Коллективный Запад, его тайны, иллюзии и угрозы человечеству
Содержание
Введение
I. Колонизация:
навязывание всему миру бесчеловечного западноевропейского «цивилизационного» прототипа
II. Западный мир:
ненормальное самоотречение и террористический отпор Истории человечества
III.
Бесконечные междоусобные войны Запада, его сложный характер и вытекающие отсюда
опасения для остального мира
IV.
Вестернизация – это не «а ля карт»
V.
Вестернизация является частью эсхатологической повестки дня
De-Westernization for Russia, Africa, the Muslim world, India, China and Latin America means a) replacement of the fallacious 'Greco-Roman' and 'Judeo-Christian' material from academic curricula and educational manuals and b) substitution of the past documentation with major specimens of Asiatic and African Art, which bear witness to the historical interaction of the world's major civilizations. Example: back panels from the couch found in the tomb of the Sogdian merchant and nobleman An Jia (安伽), who was buried in Chang'an (長安), today's Xi'an (西安市), great Chinese capital, in 579 CE, founding year of the Daxiang (大象) era, during the reign of Emperor Jing; currently in the Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology; the representations of few significant moments of the deceased nobleman's life involve scenes of cult, meetings with nomad leaders, and conclusion of agreements.
Contents
Introduction
I. Colonization:
worldwide imposition of the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model
II. The Western world:
an abnormal self-denial and a terrorist rebuff of the History of mankind
III. The interminable
internecine wars of the West, its composite nature, and the ensuing concerns for
the rest of the world
IV. Westernization is
not 'à la carte'
V. Westernization is
part of eschatological agendas
In a previous article published
few days ago under the title "World Politics as Black & White: Iran
and Israel or how people fall victims of delusions intentionally projected on
them", I made it clear that every sectarian thought does not only
constitute a sin, but it also leads to misunderstanding, ultimately plunging
the foolish guy, who thinks in this manner, into a delusion. From such traps
there is usually no comeback.
Simple people and
world-known statesmen are equally concerned in this regard, but the latter may
destroy their respective countries in the process. You can read the article
here: https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/05/16/world-politics-as-black-white-iran-and-israel-or-how-people-fall-victims-of-delusions-intentionally-projected-on-them/
There are many foolish
guys worldwide, who persistently do not see the historical truth in Palestine; they
believe a genocide that they never saw and they don’t believe a genocide that
they see with their own eyes. And there are numerous inane people, who imagine
that the ongoing war in Ukraine has -practically speaking- ended with the victory
of Russia. More advanced daydreamers are convinced that the "collective
West" has collapsed and that the BRICS+ are about to establish a new world
order – or, if this expression embarrasses you, a multipolar world community.
There is nothing more delusional than this.
The stupidity of the so-called 'multipolar world order' can bring down great states in our days. This is so because the defenders of this silly concept do not have a clue of History, but thoughtlessly learned as 'History' the false Eurocentric doctrine which was purposefully fabricated in Western universities in order to impose unipolar hegemony. Picture: 'The Nation-State and the Multipolar World' by Alexander Dugin (27 March 2016); https://www.geopolitika.ru/en/article/nation-state-and-multipolar-world
I must however admit
that a large part of my readers have been accustomed (and pleased) to reading
my devastating attacks, denunciations and rejections of the colonial deeds of
the maritime kingdoms which are -exclusively- responsible for every single
problem that occurs in the world nowadays. But …….
Because I totally,
overwhelmingly and comprehensively decry the evildoing of the colonial powers
across the Earth, this does not mean that I expect their opponents to prevail
anytime soon. Not at all! At least, not without major changes coming from the
side of the BRICS+!
Introduction
Actually, my personal
evaluation of the current situation is very negative; I am convinced that the
world affairs are very ambiguous, very grim and very ominous, because the major
continental states, their elites, and their governments are unable to
accurately assess where the overall problem lies and to subsequently find the
correct remedy.
It is correct to
conclude nowadays that the "collective West" is in disarray, discord,
disorder and decay. But so they were in 1492, in 1520, and in 1532, when they
sailed to the so-called 'New World' (which was already known for thousands of
years to ancient Oriental nations) and, in the name of the Satanic Anti-Christ
of the Catholic Church, they intentionally performed the first two of a really long
series of abhorrent genocides against the highly civilized Aztecs and Incas,
also enslaving numerous other nations and ethnic-religious groups in the
process.
A critical moment of the Inca genocide perpetrated by the Anti-Christian Spaniard conquistadors: the Capture of the Inca Emperor Atahualpa (1497-1533) during the Battle of Cajamarca; painting by Juan Lepiani (1920-1927)
All the same; this has
always been the fate of the 'West', which consists in an abysmal anomaly in the
History of Mankind. The barbarians of Western Europe always exported their
problems to the rest of the world in order to survive. As a matter of fact, the
Western elites accept as 'civilized nations' only the slaves of their
fabrication, i.e. the so-called 'Western Civilization'.
When
it comes to the non-Western world, the perverse idiots, who believe in the
existence of a so-called Western Civilization, are the worst enemies of mankind
and the most unrepentant traitors of their nations.
All the same, the so-called
'Western Civilization' is a villainous fabrication of the Western European
barbarians, which was incessantly propagated, tyrannically imposed, preached as
the 'sole civilization', praised as an all-human acquisition, declared as
'universal', and therefore meant (or hinted) as 'compulsory for every civilized
human being'. This is of course entirely racist, but this is still a minor
issue.
In fact, if the
fabrication 'Western Civilization' stayed only within the circumference of the 15th–16th
c. Western European states, it would never become a worldwide problem and, even
more happily for the rest of the world, it would soon disintegrate, driving the
Western European nations to extinction. When it comes to the vicious and
premeditated propagation, imposition and acclamation of this construct, people all
over the world must take into account the following five crucial aspects of the
phenomenon:
a. Colonization is tantamount
to Westernization;
b. The 'Western world'
is first, an abnormal self-denial and second, a terrorist rebuff of the
historical evolution of mankind;
c. The permanent internecine
wars of the West demonstrate its composite nature;
d. Westernization
cannot be 'à la carte' for anyone anytime anywhere and under any circumstances
whatsoever; and
e. Westernization is
part of eschatological agendas - not an intellectual caprice, an academic
arrogance, a moral deviation or a mental degeneration
Historical artwork from the Padmanabhapuram Palace (also known as Kalkulam Palace) in Kerala, Deccan; Eustachius De Lannoy of the Dutch East India Company (Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie) surrenders to Maharaja Marthanda Varma of the Indian Kingdom of Travancore after the Battle of Colachel (1741); Western colonialism was endless bloodshed.
I. Colonization:
worldwide imposition of the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model
Extensively but
deliberately propagated as an economic affair, colonization is basically the
premeditated exportation and the brutal imposition of the inhuman Western
European civilizational model on the rest of the world. As a matter of fact,
Colonization is Westernization. The first crucial aspect of the nefarious phenomenon
is that, by means of military, political, economic, educational, religious,
spiritual, intellectual, academic, scientific, cultural, technological,
socio-behavioral and mental colonization, the aforementioned construct was repressively
imposed worldwide.
After five centuries of
persistent, mendacious, and oppressive effort, Westernization became finally inherent
(in different degree) to everyone - with the only exception of the blessed
people who happened to live in remote areas and remained unaffected from or
immune to it.
The calamitous process
started in Western Europe (namely the territories of today's Italy, France,
Spain, Portugal, Holland, Belgium, England, Scotland, and Ireland) and then it
was transferred / relocated to the Occupied Territories which conventionally are
now called 'USA', 'Canada' and 'Australia'; for this reason, all these lands
(along with French Polynesia, New Caledonia, New Zealand, etc.) are called the
'Collective West'. It was from those lands that emanated the multifaceted and
multilayered colonization process that can also be called 'Westernization'.
Quite contrarily, Latin
America -from Mexico to Argentina and Chile- is not part of the 'Collective
West', although undoubtedly many Western Europeans settled there. The continent
where the great civilizations of the Mayas, the Aztecs and the Incas had grown
is a colonized continent, and the indigenous populations which de facto
constitute the majority of the people must take their land back, impose their
culture, religions and values, and terminate the colonial shame that started
before 500 years.
Decolonization-de-Westernization
is necessary to Latin America too.
Battle of Vienna (September 1683), monumental artwork by an anonymous, contemporary painter; Military History Museum Vienna
Similarly and more
critically, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Central Europe, the Balkan Peninsula, and
the Scandinavian Peninsula do not truly constitute part of the 'Collective
West; it is well-known that Austria-Hungary was aptly dragged by the Catholic
Church into interminable wars against the Ottoman Empire, but this fact was the
mistake of both imperial administrations which failed to assess the ignominious
plans elaborated by the Anti-Christian Church of Rome against Constantinople and
Vienna at the same time.
Later, Imperial Germany
became also the victim of the papal plots, entering into academic, intellectual,
economic and military competition with the then 'Collective West'; but this was
exactly the trap! Attempting to acquire material gains against the English and
the French, Germany started becoming part of the 'Club of the Evil', whereas it
would be pertinent for the interests of the German Nation to fully oppose it.
As a matter of fact, by competing with the Westerners in any sense, you simply
get westernized, i.e. colonized – without even understanding it. Clearly,
decolonization-de-Westernization is necessary to those parts of Europe too.
For the above reasons
and due to many other parameters, it is safe to claim that every discussion
about the 'economic motives' and the 'political predominance' of the colonial
powers is merely a smokescreen. The same is valid for the often evoked
'missionary work'; it was only the camouflage. In fact, the Western countries
invaded most of the other nations, lands and continents only to impose their
construct, namely the inhuman Western European civilizational model.
Establishing an
oligarchical economic system of social exploitation and arbitrarily imposing a
parliamentary system of social deception in one colonized land are not enough
for the devilish and criminal elites of the 'Collective West'! The colonized
countries must always be in phase with the Western metropolises, when it comes
to educational, religious, spiritual, intellectual, academic, scientific,
cultural, technological, socio-behavioral matters.
II.
The Western world: an abnormal self-denial and a terrorist rebuff of the
History of mankind
The second crucial
aspect concerns the formation of the West itself. This is a most concealed
topic, as a systematic, comprehensive and monstrous misinterpretation of the
historical facts was composed and propagated to compactly confuse people in the
West and in the rest of the world. Because Western universities and museums,
libraries, mass media, intellectuals and governments gave to the 'Collective
West' a fallacious historicity, numerous explorers, investigators, commentators
and historians were driven to the confusion that the divide between East and
West existed always. This is entirely wrong.
The appellation
"Ancient Oriental Empires" is the beginning of the historical
fallacy. The great civilizations of Mesopotamia (Sumer, Elam, Akkad, Assyria,
Babylonia, Hurrians, Aramaeans, etc.), the Nile Valley (Egypt/Kemet,
Cush/Sudan), Anatolia (Hittites, Hatti, Luwians, etc.), Syria-Palestine
(Canaanites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Hebrews, etc.), the Iranian plateau, the
Caucasus region, Central Asia, Siberia and Mongolia, the African Atlas
(Berbers, Carthaginians, etc.), India, Bengal, the Deccan, and China were all
"central to the world", according to their own standards, sources and
world conceptualization.
Designating these
civilizations, peoples and empires as "Oriental" necessitates the
preposterous anticipation that the center of the world was situated elsewhere
and these entities were located east of the center. Limiting considerations at
the purely natural and geographical level is certainly normal, and it was done
by all in the Antiquity. But extending the geographical notion to the
cultural-civilizational level constitutes an absurd categorization and a
discriminatory distinction. And on this racist foundation has been built the
pseudo-historical dogma of the 'Collective West'. But in order to be close to
factual data, I have to continue.
The Walls of Nineveh, one of the capital cities of the Assyrian Empire; Assyria was not an Oriental monarchy, because it was located east of Hittite Anatolia and Egypt, but west of Elam and China. The Western term "Oriental civilizations" consists in a monumental fallacy; what is called as 'Oriental" is the common historical heritage of the entire mankind.
What is now called 'Ancient
Greece' was an unimportant, marginal and mostly uncivilized circumference to
the Ancient so-called 'Oriental' world; the distinctive tribes that are now
conventionally called 'Ancient Greeks' failed to establish an empire of
universal vocation. Culturally, morally and spiritually different from them, Alexander
the Great of Macedonia invaded part of Greece and forced some of the local worthless
states to contribute to the exploit of substituting the ailing Achaemenid Iran
with a more genuine universal empire.
Ancient Rome was also a
peripheral and insignificant city that was transformed from kingdom to 'res
publica' and later to empire; the Roman expansion was mainly due to the rivalry
with Carthage, which was the ancient world's most democratic and most
republican state. However, after the disintegration of the shameful 'res publica',
the Romans failed to build a genuine and universal empire after the example of
Egypt, Babylonia or Assyria, despite Rome's unprecedented contest and endless wars
with the Arsacid and the Sassanid empires of Iran. These wars lasted almost 700
years (54 BCE – 628 CE), but their echo lasted until 1453, as Mehmet II the
Conqueror viewed in himself an Iranian vanquisher of the Romans.
The Christianization of
the Roman Empire demonstrated its limits; in fact, despite of a very
sophisticated administrative-military organization, the state could not hold
together. The main reason for this situation was the fact that no empire can
possibly be created around a sea; there was never an empire around the Black
Sea or the Caspian Sea. And when all the coastlands of the Red Sea belonged to
the Islamic Caliphates, the gravitational center of all these different states
(Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid, Mamluk, and Ottoman) was not situated in the Red
Sea region.
However, due to the
universal or ecumenical vocation of the Christian faith as per the Fathers of
the Christian Church, following the division of the Christian Roman Empire (395
CE), the Eastern Roman Empire developed an ecumenical character that it
retained for several centuries. But the terms used for the division of the
Roman Empire were purely geographical, having no cultural-civilizational
meaning. The same was also valid after the schisms (Photian: 863-867; final:
1054); the differences between the Eastern Roman Empire (Orthodox Christianity)
and the Catholic Church were only religious, canonical and imperial, because
the Roman pope interfered in the various states of Western Europe in order to
generate opponents to the Eastern Roman Emperor. And it so continued until the
Fall of Constantinople (1453) to the Ottomans.
The enthronement of Patriarch Michael Keroularios, who excommunicated pope Leo IX; from the 13th c. manuscript of the History by John Skylitzes (also known as Skyllitzes Matritensis; currently in Biblioteca Nacional de España, fol. 225r)
In other words, prior
to the Renaissance, there was never a cultural-civilizational differentiation
between 'East' and 'West', because the Western Europeans, like all the
civilized humans across the Earth, viewed the world civilizations across the
Earth as a unitary phenomenon.
It is the entire
Renaissance phenomenon that changed the Western Europeans, but as such, it
first led them to an absurd self-denial. In its nucleus, Renaissance is an
arbitrary approach to the Western Europeans' pre-Christian past, involving a
deliberate idealization of the daily life and the activities of the pagan
ancestors of the 14th, 15th and 16th c. Western Europeans. In real terms, it is
an illusion that they produced and believed, before exporting it to the
unfortunate others. But this totally ahistorical illusion was at the same time
a full and complete rejection of the Western Europeans themselves, i.e. of
their own Christian identity.
Commissioned by pope Julius II to decorate the rooms of the Vatican palace, and painted between 1509 and 1511, the famous fresco 'The School of Athens' ('Scuola di Atene') by Raphael (Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino) is a typical specimen of the Anti-Christian art of Renaissance. The ahistorical painting features wise scholars, thinkers and philosophers who were not Greek and, in addition, had no relationship with Athens. Even Zoroaster, the founder of the Ancient Iranian religion, is depicted in the absurd fallacy, which consists in a blasphemy against Christianity. If the Eastern Roman Empire had existed and had been powerful at the time, the repugnant shame would have not been tolerated and the infamous palace demolished. By idealizing the tiny state of Ancient Athens and by attributing to it persons, concepts, deeds and works that are totally irrelevant, the painter contributed to the prodigious fabrication of an illusion that was later believed as real. This illusion terminated the historical evolution that had taken place until then and gradually but irreversibly eradicated Christianity and faith in general.
The progressive imposition
of the illusory Antiquity on the 14th, 15th and 16th c. Western Europeans was
carried out by different mystical, religious, intellectual and academic elites
in a way that worsened the trouble caused because of the apparent detachment
from reality. Rejecting their true, Christian identity and adopting an unreal
ideal, the Renaissance elites went from disbelief to degeneracy, from deviation
to corruption, from paranoia to madness, from delusion to disorder, and from
being to non-being. Viewed in terms of massive social phenomenon, Renaissance
is the only true Holocaust in the History of Mankind. It consists in a most
comprehensive spiritual genocide that the then Western European ruling classes
performed against themselves and their own peoples.
Being cut off from their
identity and recent past which they 'excommunicated', the sick elites of
Western European Renaissance were left with only one option: they had to
a) unquestionably,
inevitably, and unrepentantly conquer and massacre the others,
b) forcefully change
the identity of the survivors (: make them look like 'copies' of Western
Europeans), and
c) flee ahead to even
more unreal, more inhuman, and more absurd notions.
This means that they
subsequently produced even more unrealistic schemes, lunatic concepts, illusory
descriptions, and delusional suggestions, which ultimately led to worse types
of colonization, repression, bloodshed, cruelty, and wars.
It goes without saying
that these elites will inevitably resort to nuclear conflagration and total
annihilation of mankind if they fail to materialize the incessantly more
unrealistic projects, which are mere paragraphs of their ominous agendas.
We can therefore easily
understand that the East-West (Orient vs. Occident) dilemma is a forgery; in
fact, what we call nowadays the 'Collective West' consists in
1) the corruption of a
part of the Mankind (namely the Western Europe),
2) the subsequent
secession of that part of the world from the rest, and
3) the opposition to,
and denial of, the rest of mankind, which is indiscriminately and pejoratively
labeled as 'Orient'.
III.
The interminable internecine wars of the West, its composite nature, and the ensuing
concerns for the rest of the world
Many
people are nowadays impressed because of the collapse of the so-called
Franco-German axis within European Union (EU); but what is there to be possibly
impressed with? Personally, I rather tend to believe that the so-called
Berlin-Paris axis lasted for long. Taking into consideration the past that
Western Europe has had after the Christianization of the Roman Empire (313-380
CE) and its final division into two parts (395 CE), we have to find the present
divisions within EU as quite normal.
Contrarily
to what happened in the Eastern Roman Empire with the prevailing Caesaropapism
(which is tantamount to absolute prevalence of the emperor over the patriarch),
in the ill-fated and short-lived Western Roman Empire, the pope of Rome prevailed
over the local emperor by means of a well-orchestrated deception (and this is
called Papo-Caesarism). Even worse, the papal authority devised an ignominious
plan as per which barbarian 'kingdoms' ruled by idiotic thugs would supplant
the Western Roman Empire as an imperial institution, thus leaving the pope as
the sole ruler of Western Europe.
By
ceaselessly pursuing divisive tactics and by keeping a balance among the
barbarian rulers, the counterfeit administration of Anti-Christian Rome, while
fervently fighting against the Eastern Roman Empire, implemented systematically
a devilish policy of acculturation during the long process of Christianization
of the uncivilized migrant tribes in the lands of today's Northern Italy, France,
Spain, Portugal, England and Ireland. This means that in fact all these
populations never became truly Christian, but believed that they were Christian
while remaining pagan, cruel and incestuous.
Quite
contrarily, in the truly Christian Eastern Roman Empire, the emperor and the
patriarch implemented methodically different approaches to the successive waves
of migrating nations, i.e. religious integration, cultural assimilation and
administrative incorporation. The alternative solution was always military victory,
expulsion and dispersion of the enemy. For this reason, in the Eastern Roman
Empire there were few religious quarrels and conflicts, whereas in Western
Europe there were endless tribal, feudal and later monarchical hostilities, which
were always wars of plunder.
Consequently,
spiritual, religious, doctrinal and theological opposition went extinct in the
Eastern Roman Empire after the 9th c., but across Western Europe, numerous
groups survived in clandestine form from the times of Late Antiquity until the
15th c. The Eastern Roman Emperors never faced an opponent like the Knights
Templar; but the papal power, which was never counterbalanced by any royal (and
the exceptions only confirm the rule), was unable to uproot secret movements and
doctrinal factions that challenged its authority in later periods, because they
had aptly managed to penetrate several religious orders and the papal
hierarchy.
The façade of the 12th c. Templar Castle in Ponferrada, in the Province of León, NW Spain; however, when it comes to land controlled by the Eastern Roman Empire, no major monuments of the Paulicians or the Iconoclasts (8th–9th c.) survived down to our times.
With
the gradual arrival of Ashkenazi 'Jews' in Northern and Central Europe
(9th–10th c.), the admixture (or if you prefer the circulation) of elites that
formed the modern Western world (also known as the 'Collective West') was
ready. Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923) understood it quite well. Consequently, it
was only normal for Western Europeans to experience interminable internecine
wars, while expanding colonially. This fact only reveals the composite nature
of Western Europe; it also explains the present conjuncture.
Originating
from diverse religious societies of the Late Antiquity, the three main forces,
which composed Modern Europe and controlled the world by means of colonization,
always managed to make compromises for their reciprocal interests in spite of
the enormous differences that their eschatological agendas comprise. The three
most influential groups (or 'nebulae' if you prefer) are the following: the
Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the Zionists. About their agendas and remote
antiquity, you can find general information in my earlier publications:
https://www.academia.edu/33381068/Zionist_Freemasonic_Jesuit_Agendas_in_Conflict_or_Superposition_End_Times_Sequence_and_Trajectories
and
https://www.academia.edu/108549891/Antiquity_and_Eschatology_of_Freemasonic_Jesuit_and_Zionist_Orders_as_Vector_of_the_Israeli_Palestinian_Conflict
Quite interestingly, I
read only recently a compelling article about the intentions toward Russia that
three major groups of the Collective West have; it was first published before
one year (8 May 2023). Titled Шахматы войны (Chess of War), the article was
authored by the world-known Russian intellectual Alexander Dugin (https://katehon.com/ru/article/shahmaty-voyny).
For an English translation (by Lorenzo Maria Pacini): https://www.geopolitika.ru/en/article/chess-war
The article was written
after a chess-like style and that is why the 'Collective West' is designated as
"Black", meaning a black set of chess. In his second part (Black's
centers), A. Dugin makes the following distinction:
«With Black we can
distinguish three main macro-figures, which are not symmetrical with each
other, but each of them has a sufficient degree of sovereignty to actively
influence the course of the entire confrontation. We have named them as
follows:
The party of complete
and immediate victory over Russia
The party of delayed
victory over Russia
The party of
indifference to Russia».
In fact, the first
'party' represents the Zionists; the second 'party' corresponds fully to the
Jesuits, their world conceptualization, mentality, attitude, and agenda. And
the third 'party' can clearly be identified with some leading Freemasonic
lodges (at this point, I have to clarify that there is an ongoing fierce
dispute among several apostate lodges).
Further expanding upon
"the party of total and immediate victory over Russia", Alexander
Dugin identifies it as the "most radical part of the globalists",
stating more specifically that it consists of "the British secret
services, which act in close connection with certain US neo-conservative
centers (Kagan, Nuland, Kristol) and with the Pentagon and CIA circles close to
them".
Focusing on "the
party of delayed victory over Russia" (i.e. the second of the three
groups), A. Dugin exemplifies the group with the Roman Catholic General Mark
Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces, a
ferocious enemy of former US President Donald Trump. While explaining the
geopolitical positions of this group, the Russian intellectual adds current US
President Biden in the picture: "This is the position of Biden himself and
most of his administration".
When it comes to the
third party (or "The indifference’s party"), A. Dugin draws the
political portrait of Donald Trump: "the position of those American
political forces that do not identify US interests with globalism, do not rely
on the rules of Atlanticist geopolitics (where the main goal of the Anglo-Saxon
civilisation of the sea is an overwhelming victory over the Eurasian
civilisation of the land, i.e. sovereign Russia), and are therefore indifferent
to Russia, which, on a soberly pragmatic analysis, does not threaten US
national interests - neither in the military nor in the economic field - in
general". He then epitomizes it by adding that "this is exactly the
position expressed by former US President Donald Trump. His claims, that if he
becomes US President again the conflict in Ukraine will immediately cease, are
not boastfulness, but pure realism".
The composite nature of
the 'Collective West' and the total control that the Jesuits, the Freemasons,
and the Zionists exercise over the governments and the societies of Western
Europe and North America (and through them over the rest of the world) are indeed
very preoccupying issues and quite determinant factors for the rest of the
world. This is so for the following four reasons:
a) the inhuman Western
European 'civilizational' model that Western European elites imposed first
locally and then worldwide is similarly a composite corpus of notions; it
contains gravely divergent concepts that were finally adopted after many gradual,
trilateral compromises.
b) in the same manner,
the bogus-historical dogma, which was elaborated by Western European academics
and then colonially imposed worldwide, is also a composite patchwork. This can
be attested in several terms, which are meaningless for the rest of the world,
but in fact, they are the result of compromises. Examples:
'Greco-Roman world',
'Hellenistic and Roman' times, 'Judeo-Christian' culture, 'Helleno-Christian'
civilization, 'Helleno-Orthodox' doctrine, etc.
c) at any given moment
during the last 500 years, the flee ahead to even more unreal notions, ideas or
theories led always to final compromises, modifications, and new composite
constructs, which had Jesuit, Freemasonic and Zionist components and
dimensions. The same is also valid for the conflicts ensued and the treaties
signed at the end.
d) even more
importantly, the penetration of the Western elites into the rest of the world
was also composite; this means that countries, parts and/or sectors of the
non-Western world are controlled at all levels by representatives of the three
groups of power. Due to this phenomenon, the internecine wars of the Western
World have spread across the Earth, making of any potential disentanglement a
very difficult and very dangerous option.
Two specimens of art are enough to prove the fallacy and the impossibility of the term "Judeo-Hellenic civilization", which is shamelessly propagated by -amongst others- the notorious Ariel Center for Policy Research (ACPR); above: Beit Alpha synagogue (in the northern slopes of the Gilboa mountains near Beit She'an, Israel) with a 6th c. CE mosaic representing the binding of Isaac and even featuring the 'hand of God'. Below: red-figure amphora with the representation of a satyr assaulting a maenad (6th c. BCE)
IV.
Westernization is not 'à la carte'
Due to the situation
described as per above, it is impossible for any non-Westerner to stand
opposite to the 'Collective West', selecting only some of the theoretical
systems, philosophical maxims, intellectual approaches, academic
considerations, political ideologies, and governmental practices produced and
implemented by the Western world. Although this attitude is not
straightforwardly opposite to the Western world, it is considered as gravely
inimical by the paranoid rulers of UK, US, EU, NATO and their satellites.
It is actually
misplaced to attempt to view the modern Western world as a diachronic entity,
because it was never such and it was not geared to be anything of the kind. You
don't have the option to possibly accept 'this' and reject 'that'. It is true
that, in every historical period after Renaissance, the Western elites came up
with several theoretical options, governmental concepts, social ideals and
philosophical concepts, which were entirely fallacious and still opposite to
one another; at a later date, one of the conflicting poles may have subsided or
eventually both were brought together, and a new -always delusional and
inhuman- environment appeared. Many scholars described this type of
developments as 'Hegelian', but in reality they were entirely Manichaean.
However, average people everywhere, either in the Western colonial metropolises or in the colonized peripheries, were always asked to promptly, duly and fully cope with the new environment. No feudal state was tolerated in the 19th c.; no imperial state was accepted in the 20th c.; and no Communist state is permitted in the 21st c. The 'logic' (truly speaking: the 'absurdity') of the conflicting Jesuit, Freemasonic and Zionist agendas that have formed the historical developments over the past 500 years is 'permanent update'. For this reason, the concept of 'evolution' (spread as delusion among people worldwide) was necessary to all major societies that rule the Western world: those who supported and promoted notions relating to Darwinism and those who opposed this theory.
Mannerism is a style of Western European art, which is good for the 16th c. until the emergence of Baroque, which replaced it. Above: the Pharos (Lighthouse of Alexandria) painting by the Dutch portrait and religious painter Maarten van Heemskerck (1498-1574); Below: engraving of the same painting by the Dutch publisher and engraver Philip Galle (1537-1612). The naked child next to the sitting king (possibly a Ptolemy) at the right bottom corner is a totally unacceptable element for every Christian adept, society, and art standards; but it constituted the beginning of a long series of stages that ends up with the legalization of pedophilia. Today, for the unrepresentative, sick and abnormal statesmen of the Collective West, it would be totally meaningless if an Asiatic, African, Latin American, East European or other head of state expressed admiration for Mannerism and the aforementioned Dutch artists; what matters for the paranoid dictators of the ailing Western world is that those statesmen facilitate the legalization process for society corruption and disintegration.
The 'permanent updates'
to which all have to concur every now and then have been scaled over the past
five centuries, because in reality every delusion made, every change occurred,
every development introduced, and every scheme implemented were either a
distinct paragraph of one of the aforementioned agendas or the ultimate
compromise between the divergent paragraphs of two among them.
The Westernization
project that was launched since the first days of the Renaissance is a compact
eschatological program of which no one can possibly accept only a part without
signing his death warrant. This is true for anyone anytime anywhere and under
any circumstances whatsoever; for this reason, every selective approach to the
inhuman scheme of worldwide Westernization would inevitably constitute a
certain opposition to the provisions of one of the existing agendas.
This fact is not
understood by several statesmen, politicians, diplomats, academics,
intellectuals and religious authorities in countries other than the 'Collective
West'; similarly, average people, who live in the Western world but still value
their own cultural heritage, ancestral traditions, faith, moral, and
spirituality, fail to grasp the true nature of the inhuman Western European
'civilizational' model and the ensuing Westernization of the world. They mistakenly
think that 'only now' or 'only recently' the Westerners started 'forgetting'
their past and values. However, this approach is shortsighted, narrow-minded,
and totally false.
The error is due to the
fact that all those, who find the so-called 'woke culture' or 'cancel culture'
as a drastically different from the earlier Western norms, values and standards,
have beforehand developed a diachronic view of the modern Western world. But
this is very wrong. Over the past 500 years, people in the West passed through
several, different from one another, stages; every stage was diverse from the
previous and constituted (for the Western elites) an 'advanced step' if
compared with earlier conditions of life.
The so-called 'woke
culture' or 'cancel culture' looks very different from the average culture of
Westerners in either Western Europe of North America in the 1930s, and this is
true. But if we add to the equation few turning points or moments of upheaval like
the May 1968 protests, the 1969 Woodstock festival, the lawless legalization of
the abortion (1975 in France / "la Loi Veil"), and the evil decriminalization
of the adultery (1987 in Belgium; 2006 in Romania), we understand that nothing
happened suddenly or abruptly. Every step of moral degradation and social
corruption of the Western societies was small enough and it was made slowly
enough in order to be accepted over a period of time that was accorded to it.
Consequently, to the eyes
of today's Western statesmen, academics and intellectuals (i.e. the puppets of
the devilish Western elites) it appears as 'hypocritical' or 'absurd' or 'crazy'
that statesmen, who reject today's Collective West, like President Putin of
Russia, refer to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, admire Peter the Great (who
attempted to emphatically westernize Russia), state publicly that they were
inspired by Catherine the Great (who opened Russia to Western philosophers),
and expect their approach to possibly please their eventual Western
interlocutors or disreputable haters or to create a feeling of
cultural-historical familiarity. The following articles are only indicative in
this regard:
Putin, Citing
Roosevelt, Hints at a 3rd-Term Bid
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/world/europe/07putin.html
Putin compares himself
to Peter the Great in quest to take back Russian lands
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/10/putin-compares-himself-to-peter-the-great-in-quest-to-take-back-russian-lands
How Catherine the Great
may have inspired Putin’s Ukraine invasion
https://theconversation.com/how-catherine-the-great-may-have-inspired-putins-ukraine-invasion-178007
Vladimir Putin
justifies his imperial aims in Tucker Carlson interview
https://theconversation.com/vladimir-putin-justifies-his-imperial-aims-in-tucker-carlson-interview-223395
The Inauguration of the Academy of Arts (Инаугурация Академии художеств 7 июля 1765 года), painting (1889) by the Russian painter Valery Yacobi (Валерий Иванович Якоби Якобий; 1834-1902); the masterpiece, which is currently in the Research Museum of the Russian Academy of Arts (Научно-исследовательский музей Российской Академии художеств), reflects the atmosphere that prevailed in the historic event, which was sponsored by Catherine the Great (reign: 762-1796). Although the Russian empress attempted clearly to westernize her country more than any other Russian, admiration for her is meaningless to the eyes of today's Western rulers because they view the Russian empress' tenure, world views, ideas and innovations good for her time only.
However, President
Putin was undoubtedly responsible for the 'mistakes'; the reason for this
conclusion is due to the fact that the Westerners do not view their modern
world as a diachronic entity but as a series of successive stages through which
they reached the present status. Consequently, to the Western elites of today,
Reagan, Roosevelt, Clemenceau, Napoleon, Louis XIV, and Charles V, pretty much
like Hegel, Kant, Rousseau, Voltaire, Pascal, Shakespeare, du Bellay, Rabelais,
and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola had a certain value but only as fully functioning
factors of their times – not diachronically. Their importance (as it is viewed
by the present Western elites) is their contribution to the developments of
their time, but Rabelais (or any other 16th c. Western European intellectual) had
become obsolete and meaningless at the time of Karl Marx, and subsequently, the
latter is -in turn- truly excoriated today. The same approach applies to music,
literature, art, theater, law, science, and -last but not the least- the manner
of living.
It is crystal clear
that this situation causes terrible troubles to the rest of the world, i.e. the
colonized periphery; this is so because of the complex manner through which the
colonization / Westernization process was carried out. Different countries in
Asia, Central and Eastern Europe, Africa, and Latin America accepted diverse
stages and aspects of the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model in
distinct moments and junctures. This automatically makes of them the disparate
members of a group that exists only in one dimension: that of being irrelevant
to 15th-16th c. Western Europe.
Then, the fact that
notable historical persons or a restricted elite from the past of one
non-Western country may have accepted in their time a certain stage or an
aspect of the Westernization project (which was later widely propagated across
the nation in question) makes today the de-Westernization effort a very
strenuous task for the said country to undertake. But this is another issue,
because it concerns the non-Western world. Example: Western Theater was alien
to the average Russian society of the time of Ivan IV the Terrible (1530-1584;
reign after 1547); however, it was initially supported by the 18th c. royal
elite, and it became gradually accepted by more people (mainly the nobles and
the then rising Russian bourgeoisie). The Bolshoi Theater was built in Moscow
before two centuries (1825), but it is a monument of Russia's Westernization. Many
Russians, Christian or Muslim, rejected the Western notion of Theater at the
time as an Anti-Russian abomination. All the same, if today's Russians want to
reach out to the spiritual concept and imperial ideal of Holy Rus (Святая Русь),
they will certainly have to allow their de-Westernization effort to cover that
sector too.
One day, the Russians will have to choose between Ivan the Terrible {in whose days St. Basil Cathedral was built (1555 and 1560) by Postnik Yakovlev and Ivan Barma} and Alexander I {in whose days the Bolshoi Theater was opened (18 January 1825)}. The choice is not either architectural or governmental, but it has cultural, moral and spiritual dimensions..
As a matter of fact, it
is certainly noteworthy that across the Earth numerous aspects of
Westernization were accepted subliminally, and this situation will apparently
necessitate an enormous effort during the process of liberation
(de-Westernization) that those countries have definitely to launch.
V. Westernization
is part of eschatological agendas
For the leading internal
forces of the West, Westernization is the process needed for the implementation
of variant eschatological agendas; in other words, the inhuman Western European
'civilizational' model was not an intellectual caprice, an academic arrogance,
a moral deviation or a mental degeneration. It was the basic means that these
forces have used to fool, corrupt and enslave their populations and the rest of
the world, and -more importantly- to impose on them their eschatological
agendas.
The sinister
Renaissance -with all its attributes and paraphernalia- was evidently conceived
as the foreclosure of History. I can only admit that it simply failed to fully impose
its barbarous, inhuman and evil scope and to comprehensively enforce its
blasphemous delusion across the Earth in only 500 years. But the abysmal attempt
to terminate History does not start with the infinitesimal, petty propagandist
Francis Fukuyama and his absurd and nonsensical book.
It started with the
ominous specter that the devilish Western European monks, priests, mystics, academics,
intellectuals, artists, and statesmen devised before 500-600 years; this is the
true, atrocious face of Renaissance, which still threatens all historical
nations with spiritual and material extinction, having the nuclear sword of
Damocles hanging over the head of the entire mankind. Actually, the
conflagration was envisioned by Mani, the Iranian founder of Manichaeism, before
almost 1800 years as the right and proper eschatological end of mankind. Lenore
Marshall's essay "The Nuclear Sword of Damocles" (1971) came only too
late for readers interested to discover their fate (https://energyhistory.yale.edu/lenore-marshall-the-nuclear-sword-of-damocles-1971/).
The New Aeon and the Liberation of Light after the eschatological conflagration as preached by Mani; the Sun, the Moon and -between them- the Column of Glory in their respective mansions demonstrate that even for Mani the foundations of the Creation will remain intact after the soteriological upheaval. From a 13th-14th c. hanging scroll (paint and gold on silk) currently in a private collection in Japan.
It is really foolish for
theoreticians like Miriam Leonard to come to the conclusion that «Heidegger and Loraux articulate how
the historical can and should act to disrupt the "final repression"
of history. If difference "alone is historical through and through and
from the start" it is also crucially able to resist the foreclosure of
history». {The Uses of
Reception Derrida and the Historical Imperative, p. 116-136 (see the last
page); in: Classics and the Uses of Reception, Editor(s): Charles Martindale,
Richard F. Thomas, 1 January 2006, Blackwell Publishing Ltd (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470774007)}
This is so because the
concept of 'classics' is fallacious, ahistorical and intentionally delusional,
whereas Western Europeans first and their colonized victims (starting from
later dates) have already lived «the
"final repression" of history»
in the lapse of time between the diffusion of the Renaissance concepts and
notions among them and the present moment. The atemporal period in which
post-Renaissance people live is the disruption of history of which today's
theoreticians are purposelessly afraid of; this is actually the final deception
which was inevitably stated in the New Testament (2 Thessalonians 2:11/ καὶ διὰ τοῦτο
πέμψει αὐτοῖς
ὁ Θεὸς
ἐνέργειαν πλάνης εἰς τὸ πιστεῦσαι
αὐτοὺς
τῷ ψεύδει,/ Ideo mittet illis Deus
operationem erroris ut credant mendacio,/For this reason God sends them a powerful
delusion so that they will believe the lie.).
With the Cappella Sistina (Sistine Chapel), painted by Michelangelo in the period 1508-1512, enters into effect the prophecy attested in the New Testament as regards the final deception (2 Thessalonians 2:11).
The elaboration of
eschatological agendas by the 'venerable elders' of the hierarchical societies
that constitute the ruling elites of our world is something natural, normal and
even intrinsic; average people today find it difficult to believe but it is
not. One must never forget that these groups originate from diverse religious societies
of the Late Antiquity. There is no religion without a version of Cosmogony, a description
of Cosmology, and a salvatory narrative of Eschatology, i.e. 'Soteriology'. In
fact, the secular appearance of those societies in our times constitutes only
their smokescreen; but their members are in reality 'priests'.
Even more importantly, I
have to point out here that several theories, philosophical systems, and
ideologies conceived and propagated by members of the said societies are purely
of eschatological content, although this is somewhat dissimulated. In fact,
modern sciences, academic theories, philosophical systems, political
ideologies, and even art movements are in reality dissimulated forms of
eschatology. And there is no Cosmogony, Cosmology and Eschatology without an
underlying notion of religion and spirituality.
That is why the
Collective West and the colonized world have been submerged over the past 200
years in particular with (unidentified as such) eschatological narratives and
systems. Utopian Socialism, Marxism-Leninism, Darwinism, Impressionism, Monism,
Anarchism, Atheism, Fascism, Nazism, Materialism, Eugenics & Scientific
Racism, Abstract Art, Robotism, Islamism, Christian Zionism, Liberalism, Leftism,
Consumerism, and a multitude of other similar systems or subsystems are in
reality Westernization-promoting parts of the eschatological agendas of the
Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the Zionists.
If the evangelized
societies and the salutatory orations appear to be so distressing, gloomy and
calamitous, and if many people across the Earth start discovering that these
promises are totally dystopian and hellish, this is due to the totally evil
nature of the ruling societies and the world elites. Not only are the initiated
members of those organizations degenerate enough to see the Hell as an optimal
choice, but their secret spiritual doctrines are counterfeit versions of religions.
To many it may appear
odd that atheism, materialism and consumerism can be considered as forms of
eschatology, but this is only the result of the deception carried out. People
have been fooled up to the point of being unable to understand that, even if
someone expresses the idea that the present society is perfect and makes the
wish that it always stays the same, this is already a form of eschatology.
However, the
inevitability of the final conflagration is only underscored by the fact that
every eschatological narrative includes an unprecedented clash. And this is
something that the evil high priests of these societies intend to bring about
anytime soon. For this reason, it is foolish to take their supposed rationalism
for granted.
Reason, reasoning and
rationality have been propagated only to fool, distract and divert the rest:
the Russians, the Indians, the Africans, the Latin Americans, the Chinese, and
the Muslims. But only insanity, lunacy, paranoia and chaos prevail in the
backside of the evil minds and the dark bottom of the venomous hearts of the ruling
Western elites.
The advantage of the
first (nuclear) strike is the 'privilege' that the inhuman rulers of the Western
world reserve for themselves; that's why they must be stripped of this
prerogative. For this reason, it will be totally disastrous for the rest of the
world not to isolate the Collective West. Instead of the nuclear conflagration
that the evil elites of the West intend to cause in order to materialize their
nauseating wickedness, a domestic implosion, a social explosion, and a final
disintegration must be forcefully adjusted to European Union, UK, Canada,
Australia, and the US.
Quantitative approaches, enthusiastic promises, and unnecessary comparisons; if the member states of BRICS+ fail to find common ground in de-Westernization processes and to isolate EU, NATO, US, UK and G7, the world perspectives will be very dark indeed.
Even if they manage to avoid a nuclear war and to isolate the Western countries, the leading non-Western nations, without a comprehensive de-Westernization process, will soon find themselves in a situation similar to what existed on the eve of WW I in 1914.
All the same, de-Westernization is imperative and inevitable to all; otherwise, even if the Collective West disappears supernaturally, the non-de-Westernized states of BRICS+ will only function like Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, the Ottoman Empire, France, Italy, England, America and Japan on the eve of WWI. Then, the same cycle of wars and bloodshed will be lamentably repeated, the empires will be merely substituted by others, and the humans will be taken in the maelstrom of Tiamat.
==========================
Download the article in PDF:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/05/26/the-collective-west-its-mysteries-illusions-and-threats-against-the-mankind/
https://www.academia.edu/120038294/The_Collective_West_its_Mysteries_Illusions_and_Threats_against_the_Mankind
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_11766%2Fall
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/ca_KNT7jjq?
https://www.calameo.com/read/00715689743fb06ed9196
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/_b_The_Collective_West_its_Mysteries_Illusions_and_Threats_against_the_Mankind_b_/25904704
https://www.patreon.com/posts/collective-west-104966587
