Syria: where three Agendas clash - Greater Israel, Greater Middle East, and the Revival of the Roman Empire

Сирия: где сталкиваются три повестки дня — Большой Израиль, Большой Ближний Восток и Возрождение Римской империи

 

Or how the dismemberment of Syria brings about the end of Iraq, the dissolution of Turkey, and the disbandment of Iran

 

Или как расчленение Сирии приводит к концу Ирака, распаду Турции и расформированию Ирана

1935 population map of the French mandate in Syria and Lebanon

The recent developments in Syria come as a nasty surprise to Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and Benjamin Netanyahu. If the latter rushed to make a touching comment and take some credit, this is due to the fact that 'in politics, you always say the opposite of what truly happened'. In a recently published comment, I explained why Donald Trump's second election is simply called "American Stupidity". I then specified the following:

 

More easily, a prevailing, ruling force is contained by means of a continuous brake than a ruling force, removed from power, is repelled at the time of its unbridled anger.

 

Contents

I. Introduction

II. The Zionist plan: Greater Israel and foundation of the Third Temple

III. The Jesuit plan: Greater Middle East, Jerusalem as Seat of Unified Christianity, and Fusion of Christianity and Islam into a Satanic, counterfeit faith

IV. The Freemasonic plan: the Revival of the Roman Empire, the Comeback of Paganism, the Abolition of Christianity, and the Mass Extermination of Muslims

V. Zionist, Jesuit, and Freemasonic agendas as Communicating Vessels  

VI. The truth about the fall of Syria

VII. The main losers in Syria: Donald Trump and China

VIII. Was Bashar al-Assad's fall inevitable?

A. Syria under the rule of al-Assad family

B. The colonial formation of the technical entity 'Syria'

The Kingdom of Syria in 1918

Содержание

I. Введение

II. Сионистский план: Великий Израиль и основание Третьего Храма

III. Иезуитский план: Большой Ближний Восток, Иерусалим как место единого христианства и слияние христианства и ислама в сатанинскую, поддельную веру

IV. Масонский план: Возрождение Римской империи, возвращение язычества, отмена христианства и массовое истребление мусульман

V. Сионистские, иезуитские и масонские программы как сообщающиеся сосуды

VI. Правда о падении Сирии

VII. Главные проигравшие в Сирии: Дональд Трамп и Китай

VIII. Было ли падение Башара Асада неизбежным?

A. Сирия под властью семьи Асада

B. Колониальное формирование технического образования «Сирия»

The states of the French Mandate from 1921 to 1922

I. Introduction

This is exactly what happened in Syria these last days; the ruling force, which is expected to be removed from power in America, is the bulk of the Jesuit Order. By far, Donald Trump would have preferred the situation in Syria to remain as it was; but all his international supporters were not in a position to help repel the attack triggered by the local puppets of the Jesuits. This consists in only the first expression of the Jesuits' unbridled anger.

 

The Jesuits took over the control of the major tool for worldwide prevalence, which is the US administration, in 1989 with the rise of G. H. W. Bush to the presidency; this was the first major consequence of the secret deal stricken between the mainstream Jesuit group and a very influential group of Zionists (involving the Rothschild and the Rockefeller families). It was even attempted to start it earlier: in 1981 with the assassination attempt against Ronald Reagan (30 March). The shift and rise of the Jesuit-Zionist alliance constituted an overwhelming change in the US politics and in the international affairs. At the political level, the deal was reflected in the secret pact made between Ariel Sharon and President Bush, the father. In fact, the Clintons, G. W. Bush, Obama, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris have been mere puppets of the then expanding Jesuit force.

 

The precipitated and disorderly collapse of the USSR and the Soviet bloc is precisely due to the fact that the 'old Freemasonic guard' (Reagan, Thatcher, Mitterrand, Kohl, Chirac, and Gorbachev) was swept away or immobilized/neutralized and their plans for a gradual and orderly transformation of the USSR into a series of independent republics thrown to the rubbish basket.

 

Such was the impact of a) the unprecedented totalitarianism imposed across the US, b) the implementation of a vast political agenda (9/11, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the fabrication of the Turkish Islamists and the UK-US-backed imposition of their most loathed, unrepresentative and lawless regime, the so-called 'Arab Spring' operations, the blackmail and annihilation of earlier allies, and the numerous 'color revolutions'), and c) the deployment of new technologies that transformed the rhythm of daily life and work (mobile telephony, Information Technology, Internet, etc.) that, when Donald Trump and with him the 'old Freemasonic guard' came to power, they found themselves in a truly ominous, lunar landscape. This situation constituted the major obstacle for Trump during his first tenure; in other words, the Jesuit eschatological agenda had already advanced much during the previous 28 years (1989-2016). In an article that I published on the 2nd January 2011 under the title "The Alexandria Crime Highlights Al Qaeda's Identity as a Freemasonic Fabrication", I described the importance of the advanced technology in the preparation of operations like 9/11 and the 'Arab Spring'. You can find it here:

https://www.academia.edu/25622783/The_Alexandria_Crime_Highlights_Al_Qaedas_Identity_as_a_Freemasonic_Fabrication_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

 

This being so, the Freemasonic forces retained their power in several other parts of the world, either opposing the Jesuit plans or acquiescing to them in order to avoid frontal opposition under unfavorable circumstances. From Russia to China to India, the forces that opposed the Jesuit agenda managed to establish numerous points of clash and thus hinder the further advancement of the Jesuit-Zionist agenda. Their strongman in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, managed to return to power. It is however noteworthy that when the Jesuit-masterminded crime of 9/11 took place, the non-Zionist, Freemason Netanyahu was not in office; he was trusted, as he was not 'theirs', and he was not allowed to govern during that period.

 

Since 2017, the Freemasonic alliance has made an effort to catch up with the developments and to take back the lost terrain. Furthermore, all factions of Jesuits, Freemasons and Zionists did their best to develop new technologies in different fields and thus promote their agendas at the detriment of the others. People who are nowadays used to view things conventionally are going to be extremely befuddled in the next few years. The so-called pandemic, in its very inception, was nothing else except an undeclared Jesuit war against China; if the Chinese establishment did not react as rapidly, as steadfastly and as resolutely as it did, China would undoubtedly have recorded 100 or 200 million dead. This was the true target.

 

During the tenures of both, Trump and Biden, the Freemasonic establishment made a certain comeback and prepared itself to deliver a series of monstrous hits against the Jesuit agenda. Donald Trump's second election was due to the fact that the evil, sick and inhuman elements of the Jesuit agenda generated a great schism among them, and this has been reflected in the overwhelming rejection of the disreputable pope Francis I by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò. Following the pathetic and ridiculous excommunication of the latter ("The Most Reverend Carlo Maria Viganò was found guilty of the reserved delict of schism") by the paranoid, pro-Muslim, pro-LGBTQ, pro-Eugenics elite of Vatican, an important group of Jesuits and American political and business figures started cooperating with the Trump establishment, and this alliance brought him back to power.

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò

It was immediately evident that the Jesuits would fight back as best they could, even before Trump is sworn-in. Very emphatically, former French Minister of Foreign Affairs Hubert Védrine named Trump's re-election a 'revolution'. Others question whether he is going to ever be in charge, since his enemies would not refrain from a final assassination attempt.

 

Then, comes the stone named 'Syria'! Throwing such a stone against Donald Trump before the beginning of his tenure is a major sign. The Jesuits used their silly pseudo-Muslim puppets to tell him that they do not intend to allow him proceed with his plans for peace in the Middle East. If I define all Muslims involved in acts, words and plans against Bashar al Assad as 'silly', this is due to the fact that they know nothing about the existing agendas of powerful forces to which they cannot resist, and even worse, they fail to understand how easily they are being manipulated, especially with so many gangsters, 'fighters', and terrorists having microchip implants in their heads without even knowing it.

 

What follows is a brief description of the three existing plans for the Middle East. 

1861–1918 Mount Lebanon Mutasarrifate, the ethnic-religious groups, and colonial structure of Lebanon; about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Lebanon_Mutasarrifate

II. The Zionist plan: Greater Israel and foundation of the Third Temple

Here I have to make several clarifications; the state of Israel is a fake. The correct name would be Judah or Judaea. After 722 BCE, there are not Israelites, as the 10-tribe northern state of Israel (with Samaria as capital) ceased to exist and the entire population was first transferred to the NE confines of Assyria and then lost.

 

Today, the so-called Jews, who lay claim to the Promised Land, are not ethnically Judean, but Ashkenazi Khazarian in their outright majority (85-90%); historically, the Jews did not lay claim to a state in Palestine, and there are numerous examples of Alexandrian Jews (like Onias IV) inviting their coreligionists in Egypt. No one cared about a state in Judaea. As a modern national movement, Zionism is overtly and viciously anti-Jewish, ceaselessly diffusing among Jews all over the world various anti-religious concepts earlier propagated within the Western world. Example: for Judaism, the foundations of Western European Renaissance, Classicism, and all the French Enlightenment ideas and concepts (Republic, Democracy, elections, Human Rights, etc.) are an evil and anti-Biblical abomination. As a matter of fact, in modern times, Judaism has been assaulted by religious renegades and political fraudsters, being therefore multi-divided. 

The Zionist project was embraced mostly by Ashkenazi Khazarians, while it was originally rejected by the Sephardic and other Jews. Zionists have been divided too. Among those allied with the Jesuits, there is an increasing attitude of accepting the Christian faith. Jacqueline de Romilly, the famous French academician and Classicist, fully converted to Maronite Catholicism in 2008, at the age of 95. Apparently, they also accept the eschatological narratives of the Jesuits, fully cooperating with them.

 

Furthermore, those among the Zionists, who oppose the aforementioned, influential Zionist group that has cooperated with the Jesuits, are also extensively divided into many branches, notably Revisionist Zionism, Religious Zionism, Revolutionary Zionism, etc. There are many supporters of the Greater Israel project among them. The concept involves also a) the identification of the Modern State of Israel with the Biblical Messiah, b) the conviction that we nowadays are already living in the so-called Messianic Era (as of 1948!), and c) the confidence that progressively the Zionist state will occupy all the lands 'given' to it by 'god', namely from the Nile to Euphrates.

 

Of course, the worst enemies of the Zionist supporters of the Greater Israel plan, are the Zionists who follow the elite that cooperated with the Jesuits; among them, one finds supporters of Reform Zionism, Liberal Zionism, and Labor Zionism.

 

Many people confuse the term 'Zionism' and attribute it indiscriminately to Israeli statesmen, politicians, academics and intellectuals; but this is wrong. For example, Netanyahu is not a Zionist, whereas his political partner (from another party) and minister Bezalel Smotrich is a Zionist, who supports the Greater Israel concept. On the contrary, the leader of the opposition, Yair Lapid is a Zionist, who totally rejects this idea. This schism goes back to the establishment of the State of Israel; the Labor Zionist leadership, which controlled totally the first three decades of Israeli political life, accepted always a pragmatic approach and partition of the territory of British Palestine. On the contrary, the Revisionist Zionists, who formed the opposition at the time, incessantly called for Eretz Yisrael ha-Shlema, i.e. the Greater Israel, or literally, the "complete" land of Israel.

 

Before closing this unit, I have to add that there is a truly dangerous type of Zionism that has no relationship with Jewish Zionism at all! Yet, this is the most dangerous tool of pressure in international affairs, namely Christian Zionism. This movement started in the 20th century, as a new form of Christian restorationism and as a late offspring of English Puritanism and Calvinistic millennialism.

 

Christian Zionism is harmful to all Jews and can become calamitous for Jewish Zionists; as movement, it is a Freemasonic outfit intentionally created so that its members appear Zionism-friendly, spy on Zionists, put impediments on their path, and fool them with extremist ideas when this is needed. For this reason, we observe that Israeli Freemasons have many Evangelical Zionist friends and supporters, who thus appear disguised as pro-Jewish and pro-Zionist whereas their anti-Jewish and anti-Zionist hatred is bottomless. All the same, Israeli Zionists have proven able to also utilize the Evangelical Zionists and their nonsensical discourse about the destruction of the Islamic holy shrines on the Temple Mount (Moriah) and the subsequent reconstruction of the 'Third Temple'.   

 

Will the Zionists, who support the Greater Israel, manage to implement their plan?

 

It depends on how swiftly they can exploit unexpected situations that may have arisen on the spur of the moment, following the deployment of other agendas; they know that their worst enemies are the Jesuits. That's why they often cooperate with Israeli Freemasons to block Jesuit plans, notably that of the two-state solution as a chance to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict resolution.

 

On the other hand, Israeli Freemasons envy the strong organization that the Zionists have and, by occasionally allying themselves with these radicals, they get the dirty job done. For an open-end agenda (since we already live in the Messianic era), there is no urgency. Greater Israel supporters want now to establish settlements in Gaza and to force Gaza and West Bank Palestinians out of Israel.

 

The dismemberment of Syria is good news for the Zionists. The reason is obvious. The chaotic conditions that will prevail in various provinces of Syria will certainly put an end to the postcolonial state that France installed on that part of Ottoman territory. The destruction of Damascus is a permanent dimension of both Zionist agendas, the Israeli and the Christian.

That's why they have -so often and in so extolling manner- quoted in their vindictive and mischievous publications the well-known Biblical excerpt (from Isaiah 17:1; A prophecy against Damascus: "See, Damascus will no longer be a city but will become a heap of ruins"). For decades, to the Greater Israel supporters, "removing the burden of Damascus" meant only the collapse of the Baath regime that they so passionately wished. But the false translation of KJV and their misinterpretation were misplaced.

 

As a matter fact, the aforementioned Biblical text concerns the lightning strike that the Assyrian Emperor Tiglath-pileser III (745-727) delivered against the Aramaean kingdom Aram-Dimashq with the siege and the subsequent destruction of Damascus (740 BCE). But the malignant Evangelicals, who hate the Israeli Zionists intentionally, attempted to fool them and to make them believe that the said excerpt has also an eschatological value – which is childish nonsense.

 

From an Israeli Zionist viewpoint, after the fall of Bashar al Assad, the best possible development across Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Turkey would be an unstable, hostile and chaotic situation of all fighting against all with the borderlines shifting endlessly and the survivors leaving for Turkey and Europe like rubbish. Under such pitiless conditions, they may wish to add some small gains (in South Lebanon and Syria), but the Israeli Freemasons will certainly minimize and/or postpone this option. The reason for this is that for the latter what will be at stake is going to be the collapse of the current, Jesuit-backed regimes of Europe and their replacement with overt and merciless tyrannies. All the same, a small scale expansion of Israel will evidently be inevitable; it already happened on 8th December 2024, as Israel strengthened its position by capturing key high points on Mount Hermon from the Assad regime.

 

The Greater Israel is the least plausible option; but it can never be ruled out as a most nefarious perspective for the wider region. .

 

III. The Jesuit plan: Greater Middle East, Jerusalem as Seat of Unified Christianity, and Fusion of Christianity and Islam into a Satanic, counterfeit faith

Every specialist, who looks comparatively at the drawing of Greater Israel and the map of Greater Middle East, immediately understands that the latter was invented in order to prevent the former. Instead of an unprecedented enlargement of Israel, as attested in the former case, we have the breakup of almost all the states that happen to surround the Zionist state in the latter document. 

There is a critical point of differentiation between the two maps and plans; whereas Turkey and Iran remain almost intact in the case of Greater Israel, when it comes to Greater Middle East, all four major Western Asiatic countries, namely Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, split into pieces. Of all these states only Saudi Arabia loses a significant portion of its territory in the first plan (Greater Israel). And Egypt, which is cut to two pieces for the needs of the Greater Israel, is left intact in the Greater Middle East project.

 

Increasing the number of states that happen to be located around the Zionist state is bad news for Israel's Zionists and Greater Israel supporters. With the populations of those lands being as they are, "more states in the region" means "more enemies for Israel". In the best case scenario, the Greater Middle East project will create a frenzied environment around Israel with incessant wars of religious, ethnic and/or economic character. It is therefore crystal clear that such a project belongs to an influential group of power with worldwide interests. This group of power must have apparently a significant benefit from the economic destruction of Saudi Arabia and Iran, two major Oil producing states. In addition, it must also harbor greater geopolitical plans, and possess the means to implement them.

 

Interestingly, for the materialization of the Greater Middle East project,

a) Turkey's territory will shrink almost up to the point of becoming slightly larger than that of a monstrous 'Free Kurdistan',

b) Iran's territory will shrink almost up to the point of becoming slightly larger than that of a monstrously enlarged Afghanistan, which is already a fake nation-state; all the same, as per the needs of the project, a significant portion of Pakistan will be annexed to the otherwise useless state of Afghanistan, and

c) Saudi Arabia will lose territories to Yemen, Jordan (now named Greater Jordan!), the Arab Shia state, which will have Basra as capital, as well as to the purposefully invented "Islamic Sacred State", which will comprise Medina, Mecca, and Jeddah.

 

The sophisticated project cancels at the same time following visions or plans of foreign policy:

a) the so-called Neo-Ottoman delusion of Turkey's ignorant, uneducated and stupid Islamists and Pan-Turanianists,

b) the alleged alliance between Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Hezbollah,

c) the hypothetical 'Shia triangle' (Iran, Syria, and Yemen),

d) the -mistakenly perceived as real- Axis of Resistance (including also Palestinians),

e) the Russian presence in, and impact on, the Middle East, and

f) China's impact on the Middle East and plans for worldwide supremacy.

 

Having as target to circumvent or breach the aforementioned visions or plans of foreign policy can only be inherent to the long-term strategy of a group of power known for its worldwide aspirations, propagation of the Modern Western culture, steadfast opposition to Eurasianism, and distance from projects like the Belt and Road Initiative (New Silk Road). This group is the Jesuit Order. If many pawns of the Jesuit establishment seem to have frenetically supported globalist policies, this is not due to their conviction in Globalism, but to the fact that globalization was considered as the fastest way to westernize China. However, one must always keep in mind that the Jesuits tried to impact the 'Middle Kingdom' (Zhongguo, 中国; 中國) as early as the 16th c.

 

Why do the Jesuits and their Zionist allies need to divide the entire region into a multitude of states? As a matter of fact, more than 20 states seem to have become the result of creative strategies of thought deployed by leading experts and specialists trying to materialize plans and transform the said region.

 

The answer is easy to understand.

 

Jordan is already a Palestinian state with two thirds of the population originating from Palestine. With a Greater Jordan, the Palestinians of Israel, West Bank, and Gaza will be smoothly transferred to their new 'homeland'. This will finally bring peace to Israel. Furthermore, a great number of people from the diaspora will flock to this "New Palestine".

 

With a Greater Lebanon, which will encompass the coastal zone of today's Syria, a new Druze, Christian and Alawi state will emerge across the Mediterranean coast in peace and cooperation with Israel. It is not therefore bizarre that Israeli supporters of the Jesuit-Zionist alliance (and therefore of the Greater Middle East project), like Zev Farber, found it necessary to publish -as early as 9th December 2024 (!)- an article under the title "Divide Syria", propagating the idea that "in time, Latakia can be another Singapore"! https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/divide-syria/

 

It would be wrong to consider this approach as philo-Druzism; it is an internal Zionist clash, because this suggestion cancels the Greater Israel project once for all.

 

The so-called 'Free Kurdistan' will function as a new lever over the Shia and Sunni militias, the Islamic terrorist groups, and all the paranoids who passionately wish to impose Sharia on a state populated by Muslims. So, the misfortunate state will be plunged into endless strives and wars, after having been the result of many other wars in the first place. It goes without saying that, having to constantly fight with the Syrian Sunni state, the Iraqi Sunni state, the Iraqi Shia state, Turkey, and Iran (or, to be more accurate, with the leftover of those two countries), 'Free Kurdistan' will undoubtedly exhaust its resources quite soon. Then, the total disaster will come.

 

But who cares?

 

To the schemers, who draw so nefarious maps, the different nations that the Western criminals call 'Kurds' have less value than a mouse for experiment; that's why all the Kurmanji, Zaza, Sorani, Yazidi, Shabak, Gorani, Faili, Bijari, Ahl-e Haq, Kurdeli, Laki and other populations that aspire to national identity preservation, cultural integrity protection and spiritual coherence continuation must reject any contact -let alone alliance- with Western protectors or supporters, because any type of cooperation with representatives of the Collective West will be detrimental and even lethal to them. The same is actually valid for all Muslims.  

Religious communities in Syria

 

Religious communities in Iraq

Last, by carefully observing the fracture of states and the readjustment of borders that the Greater Middle East map suggests and by anticipating the subsequent wars that will be inevitably triggered after the transformation of the region according to the irrelevant and meaningless borderlines invented by the map makers, experienced historians and political scientists are able to understand that the map automatically implies that we live after the year 2030, when the carbon dioxide emissions reduction targets will have been achieved and therefore the Oil and Gas production of the OPEC countries significantly diminished.

 

All the aforementioned developments and the rise of Israel's political Left to power will enable Israel to accept to transform Jerusalem into an international city where the World Council of Churches and other religious instances will be headquartered. To tame and thus subdue a great number of Muslims, the Jesuits intend to increase dramatically their symbolic acts and hypocritical lectures in view of a well-prepared fusion of Christianity and Islam. An example of what I mean as symbolic acts was offered on 7th December 2024, when pope Francis I prayed before the 'Nativity of Bethlehem 2024' in Vatican’s Paul VI Hall, inaugurating the Nativity scene, and inanely showing baby Jesus on keffiyeh. About: https://www.timesofisrael.com/pope-francis-inaugurates-nativity-scene-in-vatican-showing-baby-jesus-on-keffiyeh/

and

https://www.timesofisrael.com/vatican-nativity-scene-showing-baby-jesus-on-a-keffiyeh-removed-after-backlash/

 

The transformation of Jerusalem into an international city-workshop for the fusion of Christianity and Islam, i.e. the so-called Chrislam, will mark the Jesuits' second effort to leave Europe and the beginning of their final attempt to settle in China and christen that country. https://religion24.net/why-is-chrislam-religion-important-in-todays-society/

 

IV. The Freemasonic plan: the Revival of the Roman Empire, the Comeback of Paganism, the Abolition of Christianity, and the Mass Extermination of Muslims

Many Israelis blame Benjamin Netanyahu for destroying Israel; many uninformed and naïve people do not believe this, but it is quite true. The monstrous Gaza war and genocide were carefully planned by him long ago; before 17 years, Netanyahu helped Hamas take over Gaza, eliminate Fatah control in the Strip, receive colossal funds from abroad, smuggle an incredible amount of arms, prepare the -immense and worldwide unique- underground network of tunnels, and get military training and great support in every sense from different foreign countries. It is clear that without an unprecedented preparation during a protracted period, the Palestinian fighters would have never achieved to deliver the hit they did. All this and much more was perfectly well-known to Netanyahu, who reacted always by saying his customary, yet nonsensical and ridiculous lies.

 

Comparing the October 7 attacks to the September 11 event, an objective, impartial and sincere observer would find the former as far more detrimental than the latter, not only because the collateral damages must be evaluated proportionally (1180 killed, 3400 civilians and soldiers wounded, and 251 civilians and soldiers taken captive in a country with population of 10 million people vs. 2977 victims in a 280 million people country), but also due to the far-reaching ramifications that Hamas' attacks had at the local level.

 

As of today, it would be pertinent to say that the September 11 event had a greater impact at the worldwide scale and the October 7 attacks were of greater significance at the local-regional level; but this statement is correct only …. 'as of today'!

 

Viewing however things in perspective, one would certainly be tempted to describe the Netanyahu-sponsored October 7 theatrical coup in Israel as the Freemasonic counterweight to the G. H. W. Bush-produced September 11 Jesuit melodramatic feat. That's why one has to wait for some time in order to start noticing the avalanche of repercussions and side-effects that the October 7 attacks will have. One has to bear in mind that Netanyahu was in office from March 2009 until June 2021 and, again, from December 2022 until now. And G. H. W. Bush's tenure lasted from January 1989 until January 1993, just a month before the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which is now correctly considered as the 'powder keg' for 9/11.

 

Benjamin Netanyahu is not Bezalel Smotrich; he did not supervise the monstrous event in order to just set up settlements in Gaza and send the criminally decimated Palestinian population to the Sinai Peninsula or somewhere in Jordan. The serious complications of the extraordinary event concern mainly Europe. The Netanyahu-sponsored October 7 attacks were fully coordinated with the Russian special military operations in Ukraine that had started more than 18 months earlier (22 February 2022) and with the (then forthcoming) US presidential elections (5 November 2024).

 

The Freemasonic counter-attack is expected to be masterfully orchestrated by Trump, Putin, Netanyahu, Orban, Le Pen, and other associates in order to totally break down the Jesuit agenda which has been hitherto implemented in the European Union. Many people have often associated the will for European political unification with the notorious Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi and his ideas about Pan-Europa; but this is totally misplaced. Only an uneducated person would be as simplistic as to think that, when two powerful groups' interests clash as regards a specific topic, the only options are pro and con; that's ridiculous. The opponents of the European political unification are not necessarily supporters of divisions and wars throughout Europe, but they may well be the champions of another type of European unification within a totally different environment in terms of ethnic, cultural and spiritual dimensions.

 

The true opposite to 'European unification' is not 'division and internal conflicts in Europe', but a counterfeit European unification. The Freemasonic plan for European unification is at the antipodes of the Jesuit plan for Europe.

 

The fundamental concepts of the Jesuit plan for Europe revolve around the following key areas:

a- federal, decentralized organization,

b- Liberation Theology principles,

c- termination of the nation-state notion,

d- race amalgamation involving replacement migration,

e- religious acculturation, and

f- multicultural societies, 

In striking contrast to the Jesuit plan, the Freemasonic perspective for Europe involves following major parameters:

a- by force removal of the Jesuit-backed regimes throughout EU,

b- centralized administration of the diverse nation-states,

c- denunciation, condemnation and elimination of all religions,

d- consolidation of the nation-state notion,

e- promotion of a counterfeit concept of empire,

f- replacement of migrants, refugees and foreign workers with new technological means (AI, robots, etc.),

g- expulsion of Asiatic, African, Muslim and other foreigners who fail to untegrate, and

h- stimulation of forms of neo-paganism, militarism, Nordic mysticism, phallus cults, Greco-Roman culture, Merovingian legends, and neo-Gnostic trends,

 

Comparing the two plans, one can easily understand not only that they are at the antipodes of one another but also that the former (Jesuit) is geared to irreparably paralyze, weaken, marginalize and neutralize Europe, reducing it to a lackluster peripheral region with tremendous problems, such as internal discord, economic decay, and socio-political chaos. It is clear that for the Jesuit agenda to be deployed worldwide, Europe must cease to be a first rank force.

 

Quite contrarily, the Freemasonic agenda seems to have been devised in order to place Europe at the epicenter of the world's affairs. Simply, this appears to be a very different Europe, totally unrelated to what we now know as society, culture, and state. For an entirely contrastive Europe to emerge, the European Union must undergo a uniquely shocking disaster.

 

This is exactly what is in the minds of Trump, Putin, Netanyahu, and other leading representatives of the Freemasonic lodge that wants to turn Europe into a regime quite similar to that of Netanyahu's Israel (or Hitler's Germany). And for this reason, the Gaza war 'had' to take place and therefore duly prepared before October 2023.

 

Israeli genocidal acts and monstrosities against Gaza and West Bank Palestinians are expected to trigger frictions in the local societies from France to Germany to England; attempting to denounce the acts of a most anti-Jewish state (like Israel) governed by a genuinely anti-Zionist prime minister (like Netanyahu), European citizens and Muslim refugees have the tendency to take the local Jews for target.

 

This is of course very misplaced, but the powers-that-be never care about the rightfulness and the correctness of an average person's acts. On the contrary, they count on the confusion, the misperception, and the misunderstanding that the dynamics of every political disruption and social turbulence can produce. Even worse, the international mass media may exploit such situations as best as they can, drastically impacting the subconscious imagination of average people.  

Social Turbulence as the Scientific Phenomenon: Operational and Strategic Change

https://doaj.org/article/a9f59f6715684ee2951e9742e5a7944e

 

One has therefore to take into consideration that

a- the participation of a great number of European leftists and Muslim refugees in Europe in manifestations that take place in European cities against Israel,

b- the identification of many Islamists among them,

c- the atrocities performed by Islamists in Syria, Afghanistan, and other countries,

d- the instinctive reaction of the native, European populations to the presence of so numerous illegal migrants on their soil,

e- the extensive diffusion of various theories, such as the 'Great Replacement', which stimulate the instincts and the subconscious imagination of average people,

f- the widespread and well-deserved indignation for the woke agenda, and

g- the proper rage against Europe's Jesuit-backed, undemocratic, biased and ruinous regimes …

… are expected to generate riots, civil wars, massive bloodshed, public disorder, and regime change.  

 

In the forthcoming events, which will entirely transform today's Europe's face, incredible atrocities will come to pass, therefore generating more radical thoughts, more extreme ideas, and more repugnant monstrosities. As it is not easy to eliminate 25 million people (Europe's forcibly displaced and stateless population according to UNCHR), Sarkozy's muddled 'Union for the Mediterranean' will be viewed as an alternative so that, after several wars, invasions, and land annexations, these populations (or at least those among them who will survive) get relocated there. In this regard, it is essential to keep in mind that terms like "French Algeria" and "Roman Africa" are still part of the collective Western European subconscious. 

For the Freemasonic backers of a European Union-Revived Roman Empire and for all the religious revivalists, the reconstituted empire will include all the European states "from the Atlantic to Urals" (as per the well-known, historic statement made by Charles de Gaulle), parts of today's Turkey and Syria, Lebanon and Israel, and at least the North African coastline.

 

Evaluated on the basis of the socioeconomic and political conditions that prevail in Europe today, the master plan seems to be absolutely unrealistic. But in the wake of the successive daily riots with many casualties and heavy collateral damages, and as a result of the existential threat that the European citizens will feel, a drastic change will bring about a staggering transfiguration of the European peoples.

 

The barbarous monstrosity that characterized the Northwestern European savages throughout the ages will come back to surface, overwhelmingly transforming today's hedonistic and consumerist rats. They will then find themselves on exactly the same wavelength with Netanyahu's Israel; they will therefore be ready to unrepentantly commit scores of massacres and genocides similar to those they performed in their dark past. Ultimately, they will manage to re-establish the Roman Empire in its cruelest form and dimension.  

 

Ruled by anti-Jewish and anti-Zionist Freemasons, Israel will be an inherent part of the establishment of the immense state, which will promote debauchery, but will ban the pernicious woke agenda. Africa will certainly undergo its last and worst phase of colonialism, because the new European Union will be an entirely racist regime of white supremacism. In spite of the present stage in which there is full Freemasonic support to the Russian Confederation, after the forthcoming dismemberment of the fake nation of Ukraine, Moscow will start being less important a tool. The anti-Eurasiatic nature of the reconstituted Roman Empire makes it certain that the dismantlement of Russia will one moment be put on the table. 

This perspective explains the use of the state of Israel that the Freemasonic lodge wants to make; by containing the Zionist threat and by averting the Jesuit agenda for Jerusalem, they utilize the anti-Jewish militaristic machine of Israel as a lever for Europe's radicalization, militarization and ultimate transformation into a totalitarian state and a merciless society, before Israel becomes integral part of the revived Roman Empire.

 

V. Zionist, Jesuit, and Freemasonic agendas as Communicating Vessels   

It may appear bizarre to many people how two major groups of power, like the Jesuits and the Freemasons, do not cooperate when their respective ultimate targets seem to be identical, but it is not. A typical example in this regard is the fate of Russia and the re-organization of Moscow's vast territory. Knowing the respective plans, one may call it 'the terminal fragmentation of Russia'. However, these issues differ often in terms of contents and timing; and this issue is very grave, because pushing toward a new development at the wrong moment can bring about an avalanche of calamities.

 

The Jesuits want to Christen Russia after the Catholic fashion; this is utterly critical to them, because they view in the Patriarchate of Moscow the only possible challenge and the only religious authority that has the power and the knowledge to denounce Rome as permanently anti-Christian and inherently Satanic. Their plan is liturgically termed as "the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary"; it relates to the Third Secret of Fatima. But the Freemasons totally oppose this perspective.

 

But when the main points of the Jesuit agenda fail to be materialized, the path opens for the implementation of the Freemasonic agenda.

Pope urges renewed consecration of Ukraine and Russia to Mary; Languages spoken in Russia, a proxy for ethnic diversity

The circumstances of the clash among the world's main groups of power are not similar to those of the interstate conflicts; at times, the opposition is straightforward and the different interests are in confrontation.

 

On other occasions, the advance of a rival agenda may also serve the targets of an agenda that needs a new environment to be first created before it is properly and duly deployed; in these cases, the two agendas are superposed to one another. This situation is not limited in matters of defense and military conflict but occurs also in the spheres of economy, education, political ideology, and culture.

 

Sometimes, the delay or drawback caused to the point of an agenda is automatically recompensed by the advance made in another issue; the overall situation looks then like a set of communicating vessels. The opposite interests may look as if they are always in the same position, but this is only an illusory impression, because the overall environment changes, and although the opposite groups of power seem to be equivalent, in reality the balance of power does not show this. 

"Yes, it is Europe, from the Atlantic to the Urals, it is Europe, it is the whole of Europe, that will decide the fate of the world"; Charles de Gaulle

It goes without saying that, on numerous occasions, governments controlled by one group of power make an alliance with administrations belonging to the sphere of influence of an opposite group of power. Such situations reflect indeed the extreme complexity of today's world. The relationship between Russia, Iran and Syria illuminates these eventualities very well.

                                                                                                         

Although undeniably connected with the Freemasonic lodge that backed Chirac, Kohl, Thatcher and Reagan in the past, Vladimir Putin developed gradually very good relations with Iran, which came to the Jesuit sphere of power in 1979 due to the Iranian revolution led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

 

With Syria, it had even started earlier; USSR's Freemasonic establishment, as represented by the Brezhnev clique, signed in 1971 an agreement with the Jesuit pawn Hafez al Assad as per the terms of which Moscow opened its naval military base in Tartus. And in 1980, the president of Syria kissed the Secretary General of the Communist Party of Soviet Union after both signed a Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation. The Syrian president passed away only months after Vladimir Putin had been appointed president of the Russian Federation, but the friendly relationship lasted for another two and half decades. About:

SYND 11 10 80 BREZHNEV AND SYRIAN PRESIDENT ASSAD SIGN FRIENDSHIP TREATY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70Jn81txApw

 

Similar situations occur quite often, but it is easy to understand the standing limits; the statesmen, who enter into friendly relationship with a head of state or politician belonging to an opposite group of power, report the details of their partnership to their superiors in the secret society of which they are members. Subsequently, they get guidance as to how and up to what point to proceed. Conversely, on several occasions, for the needs of a major project implementation, groups of power simply abandon their low level members, finding for them a type of modest survival. Example: in their war against the Freemasonic establishment, the Jesuits stopped caring about the destiny of Hafez al Assad's son.

 

VI. The truth about the fall of Syria

Permanently misinformed by the mass media, systematically deceived with various forgeries, and terribly unaware of fundamental historical truths about Syria, most of the people worldwide are befuddled because of the narratives entertained as regards the end of the Bashar al Assad's tenure.

 

Most of the people 'know' that, on the 29th November 2024, the Islamic terrorist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, along with other gangsters, started its 'attack' against Haleb (Aleppo); in fact, this event was not an attack but, literally speaking, an easy advance and an unhindered entrance into Syria's largest city (until 2012). The so-called 'Battle of Aleppo' is merely a joke. The pre-arranged undertaking, which was not an 'offensive' but a fascinating promenade, had started two days earlier, on 27 November 2024. This fact is certainly well-known to many people worldwide, but to no avail.

 

However, few people remember or ever learned (although it was in the news) that Syria's former president traveled to Moscow exactly on 28th and 29th November 2024 and met president Putin. In the face of what followed, we can fully understand what the topic of their discussion may have been. Bashar al Assad was updated as regards the last movements that he had to make before returning to Moscow ten days later, on 8th December 2024. This visit was easy to find in the world news.

https://en.apa.az/cis-countries/bashar-assad-visits-moscow-media-454280

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_international_presidential_trips_made_by_Bashar_al-Assad

 

Various sources of information let us know that the then First Lady Asma al-Assad had traveled to Russia even earlier. Although I don't intend to use these sources in my argumentation, I herewith add them merely as posterior confirmation. About:   

https://unn.ua/en/news/bashar-al-assads-family-left-syria-for-russia-amid-rebel-offensive-mass-media

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Assad_regime#Departures

 

The same is also valid for the -now diffused but then classified- information that the Egyptian and the Jordanian secret services were duly updated, and on the basis of their data, officials of the two countries suggested to Bashar al Assad to leave the country and settle elsewhere. About:

https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/1/136828/Egypt-denies-WSJ-report-on-asking-Al-Assad-to-leave

 

However, it is interesting that, in spite of the highly problematic situation in which his country was, Bashar al Assad travelled to Riyadh on the 11th November in order to attend the 2024 Arab–Islamic extraordinary summit and meet with the acting ruler of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman. In fact, the true reason for this travel was the need to update the Saudi crown prince and make several final arrangements with him. It is not clear whether Bashar al Assad and the Turkish president Erdogan met in the event, but if this happened, it was purely procedural (and the reasons are explained below). About:

https://www.duvarenglish.com/turkish-president-erdogan-syrian-president-assad-in-same-frame-news-65240

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/erdogan-assad-meeting-possible-despite-hurdles-key-syrian-opposition-leader-says-2024-09-25/

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240925-erdogan-assad-meeting-possible-despite-hurdles-key-syria-opposition-leader-says/

Two months earlier, on the 14th September 2024, Bashar al Assad named a new Prime Minister, Mohammad Ghazi al-Jalali who replaced Hussein Arnous for only three months (14 September to 10 December 2024). This was the direct consequence of the 2024 Syrian parliamentary election that took place on 15th July 2024 (with a turnout of ca. 38%). I have however to add that for the circumstances under which Syrians have been living for about 12-13 years, the participation level was normal. The replacement of Hussein Arnous after four years of tenure (2020-2024) followed the typical pace for the country, as his predecessor, Imad Khamis, 'governed' Syria for four years too (2016-2020). If you need now to laugh, I can add that Imad Khamis was preceded by Wael Nader al-Halqi, who was Syria's prime minister also for four years (2012-2016). About:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Ghazi_al-Jalali

https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q122759674/

https://www.kurdistan24.net/en/story/814413/former-syrian-pm-reveals-internal-dynamics-of-assad-regimes-final-days

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Syrian_parliamentary_election

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussein_Arnous

https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q60455401/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imad_Khamis

https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q6001983/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wael_Nader_al-Halqi

https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/Q713915/

 

Of course, the parliamentary election had been scheduled months before it took place, but it is quite interesting that few days after the results were known, Bashar al Assad had to fly to Moscow for a 2-day working visit (24-25 July 2024). This meeting took place one month after the presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump (27th June 2024).

 

Quite notably 20 days before Assad's visit to Moscow and only one week after the US presidential debate, on 4th July 2024, the Disciplinary Section of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith in Vatican announced that Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, and Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana (in today's Kosovo), was found guilty of schism and was therefore excommunicated "latae sententiae" (automatically). Here you have a presentation:

https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/archbishop-vigano-excommunicated

And this is the official announcement:

https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2024/07/05/0554/01148.html#ing

 

As a matter of fact, it was in early July 2024 that everything happened: the reaction of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's supporters, the rejection of his excommunication, the decision of a group of Jesuits to fight back against Francis I, the ensuing deep dissension among the ranks of the Jesuit Order, the irreparable discord that took place among the Jesuits, and the alliance set up between a group of dissenting Jesuits and the Freemasonic lodge that supported Donald Trump. All these developments were tantamount to definite confirmation of his forthcoming victory. The overall situation became immediately known to the Jesuit establishment and their Zionist allies, because many Jesuits shifted from one side to the other; it was clear that the presidential election was lost to them. It was then that they decided about the first blows that they would deliver against the anticipated policies of the forthcoming Trump administration.

 

This approach is difficult for simple people to grasp; however, intelligent people who happen to have acquired some insight know that events happen indeed long before they take place in front of the eyes of the public. Still this is not enough to realize when it comes to ages old rival priesthoods, which took the form of secret societies and spiritual orders in Modern Times. That's why it would be accurate to conclude that the time, the events, and the scheduling thereof have a totally different meaning for the powers-that-be. In fact, the 'reaction' is planned before the 'action' is publicly materialized.

 

It is also interesting that after July 2024, Hayat Tahrir al Sham (HTS) leader Abu Mohammed al-Golani (real name: Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa) started softening his group's position as regards the rights of the minorities in the small territory that they controlled around Idlib at the time. About:

https://apnews.com/article/syria-idlib-turkey-algolani-hayat-tahrir-alsham-54a2af9fe90f10d68795e329a65c9b4d

https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/ea6cbaa5a0ff44019ba8d38d7f4323dc

https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian-arab-republic/syria-situation-update-north-west-syria-july-2024

https://stj-sy.org/en/between-reformist-discourse-and-actual-repression-how-hayat-tahrir-al-sham-handled-idlib-protests/

https://omranstudies.org/index.php/publications/reports/monthly-briefing-on-the-events-of-the-syrian-scene-july-2024.html

https://omranstudies.org/index.php/publications/articles/maintaining-mass-obedience-hts%E2%80%99s-response-to-the-protests-in-idlib.html

https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2024-december-11/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Mohammad_al-Julani#Idlib_governance

 

Consequently the form that the events concerning Syria must have taken involves the following:

 

1- through the correct channels, Putin was informed that he had to deploy a much greater effort to once more preserve Bashar al-Assad in power; realizing that the effort would be futile, the Russian president invited the embattled ruler of Syria to Moscow for consultations (end July);

 

2- it was then decided that the Syrian military establishment would not fight against the forces, which would be sent from Idlib to invade the central provinces of Syria and topple the government; and the Syrian president secured some time to arrange the fate of his relatives and associates;

 

3- Putin negotiated Russia's position in the region during the post-Baath period; and an agreement must have been reached as regards Syria's gold reserves

https://tradingeconomics.com/syria/gold-reserves

 

4- some general agreement must have been reached as regards Syria's Alawis, Druzes, Christians and Kurmanjis between Putin and his American interlocutors;

 

5- the timing of the operation was agreed for some time after the US presidential election; meanwhile, specific details about the stage management of the theatrical performance "Deterrence of Aggression" were also agreed upon, involving few, rather futile, Russian air attacks and some skirmishes with the Syrian army in specific locations;

 

6- the indivisibility of the Syrian territory seems to have been discussed and the negotiating sides agreed to hold regular consultations; there was also an agreement to keep Iran, Hezbollah, Yemen's Houthi administration, and Hamas totally uninformed about the ongoing negotiations.

 

VII. The main losers in Syria: Donald Trump and China

In fact, there was no betrayal and no abandonment of allies. Putin did not let Bashar al Assad down. Iran and Hezbollah knew little, and it is only in the second half of November that they were advised to remove key operatives. Nothing happened unexpectedly and there was no surprise to anybody in power. The development cannot be described as a defeat for Russia because states are defeated by states and not by secret organizations and mystical orders. Only people who do not know the facts or misperceive them may consider Russia as a loser. The major loser in this regard was Donald Trump because he will now find it difficult to maintain in the Middle East the policies that he had agreed with Netanyahu.

After all, if we evaluate Russia's involvement in Syria over the past decade, it would be bizarre to consider the December 2024 events as a "defeat" and not identify as Moscow's first and foremost "failure" in Syria the survival of the Islamic terrorist regime in the Idlib enclave of Syria's northwestern confines. This text demonstrates clearly that all senior Islamic terrorists and extremists are US operatives: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/how-syrias-diversity-friendly-jihadists-plan-building-state

 

To duly and fully eliminate the insurgence in Syria, Russians had to annihilate Idlib by all means. However, this would be impossible for Putin to do, because he had to take into consideration the US countermeasures that some Jesuits would force the American government to take. These are the processes in which international affairs are conducted and this is how secret societies' influence is exerted on governments.

About:

https://mid.ru/ru/press_service/publikacii-i-oproverzenia/oproverzenia1/nedostovernie-publikacii/1461718/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency_in_Idlib

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwestern_Syria_offensive_(December_2019_%E2%80%93_March_2020)

https://www.voanews.com/a/extremism-watch_will-recapture-syrias-idlib-affect-islamic-state/6183598.html

 

In the advent of this occurrence, it would also be wrong to consider Iran as a loser; the reason is simple. Iran was never a real regional player properly speaking, but an instrument for the Jesuit-controlled apostate Freemasonic lodge of England and a tool for the MI6 to carry out their anti-Zionist, anti-Jewish and anti-Israeli operations.  Under the various governments that were formed in Iran after the fall of the last Shah (1979), there was never a proper Iranian national strategy; the governmental policies were either aptly maneuvered from far or consciously carried out by English pawns like Mohammad Javad Zarif.

 

Yet, the fall of the Syrian Arab Republic demonstrates clearly that there was a loser indeed. And this is very critical in world politics. The loser is none other than China. This conclusion is drawn because China aspires to world supremacy and has risen as the leading power of the BRICS in an attempt to mark a sweeping victory over the US and to depose the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. I certainly do not intend to herewith analyze Beijing's potential errors, miscalculations, oversights and lack of action with respect to the rightful and benign, Chinese ambitions, but I have to point out that a country the size of China will definitely never materialize its vocation without first fully identifying the nature of the Western colonialism and the abysmal destruction that the Western powers caused to the colonized nations in terms of nation building, national identity, cultural integrity, educational-academic-intellectual solidity, socioeconomic and governmental sovereignty. 

The Beijing ruling class must comprehend once for all that it is absolutely useless to imagine that, by solving the economic problems of the countries with which China wants to establish an alliance, they will get it done. A military cooperation is strictly necessary too; the entire and complete formation of new local elites is imperative, if Beijing does not want to see its efforts in Libya and Syria (to offer only two examples) lost in October 2011 and in December 2024 respectively. All the same, the key to China's worldwide supremacy is the conclusion of all Chinese academics, specialists and thematically related experts that Beijing must truly remake the countries with which China intends to establish an alliance - from scratch. 

 

More specifically about the Syrian-Chinese relationship, after the completion of the Russian-Syrian operations and the successive offensives that took place between September 2015 and September 2020, Beijing should have studied the situation in Syria quite well and come up with numerous groundbreaking proposals, acting complementarily with the Russians. Details, schedules and diagrams:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_civil_war

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war#Operations_by_Russian_military_forces

 

What the Chinese could have done in Syria was absolutely impossible for Russia to do. Knowing the extent of the destruction and the disaster caused during the then 10-year long Syrian Civil War (2011-2020), Beijing's government should have entered into a series of agreements with Bashar al Assad with respect to Syria's prompt reconstruction and comprehensive rehabilitation. This should have also involved the transportation of no less than one (1) million Chinese soldiers, workers, technicians, specialists, experts and advisers. Syria should have been gradually transformed into a Chinese province or, if you prefer, an exclave.

 

Chinese industries should have outsourced part of their activities in Syria; Chinese land workers should have moved to Syria and worked in vast de-desertification projects; Chinese military training should have been offered to all schoolchildren, and hundreds of thousands of Chinese soldiers should have made their military service in the banks of Euphrates. Chinese and Russian should have irreversibly replaced French and English in the local primary and secondary education, and at least five or six Chinese universities should have been launched across the country. The Idlib province should have been liberated by Chinese soldiers and the Islamists massacred to the last; also, the Kurmanji ('Kurdish') militia-controlled eastern region should have been invaded and reunified with Damascus, and the relocated 'Kurds' returned to their original homes (because Syria's Kurmanji population was rather dispersed across the country before 2011).

 

The aforementioned examples of projects, if systematically carried out by China in Syria during the period 2020-2024, would have certainly prevented the fall of Bashar al Assad and, more importantly, would have been the best demonstration that China is a trustworthy ally able to demolish the colonial structures in Asia and Africa while also aspiring for worldwide supremacy and being ready for a faceoff with the West anytime anywhere.

 

VIII. Was Bashar al-Assad's fall inevitable?

Last points to discuss are the condition of the country which was so easy to collapse and the reasons for which the terminated situation was untenable and unsustainable. To these questions there are two very different types of response, namely a political-military approach that focuses on the rule of Hafez and Bashar al Assad (1971-2000 and 2000-2024), and a historical perspective that examines the technical entity named 'Syria', which was an inherently troublesome realm and could never become a nation-state (like Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, etc.).

 

A. Syria under the rule of al-Assad family

For what concerns the presidential tenures of Hafez and Bashar al Assad, I have to point out that Baathist Syria was a weak and poor state run by a minority. Lacking natural resources, being rather isolated at the international level, relying heavily on its relationship with the USSR, the Syrian president tried to operate the army and the administration with Alawis, Christians and Druzes, expressing distrust to the Sunni majority. At the same time, Hafez al Assad made three calamitous mistakes; first, he did not fully implement in Syria the secular, laic concepts that Kemal Ataturk had already introduced in Turkey before five (5) decades.

 

Second, he totally failed to identify the colonial nature and traits of the state that he was ruling; it would still be easy for him to understand that the English and the French had deliberately created two weak structures in Iraq and Syria, favoring the local minorities and handing over to them the power. The Sunni minority ruled Iraq and the Alawi minority governed Syria. Both states constituted merely the negative reflection of one another.

 

Third, to add insult to injury, Hafez al Assad allowed Sunni Syrians to work in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the UAE and to study Islamic theology in Egypt. He thus exposed hundreds of thousands of Syrians to the pseudo-Islamic extremists of the US-backed, lawless and criminal Wahhabi regime of Saudi Arabia. In addition, he pushed the Syrian youth to the brink of the abyss, by allowing them to study in Al Azhar University in Egypt. 

 

This is so because, during the tenure of the treacherous, duplicitous, and idiotic Egyptian dictator Anwar el Sadat, the ignorant, backward and mischievous sheikh Muhammad Metwalli al-Shaarawi became Minister of the Awqaf (Endowments), thus having the opportunity to diffuse the anti-Islamic political ideology which is nowadays known as 'Political Islam'. The pseudo-Islamic radicalization had already become a valuable tool for the CIA and MI6 against the USSR, China, any other potential Eurasiatic power, and -of course- the most targeted Muslim countries, but the naïve Hafez al Assad did not understand anything of all this.

 

It is easy to speak irrelevantly, to denounce the numerous casualties during the 1982 Hama uprising (2 to 28 February), and to label Hafez al Assad's state as a dictatorial regime; but this is utter nonsense. By the way, since the exact number of deaths was not known, we can be sure about the real dimensions of the event, when we notice that the highest numbers are always given by MI6 and CIA operatives. About: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_Hama_massacre

The destruction of Hama, 1982

The problem with Hafez al Assad's Syria was that sizeable parts of the population were thoughtlessly allowed to become enemies of their own country, opponents of their own historical heritage, and victims of the worst rivals of Damascus, namely Riyadh and Cairo. In this regard, Syria's routinely repeated positions against the 'Zionist state' only worsened the conditions of socioeconomic and political stability. The fall of the USSR and the disbandment of the Soviet Block did not bode well for Syria.

 

When Hafez al Assad died in the year 2000, his son inherited an explosive situation, as a catastrophic wave of pseudo-Islamic radicalization, laced with ignorance, lack of education, historical distortions, abysmal hatred, absurd rancor and other extremely negative feelings, had swept across the country. In fact, for Bashar al Assad, the game was already lost since Day 1. Practically speaking, his only possible chance to eventually survive would be to attempt to restart Syria from scratch and question the colonial foundations of his state, overwhelmingly changing everything. But Bashar al Assad never learned the true History of Aram Nahrain (Mesopotamia), which is the true name of his country, and he could not therefore potentially envisage which the basic acts for the salvation of Damascus were.

 

To be sincere, Bashar al Assad ruled in a naïve and amateurish manner, being unprepared for the worst. Yet, if one day he was bold enough to recognize the state of Israel, this would change many parameters in Damascus. Intransigence is good only in case of strong national foundations, socioeconomic stability, and proven governmental efficiency.

 

Even after the beginning of the Syrian civil war (for which it is now conventionally accepted that it started on the 15th March 2011), Bashar al Assad was too late to ask the Russian assistance; but under similar circumstances, by delaying the demand for help, one simply causes an increase in terms of casualties, destructions and losses. The gravity of the situation across Syria in September 2015 was such that it took years for the Russian army garrisons and the paramilitary to support the embattled Syrian army in recovering 70-75% of the national territory. This was undoubtedly an excellent opportunity of military training for the Russians. But with more than 13 million of Syrians displaced internally or externally, with more than 600000 dead, and with more than 200000 civilian casualties, the country was finally exsanguine. Syria needed a real, comprehensive and overwhelming restart. About:   

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_civil_war

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_revolution

 

In September 2020, Syria had to be reinvented. An extraordinary and unprecedented Syrian-Chinese alliance could help in that direction. But it was up to the Syrians to ask for it. Quite unfortunately, Bashar al Assad continued ruling as if nothing had happened! The soup is hot, the soup is cold; the rebels are close, the rebels are far. In fact, this could not last long. Even if the Kurmanji rebels in the East and the Islamists in Idlib had been defeated and vanished, Syria was badly hit; without a master plan for the country's reconstruction and rehabilitation, it would sooner or later fall apart.

 

Instead of trying to think out-of-the-box, the Syrian president remained captive of the same false dreams, dreadful delusions, and insipid practices. Then, the exhausted country could not continue anymore; actually, over the past 4-5 years, Syria was not viewed as a country even by the best friends of Damascus; it had gradually become the terrain for a war of attrition that Iran and Hezbollah wanted to undertake against Israel. Consequently, when a country ends up becoming a passageway, the day of its ultimate decomposition is not far.

 

In fact, what occurred in Syria in the first week of December 2024 could have happened earlier. This is not a unique case by the way; many countries all over the world are nowadays untenable and unsustainable. Average people and silly experts in geopolitics endlessly numerous consult volumes or sites of statistics, thinking that numbers can possibly reflect the situation in which a country is. Unfortunately, this is a theoretical, hypothetical and unsubstantiated assumption.

 

In fact, the powers-that-be are in a position to accurately know how long a country can stand when facing a negative shock. Certainly, many people would be taken by surprise, if they ever knew how soon a country can disintegrate. Of course, I speak as of 2024, and not 1965, but weakly structured states existed always.

Shmuel Bar: The Demise of the Arab State, Re-Tribalization, and the Emergence of Jihadistans

https://westminster-institute.org/events/shmuel-bar-demise-of-the-arab-state-re-tribalization-and-the-emergence-of-jihadistans-in-the-next-five-years/

 

B. The colonial formation of the technical entity 'Syria'

If Syria was a fake state inevitably doomed to fail, this is due to the fact that it was not created by the local inhabitants in full consciousness of their national identity. Many researchers focus on Political History and find the origins of all the problems attested in Baathist Syria in the preceding stages of Modern History of Syria. But this is an aberration. The worst aspects of the French colonial rule were not the military occupation, the economic exploitation, and the political interference. All possibly negative situations would exert only minor impact on the local people of Syria, if they were truly, correctly and accurately conscious of their identity, historical past, and three (3) millennia of national Aramaean heritage. Concerning the institutional developments, go through the following links:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupied_Enemy_Territory_Administration

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_for_Syria_and_the_Lebanon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_for_Syria_and_the_Lebanon#States_created_during_the_French_Mandate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Kingdom_of_Syria

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Lebanon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alawite_State

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Aleppo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Damascus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabal_Druze_State

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Syria

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Syrian_Republic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatay_State

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Syrian_Republic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba%27athist_Syria

 

To understand the criminal deeds that the French and the English colonials carried out from Morocco to Oman and from Syria to Somalia, one must first distinguish the great difference that exists between a) the natural and normal historical term 'nation', which existed for many millennia among all the peoples, being attested in all the languages, and b) the constructed, unnatural and abnormal modern term 'nation', which reflected the notions and the qualities that the 18th c. French philosophers of the Enlightenment attributed to this word. Those fools were preposterous enough to think that they could fabricate nations at will.

 

The modern term 'nation' is an inhuman and unhistorical anomaly, as it constitutes a vicious historical revisionism of the most arbitrary character. Historical nations that were transformed into 'modern nations' as per the disastrous ideological priorities of the absurd French philosophers of the Enlightenment became monstrous, tyrannical realms with zero tolerance toward other nations, which they tried to exterminate by all means, because they had remained 'historical nations' to them. It goes without saying that the most paramount elements, which define 'modern nations', involve amongst others the following:

1- the state, and not the people, defines the national identity;

2- the state, and not the society, determines the historical past, the cultural heritage, and the spiritual-religious traditions;

3- educational and academic institutions set up by the state impose on the people a monstrous distortion of their historical past as per the interests of the state;

4- the intellectual life is detached from the traditional culture of the people;

5- spirituality, cult, popular imagination, epics, folk poetry, and traditional literature are forcefully removed from the epicenter of the society, being replaced by state-approved norms, which gradually form a parallel society known as the elite;

6- the national language is distorted in the ateliers of the grammarians who destroy the originality of the earlier language, often introducing translated excerpts from foreign languages (in the case of colonized nations) or from the elite jargon (among colonial powers);

7- once distorted, the historical past becomes a tool in the hands of the ruling elite to totally transform the people, thus dissociating the nation from its real and original past; and

8- rationalism, nominalism, utilitarianism, and other ideological dogmas are vilely introduced in the society, also contributing to the destruction of the historical nation that the said people constituted in the past.

 

Within the limits of the present article, I cannot expand more on this vast topic, but I have to underscore its importance in the way the Western European colonial powers fabricated the modern world by systematically manufacturing fake nations here and there. As early as Napoleon's invasion of Egypt (1798), the French colonial planning involved forms of Pan-Arabism or Arab Nationalism. Of course, it was a fallacious construction; they wanted to create a vast 'Arab kingdom' that would be rebellious against the Ottoman sultan and subservient to the French Emperor. And 60 years later, Napoleon III was about to take the posture of 'Emperor of the Arabs'! About:

https://academic.oup.com/stanford-scholarship-online/book/29682/chapter-abstract/250183552?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false

 

Opposed to the fallacy of Pan-Arabism, the irrevocable historical reality of the wider region revolves around the following points:

a- The entire population of today's Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Libya is Berber (Amazigh) – not Arab;

To end colonialism in North-Northwestern Africa, Berber (Amazigh) must become the only official language in Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and Mauritania

b- The outright majority of the population of today's Egypt is Coptic (irrespective of religion), whereas the local minorities are: the Nubians, the Berbers, the Beja, and the Sinai Bedouins;

 

c- The quasi-totality of the population of today's Sudan is Cushitic and the minorities are of Nilo-Saharan origin (notably the Nubians, the Berta, the Nuba, etc.);

 

d- The entire population of today's Yemen and Oman is Yemenite, i.e. non-Arab, as it is proven by the corpus of pre-Islamic epigraphic monuments excavated throughout Saudi-occupied Najran, Yemen, Hadhramaut, Mahra, Socotra, Dhofar and Oman. It must be added that, deciphered thanks to their relationship with Axumite Ge'ez, the Ancient Yemenite languages (Sabaean, Qatabani, Himyarite, Hadhrami and Minaean / Ma'in) are Semitic, but totally unrelated to Arabic; and

 

e- The outright majority of the population of today's Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan, Palestine/Israel, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE and the Saudi North is Aramaean. The same is also valid for the Arabic-speaking populations of SE Turkey and SW Iran. The local minorities are: the Turkmen, as well as the Kurmanjis, the Shabaks, the Yazidis, the Soranis, the Failis and others (who are collectively, but mistakenly, called 'Kurds'). 

To end educational-academic-intellectual colonialism in Egypt, Coptic must become the only official language in Egypt

All the same, throughout this vast region, in striking contrast with the historical truth, the French and English propaganda has divided the population into Christians and Muslims, mistakenly and deliberately identifying the former with Aramaeans and the latter with 'Arabs'. This is preposterous; Syria's and Iraq's populations did not identify themselves as 'Arabs' before the arrival of colonial spies and agents in the 18th c. Ottoman Empire.

 

It is wrong to pretend that these populations used Quranic Arabic as vernacular before the colonials arrived. They used to speak several vernacular dialects with many words from Syriac Aramaic. Arabic was only the religious language for the Muslims, but it was a dead language; Quranic Arabic ceased progressively to be a spoken language in the advent of the Mongol invasions, the ensuing wars, and the relocation of Turkmen tribes in the wider region of Western Asia. Similar conditions existed in Egypt where numerous mixed (Coptic / Arabic) dialects were spoken and in North-Northwest Africa, a vast region with a great number of Berber vernaculars.

 

While all these populations were part of the Islamic Caliphate, during and before the Ottoman times, the prevailing notion of the word 'nation' was totally unrelated to the Modern Western concept of 'nation' about which I already expanded. The French and the English came up with a monstrous plan of Arabization of the Berbers, the Copts, the Aramaeans, and all the rest. They introduced successive campaigns of linguistic Arabization after they fabricated a constructed language, which is called 'Modern Standard Arabic' (al-Arabīyah al-Fuṣḥa al-Ḥaditha/ العربية الفصحى الحديثة); this linguistic creation is again not a native language. It is as false as Modern Hebrew and Modern Greek, being the pure result of Western Orientalists, Semitic linguists, grammarians, and their local servants (instructors or students). About:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Standard_Arabic

 

In addition, based in Khedivial Alexandria, French and English Orientalists forged the basics of a nonexistent, completely ahistorical concept: the 'Arab nation'. False versions of Islamic History (in which the reality was distorted in a way to fully serve the anti-Islamic, anti-Oriental, anti-Asiatic and anti-African purposes of the colonial powers) were diffused and imposed locally in order to totally confuse the natives who found it opportune to pursue studies either in the colonially managed, local schools and universities or in Western Europe. Gradually, the villainous ideologies of Pan-Arabism and Arab Nationalism were composed by the first victims of the scheming colonial Orientalists, who did not want to allow a proper nation-building process to be earnestly undertaken. About:

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/religions/article/2024/08/19/napoleon-bonaparte-was-attracted-by-the-figure-of-muhammad-and-the-centrality-of-the-quran-in-islam_6718119_63.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurji_Zaydan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-Arabism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_nationalism

https://lecourrierdumaghrebetdelorient.info/headline/monde-arabe-le-mythe-du-panarabisme-de-la-nahda-aux-printemps-arabes/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265942479_A_Conflicted_Sense_of_Nationality_Napoleon_III's_Arab_Kingdom_and_the_Paradoxes_of_French_Multiculturalism

M. A. Aziz, The Origins of Arab Nationalism

https://www.jstor.org/stable/24711051

 

By contriving the scarecrow named 'Arab', the colonial gangsters of the West created the recipient of all of their angry insults, vibrant attacks, untrustworthy accusations, fallacious criticisms, and false historical narratives. For everything, you could put the blame on the 'Arab'. But the Arab did not exist at all; he was purely fictional. As the Ottoman Empire was about to collapse, no one could imagine, let alone anticipate, the detrimental blow that the Western European colonials were about to deliver. Then, the nascent Pan-Arabism could easily become the mattress on which new Western Orientalist forgeries would be embedded. These fraudulent constructs involved, amongst others, Pan-Islamism, Islamic Modernism, and the nonsensical theories of the Freemason Jamal al-Din al-Afghani and of his likes. About:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamal_al-Din_al-Afghani

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_modernism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-Islamism

 

The end result of all these catastrophic delusions and deceitful schemes was not just the mobilization of local populations against the Ottoman Empire; this undertaking was due to the fact that the ignorant and fanaticized masses falsely believed that they were 'Arabs' and, in addition, they stupidly trusted the fake promises of the English and the French according to which the 'Caliphate' would return to the 'Arabs'.

 

The foremost consequence of the colonial deception was the formation of many fragmentary and fake states that had no historicity, no identity, no integrity, and no viability. Above all, the fallacy of Pan-Arabism prevented the formation of a sizeable state from the Eastern Mediterranean coastlands to the borders of Iran and from the Turkish borders to the southern shores of the Persian Gulf and the eastern littoral of the Red Sea. This state would be Aram Nahrain and its official language would be Syriac Aramaic.

 

Incorporating Damascus, Baghdad, Mosul, Haleb, Beirut, Basra, Khaybar, Jaffa, Dubai, Haifa, Khaybar, Latakia, Arbil and Jerusalem in one national territory, Aram Nahrain would be a secular state where all the believers could practice their faiths in peace and all the inhabitants would feel to be the conscious and glorious heirs of the Mesopotamian, Phoenician, Aramaean, Hebrew, Christian and Islamic civilizations.  

To terminate the neo-colonial fake states that plunged the region in numerous wars and repugnant oppression, all the territories of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and several adjacent lands must be unified into one state with Syriac Aramaic as official language: Aram Nahrain.

Syriac Aramaic, and not Arabic, is by definition the national language of Muslims and Christians, Druzes and Ismailis across the region; beyond all the deliberately exacerbated divisions, the only unifying parameter of all the populations of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, and the North of Saudi Arabia is their common Aramaean past and historical heritage. Consequently, their only chance to undergo a successful nation-building effort is to impose Syriac Aramaic as their common, official language.

Aram Nahrain would be the conscious confirmation of 6000 years of historical continuity and the living example of human ascendancy. But it would also be the terminal cancellation of all Western European and North American evil schemes and colonial crimes.

 

Aram Nahrain would be the only path to peaceful coexistence in the post-Ottoman era; that's why all three war-generating forces would never afford to allow the Aramaeans of Syria, Iraq and the adjacent regions to know who they are and what they could do, if delving in their Aramaean identity and historical heritage.

 

From now on, there will be exclusively one chance to ultimately pacify the region; and this will be the entrance into function of an external parameter. This will be an ancient factor, which will one day return to Syria, but it will be out of the three major secret societies' power to interfere or impact. Great emperors knew it and distinct historians wrote about it already before more than 1000 years. However, this great paragon will not reach Syria in force except when will be alive the only person who should never be born. About:

https://www.academia.edu/25491609/The_Aramaeans_rise_will_transfigure_the_Middle_Eastern_Chessboard_2005_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

 

https://www.academia.edu/25552905/Islam_the_Cultural_Aramaization_of_the_Arabs_by_Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

 

https://www.academia.edu/25553198/Aramaeans_vs_Arabs_The_fight_between_Civilization_and_Barbarism_within_Islam_by_Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

 

https://www.academia.edu/23219268/Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis_Progenitor_of_Wars_and_Tyrannies_the_Falsehood_of_Pan_Arabism

 

https://www.academia.edu/24440061/Arab_Nation_Hoax_Geared_to_Falsify_Islamic_History_Ruin_Varied_Nations_disfiguratively_Named_Arab_by_Prof_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

 

https://www.academia.edu/24420104/Syria_A_Non_Arabic_Aramaean_Country_Ruled_by_the_Pan_Arabist_Puppets_of_Zionism_and_Freemasonry_by_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

 

Pseudo-Assyrians, Pseudo-Chaldaeans, and the Cultural – National Needs of the Aramaean Nation

https://www.aramnahrin.org/English/PseudoAssyrians_PeudoChaldeans_Arameans_19_12_2008.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------    

Download the article in PDF:

https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/12/12/syria-where-three-agendas-clash-greater-israel-greater-middle-east-and-the-revival-of-the-roman-empire/

https://www.academia.edu/126309556/Syria_where_three_Agendas_clash_Greater_Israel_Greater_Middle_East_and_the_Revival_of_the_Roman_Empire

https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_13989%2Fall

https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/FLwnhtXwjq?

https://pubhtml5.com/jxyro/uqxd/

https://online.fliphtml5.com/qynhg/ugxx/

https://anyflip.com/fdfzl/mfow

https://www.calameo.com/read/007156897af41b9f6798f

https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/_b_Syria_where_three_Agendas_clash_-_Greater_Israel_Greater_Middle_East_and_the_Revival_of_the_Roman_Empire_b_/28030796?file=51202202

https://www.patreon.com/posts/118052491