В разительном контрасте с «греческими» варварами иранский император Ксеркс I правил самой цивилизованной империей в мире.
By Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
Мухаммад Шамсаддин Мегаломматис
I shared with friends a comment that
I sent to Dr. Kaveh
Farrokh, discussing issues of racist and deliberate falsification of Ancient Iranian
History attested in
Western universities and among scholars who fail to undertake interdisciplinary
studies and be objective and impartial in their research. The cases of the
untrustworthy Ancient Greek sources and Herodotus' felonious narratives are
referred to; more attention is given to illustrious Ancient Greek high priests,
who utterly rejected and denounced Herodotus' 'malignancy'. My introductory
letter and the comment are herewith included, along with many links for further
reading and research.
---------------------------------------------------
Dear All,
This is the congratulatory comment that I sent (9th
April 2022) to the Iranologist Dr. Kaveh Farrokh for his brief but
comprehensive article about the Great Iranian Emperor Hshaya Rshah (Xerxes) I,
who was undeservedly insulted by the inferior and uncivilized Ancient Ionians,
Dorians and Aeolians (the so-called «Greeks»), because of their misery,
insignificance, hatred, nuisance, and abysmal complex of inferiority
toward the world’s most formidable empire of those times (6th-4th c. BCE).
Compared to Xerxes’ magnificent capital
Parsa (erroneously called among the ‘Greeks’ as ‘Persepolis’), the
Acropolis of Athens looked like a stable for horses and the temple at Delphi
looked like a useless kiosk.
At the origin of the pathetic badmouthing
of the illustrious Achaemenid dynasty is Herodotus — not a
Greek, but a Carian (Western Anatolian) trash, a traitor of his own
country (Caria accepted the Achaemenid rule in striking contrast to the
idiotic and barbaric Ancient ‘Greeks’).
All the same, centuries later, Plutarch, High
Priest of the Oracle of Delphi, denounced and denigrated the disreputable
pseudo-historian Herodotus, writing a ca. 10000 words text On
Herodotus’s malignancy. Plutarch was a person incommensurately higher
than all the Ancient ‘Greek’ historians, tragedians and
impious politicians, whom today’s corrupt, vicious,
anomalous (atheist, homosexual, transvestite and incestuous) Western
Europeans and North Americans admire because of their delinquency.
This text, written by a superior
authority (the highest and holiest rank a man could have in
Ancient Greece), fully demolishes many Ancient
‘Greek’ times’ lies and distortions that are still
presented as «History» in the colonial, criminal, racist,
anti-African, anti-Asiatic, anti-Oriental, anti-Islamic,
anti-Christian pseudo-universities of Western Europe and North
America.
More details, links to Wikipedia entries, and
modern translations of Plutarch’s devastating criticism of Herodotus’
nonsensical bogus-History you will find in my comment below!
I attach Kaveh Farrokh’s article that you can
also find here:
Best regards,
Shamsaddin
===============================
Dear Kaveh,
I downloaded and read your concise,
up-to-the-point, and comprehensive presentation. It is a great effort to
effectively debunk the Ancient Greek fallacies about Achaemenid Iran.
I guess that when (p. 27, 4th column, close to
the bottom) you speak of "Egyptian popular/colloquial as well as
hieroglyphic texts", you rather mean "Egyptian Demotic as well as
Hieroglyphic texts". { https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demotic_(Egyptian) }
HERODOTUS - A CARIAN, NOT A GREEK
Speaking of Herodotus, I believe one must stress
one basic point: he was neither an Ionian, nor an Aeolian, nor a Dorian. In
fact, he was not a Greek; he was Carian. He left (or betrayed) his country
because the outright majority wanted to become part of the Empire. If Kerensky
wrote more against the USSR, after he arrived in France (1917), he would be
considered as the 20th c. Herodotus! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Kerensky
THE EGYPTIANS USED THE GREEKS AGAINST IRAN
Personally, I believe that the very intimate and
intricate impact of the Ancient Egyptians on the various peoples and races of
South Balkans and the interconnection of some of them with some Ancient
Egyptian priesthoods are at the very origin of the Anti-Iranian stance of
several Ancient Greek cities-states. Ancient Egypt never had one religion;
there were always incessant religious wars and fights, and at times they took a
very violent form. For instance, the incineration of the defeated Bakenranef
(Bocchoris), last king of the 24th dynasty, by the Cushite Shebitqo gives only
an idea. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakenranef )
The religious division of Egypt is a
millennia-long issue, with the Iwnw (Heliopolitan) priesthood opposing the
spread of the Memphite dogma of Ptah. After the rise of the 18th dynasty (16th
c. BCE), Egypt came to know terrible divisions between the monotheists
(Atenism) and the polytheistic followers of the Theban priesthood of Amun
(Theban Trinity).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenism
For more than 250 years before Cambyses invaded
Egypt, the Theban priests (in their antagonism with their counterparts of
Heliopolis) demanded the help of the Cushite (Ancient Sudanese) kings of
Napata, who moved to Thebes and ruled from both capitals. When Shebitqo's
cousin and successor Taharqa seemed to prevail and reunify the Two Lands (this
was the true name of Ancient Egypt), the Assyrians (who supported the
Heliopolitan priests against the Theban and the Memphite priesthoods)
understood the danger, and -finally- not only intervened but occupied and
annexed Egypt (670, 669, 666 BCE).
The Achaemenids in Egypt (as already in
Babylonia) followed/imitated the Assyrian Imperial policy. They mainly worked
with the Heliopolitan priests; this practice was later reproduced by the
Ptolemies. As many Ancient Greeks traveled to Memphis (in particular) to study,
a bond has been formed, and this can explain to some extent how the Memphite
Egyptian priests incited the Greek cities-states against the Iranians.
GREEKS COMMITTED A SACRILEGE, FIGHTING AGAINST
THE IRANIAN EMPIRE
This issue has always been concealed by biased
modern scholarship, but it is true; the Oracle of Delphi advised for the
acceptance of the Iranian demands.
PLUTARCH, HIGH PRIEST AT DELPHI, DENOUNCED
HERODOTUS' MALIGNANCY
More importantly, in his Moralia, Plutarch
elaborated a 9000+ words essay to decry Herodotus' fallacious pseudo-histories.
The title is 'On the Malignancy of Herodotus'.
This is a goldmine for many unbiased scholars to
use in order to demolish the racist theories as per which the Ancient Greeks
'represented the civilized world' and 'saved Europe from the barbarians'. The
historical truth is the exact opposite. About:
https://el.wikisource.org/wiki/Περί_της_Ηροδότου_κακοηθείας_(Πλούταρχος)
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0352
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Malice_of_Herodotus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moralia
Many biased and racist academics wrote and
expanded already on this topic, which certainly destroys -in and by itself- the
aforementioned racist forgery; they did so in order to discredit Plutarch and
preserve the Western European colonial dogma and Greco-centric model. Even
worse, in Greece (where all pseudo-professors write and teach a militant
version of Greco-centric bogus-History, while ostracizing all the opponents and
challengers), they gave this topic to a young student to write a most partial
'dissertation' about it - probably, as they usually say, 'to defend the
national standpoint'!
https://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/133637/files/GRI-2014-11683.pdf
NEO-NAZI GREEKS IMPOSE THEIR DOGMA IN TODAY'S
GREECE
All the same, nowadays, you can find many
ignorant and racist Greeks, who -failing to adjust the Oracle of Delphi to
their chauvinist and pathetic mindsets- denigrate Ancient Greece's holiest
shrine as 'the Phoenician Oracle' or 'the Luciferians of Delphi'! Fabulous!!
Read:
https://www.triklopodia.gr/περί-πλουτάρχου-κακοηθείας/
No comments:
Post a Comment