared as a propulsion, a praise, and a glorification of Russia; and
- second, it
was linked with Russia's apparent modernization, consolidation and
fortification.
III- Western Bias:
Russia's Europeanization as De-Russification
In fact, the
Western colonial establishments diffused numerous false concepts and scores of
historical falsification which would drastically incapacitate the Russian state
(Росийская держава/ Rossiskaya derzhava) from making most of its chances to
prevail worldwide as a Christian Orthodox Oriental state inhabited mainly by
Asiatic and Turanian peoples. Initially, the Western effort took the form of
'taming' or (even more provocatively) 'civilizing' the supposedly brutal
Russians; in other words, they attempted to gradually 'Europeanize' Russia, but
in this case there are four critical parameters, namely
- first, 17th
c. 'Europe' was a nebulous, false, and truly revisionist concept that negated
the true historical evolution from the Scythian, Cimmerian, Celtic, Punic and
Roman Antiquity down to the Fall of Constantinople (1453) and the Treaty of
Tordesillas (1494);
- second,
the concept of 'Europe' was then overwhelmingly rejected by the outright
majority of the European nations, irrespective of ethnic origin, language, religion
(Islam, Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, Protestantism), and state;
- third, in
reality, this bogus-concept was essentially the method of few Western European
powers to colonize the Germans, the Russians, and the numerous other nations of
Eastern Europe, by destroying their cultures, traditions and faiths and by
projecting onto them the vicious and evil falsehood (and version of
bogus-historical narrative) that Rome, Paris and London had fabricated in
straightforward denial of their Christian past; and
- fourth,
cultural Europeanization was aptly confused with scientific-technological
modernization, which was apparently sought after by Russian monarchs, who were willing
to consolidate their vast, apparently Oriental and Asiatic, empire.
Renaissance
and all the subsequent Western European intellectual movements are the epitome
of worldwide revisionism or anti-historical revanchism. However, to fully
comprehend the intertwined nature of Renaissance and Colonialism, one has to
realize that the first to be colonized were the colonial countries themselves,
namely Spain, Portugal, France, Holland and England; this is valid in the sense
that these lands were the first to succumb to the evil and inhuman elites that masterminded,
concocted and later spread the spiritual disease of the Renaissance, thus
taking hold of the local power due to their schemes (initiating kings, noblemen
and priests into evil religious orders).
When it
comes to Russia's enduring Europeanization, which proved to be absolutely
calamitous for all Russians and for the Russian state's natural interests, the
kingdom of France played a great role, already before Peter I the Great (Пётр I/Пётр
I Алексеевич; 1672-1725). From the days of Jacques Margaret (1565-1619),
Jacques Auguste de Thou (1553-1617) and Pyotr Potyomkin (also spelled Potemkin;
Пётр Ива́нович Потёмкин; 1617-1700 / distant relative of Grigory Potemkin,
the 18th c. statesman in whose honor was named the early 20th c. Battleship
Potemkin), dense series of cultural, intellectual and imperial exchanges
started taking place.
First, travelers
wrote about Russia, pejoratively depicting the country and the people as purely
'backward'; simply because corruption, faithlessness, evilness, debauchery and
lawlessness did not have any place in the Russian Empire, and the local morals
had not softened as in Western Europe, Russia appeared to those Western
Europeans as 'uncivilized'. Then, historians and linguists, philologists and
historians of art started therefore writing about the vast empire, which they
wanted to represent as they wished it to be, and not as it truly was. Furthermore,
scores of Italian architects were dispatched to Russia, whereas countless
German princesses married Russian noblemen and princes only to corrupt the land
from the top to the bottom. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Margeret
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Auguste_de_Thou
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Potemkin
http://www.saint-petersburg.com/famous-people/great-italians/
In fact,
what even today's Russians seem to easily forget is that, due to the need of
modernization, several Russian czars opened the way to Europeanization, which
was tantamount to utter de-Russification. Catherine II {1729-1796; Екатерина II;
born as German princess Sophie of Anhalt-Zerbst / София Августа Фредерика фон
Анхальт-Цербст-Дорнбург (Романова)} had to appear at times in the Russian
national costume (also involving veil) and at times in her Western dresses.
About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_the_Great
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Екатерина_II
IV- Where does the
Fallacy of European Russia End?
It caused an
undeniably deep division inside the Russian Empire, because the Christian
priests, monks and laymen reacted to what they considered rather as Satanization
of Holy Russia. If I expanded on the topic, it is due to the fact that the aforementioned
situation still today affects Russia directly. For instance, when Putin speaks
positively about Peter the Great, this constitutes in fact an oxymoron, because
at the same time, the Russian president opposes Russia's Europeanization today.
But this is the whole problem: in fact, Peter 'the Great' (?), in his time, was
acting in the exactly opposite direction from that of Russia's incumbent
president.
I fully support President Putin's efforts to block the spread of Western lawlessness, inhumanity, corruption and putrefaction in Russia; more importantly, the outright majority of the Russians today support him in this effort, irrespective of faith, ethnic origin, language, and culture. However, the truth is that Peter I acted differently (and very mistakenly as per my evaluation), willing to oppose and diminish the role of the Russian Orthodox Church in the Russian education and culture. So, I have to admit that Ivan the Terrible, Tamerlane, Stalin or even Genghis Khan are far more suitable prototypes and heroes for today's Russia in the great national effort to defend the land from the evil intentions of the criminals who rule the West. Then, the fact that this discrepancy obviously exists today only jeopardizes Russia's national interests and clarity as regards the national identity of the great country.
---------------------------------------------------
The greatest Russians of all times: Genghis Khan (above), Timur/Tamerlane (middle) and Stalin (below)
---------------------------------------------------
In a way, it
would make sense if Russia's liberal opposition, which consists in a shame and
a disgrace for all Russians, expanded much on Peter I as the model. If they
want to introduce in Russia today the Western European and North American decadence,
depravity and decay, thinking that this is 'modernization', it is Peter I who took
similar measures before 300 years openly supporting the presence and spread of
Freemasonic lodges in his empire; but this development had negative impact on
Russia's pledge to the Holy Rus, the Kievan kingdom. About:
Putin
compares modern-day Russia to the times of Peter the Great on tsar's 350th
anniversary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pgn0VHAYaM
https://www.academia.edu/695748/Freemasonry_and_the_Occult_at_the_Court_of_Peter_the_Great
https://www.academia.edu/449346/A_Mason_Tsar_Freemasonry_and_Fraternalism_at_the_Court_of_Peter_the_Great
This is a
nonsensical Western propaganda for idiots:
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/putin-endangers-russias-future-just-his-hero-peter-great-did
The
scrupulously elaborated and systematically projected onto all the successive
Russian establishments (Imperial, Soviet and Republican) concept of Russia as a
European nation is the Western countries' most fallacious distortion and most
pathetic falsity about the vast country. It repeatedly damaged gravely the
national interests of Russia. As a forgery, it helps identify the real
intentions of Russia's permanent enemies; to them, Russia would then be 'good'
if limited in a portion of European Russia's territory, let's say in the
triangle St Petersburg, Volgograd and Nizhny Novgorod, thus sending Moscow back
to the 1500s.
The Western fallacy of a 'European Russia' provides with an expiry date for what the Russian Empire has always been. With Russia 'becoming' a state double the size of Ukraine, with the entire Caucasus region in flames, with an independent Tatarstan (enlarged with the annexation of Bashkortostan, Chuvashia and Udmurtia), and with the secession of a Karelia-Komi-Nemets 'state' in the North, the path will be open for the detachment and colonization of Siberia and Northern Asia by the criminal Western European and North American colonial gangsters.
Bashkirs (above) and Tatars (below)
Chuvash (above) and Udmurts (below)
About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatarstan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bashkortostan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuvashia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udmurtia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwestern_Federal_District
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Federal_District
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Caucasian_Federal_District
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Russia
V- False Identity
for Russians means Defeat in the Great Game
In addition
to fallacy, deception, corruption and historical forgery, the existence of
'colonial empires' involves a lengthy and meticulous agenda for all continents,
target prioritization, and -above all- deception continuity and, if necessary,
adaptation. Whereas the British and the French colonial empires were not
dissolved but merely transformed after the end of WW II (with scores of
unsuspicious, credulous, and subservient Asiatics, Eastern Europeans, Africans
and Latin Americans endlessly enrolling to 'study' in the colonial
universities-factories of falsehood), the dissolution of the Russian (or
Soviet) Empire became a constant parameter of the perverse and criminal
expansionism of the Western powers. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union,
they insist on the dissolution of the Russian Federation that they persistently
depict as a 'vast' Russian 'Empire'. To the Russians, this sounds as merely
Western propaganda, and this is right – but only up to a certain extent. Quite
unfortunately and more importantly, this is also historiography, colonial
conceptualization, and foreign policy target.
The 'reason'
that the Western academics, experts, diplomats and statesmen evoke in order to
possibly justify their claims and demands, policies and targets is founded on
the concept of 'European Russia' that they had long created and projected onto
their agents (or interlocutors or sympathizers of 'brothers' or friends) in
Imperial Russia. In 1850 or 1900, these naïve Russians, who believed in the
good intentions of the evil Western administrations, could not understand where
this vicious concept leads to; had they survived until 2022-2023, they would
have understood very clearly the erroneous choice that they had made.
Who were
these agents of the Western establishments?
Sergei Witte
They were
high rank Russian academics, noblemen, generals, and quite often members of the
imperial family; when it comes to German princesses, they were the embodiment
of Russia's Europeanization, because Germans, who are also an Asiatic origin
nation, had been Europeanized, i.e. corrupted, first. Politicians and members
of the State Duma (Государственная дума/Gasudarstvennaya Duma), ministers and even
prime ministers, the likes of Witte (Sergei Witte/Сергей Юльевич Витте;
1849-1915), Stolypin (Pyotr Stolypin/Пётр Аркадьевич Столыпин: 1862-1911,
assassinated) and, last but not least, Kerensky (Alexander Kerensky/Александр
Фёдорович Керенский; 1881-1970), were the leading agents of the Western states
and establishments, not in the sense of payroll agent of foreign countries, but
due to their confusion between modernization and Europeanization.
Alexander Kerensky
Later, after the October revolution, Lev Davidovich Bronstein (also known as Leon Trotsky/Лев Троцкий; 1879-1940) became the main champion of Russia's foremost Europeanization; his paranoid theory of permanent revolution is the quintessence of Western European colonialism. In fact, by this term, Trotsky merely denoted the accomplished status of Asia's, Africa's and Latin America's Europeanization. English colonials had a rather shorter way to describe it: "Make the world England".
https://www.hamiltonfortexas.com/video-6
Villainous rascal and paranoid gangster Lev Davidovich Bronstein, alias Trotsky
It is not a
coincidence that Khrushchev's de-Stalinization also involved Ukraine's
annexation of Russian Crimea; it was apparently due to Khrushchev's latent but
extant Trotskyism. This was also attested in the case of Khrushchev's attempt
to breach the territorial integrity of the Kazakh SSR. About:
Kazakhstan
from the Göktürks (Celestial Turks) and Genghis Khan to the Jadid Intellectuals
to Nursultan Nazarbayev, ch. XVIII unit c:
https://www.academia.edu/85192029/Kazakhstan_from_the_G%C3%B6kt%C3%BCrks_to_Nursultan_Nazarbayev_Illustrated_edition_Album_of_Kazakh_History_with_555_pictures_and_legends_
The following
entry is filled with inaccuracies, oversights, and distortions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_of_Crimea_in_the_Soviet_Union
What matters
most in this regard are not the persons, but the calamitous results brought
about following the projection of this malicious concept onto Russia; one has
also to take into consideration the opportunities that the Russian Empire lost
due to the confusion between technological modernization and Europeanization
that prevailed in the minds of the Russian elites.
A latent form of Trotskyism
To many it
may sound bizarre that Rome, France and England first, and the US at a later
stage, supported and promoted or tolerated the expansion of the Russian Empire
during several centuries (16th-19th) only to plan to split and dismember it at
a later stage; however, this colonial attitude is not strange at all. It only
demonstrates the permanent and menacing character of the Western colonialism.
The Imperial Russian expansion in the Black Sea and the Caucasus regions, in
Northern and Northeastern Asia, and later in Central Asia was aptly utilized by
the colonial powers, England and France, as an instrument necessary for the
weakening of the Ottoman Empire, Safavid-Afshar-Qajar Iran, and Qing China.
A critical moment of the Great Game: the Russian invasion of Samarkand (1868); from the painting of Nikolai Nikolaevich Karazin (Николай Николаевич Каразин; 1842-1908)
To view it
correctly, the inception and the projection of the false concept of 'Russia as
a European Empire' is tantamount to declaration of war against Russia;
historically, it consists in the birth certificate of the Great Game. It
definitely constitutes an act of enmity against Asia in its entirety and against
all the historical nations, cultures, and empires of Asia, which -throughout
the millennia- civilized the barbarians of Asia's most worthless and most
pathetic peninsula: Europe.
VI- The Fall of the
Romanov: due to the False Concept of 'Russia as a European Empire'
In brief,
the subtle but venomous, slow and multilayered projection of the concept of
'Russia as a European Empire' onto the Russian elites prevented the czars from
forging an alliance with the sultan at Constantinople, the shah at Esfahan, the
Great Mughal (Shahanshah-e Hindustan/شاهنشاهی هندوستان) at Delhi,
and the Tianzi (Son of Heaven/天子) at Beijing
in order to set up a common front against the European colonial expansionism in
Asia and drown the colonial gangsters in the sea.
Safavid Iran (early 16th c.)
Qajar Iran (19th c.)
The
aforementioned point alone stands as convincing proof that Russians today must
rewrite their National History, removing Western European revisionism,
distortions, fake concepts, and historical falsehood, in order to allow for a veracious,
true and accurate perception of Russian
History; this would definitely lead to the formation of a consummate,
all-encompassing, and genuine Russian national identity, which would be the
solid foundation of every decision-making process.
An example
of the extremely calamitous impact that a) the false concept of 'Russia as a
European Empire', b) the erroneous perception of the Russian national identity,
and c) the mistaken, hitherto colonially written History of Russia exerted on
the imperial decision-making is Nicholas II's alliance with France and England
before and during WW I. Acting under the confusion triggered by the
aforementioned parameters, the last of the czars, although recently canonized,
led his empire from defeat to defeat, his people to certainly undeserved death,
and his throne to an end.
It is
impermissible for a continental empire to ever make an alliance with maritime
powers, which by definition constitute the embodiment of falsehood, inhumanity,
barbarism, and evilness; this fact leads to destruction, because as an
expression of the sea, i.e. the aboriginal chaos, sea powers play always a
destructive role in the human affairs until they are annihilated – which is
what they always deserve.
World History,
Spiritual Revelation, and Human Civilization are the exclusive domain of
continental empires, land kingdoms, and societies closely related with plains,
plateaus, hills, mountains and valleys. Coastal states existed, but they never
generated civilizations; at their best, they rather reflected the values, the concepts,
the virtues and the principles that were identified, cherished and defended
first by societies developed far from the sea.
In the eve
of what is, conventionally and mistakenly, called World War One (in fact, it is
an episode of the Great Game), Russia and Austria-Hungary were ostensibly continental
empires; Germany and Italy, in spite of their, then recent, colonial expansion
in Africa were continental empires that occupied overseas lands only to prevent
England and France from further enlarging their monstrous colonial empires that
spread death, oppression, corruption and inhumanity worldwide. This means that,
after the disintegration of the Spanish and Portuguese colonial empires, the
only maritime powers were England and France and, to lesser extent, Holland and
Belgium.
Imperial
Russia's misfortunate alliance with Paris-controlled Serbia was an awful trap. All
other circumstances and instances, events and incidents cannot weigh-in on a
proper decision-making, when the fundamental principles and the theoretical
prescriptions impose a resolute approach based on identity consideration, foe
identification, and strategic alliance evaluation.
The alliance
with France and England was for Russia the stupidest decision ever made by any
czar, also consisting in the Act of Death Certificate for the Romanov dynasty.
England, as an island, cannot exist as an independent state as per the criteria
of every historical continental empire. If one takes into account the despise
with which all the great historical rulers and emperors from Sargon of Akkad to
Alexander the Great to Tamerlane looked down at all the islands in general, one
gets conclusive evidence about the worthlessness of the islands in terms of
civilization, spiritual authority, and imperial rule.
Similarly,
ever since her devilish inception, France was the foothold of a maritime
monster that unfortunately Justinian I and General Belisarius failed to
eliminate; the Merovingian myth details in length the abominable deeds of the Quinotaur,
the maritime beast-ancestor of the villainous Merovingian dynasty, thus fully
unveiling the evil nature of that state irrespective of the form that it may
take. Unfortunately, Nicholas II Romanov failed to read the Chronicle of
Fredegar to possibly fathom the Anti-Christian nature and character of the
disreputable state of which he disastrously made Holy Russia an ally! About;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merovingian_dynasty
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronicle_of_Fredegar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinotaur
Quite
contrarily, if Russia was fully and irrevocably perceived as an Asiatic Empire,
the continental dimension of Holy Russia would lead Nicholas II to an alliance
with the Kaiser, the Emperor of Austria-Hungary, the Sultan at Constantinople,
and the Shah of Qajar Iran. This alliance would be the only normal and natural
expression of Russia's historical and geographic identity. The ensuing result
would be of entirely breathtaking and spectacular dimensions.
Having no
apparent need to maintain armies close to the Imperial German,
Austrian-Hungarian, and Ottoman borders, Romanov Russia and Qajar Iran would
eliminate the ahistorical bogus-state of Afghanistan, which is a filthy, devilish
English colonial invention and fabrication (geared to merely weaken Iran); soon
afterwards, no less than five million (5.000.000) Russian and Iranian soldiers
would overwhelmingly invade India, irreversibly obliterating the criminal
colonial presence of England in South Asia, triumphantly liberating the local
multi-ethnic populations, and effectively establishing fraternal relations
among the adepts of all the different religions, cults and faiths.
With the
inevitable defeat and final division of France (between Germany and Italy),
Russian, Austrian-Hungarian and Italian regiments would irrevocably eradicate
the presence of Anglo-French colonials in Egypt, Sudan and the Eastern
Mediterranean. After the prompt pacification of the three continents, an
enormous German-Russian-Spanish-Italian operation would be undertaken against
the 'British Isles' to totally eliminate every notion of insular rule and
independent state in England.
Nicholas I's
total failure to understand the Asiatic nature of Russia throughout the
millennia and his inability to exert continental force against the maritime
powers' treachery, evilness, and putrefaction caused Russians not only a
terrible defeat in WW I, a Civil War, and an unnecessary regime change, but
also a terrible bloodshed during WW II, a Cold War, the needless disintegration
of the USSR in 1991, and ever since, the absolutely unneeded fratricidal
conflict in Ukraine – an entirely Russian land and population that the sea
powers attempt to corrupt.
The maritime powers' evilness is identical with marine erosion; they appear friendly and innocent in order to cheat and they show their true face later. At the end, the Russians will understand the real meaning of the verse: "Moscou, les Plaines d'Ukraine, et les Champs-Élysées". In fact, it has absolutely nothing to do with either the French or the Ukrainians and the Russians. It simply means that in Moscow and in the plains of Ukraine there must be as many brothels, cabarets, night bars, sexual debauchery, and inhuman anomaly as in les Champs-Élysées.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Download the article in PDF:
https://www.academia.edu/98495216/Russia_Ukraine_and_the_World_I_Moscou_les_Plaines_dUkraine_et_les_Champs_%C3%89lys%C3%A9es
No comments:
Post a Comment