Сирия: где сталкиваются три повестки дня — Большой Израиль, Большой Ближний
Восток и Возрождение Римской империи
Or how the
dismemberment of Syria brings about the end of Iraq, the dissolution of Turkey,
and the disbandment of Iran
Или как расчленение Сирии приводит к концу Ирака, распаду Турции и расформированию Ирана
1935 population map of the French mandate in Syria and Lebanon
The recent developments in Syria
come as a nasty surprise to Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and Benjamin
Netanyahu. If the latter rushed to make a touching comment and take some
credit, this is due to the fact that 'in politics, you always say the opposite
of what truly happened'. In a recently published comment, I explained why
Donald Trump's second election is simply called "American Stupidity".
I then specified the following:
More easily, a prevailing, ruling
force is contained by means of a continuous brake than a ruling force, removed from power,
is repelled at the time of its unbridled anger.
Contents
I.
Introduction
II. The Zionist plan: Greater Israel
and foundation of the Third Temple
III. The Jesuit plan: Greater Middle
East, Jerusalem as Seat of Unified Christianity, and Fusion of Christianity and
Islam into a Satanic, counterfeit faith
IV. The Freemasonic plan: the
Revival of the Roman Empire, the Comeback of Paganism, the Abolition of
Christianity, and the Mass Extermination of Muslims
V. Zionist, Jesuit, and Freemasonic
agendas as Communicating Vessels
VI. The truth about the fall of
Syria
VII. The main losers in Syria:
Donald Trump and China
VIII. Was Bashar al-Assad's fall
inevitable?
A. Syria under the rule of al-Assad
family
B. The colonial formation of the
technical entity 'Syria'
The Kingdom of Syria in 1918
Содержание
I. Введение
II. Сионистский план: Великий Израиль и основание
Третьего Храма
III. Иезуитский план: Большой Ближний Восток, Иерусалим
как место единого христианства и слияние христианства и ислама в сатанинскую,
поддельную веру
IV. Масонский план: Возрождение Римской империи,
возвращение язычества, отмена христианства и массовое истребление мусульман
V. Сионистские, иезуитские и масонские программы как
сообщающиеся сосуды
VI. Правда о падении Сирии
VII. Главные проигравшие в Сирии: Дональд Трамп и
Китай
VIII. Было ли падение Башара Асада неизбежным?
A. Сирия под властью семьи Асада
B. Колониальное формирование технического образования
«Сирия»
The states of the French Mandate from 1921 to 1922
I. Introduction
This is exactly what happened in
Syria these last days; the ruling force, which is expected to be removed from
power in America, is the bulk of the Jesuit Order. By far, Donald Trump would
have preferred the situation in Syria to remain as it was; but all his
international supporters were not in a position to help repel the attack
triggered by the local puppets of the Jesuits. This consists in only the first
expression of the Jesuits' unbridled anger.
The Jesuits took over the control of
the major tool for worldwide prevalence, which is the US administration, in
1989 with the rise of G. H. W. Bush to the presidency; this was the first major
consequence of the secret deal stricken between the mainstream Jesuit group and
a very influential group of Zionists (involving the Rothschild and the
Rockefeller families). It was even attempted to start it earlier: in 1981 with
the assassination attempt against Ronald Reagan (30 March). The shift and rise
of the Jesuit-Zionist alliance constituted an overwhelming change in the US
politics and in the international affairs. At the political level, the deal was
reflected in the secret pact made between Ariel Sharon and President Bush, the
father. In fact, the Clintons, G. W. Bush, Obama, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris
have been mere puppets of the then expanding Jesuit force.
The precipitated and disorderly
collapse of the USSR and the Soviet bloc is precisely due to the fact that the 'old
Freemasonic guard' (Reagan, Thatcher, Mitterrand, Kohl, Chirac, and Gorbachev)
was swept away or immobilized/neutralized and their plans for a gradual and
orderly transformation of the USSR into a series of independent republics
thrown to the rubbish basket.
Such was the impact of a) the
unprecedented totalitarianism imposed across the US, b) the implementation of a
vast political agenda (9/11, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the fabrication of
the Turkish Islamists and the UK-US-backed imposition of their most loathed,
unrepresentative and lawless regime, the so-called 'Arab Spring' operations,
the blackmail and annihilation of earlier allies, and the numerous 'color
revolutions'), and c) the deployment of new technologies that transformed the
rhythm of daily life and work (mobile telephony, Information Technology,
Internet, etc.) that, when Donald Trump and with him the 'old Freemasonic guard'
came to power, they found themselves in a truly ominous, lunar landscape. This situation
constituted the major obstacle for Trump during his first tenure; in other
words, the Jesuit eschatological agenda had already advanced much during the
previous 28 years (1989-2016). In an article that I published on the 2nd
January 2011 under the title "The Alexandria Crime Highlights Al Qaeda's
Identity as a Freemasonic Fabrication", I described the importance of the
advanced technology in the preparation of operations like 9/11 and the 'Arab
Spring'. You can find it here:
https://www.academia.edu/25622783/The_Alexandria_Crime_Highlights_Al_Qaedas_Identity_as_a_Freemasonic_Fabrication_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis
This being so, the Freemasonic
forces retained their power in several other parts of the world, either
opposing the Jesuit plans or acquiescing to them in order to avoid frontal opposition
under unfavorable circumstances. From Russia to China to India, the forces that
opposed the Jesuit agenda managed to establish numerous points of clash and
thus hinder the further advancement of the Jesuit-Zionist agenda. Their
strongman in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, managed to return to power. It is
however noteworthy that when the Jesuit-masterminded crime of 9/11 took place,
the non-Zionist, Freemason Netanyahu was not in office; he was trusted, as he
was not 'theirs', and he was not allowed to govern during that period.
Since 2017, the Freemasonic alliance
has made an effort to catch up with the developments and to take back the lost
terrain. Furthermore, all factions of Jesuits, Freemasons and Zionists did their
best to develop new technologies in different fields and thus promote their
agendas at the detriment of the others. People who are nowadays used to view
things conventionally are going to be extremely befuddled in the next few
years. The so-called pandemic, in its very inception, was nothing else except
an undeclared Jesuit war against China; if the Chinese establishment did not
react as rapidly, as steadfastly and as resolutely as it did, China would
undoubtedly have recorded 100 or 200 million dead. This was the true target.
During the tenures of both, Trump and Biden, the Freemasonic establishment made a certain comeback and prepared itself to deliver a series of monstrous hits against the Jesuit agenda. Donald Trump's second election was due to the fact that the evil, sick and inhuman elements of the Jesuit agenda generated a great schism among them, and this has been reflected in the overwhelming rejection of the disreputable pope Francis I by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò. Following the pathetic and ridiculous excommunication of the latter ("The Most Reverend Carlo Maria Viganò was found guilty of the reserved delict of schism") by the paranoid, pro-Muslim, pro-LGBTQ, pro-Eugenics elite of Vatican, an important group of Jesuits and American political and business figures started cooperating with the Trump establishment, and this alliance brought him back to power.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò
It was immediately evident that the
Jesuits would fight back as best they could, even before Trump is sworn-in.
Very emphatically, former French Minister of Foreign Affairs Hubert Védrine
named Trump's re-election a 'revolution'. Others question whether he is going
to ever be in charge, since his enemies would not refrain from a final
assassination attempt.
Then, comes the stone named 'Syria'!
Throwing such a stone against Donald Trump before the beginning of his tenure
is a major sign. The Jesuits used their silly pseudo-Muslim puppets to tell him
that they do not intend to allow him proceed with his plans for peace in the
Middle East. If I define all Muslims involved in acts, words and plans against
Bashar al Assad as 'silly', this is due to the fact that they know nothing
about the existing agendas of powerful forces to which they cannot resist, and even
worse, they fail to understand how easily they are being manipulated,
especially with so many gangsters, 'fighters', and terrorists having microchip
implants in their heads without even knowing it.
What follows is a brief description
of the three existing plans for the Middle East.
II. The Zionist
plan: Greater Israel and foundation of the Third Temple
Here I have to make several
clarifications; the state of Israel is a fake. The correct name would be Judah
or Judaea. After 722 BCE, there are not Israelites, as the 10-tribe northern
state of Israel (with Samaria as capital) ceased to exist and the entire
population was first transferred to the NE confines of Assyria and then lost.
Today, the so-called Jews, who lay
claim to the Promised Land, are not ethnically Judean, but Ashkenazi Khazarian
in their outright majority (85-90%); historically, the Jews did not lay claim
to a state in Palestine, and there are numerous examples of Alexandrian Jews
(like Onias IV) inviting their coreligionists in Egypt. No one cared about a
state in Judaea. As a modern national movement, Zionism is overtly and
viciously anti-Jewish, ceaselessly diffusing among Jews all over the world
various anti-religious concepts earlier propagated within the Western world. Example:
for Judaism, the foundations of Western European Renaissance, Classicism, and
all the French Enlightenment ideas and concepts (Republic, Democracy,
elections, Human Rights, etc.) are an evil and anti-Biblical abomination. As a
matter of fact, in modern times, Judaism has been assaulted by religious
renegades and political fraudsters, being therefore multi-divided.
The Zionist project was embraced
mostly by Ashkenazi Khazarians, while it was originally rejected by the
Sephardic and other Jews. Zionists have been divided too. Among those allied
with the Jesuits, there is an increasing attitude of accepting the Christian
faith. Jacqueline de Romilly, the famous French academician and Classicist, fully
converted to Maronite Catholicism in 2008, at the age of 95. Apparently, they also
accept the eschatological narratives of the Jesuits, fully cooperating with
them.
Furthermore, those among the
Zionists, who oppose the aforementioned, influential Zionist group that has cooperated
with the Jesuits, are also extensively divided into many branches, notably
Revisionist Zionism, Religious Zionism, Revolutionary Zionism, etc. There are
many supporters of the Greater Israel project among them. The concept involves
also a) the identification of the Modern State of Israel with the Biblical Messiah,
b) the conviction that we nowadays are already living in the so-called Messianic
Era (as of 1948!), and c) the confidence that progressively the Zionist state
will occupy all the lands 'given' to it by 'god', namely from the Nile to Euphrates.
Of course, the worst enemies of the
Zionist supporters of the Greater Israel plan, are the Zionists who follow the
elite that cooperated with the Jesuits; among them, one finds supporters of
Reform Zionism, Liberal Zionism, and Labor Zionism.
Many people confuse the term
'Zionism' and attribute it indiscriminately to Israeli statesmen, politicians,
academics and intellectuals; but this is wrong. For example, Netanyahu is not a
Zionist, whereas his political partner (from another party) and minister
Bezalel Smotrich is a Zionist, who supports the Greater Israel concept. On the
contrary, the leader of the opposition, Yair Lapid is a Zionist, who totally
rejects this idea. This schism goes back to the establishment of the State of
Israel; the Labor Zionist leadership, which controlled totally the first three
decades of Israeli political life, accepted always a pragmatic approach and
partition of the territory of British Palestine. On the contrary, the
Revisionist Zionists, who formed the opposition at the time, incessantly called
for Eretz Yisrael ha-Shlema, i.e. the Greater Israel, or literally, the
"complete" land of Israel.
Before closing this unit, I have to
add that there is a truly dangerous type of Zionism that has no relationship
with Jewish Zionism at all! Yet, this is the most dangerous tool of pressure in
international affairs, namely Christian Zionism. This movement started in the
20th century, as a new form of Christian restorationism and as a late offspring
of English Puritanism and Calvinistic millennialism.
Christian Zionism is harmful to all
Jews and can become calamitous for Jewish Zionists; as movement, it is a
Freemasonic outfit intentionally created so that its members appear
Zionism-friendly, spy on Zionists, put impediments on their path, and fool them
with extremist ideas when this is needed. For this reason, we observe that
Israeli Freemasons have many Evangelical Zionist friends and supporters, who
thus appear disguised as pro-Jewish and pro-Zionist whereas their anti-Jewish and
anti-Zionist hatred is bottomless. All the same, Israeli Zionists have proven
able to also utilize the Evangelical Zionists and their nonsensical discourse
about the destruction of the Islamic holy shrines on the Temple Mount (Moriah)
and the subsequent reconstruction of the 'Third Temple'.
Will the Zionists, who support the
Greater Israel, manage to implement their plan?
It depends on how swiftly they can
exploit unexpected situations that may have arisen on the spur of the moment,
following the deployment of other agendas; they know that their worst enemies
are the Jesuits. That's why they often cooperate with Israeli Freemasons to
block Jesuit plans, notably that of the two-state solution as a chance to the
Israeli–Palestinian conflict resolution.
On the other hand, Israeli
Freemasons envy the strong organization that the Zionists have and, by
occasionally allying themselves with these radicals, they get the dirty job
done. For an open-end agenda (since we already live in the Messianic era),
there is no urgency. Greater Israel supporters want now to establish
settlements in Gaza and to force Gaza and West Bank Palestinians out of Israel.
The dismemberment of Syria is good news for the Zionists. The reason is obvious. The chaotic conditions that will prevail in various provinces of Syria will certainly put an end to the postcolonial state that France installed on that part of Ottoman territory. The destruction of Damascus is a permanent dimension of both Zionist agendas, the Israeli and the Christian.
That's why they have -so often and
in so extolling manner- quoted in their vindictive and mischievous publications
the well-known Biblical excerpt (from Isaiah 17:1; A prophecy against Damascus:
"See, Damascus will no longer be a city but will become a heap of
ruins"). For decades, to the Greater Israel supporters, "removing the
burden of Damascus" meant only the collapse of the Baath regime that they
so passionately wished. But the false translation of KJV and their misinterpretation
were misplaced.
As a matter fact, the aforementioned
Biblical text concerns the lightning strike that the Assyrian Emperor
Tiglath-pileser III (745-727) delivered against the Aramaean kingdom
Aram-Dimashq with the siege and the subsequent destruction of Damascus (740
BCE). But the malignant Evangelicals, who hate the Israeli Zionists
intentionally, attempted to fool them and to make them believe that the said
excerpt has also an eschatological value – which is childish nonsense.
From an Israeli Zionist viewpoint, after
the fall of Bashar al Assad, the best possible development across Lebanon,
Syria, Iraq and Turkey would be an unstable, hostile and chaotic situation of
all fighting against all with the borderlines shifting endlessly and the
survivors leaving for Turkey and Europe like rubbish. Under such pitiless conditions,
they may wish to add some small gains (in South Lebanon and Syria), but the
Israeli Freemasons will certainly minimize and/or postpone this option. The
reason for this is that for the latter what will be at stake is going to be the
collapse of the current, Jesuit-backed regimes of Europe and their replacement
with overt and merciless tyrannies. All the same, a small scale expansion of
Israel will evidently be inevitable; it already happened on 8th December 2024,
as Israel strengthened its position by capturing key high points on Mount
Hermon from the Assad regime.
The Greater Israel is the least
plausible option; but it can never be ruled out as a most nefarious perspective
for the wider region. .
III. The Jesuit
plan: Greater Middle East, Jerusalem as Seat of Unified Christianity, and
Fusion of Christianity and Islam into a Satanic, counterfeit faith
Every specialist, who looks
comparatively at the drawing of Greater Israel and the map of Greater Middle
East, immediately understands that the latter was invented in order to prevent
the former. Instead of an unprecedented enlargement of Israel, as attested in
the former case, we have the breakup of almost all the states that happen to
surround the Zionist state in the latter document.
There is a critical point of
differentiation between the two maps and plans; whereas Turkey and Iran remain
almost intact in the case of Greater Israel, when it comes to Greater Middle
East, all four major Western Asiatic countries, namely Turkey, Iran, Pakistan,
and Saudi Arabia, split into pieces. Of all these states only Saudi Arabia
loses a significant portion of its territory in the first plan (Greater
Israel). And Egypt, which is cut to two pieces for the needs of the Greater
Israel, is left intact in the Greater Middle East project.
Increasing the number of states that
happen to be located around the Zionist state is bad news for Israel's Zionists
and Greater Israel supporters. With the populations of those lands being as
they are, "more states in the region" means "more enemies for
Israel". In the best case scenario, the Greater Middle East project will
create a frenzied environment around Israel with incessant wars of religious,
ethnic and/or economic character. It is therefore crystal clear that such a
project belongs to an influential group of power with worldwide interests. This
group of power must have apparently a significant benefit from the economic
destruction of Saudi Arabia and Iran, two major Oil producing states. In
addition, it must also harbor greater geopolitical plans, and possess the means
to implement them.
Interestingly, for the
materialization of the Greater Middle East project,
a) Turkey's territory will shrink
almost up to the point of becoming slightly larger than that of a monstrous
'Free Kurdistan',
b) Iran's territory will shrink
almost up to the point of becoming slightly larger than that of a monstrously
enlarged Afghanistan, which is already a fake nation-state; all the same, as
per the needs of the project, a significant portion of Pakistan will be annexed
to the otherwise useless state of Afghanistan, and
c) Saudi Arabia will lose
territories to Yemen, Jordan (now named Greater Jordan!), the Arab Shia state,
which will have Basra as capital, as well as to the purposefully invented
"Islamic Sacred State", which will comprise Medina, Mecca, and Jeddah.
The sophisticated project cancels at
the same time following visions or plans of foreign policy:
a) the so-called Neo-Ottoman
delusion of Turkey's ignorant, uneducated and stupid Islamists and
Pan-Turanianists,
b) the alleged alliance between
Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Hezbollah,
c) the hypothetical 'Shia triangle'
(Iran, Syria, and Yemen),
d) the -mistakenly perceived as
real- Axis of Resistance (including also Palestinians),
e) the Russian presence in, and
impact on, the Middle East, and
f) China's impact on the Middle East
and plans for worldwide supremacy.
Having as target to circumvent or breach
the aforementioned visions or plans of foreign policy can only be inherent to the
long-term strategy of a group of power known for its worldwide aspirations,
propagation of the Modern Western culture, steadfast opposition to Eurasianism,
and distance from projects like the Belt and Road Initiative (New Silk Road).
This group is the Jesuit Order. If many pawns of the Jesuit establishment seem
to have frenetically supported globalist policies, this is not due to their
conviction in Globalism, but to the fact that globalization was considered as
the fastest way to westernize China. However, one must always keep in mind that
the Jesuits tried to impact the 'Middle Kingdom' (Zhongguo, 中国; 中國) as early as the 16th c.
Why do the Jesuits and their Zionist
allies need to divide the entire region into a multitude of states? As a matter
of fact, more than 20 states seem to have become the result of creative
strategies of thought deployed by leading experts and specialists trying to
materialize plans and transform the said region.
The answer is easy to understand.
Jordan is already a Palestinian
state with two thirds of the population originating from Palestine. With a
Greater Jordan, the Palestinians of Israel, West Bank, and Gaza will be
smoothly transferred to their new 'homeland'. This will finally bring peace to
Israel. Furthermore, a great number of people from the diaspora will flock to
this "New Palestine".
With a Greater Lebanon, which will
encompass the coastal zone of today's Syria, a new Druze, Christian and Alawi
state will emerge across the Mediterranean coast in peace and cooperation with
Israel. It is not therefore bizarre that Israeli supporters of the
Jesuit-Zionist alliance (and therefore of the Greater Middle East project),
like Zev Farber, found it necessary to publish -as early as 9th December 2024
(!)- an article under the title "Divide Syria", propagating the idea
that "in time, Latakia can be another Singapore"!
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/divide-syria/
It would be wrong to consider this
approach as philo-Druzism; it is an internal Zionist clash, because this
suggestion cancels the Greater Israel project once for all.
The so-called 'Free Kurdistan' will
function as a new lever over the Shia and Sunni militias, the Islamic terrorist
groups, and all the paranoids who passionately wish to impose Sharia on a state
populated by Muslims. So, the misfortunate state will be plunged into endless strives
and wars, after having been the result of many other wars in the first place.
It goes without saying that, having to constantly fight with the Syrian Sunni
state, the Iraqi Sunni state, the Iraqi Shia state, Turkey, and Iran (or, to be
more accurate, with the leftover of those two countries), 'Free Kurdistan' will
undoubtedly exhaust its resources quite soon. Then, the total disaster will
come.
But who cares?
To the schemers, who draw so
nefarious maps, the different nations that the Western criminals call 'Kurds'
have less value than a mouse for experiment; that's why all the Kurmanji, Zaza,
Sorani, Yazidi, Shabak, Gorani, Faili, Bijari, Ahl-e Haq, Kurdeli, Laki and
other populations that aspire to national identity preservation, cultural
integrity protection and spiritual coherence continuation must reject any
contact -let alone alliance- with Western protectors or supporters, because any
type of cooperation with representatives of the Collective West will be
detrimental and even lethal to them. The same is actually valid for all
Muslims.
Religious communities in Syria
Last, by carefully observing the
fracture of states and the readjustment of borders that the Greater Middle East
map suggests and by anticipating the subsequent wars that will be inevitably
triggered after the transformation of the region according to the irrelevant
and meaningless borderlines invented by the map makers, experienced historians
and political scientists are able to understand that the map automatically
implies that we live after the year 2030, when the carbon dioxide emissions
reduction targets will have been achieved and therefore the Oil and Gas
production of the OPEC countries significantly diminished.
All the aforementioned developments
and the rise of Israel's political Left to power will enable Israel to accept
to transform Jerusalem into an international city where the World Council of
Churches and other religious instances will be headquartered. To tame and thus
subdue a great number of Muslims, the Jesuits intend to increase dramatically their
symbolic acts and hypocritical lectures in view of a well-prepared fusion of
Christianity and Islam. An example of what I mean as symbolic acts was offered
on 7th December 2024, when pope Francis I prayed before the 'Nativity of
Bethlehem 2024' in Vatican’s Paul VI Hall, inaugurating the Nativity scene, and
inanely showing baby Jesus on keffiyeh. About: https://www.timesofisrael.com/pope-francis-inaugurates-nativity-scene-in-vatican-showing-baby-jesus-on-keffiyeh/
and
https://www.timesofisrael.com/vatican-nativity-scene-showing-baby-jesus-on-a-keffiyeh-removed-after-backlash/
The transformation of Jerusalem into
an international city-workshop for the fusion of Christianity and Islam, i.e.
the so-called Chrislam, will mark the Jesuits' second effort to leave Europe and
the beginning of their final attempt to settle in China and christen that
country. https://religion24.net/why-is-chrislam-religion-important-in-todays-society/
IV. The Freemasonic
plan: the Revival of the Roman Empire, the Comeback of Paganism, the Abolition
of Christianity, and the Mass Extermination of Muslims
Many Israelis blame Benjamin Netanyahu
for destroying Israel; many uninformed and naïve people do not believe this,
but it is quite true. The monstrous Gaza war and genocide were carefully
planned by him long ago; before 17 years, Netanyahu helped Hamas take over
Gaza, eliminate Fatah control in the Strip, receive colossal funds from abroad,
smuggle an incredible amount of arms, prepare the -immense and worldwide
unique- underground network of tunnels, and get military training and great
support in every sense from different foreign countries. It is clear that
without an unprecedented preparation during a protracted period, the
Palestinian fighters would have never achieved to deliver the hit they did. All
this and much more was perfectly well-known to Netanyahu, who reacted always by
saying his customary, yet nonsensical and ridiculous lies.
Comparing the October 7 attacks to
the September 11 event, an objective, impartial and sincere observer would find
the former as far more detrimental than the latter, not only because the
collateral damages must be evaluated proportionally (1180 killed, 3400
civilians and soldiers wounded, and 251 civilians and soldiers taken captive in
a country with population of 10 million people vs. 2977 victims in a 280
million people country), but also due to the far-reaching ramifications that
Hamas' attacks had at the local level.
As of today, it would be pertinent
to say that the September 11 event had a greater impact at the worldwide scale
and the October 7 attacks were of greater significance at the local-regional
level; but this statement is correct only …. 'as of today'!
Viewing however things in
perspective, one would certainly be tempted to describe the Netanyahu-sponsored
October 7 theatrical coup in Israel as the Freemasonic counterweight to the G.
H. W. Bush-produced September 11 Jesuit melodramatic feat. That's why one has
to wait for some time in order to start noticing the avalanche of repercussions
and side-effects that the October 7 attacks will have. One has to bear in mind
that Netanyahu was in office from March 2009 until June 2021 and, again, from
December 2022 until now. And G. H. W. Bush's tenure lasted from January 1989
until January 1993, just a month before the 1993 World Trade Center bombing,
which is now correctly considered as the 'powder keg' for 9/11.
Benjamin Netanyahu is not Bezalel Smotrich;
he did not supervise the monstrous event in order to just set up settlements in
Gaza and send the criminally decimated Palestinian population to the Sinai
Peninsula or somewhere in Jordan. The serious complications of the extraordinary
event concern mainly Europe. The Netanyahu-sponsored October 7 attacks were
fully coordinated with the Russian special military operations in Ukraine that
had started more than 18 months earlier (22 February 2022) and with the (then
forthcoming) US presidential elections (5 November 2024).
The Freemasonic counter-attack is
expected to be masterfully orchestrated by Trump, Putin, Netanyahu, Orban, Le
Pen, and other associates in order to totally break down the Jesuit agenda
which has been hitherto implemented in the European Union. Many people have
often associated the will for European political unification with the notorious
Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi and his ideas about Pan-Europa; but this is
totally misplaced. Only an uneducated person would be as simplistic as to think
that, when two powerful groups' interests clash as regards a specific topic,
the only options are pro and con; that's ridiculous. The opponents of the
European political unification are not necessarily supporters of divisions and
wars throughout Europe, but they may well be the champions of another type of
European unification within a totally different environment in terms of ethnic,
cultural and spiritual dimensions.
The true opposite to 'European
unification' is not 'division and internal conflicts in Europe', but a
counterfeit European unification. The Freemasonic plan for European unification
is at the antipodes of the Jesuit plan for Europe.
The fundamental concepts of the
Jesuit plan for Europe revolve around the following key areas:
a- federal, decentralized
organization,
b- Liberation Theology principles,
c- termination of the nation-state
notion,
d- race amalgamation involving
replacement migration,
e- religious acculturation, and
f- multicultural societies,
In striking contrast to the Jesuit
plan, the Freemasonic perspective for Europe involves following major
parameters:
a- by force removal of the
Jesuit-backed regimes throughout EU,
b- centralized administration of the
diverse nation-states,
c- denunciation, condemnation and
elimination of all religions,
d- consolidation of the nation-state
notion,
e- promotion of a counterfeit
concept of empire,
f- replacement of migrants, refugees
and foreign workers with new technological means (AI, robots, etc.),
g- expulsion of Asiatic, African,
Muslim and other foreigners who fail to untegrate, and
h- stimulation of forms of
neo-paganism, militarism, Nordic mysticism, phallus cults, Greco-Roman culture,
Merovingian legends, and neo-Gnostic trends,
Comparing the two plans, one can
easily understand not only that they are at the antipodes of one another but
also that the former (Jesuit) is geared to irreparably paralyze, weaken,
marginalize and neutralize Europe, reducing it to a lackluster peripheral
region with tremendous problems, such as internal discord, economic decay, and
socio-political chaos. It is clear that for the Jesuit agenda to be deployed
worldwide, Europe must cease to be a first rank force.
Quite contrarily, the Freemasonic
agenda seems to have been devised in order to place Europe at the epicenter of
the world's affairs. Simply, this appears to be a very different Europe, totally
unrelated to what we now know as society, culture, and state. For an entirely
contrastive Europe to emerge, the European Union must undergo a uniquely
shocking disaster.
This is exactly what is in the minds
of Trump, Putin, Netanyahu, and other leading representatives of the
Freemasonic lodge that wants to turn Europe into a regime quite similar to that
of Netanyahu's Israel (or Hitler's Germany). And for this reason, the Gaza war
'had' to take place and therefore duly prepared before October 2023.
Israeli genocidal acts and
monstrosities against Gaza and West Bank Palestinians are expected to trigger frictions
in the local societies from France to Germany to England; attempting to
denounce the acts of a most anti-Jewish state (like Israel) governed by a
genuinely anti-Zionist prime minister (like Netanyahu), European citizens and
Muslim refugees have the tendency to take the local Jews for target.
This is of course very misplaced,
but the powers-that-be never care about the rightfulness and the correctness of
an average person's acts. On the contrary, they count on the confusion, the
misperception, and the misunderstanding that the dynamics of every political
disruption and social turbulence can produce. Even worse, the international
mass media may exploit such situations as best as they can, drastically
impacting the subconscious imagination of average people.
Social Turbulence as the Scientific
Phenomenon: Operational and Strategic Change
https://doaj.org/article/a9f59f6715684ee2951e9742e5a7944e
One has therefore to take into
consideration that
a- the participation of a great
number of European leftists and Muslim refugees in Europe in manifestations that
take place in European cities against Israel,
b- the identification of many
Islamists among them,
c- the atrocities performed by
Islamists in Syria, Afghanistan, and other countries,
d- the instinctive reaction of the
native, European populations to the presence of so numerous illegal migrants on
their soil,
e- the extensive diffusion of
various theories, such as the 'Great Replacement', which stimulate the
instincts and the subconscious imagination of average people,
f- the widespread and well-deserved
indignation for the woke agenda, and
g- the proper rage against Europe's
Jesuit-backed, undemocratic, biased and ruinous regimes …
… are expected to generate riots, civil
wars, massive bloodshed, public disorder, and regime change.
In the forthcoming events, which
will entirely transform today's Europe's face, incredible atrocities will come
to pass, therefore generating more radical thoughts, more extreme ideas, and
more repugnant monstrosities. As it is not easy to eliminate 25 million people
(Europe's forcibly displaced and stateless population according to UNCHR),
Sarkozy's muddled 'Union for the Mediterranean' will be viewed as an alternative
so that, after several wars, invasions, and land annexations, these populations
(or at least those among them who will survive) get relocated there. In this
regard, it is essential to keep in mind that terms like "French
Algeria" and "Roman Africa" are still part of the collective Western
European subconscious.
For the Freemasonic backers of a European
Union-Revived Roman Empire and for all the religious revivalists, the
reconstituted empire will include all the European states "from the
Atlantic to Urals" (as per the well-known, historic statement made by
Charles de Gaulle), parts of today's Turkey and Syria, Lebanon and Israel, and
at least the North African coastline.
Evaluated on the basis of the
socioeconomic and political conditions that prevail in Europe today, the master
plan seems to be absolutely unrealistic. But in the wake of the successive daily
riots with many casualties and heavy collateral damages, and as a result of the
existential threat that the European citizens will feel, a drastic change will
bring about a staggering transfiguration of the European peoples.
The barbarous monstrosity that
characterized the Northwestern European savages throughout the ages will come
back to surface, overwhelmingly transforming today's hedonistic and consumerist
rats. They will then find themselves on exactly the same wavelength with
Netanyahu's Israel; they will therefore be ready to unrepentantly commit scores
of massacres and genocides similar to those they performed in their dark past.
Ultimately, they will manage to re-establish the Roman Empire in its cruelest
form and dimension.
Ruled by anti-Jewish and
anti-Zionist Freemasons, Israel will be an inherent part of the establishment
of the immense state, which will promote debauchery, but will ban the
pernicious woke agenda. Africa will certainly undergo its last and worst phase
of colonialism, because the new European Union will be an entirely racist
regime of white supremacism. In spite of the present stage in which there is
full Freemasonic support to the Russian Confederation, after the forthcoming dismemberment
of the fake nation of Ukraine, Moscow will start being less important a tool. The
anti-Eurasiatic nature of the reconstituted Roman Empire makes it certain that
the dismantlement of Russia will one moment be put on the table.
This perspective explains the use of the state of Israel that the Freemasonic lodge wants to make; by containing the Zionist threat and by averting the Jesuit agenda for Jerusalem, they utilize the anti-Jewish militaristic machine of Israel as a lever for Europe's radicalization, militarization and ultimate transformation into a totalitarian state and a merciless society, before Israel becomes integral part of the revived Roman Empire.
V. Zionist, Jesuit,
and Freemasonic agendas as Communicating Vessels
It may appear bizarre to many people
how two major groups of power, like the Jesuits and the Freemasons, do not
cooperate when their respective ultimate targets seem to be identical, but it
is not. A typical example in this regard is the fate of Russia and the
re-organization of Moscow's vast territory. Knowing the respective plans, one
may call it 'the terminal fragmentation of Russia'. However, these issues
differ often in terms of contents and timing; and this issue is very grave,
because pushing toward a new development at the wrong moment can bring about an
avalanche of calamities.
The Jesuits want to Christen Russia
after the Catholic fashion; this is utterly critical to them, because they view
in the Patriarchate of Moscow the only possible challenge and the only
religious authority that has the power and the knowledge to denounce Rome as
permanently anti-Christian and inherently Satanic. Their plan is liturgically termed
as "the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary"; it
relates to the Third Secret of Fatima. But the Freemasons totally oppose this
perspective.
But when the main points of the Jesuit agenda fail to be materialized, the path opens for the implementation of the Freemasonic agenda.
Pope urges renewed consecration of Ukraine and Russia to Mary; Languages spoken in Russia, a proxy for ethnic diversity
The circumstances of the clash among
the world's main groups of power are not similar to those of the interstate
conflicts; at times, the opposition is straightforward and the different
interests are in confrontation.
On other occasions, the advance of a
rival agenda may also serve the targets of an agenda that needs a new environment
to be first created before it is properly and duly deployed; in these cases,
the two agendas are superposed to one another. This situation is not limited in
matters of defense and military conflict but occurs also in the spheres of
economy, education, political ideology, and culture.
Sometimes, the delay or drawback
caused to the point of an agenda is automatically recompensed by the advance
made in another issue; the overall situation looks then like a set of
communicating vessels. The opposite interests may look as if they are always in
the same position, but this is only an illusory impression, because the overall
environment changes, and although the opposite groups of power seem to be
equivalent, in reality the balance of power does not show this.
"Yes, it is Europe, from the Atlantic to the Urals, it is Europe, it is the whole of Europe, that will decide the fate of the world"; Charles de Gaulle
It goes without saying that, on
numerous occasions, governments controlled by one group of power make an
alliance with administrations belonging to the sphere of influence of an
opposite group of power. Such situations reflect indeed the extreme complexity
of today's world. The relationship between Russia, Iran and Syria illuminates
these eventualities very well.
Although undeniably connected with
the Freemasonic lodge that backed Chirac, Kohl, Thatcher and Reagan in the
past, Vladimir Putin developed gradually very good relations with Iran, which came
to the Jesuit sphere of power in 1979 due to the Iranian revolution led by
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
With Syria, it had even started
earlier; USSR's Freemasonic establishment, as represented by the Brezhnev
clique, signed in 1971 an agreement with the Jesuit pawn Hafez al Assad as per
the terms of which Moscow opened its naval military base in Tartus. And in
1980, the president of Syria kissed the Secretary General of the Communist
Party of Soviet Union after both signed a Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation.
The Syrian president passed away only months after Vladimir Putin had been
appointed president of the Russian Federation, but the friendly relationship
lasted for another two and half decades. About:
SYND 11 10 80 BREZHNEV AND SYRIAN
PRESIDENT ASSAD SIGN FRIENDSHIP TREATY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70Jn81txApw
Similar situations occur quite
often, but it is easy to understand the standing limits; the statesmen, who
enter into friendly relationship with a head of state or politician belonging
to an opposite group of power, report the details of their partnership to their
superiors in the secret society of which they are members. Subsequently, they
get guidance as to how and up to what point to proceed. Conversely, on several
occasions, for the needs of a major project implementation, groups of power
simply abandon their low level members, finding for them a type of modest
survival. Example: in their war against the Freemasonic establishment, the
Jesuits stopped caring about the destiny of Hafez al Assad's son.
VI. The truth about
the fall of Syria
Permanently misinformed by the mass
media, systematically deceived with various forgeries, and terribly unaware of
fundamental historical truths about Syria, most of the people worldwide are
befuddled because of the narratives entertained as regards the end of the
Bashar al Assad's tenure.
Most of the people 'know' that, on
the 29th November 2024, the Islamic terrorist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, along
with other gangsters, started its 'attack' against Haleb (Aleppo); in fact,
this event was not an attack but, literally speaking, an easy advance and an
unhindered entrance into Syria's largest city (until 2012). The so-called
'Battle of Aleppo' is merely a joke. The pre-arranged undertaking, which was
not an 'offensive' but a fascinating promenade, had started two days earlier,
on 27 November 2024. This fact is certainly well-known to many people worldwide,
but to no avail.
However, few people remember or ever
learned (although it was in the news) that Syria's former president traveled to
Moscow exactly on 28th and 29th November 2024 and met president Putin. In the
face of what followed, we can fully understand what the topic of their
discussion may have been. Bashar al Assad was updated as regards the last
movements that he had to make before returning to Moscow ten days later, on 8th
December 2024. This visit was easy to find in the world news.
https://en.apa.az/cis-countries/bashar-assad-visits-moscow-media-454280
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_international_presidential_trips_made_by_Bashar_al-Assad
Various sources of information let
us know that the then First Lady Asma al-Assad had traveled to Russia even
earlier. Although I don't intend to use these sources in my argumentation, I
herewith add them merely as posterior confirmation. About:
https://unn.ua/en/news/bashar-al-assads-family-left-syria-for-russia-amid-rebel-offensive-mass-media
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Assad_regime#Departures
The same is also valid for the -now
diffused but then classified- information that the Egyptian and the Jordanian
secret services were duly updated, and on the basis of their data, officials of
the two countries suggested to Bashar al Assad to leave the country and settle
elsewhere. About:
https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/1/136828/Egypt-denies-WSJ-report-on-asking-Al-Assad-to-leave
However, it is interesting that, in
spite of the highly problematic situation in which his country was, Bashar al
Assad travelled to Riyadh on the 11th November in order to attend the 2024
Arab–Islamic extraordinary summit and meet with the acting ruler of Saudi
Arabia Mohammed bin Salman. In fact, the true reason for this travel was the
need to update the Saudi crown prince and make several final arrangements with
him. It is not clear whether Bashar al Assad and the Turkish president Erdogan
met in the event, but if this happened, it was purely procedural (and the
reasons are explained below). About:
https://www.duvarenglish.com/turkish-president-erdogan-syrian-president-assad-in-same-frame-news-65240
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/erdogan-assad-meeting-possible-despite-hurdles-key-syrian-opposition-leader-says-2024-09-25/
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240925-erdogan-assad-meeting-possible-despite-hurdles-key-syria-opposition-leader-says/
Two months earlier, on the 14th
September 2024, Bashar al Assad named a new Prime Minister, Mohammad Ghazi
al-Jalali who replaced Hussein Arnous for only three months (14 September to 10
December 2024). This was the direct consequence of the 2024 Syrian
parliamentary election that took place on 15th July 2024 (with a turnout of ca.
38%). I have however to add that for the circumstances under which Syrians have
been living for about 12-13 years, the participation level was normal. The
replacement of Hussein Arnous after four years of tenure (2020-2024) followed
the typical pace for the country, as his predecessor, Imad Khamis, 'governed'
Syria for four years too (2016-2020). If you need now to laugh, I can add that
Imad Khamis was preceded by Wael Nader al-Halqi, who was Syria's prime minister
also for four years (2012-2016). About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Ghazi_al-Jalali
https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q122759674/
https://www.kurdistan24.net/en/story/814413/former-syrian-pm-reveals-internal-dynamics-of-assad-regimes-final-days
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Syrian_parliamentary_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussein_Arnous
https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q60455401/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imad_Khamis
https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q6001983/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wael_Nader_al-Halqi
https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q713915/
Of course, the parliamentary
election had been scheduled months before it took place, but it is quite
interesting that few days after the results were known, Bashar al Assad had to
fly to Moscow for a 2-day working visit (24-25 July 2024). This meeting took
place one month after the presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald
Trump (27th June 2024).
Quite notably 20 days before Assad's
visit to Moscow and only one week after the US presidential debate, on 4th July
2024, the Disciplinary Section of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith
in Vatican announced that Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, former Apostolic
Nuncio to the United States, and Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana (in today's
Kosovo), was found guilty of schism and was therefore excommunicated
"latae sententiae" (automatically). Here you have a presentation:
https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/archbishop-vigano-excommunicated
And this is the official
announcement:
https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2024/07/05/0554/01148.html#ing
As a matter of fact, it was in early
July 2024 that everything happened: the reaction of Archbishop Carlo Maria
Viganò's supporters, the rejection of his excommunication, the decision of a
group of Jesuits to fight back against Francis I, the ensuing deep dissension
among the ranks of the Jesuit Order, the irreparable discord that took place
among the Jesuits, and the alliance set up between a group of dissenting Jesuits
and the Freemasonic lodge that supported Donald Trump. All these developments
were tantamount to definite confirmation of his forthcoming victory. The
overall situation became immediately known to the Jesuit establishment and
their Zionist allies, because many Jesuits shifted from one side to the other;
it was clear that the presidential election was lost to them. It was then that
they decided about the first blows that they would deliver against the
anticipated policies of the forthcoming Trump administration.
This approach is difficult for
simple people to grasp; however, intelligent people who happen to have acquired
some insight know that events happen indeed long before they take place in
front of the eyes of the public. Still this is not enough to realize when it
comes to ages old rival priesthoods, which took the form of secret societies
and spiritual orders in Modern Times. That's why it would be accurate to
conclude that the time, the events, and the scheduling thereof have a totally
different meaning for the powers-that-be. In fact, the 'reaction' is planned
before the 'action' is publicly materialized.
It is also interesting that after
July 2024, Hayat Tahrir al Sham (HTS) leader Abu Mohammed al-Golani (real name:
Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa) started softening his group's position as regards the
rights of the minorities in the small territory that they controlled around
Idlib at the time. About:
https://apnews.com/article/syria-idlib-turkey-algolani-hayat-tahrir-alsham-54a2af9fe90f10d68795e329a65c9b4d
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/ea6cbaa5a0ff44019ba8d38d7f4323dc
https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian-arab-republic/syria-situation-update-north-west-syria-july-2024
https://stj-sy.org/en/between-reformist-discourse-and-actual-repression-how-hayat-tahrir-al-sham-handled-idlib-protests/
https://omranstudies.org/index.php/publications/reports/monthly-briefing-on-the-events-of-the-syrian-scene-july-2024.html
https://omranstudies.org/index.php/publications/articles/maintaining-mass-obedience-hts%E2%80%99s-response-to-the-protests-in-idlib.html
https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2024-december-11/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Mohammad_al-Julani#Idlib_governance
Consequently the form that the
events concerning Syria must have taken involves the following:
1- through the correct channels,
Putin was informed that he had to deploy a much greater effort to once more preserve
Bashar al-Assad in power; realizing that the effort would be futile, the
Russian president invited the embattled ruler of Syria to Moscow for
consultations (end July);
2- it was then decided that the
Syrian military establishment would not fight against the forces, which would
be sent from Idlib to invade the central provinces of Syria and topple the
government; and the Syrian president secured some time to arrange the fate of
his relatives and associates;
3- Putin negotiated Russia's
position in the region during the post-Baath period; and an agreement must have
been reached as regards Syria's gold reserves
https://tradingeconomics.com/syria/gold-reserves
4- some general agreement must have
been reached as regards Syria's Alawis, Druzes, Christians and Kurmanjis between
Putin and his American interlocutors;
5- the timing of the operation was
agreed for some time after the US presidential election; meanwhile, specific details
about the stage management of the theatrical performance "Deterrence of
Aggression" were also agreed upon, involving few, rather futile, Russian
air attacks and some skirmishes with the Syrian army in specific locations;
6- the indivisibility of the Syrian
territory seems to have been discussed and the negotiating sides agreed to hold
regular consultations; there was also an agreement to keep Iran, Hezbollah,
Yemen's Houthi administration, and Hamas totally uninformed about the ongoing
negotiations.
VII. The main losers in Syria: Donald Trump and China
In fact, there was no betrayal and no abandonment of allies. Putin did not let Bashar al Assad down. Iran and Hezbollah knew little, and it is only in the second half of November that they were advised to remove key operatives. Nothing happened unexpectedly and there was no surprise to anybody in power. The development cannot be described as a defeat for Russia because states are defeated by states and not by secret organizations and mystical orders. Only people who do not know the facts or misperceive them may consider Russia as a loser. The major loser in this regard was Donald Trump because he will now find it difficult to maintain in the Middle East the policies that he had agreed with Netanyahu.
After all, if we evaluate Russia's
involvement in Syria over the past decade, it would be bizarre to consider the
December 2024 events as a "defeat" and not identify as Moscow's first
and foremost "failure" in Syria the survival of the Islamic terrorist
regime in the Idlib enclave of Syria's northwestern confines. This text
demonstrates clearly that all senior Islamic terrorists and extremists are US
operatives:
https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/how-syrias-diversity-friendly-jihadists-plan-building-state
To duly and fully eliminate the
insurgence in Syria, Russians had to annihilate Idlib by all means. However,
this would be impossible for Putin to do, because he had to take into
consideration the US countermeasures that some Jesuits would force the American
government to take. These are the processes in which international affairs are
conducted and this is how secret societies' influence is exerted on
governments.
About:
https://mid.ru/ru/press_service/publikacii-i-oproverzenia/oproverzenia1/nedostovernie-publikacii/1461718/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency_in_Idlib
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwestern_Syria_offensive_(December_2019_%E2%80%93_March_2020)
https://www.voanews.com/a/extremism-watch_will-recapture-syrias-idlib-affect-islamic-state/6183598.html
In the advent of this occurrence, it
would also be wrong to consider Iran as a loser; the reason is simple. Iran was
never a real regional player properly speaking, but an instrument for the
Jesuit-controlled apostate Freemasonic lodge of England and a tool for the MI6 to
carry out their anti-Zionist, anti-Jewish and anti-Israeli operations. Under the various governments that were
formed in Iran after the fall of the last Shah (1979), there was never a proper
Iranian national strategy; the governmental policies were either aptly
maneuvered from far or consciously carried out by English pawns like Mohammad
Javad Zarif.
Yet, the fall of the Syrian Arab
Republic demonstrates clearly that there was a loser indeed. And this is very
critical in world politics. The loser is none other than China. This conclusion
is drawn because China aspires to world supremacy and has risen as the leading
power of the BRICS in an attempt to mark a sweeping victory over the US and to
depose the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. I certainly do not intend
to herewith analyze Beijing's potential errors, miscalculations, oversights and
lack of action with respect to the rightful and benign, Chinese ambitions, but
I have to point out that a country the size of China will definitely never
materialize its vocation without first fully identifying the nature of the
Western colonialism and the abysmal destruction that the Western powers caused
to the colonized nations in terms of nation building, national identity,
cultural integrity, educational-academic-intellectual solidity, socioeconomic
and governmental sovereignty.
The Beijing ruling class must comprehend
once for all that it is absolutely useless to imagine that, by solving the
economic problems of the countries with which China wants to establish an
alliance, they will get it done. A military cooperation is strictly necessary
too; the entire and complete formation of new local elites is imperative, if
Beijing does not want to see its efforts in Libya and Syria (to offer only two
examples) lost in October 2011 and in December 2024 respectively. All the same,
the key to China's worldwide supremacy is the conclusion of all Chinese
academics, specialists and thematically related experts that Beijing must truly
remake the countries with which China intends to establish an alliance - from
scratch.
More specifically about the
Syrian-Chinese relationship, after the completion of the Russian-Syrian
operations and the successive offensives that took place between September 2015
and September 2020, Beijing should have studied the situation in Syria quite
well and come up with numerous groundbreaking proposals, acting complementarily
with the Russians. Details, schedules and diagrams:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_civil_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war#Operations_by_Russian_military_forces
What the Chinese could have done in
Syria was absolutely impossible for Russia to do. Knowing the extent of the
destruction and the disaster caused during the then 10-year long Syrian Civil
War (2011-2020), Beijing's government should have entered into a series of
agreements with Bashar al Assad with respect to Syria's prompt reconstruction
and comprehensive rehabilitation. This should have also involved the
transportation of no less than one (1) million Chinese soldiers, workers,
technicians, specialists, experts and advisers. Syria should have been
gradually transformed into a Chinese province or, if you prefer, an exclave.
Chinese industries should have
outsourced part of their activities in Syria; Chinese land workers should have
moved to Syria and worked in vast de-desertification projects; Chinese military
training should have been offered to all schoolchildren, and hundreds of
thousands of Chinese soldiers should have made their military service in the
banks of Euphrates. Chinese and Russian should have irreversibly replaced
French and English in the local primary and secondary education, and at least
five or six Chinese universities should have been launched across the country.
The Idlib province should have been liberated by Chinese soldiers and the
Islamists massacred to the last; also, the Kurmanji ('Kurdish') militia-controlled
eastern region should have been invaded and reunified with Damascus, and the
relocated 'Kurds' returned to their original homes (because Syria's Kurmanji
population was rather dispersed across the country before 2011).
The aforementioned examples of
projects, if systematically carried out by China in Syria during the period
2020-2024, would have certainly prevented the fall of Bashar al Assad and, more
importantly, would have been the best demonstration that China is a trustworthy
ally able to demolish the colonial structures in Asia and Africa while also
aspiring for worldwide supremacy and being ready for a faceoff with the West anytime
anywhere.
VIII. Was Bashar
al-Assad's fall inevitable?
Last points to discuss are the
condition of the country which was so easy to collapse and the reasons for
which the terminated situation was untenable and unsustainable. To these
questions there are two very different types of response, namely a
political-military approach that focuses on the rule of Hafez and Bashar al
Assad (1971-2000 and 2000-2024), and a historical perspective that examines the
technical entity named 'Syria', which was an inherently troublesome realm and
could never become a nation-state (like Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen,
Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, etc.).
A. Syria under the
rule of al-Assad family
For what concerns the presidential
tenures of Hafez and Bashar al Assad, I have to point out that Baathist Syria was
a weak and poor state run by a minority. Lacking natural resources, being
rather isolated at the international level, relying heavily on its relationship
with the USSR, the Syrian president tried to operate the army and the
administration with Alawis, Christians and Druzes, expressing distrust to the
Sunni majority. At the same time, Hafez al Assad made three calamitous mistakes;
first, he did not fully implement in Syria the secular, laic concepts that Kemal
Ataturk had already introduced in Turkey before five (5) decades.
Second, he totally failed to
identify the colonial nature and traits of the state that he was ruling; it
would still be easy for him to understand that the English and the French had
deliberately created two weak structures in Iraq and Syria, favoring the local minorities
and handing over to them the power. The Sunni minority ruled Iraq and the Alawi
minority governed Syria. Both states constituted merely the negative reflection
of one another.
Third, to add insult to injury,
Hafez al Assad allowed Sunni Syrians to work in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar,
Bahrain and the UAE and to study Islamic theology in Egypt. He thus exposed
hundreds of thousands of Syrians to the pseudo-Islamic extremists of the US-backed,
lawless and criminal Wahhabi regime of Saudi Arabia. In addition, he pushed the
Syrian youth to the brink of the abyss, by allowing them to study in Al Azhar
University in Egypt.
This is so because, during the
tenure of the treacherous, duplicitous, and idiotic Egyptian dictator Anwar el
Sadat, the ignorant, backward and mischievous sheikh Muhammad Metwalli
al-Shaarawi became Minister of the Awqaf (Endowments), thus having the
opportunity to diffuse the anti-Islamic political ideology which is nowadays
known as 'Political Islam'. The pseudo-Islamic radicalization had already
become a valuable tool for the CIA and MI6 against the USSR, China, any other
potential Eurasiatic power, and -of course- the most targeted Muslim countries,
but the naïve Hafez al Assad did not understand anything of all this.
It is easy to speak irrelevantly, to
denounce the numerous casualties during the 1982 Hama uprising (2 to 28
February), and to label Hafez al Assad's state as a dictatorial regime; but
this is utter nonsense. By the way, since the exact number of deaths was not
known, we can be sure about the real dimensions of the event, when we notice
that the highest numbers are always given by MI6 and CIA operatives.
About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_Hama_massacre
The destruction of Hama, 1982
The problem with Hafez al Assad's
Syria was that sizeable parts of the population were thoughtlessly allowed to
become enemies of their own country, opponents of their own historical
heritage, and victims of the worst rivals of Damascus, namely Riyadh and Cairo.
In this regard, Syria's routinely repeated positions against the 'Zionist state'
only worsened the conditions of socioeconomic and political stability. The fall
of the USSR and the disbandment of the Soviet Block did not bode well for
Syria.
When Hafez al Assad died in the year
2000, his son inherited an explosive situation, as a catastrophic wave of
pseudo-Islamic radicalization, laced with ignorance, lack of education,
historical distortions, abysmal hatred, absurd rancor and other extremely
negative feelings, had swept across the country. In fact, for Bashar al Assad, the
game was already lost since Day 1. Practically speaking, his only possible
chance to eventually survive would be to attempt to restart Syria from scratch
and question the colonial foundations of his state, overwhelmingly changing
everything. But Bashar al Assad never learned the true History of Aram Nahrain
(Mesopotamia), which is the true name of his country, and he could not
therefore potentially envisage which the basic acts for the salvation of
Damascus were.
To be sincere, Bashar al Assad ruled
in a naïve and amateurish manner, being unprepared for the worst. Yet, if one
day he was bold enough to recognize the state of Israel, this would change many
parameters in Damascus. Intransigence is good only in case of strong national
foundations, socioeconomic stability, and proven governmental efficiency.
Even after the beginning of the Syrian
civil war (for which it is now conventionally accepted that it started on the
15th March 2011), Bashar al Assad was too late to ask the Russian assistance;
but under similar circumstances, by delaying the demand for help, one simply causes
an increase in terms of casualties, destructions and losses. The gravity of the
situation across Syria in September 2015 was such that it took years for the
Russian army garrisons and the paramilitary to support the embattled Syrian
army in recovering 70-75% of the national territory. This was undoubtedly an
excellent opportunity of military training for the Russians. But with more than
13 million of Syrians displaced internally or externally, with more than 600000
dead, and with more than 200000 civilian casualties, the country was finally
exsanguine. Syria needed a real, comprehensive and overwhelming restart. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_civil_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_revolution
In September 2020, Syria had to be
reinvented. An extraordinary and unprecedented Syrian-Chinese alliance could
help in that direction. But it was up to the Syrians to ask for it. Quite
unfortunately, Bashar al Assad continued ruling as if nothing had happened! The
soup is hot, the soup is cold; the rebels are close, the rebels are far. In
fact, this could not last long. Even if the Kurmanji rebels in the East and the
Islamists in Idlib had been defeated and vanished, Syria was badly hit; without
a master plan for the country's reconstruction and rehabilitation, it would sooner
or later fall apart.
Instead of trying to think
out-of-the-box, the Syrian president remained captive of the same false dreams,
dreadful delusions, and insipid practices. Then, the exhausted country could
not continue anymore; actually, over the past 4-5 years, Syria was not viewed
as a country even by the best friends of Damascus; it had gradually become the
terrain for a war of attrition that Iran and Hezbollah wanted to undertake
against Israel. Consequently, when a country ends up becoming a passageway, the
day of its ultimate decomposition is not far.
In fact, what occurred in Syria in
the first week of December 2024 could have happened earlier. This is not a
unique case by the way; many countries all over the world are nowadays
untenable and unsustainable. Average people and silly experts in geopolitics endlessly
numerous consult volumes or sites of statistics, thinking that numbers can
possibly reflect the situation in which a country is. Unfortunately, this is a theoretical,
hypothetical and unsubstantiated assumption.
In fact, the powers-that-be are in a
position to accurately know how long a country can stand when facing a negative
shock. Certainly, many people would be taken by surprise, if they ever knew how
soon a country can disintegrate. Of course, I speak as of 2024, and not 1965,
but weakly structured states existed always.
Shmuel Bar: The Demise of the Arab
State, Re-Tribalization, and the Emergence of Jihadistans
https://westminster-institute.org/events/shmuel-bar-demise-of-the-arab-state-re-tribalization-and-the-emergence-of-jihadistans-in-the-next-five-years/
B. The colonial
formation of the technical entity 'Syria'
If Syria was a fake state inevitably
doomed to fail, this is due to the fact that it was not created by the local
inhabitants in full consciousness of their national identity. Many researchers
focus on Political History and find the origins of all the problems attested in
Baathist Syria in the preceding stages of Modern History of Syria. But this is
an aberration. The worst aspects of the French colonial rule were not the
military occupation, the economic exploitation, and the political interference.
All possibly negative situations would exert only minor impact on the local
people of Syria, if they were truly, correctly and accurately conscious of their
identity, historical past, and three (3) millennia of national Aramaean
heritage. Concerning the institutional developments, go through the following
links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupied_Enemy_Territory_Administration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_for_Syria_and_the_Lebanon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_for_Syria_and_the_Lebanon#States_created_during_the_French_Mandate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Kingdom_of_Syria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Lebanon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alawite_State
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Aleppo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Damascus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabal_Druze_State
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Syria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Syrian_Republic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatay_State
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Syrian_Republic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba%27athist_Syria
To understand the criminal deeds
that the French and the English colonials carried out from Morocco to Oman and
from Syria to Somalia, one must first distinguish the great difference that
exists between a) the natural and normal historical term 'nation', which
existed for many millennia among all the peoples, being attested in all the
languages, and b) the constructed, unnatural and abnormal modern term 'nation',
which reflected the notions and the qualities that the 18th c. French philosophers
of the Enlightenment attributed to this word. Those fools were preposterous
enough to think that they could fabricate nations at will.
The modern term 'nation' is an
inhuman and unhistorical anomaly, as it constitutes a vicious historical
revisionism of the most arbitrary character. Historical nations that were
transformed into 'modern nations' as per the disastrous ideological priorities
of the absurd French philosophers of the Enlightenment became monstrous,
tyrannical realms with zero tolerance toward other nations, which they tried to
exterminate by all means, because they had remained 'historical nations' to
them. It goes without saying that the most paramount elements, which define
'modern nations', involve amongst others the following:
1- the state, and not the people,
defines the national identity;
2- the state, and not the society,
determines the historical past, the cultural heritage, and the spiritual-religious
traditions;
3- educational and academic
institutions set up by the state impose on the people a monstrous distortion of
their historical past as per the interests of the state;
4- the intellectual life is detached
from the traditional culture of the people;
5- spirituality, cult, popular
imagination, epics, folk poetry, and traditional literature are forcefully
removed from the epicenter of the society, being replaced by state-approved
norms, which gradually form a parallel society known as the elite;
6- the national language is
distorted in the ateliers of the grammarians who destroy the originality of the
earlier language, often introducing translated excerpts from foreign languages
(in the case of colonized nations) or from the elite jargon (among colonial
powers);
7- once distorted, the historical
past becomes a tool in the hands of the ruling elite to totally transform the
people, thus dissociating the nation from its real and original past; and
8- rationalism, nominalism,
utilitarianism, and other ideological dogmas are vilely introduced in the
society, also contributing to the destruction of the historical nation that the
said people constituted in the past.
Within the limits of the present
article, I cannot expand more on this vast topic, but I have to underscore its
importance in the way the Western European colonial powers fabricated the
modern world by systematically manufacturing fake nations here and there. As
early as Napoleon's invasion of Egypt (1798), the French colonial planning
involved forms of Pan-Arabism or Arab Nationalism. Of course, it was a fallacious
construction; they wanted to create a vast 'Arab kingdom' that would be
rebellious against the Ottoman sultan and subservient to the French Emperor.
And 60 years later, Napoleon III was about to take the posture of 'Emperor of
the Arabs'! About:
https://academic.oup.com/stanford-scholarship-online/book/29682/chapter-abstract/250183552?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
Opposed to the fallacy of
Pan-Arabism, the irrevocable historical reality of the wider region revolves
around the following points:
a- The entire population of today's
Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Libya is Berber (Amazigh) – not Arab;
To end colonialism in North-Northwestern Africa, Berber (Amazigh) must become the only official language in Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and Mauritania
b- The outright majority of the
population of today's Egypt is Coptic (irrespective of religion), whereas the
local minorities are: the Nubians, the Berbers, the Beja, and the Sinai
Bedouins;
c- The quasi-totality of the
population of today's Sudan is Cushitic and the minorities are of Nilo-Saharan origin
(notably the Nubians, the Berta, the Nuba, etc.);
d- The entire population of today's
Yemen and Oman is Yemenite, i.e. non-Arab, as it is proven by the corpus of
pre-Islamic epigraphic monuments excavated throughout Saudi-occupied Najran,
Yemen, Hadhramaut, Mahra, Socotra, Dhofar and Oman. It must be added that,
deciphered thanks to their relationship with Axumite Ge'ez, the Ancient
Yemenite languages (Sabaean, Qatabani, Himyarite, Hadhrami and Minaean / Ma'in)
are Semitic, but totally unrelated to Arabic; and
e- The outright majority of the
population of today's Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan, Palestine/Israel, Kuwait,
Qatar, UAE and the Saudi North is Aramaean. The same is also valid for the
Arabic-speaking populations of SE Turkey and SW Iran. The local minorities are:
the Turkmen, as well as the Kurmanjis, the Shabaks, the Yazidis, the Soranis, the
Failis and others (who are collectively, but mistakenly, called 'Kurds').
To end educational-academic-intellectual colonialism in Egypt, Coptic must become the only official language in Egypt
All the same, throughout this vast
region, in striking contrast with the historical truth, the French and English
propaganda has divided the population into Christians and Muslims, mistakenly
and deliberately identifying the former with Aramaeans and the latter with 'Arabs'.
This is preposterous; Syria's and Iraq's populations did not identify
themselves as 'Arabs' before the arrival of colonial spies and agents in the
18th c. Ottoman Empire.
It is wrong to pretend that these
populations used Quranic Arabic as vernacular before the colonials arrived.
They used to speak several vernacular dialects with many words from Syriac
Aramaic. Arabic was only the religious language for the Muslims, but it was a
dead language; Quranic Arabic ceased progressively to be a spoken language in
the advent of the Mongol invasions, the ensuing wars, and the relocation of
Turkmen tribes in the wider region of Western Asia. Similar conditions existed
in Egypt where numerous mixed (Coptic / Arabic) dialects were spoken and in
North-Northwest Africa, a vast region with a great number of Berber
vernaculars.
While all these populations were part
of the Islamic Caliphate, during and before the Ottoman times, the prevailing
notion of the word 'nation' was totally unrelated to the Modern Western concept
of 'nation' about which I already expanded. The French and the English came up
with a monstrous plan of Arabization of the Berbers, the Copts, the Aramaeans,
and all the rest. They introduced successive campaigns of linguistic
Arabization after they fabricated a constructed language, which is called
'Modern Standard Arabic' (al-Arabīyah
al-Fuṣḥa al-Ḥaditha/ العربية الفصحى الحديثة); this linguistic creation is again not a
native language. It is as false as Modern Hebrew and Modern Greek, being the
pure result of Western Orientalists, Semitic linguists, grammarians, and their
local servants (instructors or students). About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Standard_Arabic
In addition, based in Khedivial
Alexandria, French and English Orientalists forged the basics of a nonexistent,
completely ahistorical concept: the 'Arab nation'. False versions of Islamic
History (in which the reality was distorted in a way to fully serve the
anti-Islamic, anti-Oriental, anti-Asiatic and anti-African purposes of the
colonial powers) were diffused and imposed locally in order to totally confuse
the natives who found it opportune to pursue studies either in the colonially
managed, local schools and universities or in Western Europe. Gradually, the
villainous ideologies of Pan-Arabism and Arab Nationalism were composed by the
first victims of the scheming colonial Orientalists, who did not want to allow
a proper nation-building process to be earnestly undertaken. About:
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/religions/article/2024/08/19/napoleon-bonaparte-was-attracted-by-the-figure-of-muhammad-and-the-centrality-of-the-quran-in-islam_6718119_63.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurji_Zaydan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-Arabism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_nationalism
https://lecourrierdumaghrebetdelorient.info/headline/monde-arabe-le-mythe-du-panarabisme-de-la-nahda-aux-printemps-arabes/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265942479_A_Conflicted_Sense_of_Nationality_Napoleon_III's_Arab_Kingdom_and_the_Paradoxes_of_French_Multiculturalism
M. A. Aziz, The Origins of Arab
Nationalism
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24711051
By contriving the scarecrow named
'Arab', the colonial gangsters of the West created the recipient of all of
their angry insults, vibrant attacks, untrustworthy accusations, fallacious
criticisms, and false historical narratives. For everything, you could put the
blame on the 'Arab'. But the Arab did not exist at all; he was purely
fictional. As the Ottoman Empire was about to collapse, no one could imagine,
let alone anticipate, the detrimental blow that the Western European colonials
were about to deliver. Then, the nascent Pan-Arabism could easily become the
mattress on which new Western Orientalist forgeries would be embedded. These
fraudulent constructs involved, amongst others, Pan-Islamism, Islamic
Modernism, and the nonsensical theories of the Freemason Jamal al-Din
al-Afghani and of his likes. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamal_al-Din_al-Afghani
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_modernism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-Islamism
The end result of all these
catastrophic delusions and deceitful schemes was not just the mobilization of
local populations against the Ottoman Empire; this undertaking was due to the
fact that the ignorant and fanaticized masses falsely believed that they were
'Arabs' and, in addition, they stupidly trusted the fake promises of the
English and the French according to which the 'Caliphate' would return to the
'Arabs'.
The foremost consequence of the
colonial deception was the formation of many fragmentary and fake states that
had no historicity, no identity, no integrity, and no viability. Above all, the
fallacy of Pan-Arabism prevented the formation of a sizeable state from the
Eastern Mediterranean coastlands to the borders of Iran and from the Turkish
borders to the southern shores of the Persian Gulf and the eastern littoral of
the Red Sea. This state would be Aram Nahrain and its official language would
be Syriac Aramaic.
Incorporating Damascus, Baghdad,
Mosul, Haleb, Beirut, Basra, Khaybar, Jaffa, Dubai, Haifa, Khaybar, Latakia,
Arbil and Jerusalem in one national territory, Aram Nahrain would be a secular
state where all the believers could practice their faiths in peace and all the
inhabitants would feel to be the conscious and glorious heirs of the
Mesopotamian, Phoenician, Aramaean, Hebrew, Christian and Islamic
civilizations.
To terminate the neo-colonial fake states that plunged the region in numerous wars and repugnant oppression, all the territories of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and several adjacent lands must be unified into one state with Syriac Aramaic as official language: Aram Nahrain.
Syriac Aramaic, and not Arabic, is by definition the national language of Muslims and Christians, Druzes and Ismailis across the region; beyond all the deliberately exacerbated divisions, the only unifying parameter of all the populations of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, and the North of Saudi Arabia is their common Aramaean past and historical heritage. Consequently, their only chance to undergo a successful nation-building effort is to impose Syriac Aramaic as their common, official language.
Aram Nahrain would be the conscious
confirmation of 6000 years of historical continuity and the living example of
human ascendancy. But it would also be the terminal cancellation of all Western
European and North American evil schemes and colonial crimes.
Aram Nahrain would be the only path
to peaceful coexistence in the post-Ottoman era; that's why all three
war-generating forces would never afford to allow the Aramaeans of Syria, Iraq
and the adjacent regions to know who they are and what they could do, if
delving in their Aramaean identity and historical heritage.
From now on, there will be exclusively
one chance to ultimately pacify the region; and this will be the entrance into
function of an external parameter. This will be an ancient factor, which will
one day return to Syria, but it will be out of the three major secret
societies' power to interfere or impact. Great emperors knew it and distinct
historians wrote about it already before more than 1000 years. However, this great
paragon will not reach Syria in force except when will be alive the only person
who should never be born. About:
https://www.academia.edu/25491609/The_Aramaeans_rise_will_transfigure_the_Middle_Eastern_Chessboard_2005_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis
https://www.academia.edu/25552905/Islam_the_Cultural_Aramaization_of_the_Arabs_by_Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis
https://www.academia.edu/25553198/Aramaeans_vs_Arabs_The_fight_between_Civilization_and_Barbarism_within_Islam_by_Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis
https://www.academia.edu/23219268/Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis_Progenitor_of_Wars_and_Tyrannies_the_Falsehood_of_Pan_Arabism
https://www.academia.edu/24440061/Arab_Nation_Hoax_Geared_to_Falsify_Islamic_History_Ruin_Varied_Nations_disfiguratively_Named_Arab_by_Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis
https://www.academia.edu/24420104/Syria_A_Non_Arabic_Aramaean_Country_Ruled_by_the_Pan_Arabist_Puppets_of_Zionism_and_Freemasonry_by_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis
Pseudo-Assyrians, Pseudo-Chaldaeans,
and the Cultural – National Needs of the Aramaean Nation
https://www.aramnahrin.org/English/PseudoAssyrians_PeudoChaldeans_Arameans_19_12_2008.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Download the article in PDF:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/12/12/syria-where-three-agendas-clash-greater-israel-greater-middle-east-and-the-revival-of-the-roman-empire/
https://www.academia.edu/126309556/Syria_where_three_Agendas_clash_Greater_Israel_Greater_Middle_East_and_the_Revival_of_the_Roman_Empire
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_13989%2Fall
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/FLwnhtXwjq?
https://pubhtml5.com/jxyro/uqxd/
https://online.fliphtml5.com/qynhg/ugxx/
https://anyflip.com/fdfzl/mfow
https://www.calameo.com/read/007156897af41b9f6798f
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/_b_Syria_where_three_Agendas_clash_-_Greater_Israel_Greater_Middle_East_and_the_Revival_of_the_Roman_Empire_b_/28030796?file=51202202
https://www.patreon.com/posts/118052491
No comments:
Post a Comment