BRICS+: Bright or Dark Perspectives of a Block of Countries in the Path to Real or Delusional Multipolarity

БРИКС+: светлые или темные перспективы блока стран на пути к реальной или иллюзорной многополярности

 

When last August, in the XV BRICS summit (22-24.8.2023), it was announced that the five constituent members of the Block (China, India, Russia, and Brazil, as initial members in 2006, with the addition of South Africa in 2010) agreed to admit another six (6) countries, namely Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and UAE (herewith mentioned in alphabetic order; Argentina did not make use of the offer, following the recent presidential elections), the member states ushered the world community in a new era. The groundbreaking decision will be effect January 1st 2024. The development -in and by itself- is neither good nor bad; the outcome will depend on the choices that will be made and the changes that will be implemented with respect to the nature, the status, the function, the targets, and the international role of the Block itself. In fact, right now, all options are open.

Содержание

I - Что такое БРИКС и чем он не является

II - Сильные стороны БРИКС

III - Слабые стороны БРИКС

IV - Расширение БРИКС

V - Что дальше для БРИКС?

VI - Экономические интересы могут быть основой только слабо ассоциированных государств (или Лиги), а не союза государств

VII - Многосторонние организации государств никогда не могут быть созданы как противоположный полюс мировой державы

VIII - Многополярность: реальность или заблуждение?

IX - Многополярность завтра: реальность только через изоляцию однополярного мирового центра

 

Contents

I - What BRICS is and what it is not 

II - Strong points of BRICS

III - Weak points of BRICS

IV - The Expansion of BRICS

V - What next for the BRICS?

VI - Economic interests can be the basis of only loosely associated states (or a League), not a union of states

VII - Multilateral organizations of states can never be established as an opposite pole of a world power

VIII - Multipolarity: a reality or a delusion?

IX - Multipolarity tomorrow: a reality only through the isolation of the unipolar world center

 

What is better or more suitable? Is it wise to enlarge BRICS or to deepen the integration of this block of 11 countries? The challenges are enormous and the repercussions will be cataclysmic for the entire world. This topic has indeed been controversial for some time; Russia, India and Brazil were not enthusiastic about China's incessant suggestions for the "influx of fresh blood". In fact, the decision to invite six emerging market group countries was a compromise; several other states had expressed their wish to join, but after numerous deliberations, for various reasons they were not accepted now.

 

Before new members arrive, the existing partners should define what they truly want BRICS or BRICS+ to be; this issue is still perplex, diverse and vague. In this regard, it is crucial to always recall that the original concept of BRIC (for only four countries) is credited to an Englishman, namely Jim O'Neill (Baron O'Neill of Gatley), who was at the time the chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management; the idea was first expressed within very different context -quite noticeably- in November 2001.

 

However, the governments concerned took some time to explore and evaluate the thought before adapting it to their interests and perspectives; the first high-level meetings started in 2006, and the first formal summit (4 members) was held in Yekaterinburg in July 2009. Everyone today effortlessly understands that the world was very different at the time; meanwhile, the achievements of the 5-country block, although significant for the beneficiaries, were modest at the international level.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_O%27Neill,_Baron_O%27Neill_of_Gatley

https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/archive/building-better.html

 

Consequently, before considering BRICS as the perfect counterbalance to the West (as President Putin stated openly lasst year), it is essential for anyone to accurately understand what BRICS is, what it is not, what it can be, and what it cannot.  

https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-08-23/brics-explores-expanding-its-membership-to-counterbalance-the-west.html

 

I - What BRICS is and what it is not 

BRICS is not an 'organization' like the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization), which is a Eurasian political, economic, international security and defense organization, and the EAEU (Eurasian Economic Union), which is an economic union of several post-Soviet states located in Eurasia. To be constructive and effective in his approach to this topic, an astute observer should dissociate three totally distinct issues:

a- the hitherto achievements of the 5-country block;

b- what BRICS is nowadays; and

c- what BRICS can become in the future.

 

In this regard, what Muhammad Kamal wrote in the Egyptian daily Al Masry al Yom (« نحو عضوية «البريكس; Towards BRICS Membership) is totally inconsistent; worse, his pessimism for Egypt's adhesion to the 5-country block only reflects the wishes of the idiotic and corrupt stooges of Western embassies in Cairo. This type of thought may be disastrous for Egypt. If BRICS did not achieve 'much' in the past, this fact hinges on eventually misplaced worldviews and pointless considerations that the member states may have had. All the same, with a new approach, with an accurate perception of what an expanded BRICS can or cannot become, and with a strong commitment to the interests of these countries' populations, one can certainly mark a spectacular success. https://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/2875518

 

Definitely, BRICS is not an organization; it is not an economic bloc, in spite of the numerous projects launched and materialized, such as the New Development Bank (launched in 2014-2015), the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA), the BRIC Cable (the construction of which has not yet started), joint publications, and various initiatives. Under discussion are issues of paramount importance, namely a potential BRICS payment system and an eventual common currency. It becomes therefore evident that there are slow steps toward a comprehensive partnership.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Development_Bank

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS_Cable

https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/BRICS%20Joint%20Statistical%20Publication-2022.pdf

 

The latest initiative is VII BRICS International School, which will be held by the Russian National Committee on BRICS Research on November 13-18, 2023 in Moscow. About: http://infobrics.org/post/39507

 

Precisely because BRICS is not an organization, they don't have a proper portal, as it happens in the case of existing international bodies like the SCO, the Turkic Union or the African Union. Instead, they have a rudimentary site with basic info, and every annual meeting comes up with a separate, new site. Examples:

http://infobrics.org/

http://infobrics.org/post/39107/

http://infobrics.org/news/summits/

http://infobrics.org/news/brics-plus/

https://brics2023.gov.za/

 

The rest is up to private initiatives, think tanks, research centers, online magazines, and the world's mass media. Examples:

https://kidsnews.top/brics-summit-2022/

https://brics-plus-analytics.org/what-is-bricks-plus/

https://www.bricsmagazine.com/en/articles/what-makes-brics-strong

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/06/21/4-charts-on-how-russians-see-their-countrys-place-in-the-world/

https://intellinews.com/comment-so-what-did-happen-to-that-claimed-turkish-aspiration-to-join-brics-289788/

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-the-future-global-economy-by-gdp-in-2050/

https://www.reuters.com/world/brics-poised-invite-new-members-join-bloc-sources-2023-08-24/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/prime-minister-narendra-modi-on-wednesday-said-india-supports-expansion-of-brics-to-include-new-nations-/articleshow/102982077.cms?from=mdr

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/BRICS

 

As group of countries, BRICS is a heteroclite array of states with certain common interests, but also with very divergent economies, structures and legislations, and partly different socioeconomic visions; until now, no common long-term perspective has been envisaged – let alone agreed upon. This means that the governments of the member states have to seriously consider and scrupulously study how they will manage to set up a common economic space and how to first offer themselves the necessary tools in order to advance in that direction. 

 

Many charts, tables, drawings and tables have been produced in order to highlight to all what BRICS really is; but this approach comprises also a drawback that can cause confusion and misjudgment. This is due to the fact that each visual representation highlights only one aspect of the reality; however one gets a complete idea of the reality, only if one goes through illustrations of all the existing aspects of the reality. One missing diagram about the BRICS is enough to obscure our understanding and confuse our perception.

 

II - Strong points of BRICS

As of end 2023, over 3.3 billion people lived in the BRICS countries, making more than 40% of the world population; BRICS states stretch over 30% of the world's land surface and account for 26% of the global economy. The 5-country block represents 18% of trade in goods and 25% of foreign investment. At this point, we already face some challenges in our effort to quantify the reality. Verifiable facts like the area and the population of a country are undeniable points of reference; the area of a country is measured in kilometers square, whereas the population is estimated in millions or thousands of people. However, when it comes to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of a country, there are two diametrically opposed methods of calculation; the end results may be very divergent.

 

GDP estimates published by financial and statistical institutions are calculated at market or government official exchange rates. But what is called 'Nominal GDP' is stated without taking into consideration the existing differences in the cost of living among the countries. This means that the data presented can vary enormously from one year to another due to fluctuations in the currency exchange rates; but this may be temporary and therefore irrelevant.   

 

That is why GDP (PPP) forecast estimates are to be considered as a better reflection of the economic realities, and of the comparison between two countries; to sort this data and publish their databases, financial and statistical institutions calculate using both, market and government official exchange rates. PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) is a method of measuring that takes into consideration the relative cost of local goods, services and inflation rates of the country.

 

The ensuing difference can be colossal: China's nominal GDP for the year 2023 is 19.37 trillion US$, but the PPP-based GDP of China for the same year is 33 trillion US$; on the contrary, on either case, US GDP amounts to 26.85 trillion US$. As it can be surmised, PPP-based GDP is preferable for comparison; all the same, the size of an economy being also a matter of political propaganda, many Anglo-Saxon institutions deliberately show a predilection for Nominal GDP in order to occasionally show that Russia is not among the top ten economies of the world.

https://www.france24.com/en/business/20230822-size-population-gdp-the-brics-nations-in-numbers

http://brics2022.mfa.gov.cn/eng/tpzx/202206/t20220627_10710527.html

https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/April/weo-report

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)

https://www.statista.com/statistics/254281/gdp-of-the-bric-countries/

https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/real-gdp-purchasing-power-parity/country-comparison/

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/БРИКС

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS

https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/金砖国家

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS

https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/ब्रिक्स

 

III - Weak points of BRICS

Be that as it may, the aforementioned impressive figures about the BRICS are not attested on other occasions; for instance, the total voting quota of the 5-country block in the IMF is only 14.7%, although in 2021 they accounted for about a third of world GDP, a fifth of world trade, about a quarter of direct investment, and their foreign exchange reserves reached 35% of the world's total. This point was highlighted by President Putin in his address to President Xi Jinping on 22nd June 2022.

Приветствие участникам Делового форума БРИКС (Greetings to the participants of the BRICS Business Forum)

http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/speeches/68689

 

On another note, in the US$ 109 trillion world stock market, BRICS represent only a small segment of the world market capitalization (around 20%), whereas the US, which is home to 39 of the 100 largest companies in the world, has more than 40% of the market and the European Union amounts to ca. 11%.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_stock_market_capitalization

https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/stock_market_capitalization_dollars/

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-109-trillion-global-stock-market-in-one-chart/

 

IV - The Expansion of BRICS

On the basis of the above mentioned data, one can understand that the recently admitted six (6) countries do not constitute a major expansion. When it comes to total area (in kilometers square), the six states {Argentina (2.780.400 km2), Saudi Arabia (2.149.690 km2), Iran (1.648.195 km2), Ethiopia (1.104.300 km2), Egypt (1.002.450 km2) and UAE (83.600 km2)} amount to ca. 20% (8768635 km2) of the land surface of the BRICS countries (ca. 40 million km2).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_area

 

Similarly, with respect to population, the six newly accepted states {Ethiopia (107.334.000), Egypt (105.388.000), Iran (85.298.600), Argentina (46.654.581), Saudi Arabia (32.175.224) and UAE (9.282.410)} have a total population of 386.132.815 people, which is around 10% of the current population of BRICS. However, the 11-country block will be home to almost half the population of the world (46%); this marks a significant threshold indeed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_population

 

Similar conclusions we draw concerning the economic indicators of the six newly admitted states and notably their PPP-based GDP; combined the GDP of the six countries {Saudi Arabia (2.300.967 US$ million), Egypt (1.803.584 US$ million), Iran (1.691.819 US$ million), Argentina (1.274.807 US$ million), UAE (890.171 US$ million), Ethiopia (393.847 US$ million)} is around 8.350.000 US$ million; in other words, the six states produce only one seventh (1/7) of the total GDP of the current BRICS member states (56 US$ trillion).

 

This aspect was duly discerned also by those who are accustomed to rather take into account the nominal GDP; that's why they underscored the fact that "Saudi Arabia is the only trillion-dollar economy being added to the BRICS".

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-the-brics-expansion-in-4-charts/

 

Combined the nominal GDP of the six new member states {Saudi Arabia (1.061.902 US$ million), Argentina (641.102 US$ million), UAE (498.978 US$ million), Egypt (378.110 US$ million), Iran (367.970 US$ million), Ethiopia (156.083 US$ million)} amounts to 3.1 US$ trillion; this is about one ninth (1/9) of the nominal GDP of the current BRICS member states (27.7 US$ trillion).

 

If we stop at this point and we do not further explore the manifold aspects of BRICS expansion, we will be left with the idea that, due to necessary compromises, the first major phase of BRICS expansion did not include several other countries, which also expressed the interest to join, notably Algeria, Belarus, Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Venezuela, Vietnam, etc. But this will prevent us from observing a very interesting and crucial aspect of the development. As a matter of fact, this was not particularly highlighted by anyone in the world's mainstream mass media. There is indeed one economic sector in which the present stage of BRICS expansion made a significant breakthrough; this is the energy sector, and more particularly, the Oil production.

 

As a matter of fact, the addition of Saudi Arabia, Iran and the UAE will more than double BRICS' share of global oil production. With six out of the nine top oil producers being BRICS+ member states (Saudi Arabia, Russia, China, Brazil, Iran, UAE), the 11-country block represents 43% of the world oil production.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-the-brics-expansion-in-4-charts/

https://wisevoter.com/country-rankings/oil-producing-countries/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_oil_production

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-worlds-biggest-oil-producers-in-2022/

 

This means that, in spite of the compromises made, BRICS made a big step ahead in preparing their forthcoming transformation from an ill-defined block of countries to a well-defined organization that will change the post-WW II world drastically and irrevocably. As I already said, the concept that they will have to adopt for their alliance is that of the common economic space.

 

V - What next for the BRICS?

Dangling between long term strategy and everyday opportunities, the governments of the 5- or 11-country block can really make of their partnership whatever they want. They can turn it to the tool par excellence for the transformation of the present world; indeed, they can make of the BRICS+ the cornerstone in the foundation of a human world order of unity, equity, justice, lawfulness, concord, and worldwide cordiality. Reversely, they can neglect their imagination, fail to create a vision, ignore their intellect, and thus waste their time.

 

In this regard, it is clear that BRICS+ will be the reflection of the shared vision that the member states, the respective governments, and -above all- the civil societies will initiate. It is therefore essential to avoid extreme optimism or pessimism and to make an effort not to mix a long term perspective with any type of unnecessary political propaganda. The difference can be understood in the following examples:

 

Speaking about Russia’s vision of the BRICS+ format as early as February 2018, Sergey Ryabkov, a noteworthy statesman and Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister since 2008, stated: «we suggest that our partners consider BRICS+ as a platform for developing what could be termed an 'integration of integrations'».

https://brics-plus-analytics.org/what-is-bricks-plus/

 

This sounds as sheer advocacy of the 'single economic space' concept, which leads to economic union. Quite contrarily, Sergei Lavrov (Center for World Politics and Strategic Analysis) and Kirill Babaev (Director of the Institute of China and Modern Asia), both of the Russian Academy of Sciences, in their article «И вширь, и вглубь - Пути укрепления институциональной основы БРИКС» (Both in breadth and in depth - Ways to strengthen the institutional framework of BRICS / Бабаев К.В., Лавров С.В. И вширь, и вглубь // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21. № 5. С. 69–81; https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/vglub-i-vshir-brics/) present a far more realistic approach, opting for the 'common economic space' concept.

 

There are important differences between the two concepts, and it is essential to make this point clear, because the 'single economic space' concept simply cannot work in the case of BRICS, and even more so that of BRICS+. This is exactly what the authors of the aforementioned article do; the question is whether this is enough.

 

VI - Economic interests can be the basis of only loosely associated states (or a League), not a union of states

At this point, taking into consideration the international situation as it is evidently downgrading over the past few years, the governments of the BRICS+ member states must truly become consciously serious in their judgment, drastically bold in their action, and greatly resourceful in their vision before they are soon met with an aggravated deterioration of the world order in which their efforts will unfortunately be irrevocably meaningless.  

 

Although BRICS+ governments are correct in their analyses and conclusions as regards the major structural problems of the world economy, they all apparently fail to understand where the world community is led to; this is due to the prevailing, very confusing, and definitely perplex situation. But the present condition of the world affairs makes of the aforementioned economic problems only a tiny sector of the very grave troubles that currently exist and impact every human across the Earth.

 

Consequently, in spite of the fact that the world economy is in major trouble, all its aspects cannot be tackled independently of the other, grave and thorny, issues of intellectual, academic, educational, scientific, cultural, and socio-governmental order that we are currently facing. As a matter of fact, erroneous intellectual concepts, delusional interpretations of the reality, intentional distortions of World History, ideological aberrations, and overwhelming oppression of indigenous cultures are at the origin of developments that brought the world economy to the brink of collapse. Scientific absurdities, military interventions, and corrupt governmental practices contributed to the overall deterioration, and have therefore to be also taken into consideration.   

 

As far as BRICS+ member states are concerned, there is one word that terminally encapsulates the aforementioned reality in its totality: Western colonialism. What matters in this regard is that this term is not to be identified with only its military, political and economic dimensions.

 

Colonialism is basically a criminal and anti-human development the most crucial dimension of which is cultural; culture determines the psychology of people, nations, ruling classes and governments, and this -in turn- impacts the local economy.

 

In addition to the aforementioned points, there is a critical factor which must also be taken into account: only a union of loosely associated states can ever be successfully established on the basis of economic interests. This is a fundamental condition to retain. As situation, it is due to the fact that states do not exist in themselves, but constitute the receptacle of human activity related to the administration and the governance of the society.

 

Consequently, a number of states can form an effective organization that will impact worldwide developments only on the basis of major decisions taken by conscious peoples and statesmen genuinely representing their societies, which are known for their historically diverse values, distinct moral principles, varied cultural heritage, but shared goals and common vision. But this is much broader than an economic union.

 

The perfect example of failure is in this regard offered by the European Union. The debilitated union of states started before 72 years with the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC; 1952), which was designed to integrate the coal and steel industries in Western Europe (France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg). Evaluated for that purpose, ECSC was good, but it could never progress in the direction of transformation from an economic community to one nation-state.

 

Different peoples do not integrate into one nation-state without a unifying force; this can certainly be a faith, a cult, a worldview or even an ideology, but never economic interests. That is why BRICS+ member states, although they are forced to define how to set up a 'common economic space', have to broaden the box and try to see things as widely as they can.

 

VII - Multilateral organizations of states can never be established as an opposite pole of a world power

In spite of the urgency of their economic demands for new standards and rules or a new world order (as many people say), BRICS+ member states have got to approach the world affairs in a different, far broader, and definitely comprehensive manner. This imperative is due to both, their incomparably enormous size and the undeniable fact that they altogether constitute a worldwide organization with major, not only economic, interests that they have in common. Actually, the troubles that all these countries face at the level of the international trade and world economy are due to

a- political developments that took place over the last70-80 years,

b- two successive World Wars,

c- numerous earlier conflicts,

d- extreme ideological aberrations,

e- preposterous intellectual assumptions,

f- outrageous educational-academic forgeries, and

g- a 5-century long, nefarious and calamitous, colonial legacy.

 

In this case, BRICS+ member states cannot possibly imagine that they are able to rectify a so deeply rooted injustice and inhumanity that prevail worldwide by merely sidestepping the US dollar via

- local currency trading,

- Mbridge (a multi-central bank digital currency platform, which is shared among participating central banks and commercial banks, as it is built on distributed ledger technology in order to enable instant cross-border payments and settlement) or

- other alternative payment routes and methods of de-dollarization.

 

In fact, their true problem is what is accurately called 'the Collective West' in its entirety. The US dollar replaced indeed the British pound as the world’s reserve currency (in 1944 following the Bretton Woods Agreement); it ceased unilaterally to be convertible to gold (in 1971, due to the so-called Nixon shock); and it became the sole currency in which Saudi Arabia is paid for Oil (in 1974, as per the terms of the Saudi Arabia and US Agreement on Cooperation, signed June 8, that made the petrodollar possible, which also known as 'the petrocurrency effect' and 'the petrodollar recycling').

 

However, all these developments consist, truly speaking, in Microhistory, if viewed within a wider context. In fact, they constitute only in the latest episodes of the colonial conquest, contamination and putrefaction, which have progressively enveloped the world. That is why BRICS+ member states must see things within a macrohistorical context and shape their decision making processes accordingly.

 

Precisely because the aspects of the world troubles are so many, BRICS+ member states have to realize that the country, which capitalized on its monetary privilege, namely the petrodollar, did so while also defending all the other aspects of the 5-century long Western predominance, which proved to be catastrophic for the entire world, except for the West European colonial powers and their annexes.

 

As a matter of fact, the historically true definition of the USA is not "the country with the US dollar as national currency", but "the heir of 5-century long, colonial legacy". This is what the US stands for – not just a currency.

 

Indeed, the US dollar is not only the default world currency, but at the same time, the strongest currency of the Western world. All the same, people often tend to forget that the American currency was first one of the strongest in the Western world, then its strongest, and only 'recently' the world's medium of exchange. It is therefore undeniable that, also at the financial and economic level, it represents the 'Collective West'.

 

Due to the successive historical developments, which led the entire Mankind to the present occurrence and on which the US predominance has persistently based its delusional legitimacy, it would be foolish to believe that the US will ever accept the reduction of the systemically omnipotent Western world into merely two or three poles (EU, US, and -eventually- Japan) of a delusional multipolar system composed by them and by the rising, major BRICS+ forces. Nuclear wars of any form are far more plausible to take place than a multipolar world to be potentially formed with the participation of the EU and the US.  

 

To put it in simple words, you can never possibly ask someone, who considers himself as extraordinarily enormous as a 'dinosaur', to condescend to accept few 'cockroaches' as equal; this metaphor does not constitute the exact representation of the reality, but it accurately reflects the mentality of the people who currently run the EU, the US, the UK and their annexes. These forces have by now carried out a fully obvious colonial agenda across the Earth; even worse, they are evidently intending to implement the next parts of the agenda, which has already been proven as inherently unacceptable to the mankind – the majority of the misfortunate inhabitants of the Collective West included. In other words, the world situation is far worse than what most of the foolish or fooled leaders of the BRICS+ member states have imagined.  

 

VIII - Multipolarity: a reality or a delusion?

Discussing about the chances for the emergence of a multipolar world system does not hinge only on a qualitative examination of intentions and a quest for world peace and security; it is not sufficient to only scrutinize the purposes of the decayed and ailing but raucous and rancorous elites of US, Germany, France, England and Italy from one side and assess the aspirations of the ruling classes of China, India, Russia, Brazil and a nebula of several heavily populated countries, namely Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Mexico, Ethiopia, Egypt, Congo, Vietnam, Turkey, Iran, Thailand, Tanzania and South Africa.

 

Despite the undeniable importance of all the aforementioned parameters, there is another factor that determines even more conclusively the outcome of the present cleavage. This pertains to the process of historical developments that brought about the present state of international affairs. There are only specific procedures that allow a multipolar world community to be formed; it cannot rise anytime anywhere.

 

The past eighty (80) years have been characterized by a unipolar system of world governance; this was not the first time in World History in which a very large part of the Earth was under the control of one state (the Neo-Assyrian Empire, Achaemenid Iran, the Abbasid Caliphate, the Mongol Empire of Genghis Khan, the Chagatai Empire of Timur/Tamerlane, etc.) without any other state being able to challenge it.

 

Several political commentators often dare to portray the present period as the first time in which one country 'controlled' almost the totality of the surface of the Earth, but this is definitely a maximalist approach. In fact, as description, it is wrong. As conclusion, it has only a nominal value; this is so because the 'control' was asserted only via various layers of proxies, who were, practically speaking, unable to always govern all the territory that they claimed to possess.

 

It is essential not to confuse the present conjecture with the days that antedated WW II or WW I; many irrelevant historians and inconsistent intellectuals are pleased to draw parallels between 1914 and 2024 or between 1939 and 2024, but they are very wrong, confusing, and dangerously deceitful.

 

Parallels as regards the ensuing consequences or outcome cannot be drawn between a past circumstance and the present occurrence; this is so because people know what came next, after the past circumstance that they take as one pole of the parallel, but only assume that the other pole (namely the present occurrence) will have the same exit (namely a war).  

 

Parallels can be drawn between a past circumstance and the present occurrence only with respect to the anteriority of both moments that are taken as parallels. In this case, we know very well that no unipolar system of world governance existed either in the period 1870-1914 or during the interval between the two world wars.

 

Prior to WW II, the world community revolved around six major poles, i.e. England (as the British Empire), USSR, USA, France, Japan and Germany; the six powers gradually formed two heteroclite groups of allies of which one prevailed in 1945.

 

Prior to WW I, the world community revolved around nine major poles, i.e. England (as the British Empire), the Russian Empire, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, the Ottoman Empire, USA, and Japan. 

 

It is very critical at this point to comprehensively comprehend that those major poles or constituents of the world community did not seek to establish a multipolar system of world governance either in 1914 or in 1939; it is actually necessary to take into consideration the fact that the concept of 'world community' had not yet been formed or formulated as a substitute to the criminal colonial activities of England and France, which attempted to divide Africa, Western and South Asia, and Oceania among themselves.

 

Even worse for the silly raiders of the lost multipolarity, it is even more crucial to take into account that, if a proposal for the establishment of a multipolar system of world governance was made back in 1914, the colonial powers England and France would be the first to reject it. Actually, the criminal gangsters, who always ruled Paris and London and later hijacked Washington D.C., deliberately triggered WW I, by duly utilizing their paranoid Serbian lackeys.

 

Why England and France back in 1914 would vehemently oppose any proposal for the establishment of a multipolar system of world governance is easy to assess; this development would block their effort to terminally dismantle Austria Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, while also effectively carrying out cruel operations of regime change in the German and the Russian Empires.

 

Furthermore, we have to also reckon with the fact that, if someone advanced a proposal as regards the establishment of a multipolar system of world governance back in 1939, he would surely be resolutely reprimanded by the criminal colonial rascals of London and Paris. England and France declared war on Germany, because they did not want to establish a multipolar world community including the USSR, Japan, Germany, and Berlin's ally Italy. As we all know, regime change operations took place in the latter three states in 1945, and 40-45 years later in the (until then greatly marginalized, continually defamed, and shamelessly vilified) USSR.

 

So, to conclude the present assessment, we have to perceive the establishment of the so-called 'world community' and the inception of the 'international law' as mere tricks, intentional schemes, and colonial contrivance deceitfully presented but successfully elaborated by England, France and their successor, namely the US. In fact, on multiple occasions over the past 80 years, it was fully proven that there is no world community, but a perilous jungle inhabited by ferocious monsters, which are more incensed and more devilish than any wild animal, those of the Mesozoic included.

 

The sole reality is this: what the mankind attested for 300 years -from the Carnatic Wars (1740-1763; Anglo-French wars in India) to the end of WW II- was only the rise of the Western colonial powers to world predominance. The world impressively shifted from a multipolar system of world belligerency (with 11 poles, namely Spain, Portugal, England, France, Holland, Austria-Hungary, Russia, the Ottoman Empire, Safavid-Afshar Iran, Mughal India, and Qing China) to a unipolar system of world governance, which can be conclusively described as the Western barbarism and colonial tyranny over mankind.  

 

The above makes clear to all that the termination of a unipolar system of world governance can never happen through negotiations with the central pole of the system; in a Jurassic environment, only idiots would believe in and count on such 'negotiations'.

 

IX - Multipolarity tomorrow: a reality only through the isolation of the unipolar world center

It would be anything between foolish and paranoid to imagine that the forces, which controlled the Western states and elites over the past five centuries, will be ready to yield power to those whom they have been considering, for at least 350-400 years, as targets for conquest and world dominance.

 

BRICS+ member states stand therefore in front of a dilemma: either reject the Western unipolar dominance or capitulate. Since the latter is a non-option, it would be useful to explore the possible ways to reject the barbarian, catastrophic and heinous Western rule. However, before pondering on how the 5-century long colonial impact can be overthrown by the countries that represent ca. 90% of the world population, it would be essential for all of them, and more particularly, for the BRICS+ governments, to specify the sectors in which the rejection of the colonial rule (or unipolar system of world governance) must take place.

 

Because it will be partly functional and basically ineffective, if the BRICS+ member states challenge the Collective West only at the monetary, financial and economic levels, it is imperative for the respective governments to come to an agreement about launching BRICS+ commissions specializing in almost all the sectors for which there are presently fully-fledged UN Specialized Agencies, Programmes and Funds, Research and Training Institutes, Other Entities and Bodies, as well as Related Organizations. A separate commission in Decolonization and De-Westernization should be added, involving groups of study and rejection of all aspects of academic, educational, scientific, intellectual, cultural, moral, behavioral and socio-governmental colonialism.  

 

Following a 6-month period of tense consultations, the commissions and the groups of study should come up with conclusive proposals about the restructuring of all the international bodies, their priorities, works, methods and processes. Effectively backed by a comprehensive refutation of the 5-century long Western colonial order, an overwhelming denunciation of the racist and fallacious Western version of World History, and an all-encompassing condemnation of the preposterous and biased function of the UN for 80 years, BRICS+ member states and all their allies should irrevocably withdraw from all the UN organizations, unequivocally deny any legitimacy to the fake international body, and immediately launch the All Peoples Assembly, as the sole legitimate international body. This will convene initially for an indefinite period of time and institute the fair, just, unquestionably multilateral, and solid international milieu to which all the people worldwide have long aspired. A new Internet will have to be rapidly launched for all the member states totally independently from the US-based legacy system.   

 

This will be tantamount to complete transformation of the BRICS+ into the new international body, which has been badly missing to almost all the people across the Earth. All the employees of the new international body and its specialized agencies, institutes and related organization will have to be proportionally hired on the basis of ethnic origin, language and religion/belief. It will therefore be impossible for a group that constitutes approximately 0.2% of the 8 billion world population to literally invade key positions, promote sectarianism, and thus become the well-justified reason of its own rejection by all the rest.  

 

Subsequently, BRICS+ member states and all their allies will be accepted as members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (CSO), which will turn out to be the de facto guarantee of worldwide peace and security. International relations with the NATO member states, their allies and satellites will be totally severed at all levels, commercial, educational, recreational, academic, intellectual, scientific, technological, economic, social, governmental and military.

 

This abrupt separation will evidently produce a tremendous international economic shock; but the BRICS+-led countries will be able to face the challenge, recover in relatively short time, and adapt in a far better environment totally void of the Western colonial barbarism, horrific criminality, heinous inhumanity, and evil delusions.

 

The Collective West must die and it will die; powerfully quarantined, asphyxiated within its borders, economically collapsed, socially imploded, and irreversibly poisoned by the evil delusions, sick literature, inhuman governance, rotten thoughts, insidious ideas, demented ideologies, corrupt arts, suicidal philosophies, absurd disbelief, and utter nonsense that their supposed spiritual, religious, intellectual and social leaders produced, the Western world will totally perish in the most deserved hecatomb, which will be the price they will pay for the unipolar system of world governance that they imposed and for the plans of human annihilation that they developed.

 

Quite unfortunately for the BRICS+ member states and their allies, there is no alternative; by totally isolating the unipolar world center (namely Canada, USA, UK, EU, Australia and New Zealand), which is what is called the 'Collective West', they will be in a position to effectively install a genuinely representative, peaceful, secure, sustainable multipolar system of world governance, which will extend covering the quasi-totality (ca. 90%) of the world population.

 

The only other possible transition from a unipolar to a multipolar world is nuclear; if the eventually foolish and fooled leaders of the BRICS+ member states do not truly know or do not duly expect this, it will certainly be too bad for them. If they do not act immediately according to the aforementioned description, they will inevitably offer their worst enemies the privilege of a surprise attack. This is so because the Collective West is very close to the point of no return; they reached the stage of irreparable social disintegration. Consequently, their own chance of survival is to trigger further wars abroad. This is actually what these barbarians have always done after 1492; but this time, it will surely be nuclear.

 

All those, who 'calmly' wait for the US presidential elections to take place and -even worse- anticipate the victory of Donald Trump, will be proven as the best, although unpaid, agents of the Collective West among the leadership of the BRICS+ member states.

 

And the establishment of a country, which is hit by a nuclear attack of any type, will have either to cause tremendous nuclear devastation -which involves also terrible collateral damages- or to leave in History the memory of a protracted but failed tenure. It will be a shame and an example to avoid.

 

 ---------------------------------------------   

Download the article in PDF:

https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/08/28/brics-bright-or-dark-perspectives-of-a-block-of-countries-in-the-path-to-real-or-delusional-multipolarity/

https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_13461%2Fall

https://www.academia.edu/123338902/BRICS_Bright_or_Dark_Perspectives_of_a_Block_of_Countries_in_the_Path_to_Real_or_Delusional_Multipolarity

https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/pWCifbU8ku?

https://www.patreon.com/posts/brics-bright-or-110991870

Russia, Ukraine and the World-III: the need for a New UN or how UK, US, France and NATO must be defenestrated from the world

Россия, Украина и мир-III: необходимость новой ООН или как Великобритания, США, Франция и НАТО должны быть дефенестрированы от мира

 

 

Contents

I. Ukraine or Ireland and Switzerland?

II. England, France, and the fake state 'US'

III. Ukraine or Mexico?

IV. UK, France, US and NATO: the Enemies of the Mankind

V. The Fallacy of all Geopolitical Analyses

 

Содержание

I. Украина или Ирландия и Швейцария?

II. Англия, Франция и фальшивое государство «США»

III. Украина или Мексика?

IV. Великобритания, Франция, США и НАТО: враги человечества

V. Ошибочность всех геополитических анализов

 

---------------

 

Earlier Publications: Titles, Dates, Links & Contents

 

From the Pandemic to the Special Operations in Russian Ukraine (3 April 2022)

https://www.slideshare.net/MuhammadShamsaddinMe/from-the-pandemic-to-the-special-operations-in-russian-ukraine

1- A Critical Confrontation between Jesuits and Freemasons

2- The Pandemic and the Jesuit Eschatological Agenda (and how it has advanced throughout the last millennium)

3- The Multiple Dimensions of the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine

4- The Historical Facts

 

My position about Ukraine, Russia, and the Russian Special Operations in Russian Ukraine - in brief (15 April 2022)

https://megalommatis.livejournal.com/25045.html

https://megalommatis.blogspot.com/2022/04/my-position-about-ukraine-russia-and.html

https://ok.ru/megalommatis/statuses/154562853352280

https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_6737%2Fall

https://www.slideshare.net/MuhammadShamsaddinMe/my-position-about-ukraine-russia-and-the-russian-special-operations-in-russian-ukraine-in-brief

1. Many people did not expect it, but I did

2. The plan to split Russia to 5-10 pieces

3. There is no Ukrainian language or nation

4. The negative impact of History

5. If Ukrainians are a nation, then Egypt's Sa'idis are a nation too!

 

Russia, Ukraine and the World-I: 'Moscou, les Plaines d'Ukraine, et les Champs-Élysées' (14 March 2023)

https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2023/03/14/russia-ukraine-and-the-world-i-moscou-les-plaines-dukraine-et-les-champs-elysees/

https://www.academia.edu/98495216/Russia_Ukraine_and_the_World_I_Moscou_les_Plaines_dUkraine_et_les_Champs_%C3%89lys%C3%A9es

I- The Historical Background

II- Western Colonialism against Russia: Projection of Fake Concepts and Historical Falsehood onto Russian Elites

III- Western Bias: Russia's Europeanization as De-Russification

IV- Where does the Fallacy of European Russia End?

V- False Identity for Russians means Defeat in the Great Game

VI- The Fall of the Romanov: due to the False Concept of 'Russia as a European Empire'

 

Russia, Ukraine and the World-II: 5000 Years of Russian Asiatic Identity vs. 500 Years of Anglo-French Racism & Colonialism (21 March 2023)

https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2023/03/21/russia-ukraine-and-the-world-ii-5000-years-of-russian-asiatic-identity-vs-500-years-of-anglo-french-racism-colonialism/

https://www.academia.edu/98873247/Russia_Ukraine_and_the_World_II_5000_Years_of_Russian_Asiatic_Identity_vs_500_Years_of_Anglo_French_Racism_and_Colonialism

I. The Western Anti-Russian Bias

II. Skillful Western European Falsification of Russian History

A. Erroneous contextualization of Archaeology of Northern Asia

B. Deliberate use of overlapping terms: Northern Asia, Siberia, and Scythia

C. Prehistory and Ancient History of Northern Asia are subject to modern borders and to the meaningless attempts for 'national archaeology'

D. Failure to discern Northern Asia in its entirety and true dimensions

E. Deliberate, multifaceted distortion of the Asiatic Turanian Migrations

F. Minimization of the cataclysmic presence and prevalence of the Turanian nations throughout Eastern Europe

G. European academia-backed biases: malignant disregard of the spiritual value of Kievan Rus, and absurd focus on ethnic, racial and linguistic considerations   

H. Erroneous focus on Kievan Rus and disastrous neglect for Volga Bulgaria

I. Concealment of the historical reality of the Turanian ('Tatar-Mongol') period

 

------------------------------ 

 

The present world is very well known; England and France, two formerly great colonial empires that exercised enormous impact on world affairs until recently, simply do not exist. They are absolutely unable to undertake a war either overseas or on the other side of their borders. What people worldwide see today as 'England' or 'France' is a masqueraded façade of a rather nonexistent state, of an entirely fake nation, and an absolutely dysfunctional country. 

 

I. Ukraine or Ireland and Switzerland?

This is something you can easily understand; imagine for instance that Ireland plays the role of 'Ukraine' for England! Assume that Switzerland plays the same role for France!! Picture for yourself that Russia trained for years and systematically armed the two small states' armies, guiding them in attacks against their big neighbors!

 

Try then to evaluate how long either France or England could stand, if also facing the sanctions that Russia does for 13 months already!

 

Assess how long either country could fight against their two small neighbors before their wretched and absolutely worthless economies collapse!

 

In fact, London and Paris would capitulate in a matter of days.

 

Their armies are therefore good for nothing; it is true that they can cause terrible damage to innocent nations that reject the Anglo-French racism, but 'harming another country' does not mean 'being able to undertake a war'.

 

England and France, today, are -in reality- less important than Iran and Turkey.

 

But the critical factor in this regard is that their corrupt elites, which must be eliminated to the last and reduced to homeless beggars, know this fact very well.

 

II. England, France, and the fake state 'US'

The United States is in dire conditions of dismemberment, disintegration, decay and decomposition too. In fact, this insolent country, fabricated following the bloodshed of the persecuted indigenous nations that underwent an abhorrent genocide, ceased to exist in a matter of decades after it was established. It was hijacked.

 

The English bombardment of the First White House (24 August 1814) can tell a thing or two in this regard. In reality, since the early 19th c., the US was transformed from an independent state into a most loathsome tool of the racist forces and the evil organizations that shaped Modern European History. About:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House#Evolution_of_the_White_House

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812#Course_of_war

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_units_of_the_War_of_1812

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_War_of_1812#1814

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of_Washington

 

 Paul M. Rapin de Thoyras, British burning Washington

 1814: watercolor and ink depiction of US Capitol after the burning

If this ominous development did not occur, the US would gradually become the world's largest country (with an area ca. 20 km2) fully absorbing the illegal, lawless and obsolete remnant of colonialism fancifully named 'Canada'. Then there would not be any colonial dimension in the US national decision-making - which was actually the wish of the Founding Fathers; and the country would look like an 'American China', without the well-known interventionist character of every so-called 'American' administration.

 

In fact, the nefarious Western European societies merely 'transferred' their endless and calamitous conflicts in the so-called 'New World', incessantly trying to fully utilize and instrumentalize the US for their interests. Had the US been a truly independent state, Washington D.C. would never participate in the 'two world wars' or the 'cold war', which were -all- coverage operations for the criminal interests of England (aiming to hide what has been called the 'Great Game'). Today, viewing things retrospectively, one can safely claim that for the US to become an independent state, there has first to be a Hispanic-African American revolution in the US, and then the US must set ablaze the Buckingham Palace and turn London to ashes.

 

However, the fact that no one expects today such a development is due to the absolute, compact, and tyrannical control that the-powers-that-be exercise over the truly headless state of the United States of America. The contrasting policies of the Trump and Biden administrations only reflect the opposite tendencies, as Israel from one side and England from the other try to pull the US administrative machine to their side.

 

III. Ukraine or Mexico?

However, because of the aforementioned clash that take place in the political-economic backstage of the US and due to the fact that there is no such thing as 'US national interests' for any person allowed to participate in the American political life, the US is currently in dire condition too.  

 

The only difference between the US and their masters (masqueraded as 'traditional Western European allies') is the fact that America is significantly bigger than the two criminal colonial states that proved to be the scourge of barbarism for the rest of the world.

 

However, one has to admit that the contrast is merely quantitative; this you will understand better, if you postulate that Mexico would play the role of 'Ukraine' for the US! If you start the working hypothesis that Russia or China trained for years and systematically armed Mexicans, also guiding them in attacks against their big neighbor, you will soon unveil a fully concealed, yet very true, vision of reality.

 

With 60-65 million Hispanics living in America, the US army fighting against Mexico in order to stop the attacks emanated from that country's territory would soon face a serious and perplex problem: insecurity in ammunition transportation and local insurgency. If Mexico received an amount of ammunition analogous to that collected by Ukraine in Kiev's ongoing conflict with Moscow, Washington D.C. would speak more often than Putin and Medvedev about nuclear retaliation (against US' southern neighbor).

 

If America was sanctioned by China in the manner Russia has been penalized until now by UK, US, EU and NATO, the entire world would hear the word 'nuclear' more often than our fathers did during the Cuban crisis.

 

This comparative hypothesis helps us conclude that surprisingly the US is unfit for war even with a country the size of Mexico (130 million people, whereas Russia's population makes a total of 145 million people). Just 20 years after the absurd and criminal invasion of Iraq, the US is an impotent, divided, hollow realm of chaos and disorder, paranoia and putrefaction.

 

Similarly with the cases of England and France, the critical factor is that the corrupt American elites know this fact very well; after all, the so-called American elites are Western European elites that settled there. Only ethnic nations are nations; and the filthy rascals of England now this very well. A civic nation is never a nation; it's a band of gangsters. About:

https://www.academia.edu/26177020/Scotland_Civic_Nation_Ethnic_Nation_and_the_Search_for_National_Identity_and_Independence

 

IV. UK, France, US and NATO: the Enemies of the Mankind

And this is Moscow's major problem today; the present administration and Russia's major magistrates and potentates seem not to have understood that the countries, which have been pushing Ukraine for eight years (2014-2022) in a way to force upon Kremlin the decision to carry out the special operation, know that they cannot undertake a war, based on their own forces.  

 

This is the major factor of international relations that all the nations, all the countries and all the governments of the world must reckon with; UK, France, US and NATO can only attempt proxy wars by now. They cannot launch wars, based exclusively on their own armies.

 

This is important for Russians to know; because this means that, if facing such a war, they must terminate it long before it becomes a war of attrition against Russia.

 

This is important for Ukrainians to know; because this means that UK, France, US and NATO -deliberately and intentionally- pushed them to certain death, inevitable disability, material loss, unprecedented destruction, and forced migration (for at least 25% of Ukraine's total population) in order to pursue their own targets and implement their own agendas.

 

UK, France, US and NATO don't give a damn fuck of the lives of the Ukrainians, let alone their well-being! The criminal gangsters of the West pitilessly used all the Ukrainians as expendable material. The life of a Ukrainian for the inhuman gangsters of the West has the value of toilet paper used and disposed of! The sly and coward figureheads of UK, France, US and NATO bribed all those among the Ukrainian statesmen, politicians, businessmen, military, academics and even actors (!!) whom they did not incriminate otherwise for high treason against Ukraine.

 

This monstrously heinous act against all the populations living in Ukraine was perpetrated by the Western gangsters only to destroy the new nation that they promised to fabricate by only accentuating the differences between Russian and Ukrainian – and by ridiculously writing 'Kyiv' instead of 'Kiev'!

 

This is important also for all the other nations to know; because this means that UK, France, US and NATO may one day for the sake of their own targets and survival -deliberately and intentionally- push them to terminal national extinction.  

 

In fact, what happens now in Ukraine can occur in many other lands, locations and spots. But is it worth it?

 

In fact, the worldwide benefit of the hitherto unconditionally carried out (by the blind, heinous, and hysterical Ukrainian 'leadership'), detrimental destruction of Ukraine is that now people all over the world can understand that all conflicts are triggered by the criminal elites of the collapsing colonial powers UK, France, US and NATO.

 

It is essential therefore for all to comprehend that, while they undertake wars, they most probably are -ipso facto- used by the collapsing Western powers, which have no other means of survival than causing proxy wars here and there.  

 

The aforementioned 'alliance' represents the wrong side of History.

 

These countries and their worthless paraphernalia, the likes of Canada, Australia and New Zealand,

a- colonized a very large part of the world,

b- diffused their fake version of historiography,

c- imposed their rotten and villainous culture,

d- inflicted the subjugated nations with the nonsensical teachings of the Western European and North American education and science,

e- robbed the local natural resources, and

f- ultimately tyrannized the highly civilized indigenous populations with repugnant elites, political lackeys, treacherous methods, execrable ideologies, and above all, immoral thinking.

 

The multipolar world back in 1500 was destroyed by Western European colonial powers.

Acting as the only enemies of the Mankind, the UK, France, the US and the NATO intend to continue exploiting all the other nations of the world, ensuring the permanent, worldwide acceptance of their racist dogma and the associated bogus-historical version of Greco-centrism and Euro-centrism, which started with the Renaissance and the genocidal massacres that the anti-Christian colonial butchers carried out first in Mexico and Peru, then in Asia, and later in Africa.  

 

It is an outrage that the ruling classes of UK, France, US and NATO still use widely the racist term 'civilized world' when describing 'themselves', i.e. their fallacious story about Ancient Greece, Rome, and Western Europe. This means that all the rest are barbarians. All the same, the truth is exactly the opposite. The Western European barbarians were feeding on roots and insects when the Ancient Oriental, hitherto unmatched, civilizations flourished in Sumer, Akkad, Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, Hittite Anatolia, China, the Indus River Valley, Cushitic Eastern Africa, Hamitic-Berber Atlas, and Central & Northern Asia. However, this outrage shows at the same time the true root and the real extent of the problem.

 

UK, France, US and NATO will never accept peace, will never come to senses, and will never interact on terms of parity with the rest of the world, before Hellenism, the so-called 'Greco-Roman civilization', Renaissance, Classicism, Euro-centrism and the Occidental World (as a bogus-historical narrative) are not demolished, denounced as White racism, and abolished as bogus-historical dogma. This is so because simply UK, France, US and NATO 'are' the manifestation of this dogma. They don't exist without it; it is this very dogma that created, shaped and developed them.

 

The most biased artwork in World History: Rafaello’s The School of Athens is a fake that gathers in Athens ancient intellectuals, scholars and philosophers who never visited Athens, belonged in different historical periods, shared almost nothing in common, rejected the racist political regime of Athens, and (in the cases of some) were not Greeks (Zoroaster, Averroes). Even worse, the buildings depicted have nothing in common with any structure every built in Ancient Athens. Only a sick imagination or the vicious character of a deceiver could end up in this delusional creation.

All these parts of the Western European 'historical supremacism' are indeed vital units of the academic, educational, intellectual, spiritual, religious, cultural, moral, scientific and behavioral colonialism that the colonial powers have systematically projected onto their colonies and onto the subjugated, colonized nations in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe. Ukraine's attempted derussification (1991-2022) was indeed a repugnant form of colonization. It goes without saying that the villainous Western gangsters intend to carry out similar processes throughout Central Asia, Russia and China in order to complete the colonization process that they started before 500 years.

 

If -suddenly and unexpectedly- one man, by magical force, removes this 'intention' from the minds of the Western elites, the Western countries will automatically cease to be.  

 

These facts demonstrate that Moscow and Beijing may have not assessed correctly the situation in which their true adversaries are and may have failed to accurately identify the true targets of the Western elites. This situation endangers both countries greatly, because it detrimentally affects their decision-making, thus exposing them to ruse and deceit of disproportionate dimensions.

 

V. The Fallacy of all Geopolitical Analyses

In a rather brief article published (about the then recently started conflict) on the 3rd April 2022 under the title 'From the Pandemic to the Special Operations in Russian Ukraine' (https://www.slideshare.net/MuhammadShamsaddinMe/from-the-pandemic-to-the-special-operations-in-russian-ukraine), I expanded on the multiple dimensions of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. More specifically, in addition to the strictly military, economic and political levels of the 13th-month conflict, I mentioned the following dimensions: moral, behavioral, cultural, educational, intellectual, scientific and academic. Writing now, almost an entire year later, I have to also add the religious, ecclesiastical, theological and spiritual aspects of the conflict, which developed meanwhile.

 

Some of the aforementioned dimensions may not look obvious or easy to discern, but the biased reactions, activities, declarations and decisions of the ailing colonial powers (UK, France, US and NATO) are good enough to demonstrate that there is a far more serious problem than a mere clash of interest or prestige/pride.  

 

Nowhere can this Western bias be better attested than in the entirely fake science of geopolitics that the colonial cheater and academic fraudster (Sir ?? !!) Halford John Mackinder (1861–1947) 'invented' as a preposterous manner to possibly 'explain' the overseas English criminality and perfidy. It is quite unfortunate that countries like Russia, China, India, etc. have accepted the fake science and attempted to adapt it to their national interests; this fallacy is severely detrimental to their national interests. In fact, this effort cannot actually be effective and bring positive results because first, the essence of geopolitics is purely arbitrary and second, the national interests of all the countries are confusingly assessed at this time, due to the extensive diffusion of the aforementioned bogus-historical dogma that the Western European colonial academics and intellectuals fabricated in order to defend their racist viewpoint and force the others to speak in their own (Western) terms.

 

Russia, China, Iran, Turkey, India, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, and other countries cannot simply 'insert' the defense of their national interests within a system earlier invented and systematically contrived as per their enemies' interests. It is therefore essential for all of them to realize that there cannot be a "multipolar world" formulated in Western terms; such an attempt would not only be futile but also terribly perilous. This situation demands an explicit denunciation of the Western world not only as a political-economic-military entity, but also as

a- a historical forgery turned to imperative dogma,

b- a discriminatory theoretical system, and

c- a deceptive and hazardous array of fake values. 

 

It goes without saying that the ailing colonial powers (UK, France, US and NATO) will never accept either a "multipolar world" formulated in non-Western terms or a "multipolar world" anyway; under any circumstances whatsoever it is necessary to always take into consideration the fact that the Western world was incepted precisely in order not to tolerate the existence of the rest of the world, let alone a "multipolar world".

 

Before 500 years, there was indeed a multipolar world; it was constituted by Ming China, Mughal Hindustan, Safavid Iran, the Oirats, the Kazakhs, the Uzbeks, the khanates of the Golden Horde, Muscovy, the Ottoman Empire, the Somali Sultanates, several African kingdoms, the Aztecs, the Incas, and the various European kingdoms. It was that multipolar world that the discriminatory theoretical system "Renaissance" was intentionally fabricated to totally destroy.

 

Renaissance unleashed worldwide genocides, unrestrained colonialism of all forms and levels, a vicious denial of the other, and the division of the rest of the world into zones of influence. Even worse, the cruelest intellectual byproduct of the Western European contamination, i.e. Orientalism, was established not to study the 'other' (as various Orientalists purportedly pretended) but to deny to any 'other' the right to self-identification, self-definition, self-description, and self-determination as per the terms of the 'other'. 

 

Orientalism means this: "you are not allowed to think who you are, because I will tell you who you are, and you are forced to either accept it or die".

 

If the 'Scramble for Africa' was debated in the Berlin Conference of 1884, the Western European aggression against the Mankind and the colonial division of the entire world by the Western European racists had started 400 years earlier.

  Scramble for Africa 1880-1913

If this sounds as an overstatement, you can study carefully the terms and the conditions under which the seas and the oceans were divided to Portuguese and Spanish zones by pope Alexander VI in the Treaty of Tordesillas (Tratado de Tordesillas, 7 June 1494).

 

 With the Treaty of Tordesillas (1494), all the seas became either Portuguese or Spanish.

It is therefore crucially important for the major powers of our world, notably Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Kazakhstan, etc., to reject the Anglo-American geopolitical forgery and to react to each and every measure that the Western colonial countries take in order to spread disorder, discord, destruction, decomposition and death across all continents. The denunciation of geopolitics as a nonsensical pseudo-science must take two directions, notably historical and geographical. Zbigniew Brzezinski's The Grand Chessboard (US, 1997) offers an excellent example in this regard. It consists in a preposterous aberration that was published to shamelessly present criminal interests, heinous targets, and clownish lines as a new "science". All the same, the so-called "Eurasian Balkans" is a ridiculous concept, an absurd lie, and a mental disorder.

 

First, historically, the region that was so ludicrously described with the above mentioned term never functioned as a multi-divided area like the Balkans. In striking contrast to the Balkan Peninsula that was often divided among numerous small kingdoms, which did not impact World History, the region absurdly designated as "Eurasian Balkans" is the center of the History of Mankind; actually, almost for five millennia, it was home to some of the world's most formidable empires. Any idiot who would use the fake term and claim such an absurdity should be sent back to first year of university, in the Faculty of History. However, this was well known to the disreputable impostor Brzezinski, who never studied any civilization, culture, language or religion that flourished in the area about which he so peremptorily and so mistakenly spoke.

 

Second, geographically, wherever you arbitrarily draw a line, placing an ellipse of this size on a modern political map of Asia or Africa, you will be able to discover "Balkans" in the sense that many different nations live in so vast territories. This means that throughout Asia, one can find five or six regions of the same size that could –all- be named "Eurasian Balkans"! This does not mean that the various nations living there need nowadays to eventually undertake wars against one another or in opposition to a major state in the same manner colonial structures like Romania, Serbia and Greece declared war before 110 years against the Ottoman Empire.

 

Since the pseudo-scientific nature of geopolitics is quite easily revealed, it is essential for many major powers of our world to draw the conclusion that it is unrealistic under the current conditions to attempt to establish a 'multipolar world'. This is so for the very simple reason that the ailing colonial powers (UK, France, US and NATO) will never accept to participate in it. The only sensible target is to promptly and systematically lead to the creation of two separate entities, namely

a- the truly multipolar world, which will comprise of all the normal and civilized countries of the world except the racist realms of the West – so, more than 90% of the population of the mankind, and

b- the isolated, colonial powers and their satellites (or slaves), i.e. today's Western world involving the UK, France, the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and -last but not least- the stupid governments and statesmen of EU and NATO countries that will commit suicide by following the colonial gangsters and by being cut off from the outright majority of the world, namely part a.

 

For this to happen, Russia, China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia and all the other major nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America need to swiftly, dynamically and irreversibly launch a new United Nations – a truly representative and functional international body with London, Paris and Washington D.C. entirely defenestrated from this world.

--------------------------------------------------   

Download the article in PDF:

https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2023/03/28/russia-ukraine-and-the-world-iii-the-need-for-a-new-un-or-how-uk-us-france-and-nato-must-be-defenestrated-from-the-world/

https://www.academia.edu/99242411/Russia_Ukraine_and_the_World_III_the_need_for_a_New_UN_or_how_UK_US_France_and_NATO_must_be_defenestrated_from_the_world

https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_8657%2Fall