Ассирия, Израиль, Иудея, Вавилон, Конец времён, Библия и иезуитская подделка всемирной истории
The first cinema movie in the History of Mankind: Tukulti Ninurta I (1244-1207), King of Assyria, King of Sumer and Akkad, King of the Four Corners of the World, King of All Peoples, King of kings, is represented as standing and then as kneeling, in an effort to feature the movement of the emperor during his prayer to Assur figuratively shown as ceremonial pole implying the Divine Epiphany above the temple's altar. Berlin, Staatliche Museen, Vorderasiatisches Museum
Содержание
Введение
I. Заблуждения, основанные на ложных источниках: иудео-христианская цивилизация и греко-римский мир
II. Древние евреи были всего лишь месопотамцами
III. Моисей и египтизация ранее ханаанизированных месопотамцев
IV. Библейские пророки: распространение ассирийского монотеизма среди немногих египтян, переселившихся в Ханаан
V. Священная Ниневия, ассирийцы как избранный народ, Мессия и Конец времён: основные принципы ассирийского монотеизма
VI. Ассирийский монотеизм против вавилонского политеизма: соперничество, сформировавшее мировую историю
VII. Перенос основных тем ассирийского монотеизма и цивилизации в библейские тексты
VIII. Ассур, Единый Бог, говорил с Ионой
IX. Божественная Ассирия, искажённая Ассирия, проповедь Ионы и вселенско-эсхатологическая роль империи Саргонидов
X. Иона, Иисус и возвращение ассирийцев в конце времён
XI. Иезуиты, масоны, сионисты и католический Рим/Вавилон Великий вскоре будут уничтожены.
Contents
Introduction
I. Fallacies fabricated on deceitful
sources: Judeo-Christian Civilization and Greco-Roman World
II. The Ancient Hebrews were merely
Mesopotamians
III. Moses and the Egyptianization
of the earlier Canaanized Mesopotamians
IV. Biblical prophets: diffusion of
Assyrian Monotheism among few Egyptians who resettled in Canaan
V. Sacred Nineveh, Assyrians as the
Chosen People, Messiah, and the End Times: major tenets of Assyrian Monotheism
VI. Assyrian Monotheism vs.
Babylonian Polytheism: the rivalry that shaped World History
VII. Transfer of major themes of the
Assyrian monotheism and civilization in the biblical texts
VIII. Assur, the Only God, spoke to
Jonah
IX. Divine Assyria, Deviate Assyria,
the Preaching of Jonah, and the Universal-Eschatological Role of the Sargonid
Empire
X. Jonah, Jesus, and the Return of
the Assyrians at the End of Time
XI. Jesuits, Freemasons, Zionists,
and Catholic Rome/Babylon the Great to be soon windswept
Introduction
What follows is a lengthy response that I sent to a friend in response of his questions, which concerned few excerpts from the biblical prophet Nahum, Assyria, and our deviate world whereby witchcraft is performed by evil people against innocent and moral persons.
------------------- A friend's question ---------------------
Good afternoon, Shamsaddin.
I recently read several books on the
history of Assyria - its political and economic structure, religion, and wars.
The commentaries on the Book of Nahum mention debauchery and witchcraft as the
primary strategies for enslaving Assyria's neighboring states. This has given
me several thoughts. Drawing parallels with today, I believe that the structure
of society has changed little since then. There is also a certain group of the
population which, under cover of the secret services, practices witchcraft to
discredit and destroy so-called "undesirable" citizens. I'm referring
to the issue of "targeted Individuals". I'd like to hear an expert's
opinion. What do you think about this?
---------------------- My response --------------------------
Good evening, my friend!
Thank you for your consideration and
question! Apologies for the delay!
I. Fallacies
fabricated on deceitful sources: Judeo-Christian Civilization and Greco-Roman
World
Unfortunately, today,
most of the people have minimal knowledge or understanding of the Ancient
Mesopotamian world, which is however more authoritatively known and therefore
far better accessed than the fallacious fabrications, which are called
'Biblical world' or 'Ancient Greek world'. Few people realize that there is no
trust, no honesty, and therefore no authority in manuscripts that are dated
2000 years or 1500 years after the date they had purportedly been written.
The Hebrew Bible
(Masoretic text) is an entire reconstruction; the Septuagint is also preserved
in manuscripts that date many centuries after the supposed texts were written.
And the entire Greek world is a fabrication of Christian monks who wrote
whatever opinion they wanted to attribute to Aristotle, Demosthenes, Herodotus,
Thucydides and Plato in the 'copies of manuscripts' that they were ordered by
their superiors to prepare. It is an entire fabrication, which if not
demolished will lead the entire world to extinction.
Contrarily to them,
Ancient Assyrian-Babylonian and Ancient Egyptian sources are abundant and, more
importantly, they are coeval with the events that they describe. Many other
Oriental sources complete the picture: Sumerian, Elamite, Hurrian, Hittite, Ugaritic
Canaanite, Urartu, etc., perhaps not so abundant as the above mentioned
fundamental sources, but undeniably all contemporaneous, not posterior.
But the fraudulent
nature of the Western universities is such that they do their ingenious best to
conceal the aforementioned truths and -worse- to delay or cancel the study of
the voluminous cuneiform documentation (more than one million two hundred
thousand texts) that we already possess. The same can be said about the
extraordinary number of (at times very lengthy) Islamic manuscripts accumulated
and preserved in Western libraries and museums; the bulk of them (more than one
hundred thousand) have not been read, translated, studied, commented, and made
widely known and part of the primary-secondary education worldwide. A great
number among them are of scientific contents and they document a science,
namely the 'ancient science', which was totally different from the distorted
modern pseudo-science that leads nowadays mankind to extinction.
In fact, the so-called
international community should nowadays have at least 10000 Egyptologists,
30000 Assyriologists (with strong background in Sumerian, Assyrian-Babylonian
Elamite, Hurrian, Hittite, Ugaritic Canaanite, Urartu, and Achaemenid Iranian),
and 50000 Islamologists (fluent in Farsi, Arabic, Middle Persian, Avestan,
Turkic languages, and Urdu) in order to progressively make the badly missing,
yet existing, information known to all. This effort would consist in true and
genuine liberation from the fallacies of the so-called Hellenism, Hellenistic
times, Greco-Roman world, Judeo-Christian civilization, Migration periods, etc.
In any case, this is a vast topic, but I digress …
The nature of Ancient
Hebrews as an independent ancient 'nation' is disputed; although the backbone
of the main narrative (Abraham, Joseph, Moses, David, Solomon) is easily
confirmed by the existing cuneiform and hieroglyphic literature as eventually plausible
(i.e. not as fact), the overall articulation of the Old Testament echoes many
ancient texts that were unearthed in Mesopotamia, Canaan and Egypt,
deciphered-translated, studied and commented. But no scholar was truly allowed
to draw parallels and point out facts, so that the misinterpretation and -above
all- the isolation of the so-called Biblical world may be preserved.
II.
The Ancient Hebrews were merely Mesopotamians
I will know break down
the entire myth about the so-called Ancient Hebrews into some pieces:
For what concerns the
world until 2-3 generations after Noah, the so-called Biblical authors offer
versions of narratives attested in Mesopotamia. But what we know from cuneiform
documentation already is sufficient enough for us to understand that there were
very different and conflicting priesthoods of monotheistic-aniconic and
polytheistic-idolatrous backgrounds always in clash with one another; the
conflict is attested in the different versions of Assyrian-Babylonian sacred
texts, namely epics, cosmogonies, myths, cosmologies, eschatologies, hymns,
moral literature, and the local education and culture. So, we have a selected
transfer of Mesopotamian cults.
Who is Abraham? A
Babylonian from Ur who escapes the polytheistic rule of Nimrud-Gilgamesh! He
pursues the then highly documented trade route from Mesopotamia alongside the
Euphrates up to Harran, in the area where the river crosses today the
Turkish-Syrian border. There he must have been associated with the Hapiru,
early attestation of the name of the Hebrews; but the Hapiru are not a
'nation', as they constitute a socio-professional class. They are boatmen who
cross the river. The topic has been recurrently discussed among scholars ever
since my French professor Jean Bottéro, renowned Assyriologist and friend of
Igor Diakonoff, wrote his famous article back in the 1950s. About:
Le problème des Habiru à la 4e Rencontre assyriologique internationale
https://catalogue.leidenuniv.nl/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=31UKB_LEU:UBL_V1&docid=alma990013505780302711&context=L
Book review:
https://www.persee.fr/doc/syria_0039-7946_1955_num_32_3_5107_t1_0333_0000_4
Also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%BFApiru
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Хабиру
Who is Joseph? When
someone settles in Canaan, works the land, keeps the cattle, and procreates,
his small family gets acquainted with Canaanite traditions and cults apparently
of monotheistic nature, e.g. the worshippers of El. When two generations later,
the small tribe seeks safety in Egypt they are not viewed as Mesopotamians
anymore, but as Canaanites. In time, the newcomers get Egyptianized, and are easily
assimilated among Egyptian monotheists. But there were no slaves in Egypt and
in Mesopotamia, and the status of servant in the ancient Oriental civilizations
was later confused with that of slave in the barbarian realms of South Balkans
(the so-called, but otherwise nonexistent, Greece) and Rome.
Due to his Egyptian
name, we know that Moses was an Egyptian monotheist, apparently supporter of
the strictly monotheistic religion of Akhenaten; entire verses of hymns
composed by Akhenaten are inextricable parts of Psalms, but still the Western
forgers and colonial academics try to keep the sector of Biblical Studies
dissociated from Egyptology! About:
https://www.academia.edu/106818658/Hatshepsut_Thutmose_III_Akhenaten_Ramesses_III_and_Moses_Double_Stratagem_against_the_Sea_Peoples_PLUS_107_PICTURES_and_LEGENDS
III.
Moses and the Egyptianization of the earlier Canaanized Mesopotamians
So, who was Moses?
Clearly an Egyptian monotheist, who -after the collapse of the monotheistic
state of Akhenaten and Tutankhaten (later renamed Tutankhamun) and following
the white terror imposed by Ay and Horemheb due to the restoration of Amun
Theban polytheism and trinity (Amun, Mut, Khonsu)- first, confronted the
pharaoh and the polytheistic priesthood (thus demonstrating that the
monotheists were markedly stronger in spirituality: 'his' snake ate the
serpents of the polytheistic high priests) and second, led a great number of
Egyptian monotheists out of Egypt to the Sinai, namely Saudi Arabia's NW
confines. What we conventionally call 'the Sinai Peninsula' is not the Biblical
Sinai. Now, it would be highly unlikely for the small Babylonian-Canaanite tribe
of Hapiru that had settled in Egypt almost 400 years before the Exodus to still
use their Babylonian-Canaanite jargon. But never mind! They were heading to
Canaan again, and their Egyptian idiom would again be Canaanized.
Who were David and
Solomon? Two kings that the Egyptian monotheists, who settled in South Canaan,
wanted to have like the Phoenicians (the descendants of the 2nd millennium BCE
Canaanites), the Aramaeans, the Neo-Hittites, the Philistines, and other small
nations in whose vicinity they lived. This was a concession, not a right; this
fact demonstrates that, for their strictly monotheistic perception of God,
human societies must not have kings.
Only the rise of the
two monarchs and the subsequent division of their state in two small kingdoms
(namely Israel, the Northern Kingdom of the ten tribes, and Judah, the Southern
Kingdom of the two tribes) is enough to demonstrate the advanced Canaanization
of the monotheistic Egyptian migrants, who had crossed the desert for 40 years.
If this occurred in terms of state organization, it certainly happened also at
the level of writing and language. When we examine the scarce but extant
epigraphic documentation, which is the only to count because it is contemporaneous
with the facts), we realize that what is now called 'Ancient Hebrew' is merely
a Phoenician dialect.
So what did finally
take place among the divided 'Hebrews' of the late 10th c. BCE?
In fact, they had undergone
an enormous adversity to preserve their monotheistic faith in another land, moving
out of the corrupted but not terminated Egypt, and they had ended up in the same
polytheistic structure which would inevitably drive them back to polytheistic
practices as it occurred most of the time in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Canaan and
Anatolia. The practices of the first descendants of Solomon either in Israel
(with Samaria as capital) or in Judah (with Jerusalem as capital), as they are
documented in contemporaneous Assyrian texts and preserved on inscriptions, fully
demonstrate their common, ordinary nature: they were two kingdoms similar to
all the rest and that's why they constantly participated in the same or
opposite alliance of small states fighting against one another.
At this point, we
notice -in the posterior Biblical sources- the appearance of prophets; but we
have no epigraphic documentation about them. In addition, no external,
contemporaneous or posterior sources mention the 'Biblical prophets'; there are
no Assyrian-Babylonian, Phoenician, Aramaic, Egyptian texts about them. In
addition, we don't find the slightest mention of them in any Achaemenid Iranian
text, Meroitic or Yemenite inscription, Greek or Latin textual documentation. I
don't imply that the Biblical (four 'major' and twelve 'minor') prophets did
not exist. But I state this fact as a problem.
Why on Earth do we find
diverse posterior references to Imhotep (an Egyptian), Sanchuniathon (a
Phoenician), Zoroaster (an Iranian) and Berossus (a Babylonian), but Elijah,
Isaiah, and Jeremiah appear to be totally unknown outside the limited
environment of the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic worlds and of their derivatives?
It is not only this; in spite of the numerous Assyrian texts that relate to the
small kingdoms of Israel and Judah, which ended with the Assyrian captivity of
Israel (722-719 BCE, after which the Ancient Israelites disappear once forever)
and with the Babylonian captivity of Judah (587-6 BCE), we have no mention of
Jews throughout the Achaemenid Iranian epigraphic documentation. Both in
Persepolis and in Naqsh-e Rustam, we have several cases of epigraphic and
pictorial enumeration of all the peoples of the vast Empire, but no Jews are
mentioned anywhere. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_captivity
https://archive.org/details/who-were-the-cimmerians-and-origins
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/373660
http://publ.royalacademy.dk/books/222/1393?lang=da
IV.
Biblical prophets: diffusion of Assyrian Monotheism among few Egyptians who
resettled in Canaan
Based on Biblical and
posterior religious (Christian and Islamic) texts, we find the prophets in
their -rather concealed today- role; they ostensibly were in constant clash
with the kings and their infidel priests, who justified all the erroneous
choices made by the unjust rulers. In fact, the prophets totally denounced the
malefic rabbis for perfidiously siding with the thrones of Samaria and
Jerusalem, and for thus driving all the Hebrews astray. To this fundamental
element, numerous eschatological descriptions were added only to illustrate the
punishment of the infidel rulers and people. Infidelity is the reason for which
prophets were sent to Israel.
- What is infidelity?
This is easy to
describe, and the Old Testament offers abundant examples; infidelity is the
predisposition to rely on material force (goods, economic wealth, military
force, alliance with foreign rulers, etc.) and not on spirituality (God) when
one needs to overcome the difficulties and the adversities faced by their common
fate (or society or realm).
Using a modern term, we
would be on the safe side if we claimed that the prophets of the Ancient
Hebrews were permanent reminders of monotheism not only at the theoretical
level but also with respect to practical matters, taking into consideration the
fact that it is false, improper and impertinent for a monotheistic society and
kingdom to take a polytheistic stance in terms of foreign affairs and relations
with other kingdoms and empires, while always pretending to be monotheistic of
faith. There are no such things as 'political convenience', 'conventional
approach to reality', 'my enemy's enemy is a friend', 'alliance with the
devil', and so on; faith means permanent dedication to, and reliance on, the
Divine.
In this regard, we can
certainly establish a parallel between a) the aforementioned internal strife in
the Hebrew kingdom(s) of the 10th–6th c. BCE and b) the fierce opposition
between the monotheists of Assyria and the polytheists of Babylonia in Mesopotamia.
This well known, extensively documented, and yet most concealed polarization
shaped the course of History from the end of the 3rd millennium to the middle
of the 1st millennium BCE; it was not only a matter of spirituality, religion,
cosmogony, cosmology, eschatology, world conceptualization, cult, education,
art, literature and culture, but also of imperial authority, functionality and
paraphernalia.
Whereas Assur (written
with the Sumerogram DINGIR, which was initially an ideogram for the Sumerian word
'Sky'/'Heaven', later extended to a logogram for 'God', and finally turned into
a phonogram for 'an'; it was pronounced 'ilu' in Assyrian-Babylonian, i.e.
'God', because a logographic reading was added. Finally, the same sign was used
to denote 'God', in both languages, as well as the following aspects of the
Divine: Anshar, Anu, and Assur) was perceived as the Only God by the Assyrians,
Marduk of Babylonia was an abomination to them. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingir
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anshar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_%3D_Anum
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Aššūr
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashur_(god)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumerogram
For the Babylonians,
their city (Bab ili: the Gate of god) was the image of the entire world,
because it was exactly there where the axis of the sphere of the Universe
crossed the horizontal section of the sphere, which was the conceived as the surface
of the Earth; to them Assur was merely the god of some aggressive warriors in
the North. About:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/B%C4%81bilim#Akkadian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon#Names
V.
Sacred Nineveh, Assyrians as the Chosen People, Messiah, and the End Times:
major tenets of Assyrian Monotheism
But Assyria was Divine.
Take into account this: the city was named 'Assur', i.e. the 'City of God'; the
nation was called 'Assur', i.e. the 'Nation of God'; the country was identified
as 'Assur', i.e. the 'Land of God'. As the entire Earth belonged -by Divine
Right- to Assyria, the Emperor of Assyria was indeed the 'Emperor of the
Universe', and the Assyrians were the Chosen People tasked to preserve the
Rightness, the Justice and the Truth on Earth until all things end. The absolute
concept of the Divine Kingdom (which definitely involves spirituality in the 'Imperial
Art', i.e. the imperial governance) dates back to the time of the first emperor
in World History: Sargon of Akkad (24th-23rd c. BCE); the Akkadians (named
after their still unidentified and unearthed capital, Agadé-Akkad) were the
early Semites, and their descendants were the Assyrians in the North and the
Babylonians in the South. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_the_Universe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_monarchy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Kings_of_the_Universe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_the_Four_Corners
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_corners_of_the_world
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_Sumer_and_Akkad
Assyrian Ideology and
Israelite Monotheism
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4200589
Imperial ideology in
the Neo-Assyrian empire
https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.129273998814988
The Ideology of the
Assyrian Empire
https://ixtheo.de/Record/1588646025
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003157717-12/ideology-assyrian-empire-mario-liverani-niels-peter-lemche-emanuel-pfoh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Assyrian_Empire#Government
At the intersection
between dogma and cult, the Assyrian religion can be understood as entirely monotheistic:
the diverse names of 'gods' reflect only human efforts to better define the
omnipotence and omnipresence of the Divine. Some 'gods' represent only the
successive hypostases of the Creator; Both, Mesopotamians and Egyptians, made a
clear distinction of the stages of the Divine: 'before the Creation', 'during
the Creation', and 'after the Creation' (or if you prefer 'present times');
this means that for an Assyrian monotheist, the distinction between Ea and Nabu
was minimal.
Other 'divinities' constituted
only aspects of Assur; Nabu is the Divine Wisdom; Adad is the electromagnetic
flow and force of the Divine. Shamash was the Divine Justice (symbolized by the
Sun), and Nergal was, as stated in texts, 'the Shamash of the Nether World'
(which means the Justice in the Hereafter). As represented by the Moon, Sin was
the symbol of the divine Chosen People (i.e. the Assyrians); this is not
bizarre at all, because the Assyrian-Babylonian word for 'man' ('human' or
'human being') was in later periods 'amilu' (from which originates the Arabic
word 'amil') and in earlier periods 'awilu' and 'awilum'. The etymology of this
word reveals its real meaning: 'awe ilu' means 'like God'. So, humans are
indeed the likeness of God. About:
https://www.assyrianlanguages.org/akkadian/dosearch.php?searchkey=aw%C4%ABlu&language=rawakkadian
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/awīlum
https://www.assyrianlanguages.org/akkadian/dosearch.php?searchkey=28&language=id
Last but not least,
Ishtar (Inanna in Sumerian) is the representation of the divine college of the
Assyrian monotheistic priests, and that is why she was constantly represented
as seated (and not standing) and as bearded (thus exercising a later impact on
the Phoenicians, the Greeks, and the Romans, namely in statues of the bearded
Astarte, the bearded Aphrodite, and the bearded Venus). This concept was
introduced among the Ancient Hebrews, as per the Bible the entire nation of
Israel is a 'woman' besides Yahweh. In fact, the Assyrian Ishtar was the secret
society of the spiritually formidable priests who had to guide the Assyrian
nation to exile so that they return back to their land through a most
spectacular flight at the End of Time by the Messiah (conceived by the Assyrian
monotheists in two different versions, namely Ninurta and Etana).
The Assyrian Ishtar has
an Egyptian parallel; this is Isis of the Iwnw Heliopolitan priesthood (the
dogma of the so-called Ennead); Isis (Aset in Ancient Egyptian) is represented with
a seat (a throne) on her head, thus fully establishing the concept of seated
colleges of priests during their regularly convened meetings. In fact, all the
travails and the lamentations of Isis for the excruciating dismemberment of the
Osirian body by Seth (Osiris, Wser in Ancient Egyptian, means 'the Well Being')
find their literary-mythical-cosmological-spiritual counterpart in the
Assyrian-Babylonian Epic "The Descent of Ishtar to the Nether World".
About:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ꜣst#Egyptian
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wsjr#Egyptian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descent_of_Inanna_into_the_Underworld
If I briefly expanded
on topics pertaining to the Assyrian Monotheism, Messianism, Mysticism, Divine
Imperialism, and Eschatology, this is because I wanted to show to you that all
these thematic entities were progressively copied and transferred within the
so-called Biblical contexts. After being established (ca. 1000 BCE), during its
brief existence, and after its division (ca. 930 BCE), the Ancient Hebrew
kingdom(s) got entirely Assyrianized.
For this reason Assyria
plays a so important role in the Old Testament, in the Gospels, and in the
Quran. One would have to elaborate a series of books to duly present all the
issues involved. To summarize it, I would say that the Ancient Hebrew kingdoms
were and functioned as paraphernalia of the Mesopotamian tradition of
Monotheism.
VI.
Assyrian Monotheism vs. Babylonian Polytheism: the rivalry that shaped World
History
From Tukulti Ninurta I (1244-1207
BCE) to Sargon of Assyria (722-7O5 BCE) to Assurbanipal (669-625 BCE), the
monotheists of Assyria were not the same; the
spiritual-intellectual-academic-educational-cultural identity of Assyria
presents several ups and downs during this period. These are all due to the
very diverse forms of clash between monotheists and polytheists. My previous
description of the topic was definitely brief; so, please, do not take it as a
presentation of the sole and absolute norm and definition! I certainly
presented the rule, but -as you know- every rule has its exceptions. There were
always a pro-Assyrian party in Babylonia and a pro-Babylonian party in Assyria;
the forms of clash were diverse but there was never an intention to totally
exterminate the other because their common Semitic Akkadian origin and their
shared Sumerian cultural heritage were deeply felt situations and conditions of
life. There were several wars between Assyrians and Babylonians, and they were
all religious, but this was only one form of the clash.
As I said, the
polarization between monotheists and polytheists took the form of
a) alteration of sacred
texts, epics, hymns and admonitions;
b) diverse writing
(spelling) of names, which were then differently interpreted;
c) elaboration of
different versions of mythical narratives;
d)
individualization-personalization of the divine traits, aspects and manifestations;
e) attribution of perverse
traits, identities and stories to the personalized aspects of the divine;
f) gradual formation of
independent, male or female, 'deities' of anthropomorphic conceptualization;
g) subordination of various
'aspects of the divine' (according to earlier beliefs) to the fabricated
deities;
h) extreme paganization
of faith and individualization of the cult, which was thenceforth attributed to
idols, and not to the Divine;
i) transformation of
the earlier eschatological concepts, which were all due to the spiritual
potency of the monotheists and to their ability to totally transcend the time,
into miserably preached soteriological fallacies as per which the believers
would be saved, if they believed the abominable profanities of the perverse
polytheists of Babylon; and
j) villainous
proclamation of the concept of Papo-Caesarism, in order to subordinate the
emperors to the priests, which is truly the abomination of the desolation,
because humans can be organized in societies normally, naturally, effectively,
and divinely only after the concept of Caesaropapism.
In other words, instead
of perceiving God, the profane and blasphemous polytheists created the 'gods'.
It was only normal for
the monotheists of Assyria to oppose, decry, threaten, curse and ultimately
exterminate the polytheists and their evil distortions, alterations, and
barbarizations, which were tantamount to complete dehumanization. God is One
and the Same everywhere; there is no difference between Assur and Elohim, when
it comes to monotheists. But Assur with polytheistic attributes becomes
instantly an abomination.
What you read as expression
of prophetic anger against Assyria is merely the echo of the wrath that the
Assyrian monotheists felt against the effort of polytheists to take hold of
Assyria in order to prevent the divine empire from performing its unique and
universal role in World History.
With more than 100
references of the name of Assyria in the Old Testament, you understand that I
cannot write here a full commentary of the topic; such an endeavor would take a
large book. It is essential however to tell you beforehand that no place on
Earth is holier than Assyria, no other land has ever had greater importance,
and no other nation managed to be as crucial and as seminal in World History as
the Assyrians – those who lived in Northern Mesopotamia until 640-630 BCE, departed
at that time (in order to fulfill an old Assyrian prophecy detailing their
diachronic and universal role), scattered in faraway regions among diverse
nations (therefore losing their identity, religion, writing and language),
lived for 27 centuries without remembering their past, and were totally unaware
of their prophesied spectacular return at the end times during an operation
undertaken by the Ultimate Emperor.
The true, historical Assyrians
are not to be confused with today's bogus-Assyrians, who are merely Aramaeans
targeted by the Protestant missionaries who corrupted them first, converted
them to their pseudo-Christian heresy, and finally ordered them to change their
national name.
All Biblical references
to Assyria have been either concealed or misinterpreted by modern scholars in
an effort to divert the average people from understanding the successive
distortions that were intentionally effectuated in World History in order to make
it suit the evil needs of the viciously antihuman forces that rose in power
before 550 years and managed to progressively control the world. That's why
Assyria is said to be portrayed as an instrument of judgment or as a symbol of
wickedness and oppression or anything else that allows for false interpretations,
which suit the fake Jews, the fake Christians, and the fake Muslims of today.
All Biblical prophetic references
to Assyria are therefore presented flatly as if the prophets did not live in
subsequent historical periods (from the 10th to the 7th c. BCE) and as if they
did not reflect different historical circumstances (the various ups and downs of
the Assyrian monotheism). However, if all the prophets and the texts attributed
to them are dated correctly, and all their references to Assyria are properly
interpreted, all the people will understand because they make sense. By the
way, Assyria is also mentioned in the Books of Kings and Chronicles, not to
mention the Book of Genesis (2:14; this verse makes of the Assyrians the first
nation mentioned in the Bible).
VII.
Transfer of major themes of the Assyrian monotheism and civilization in the
biblical texts
However, what else are the
Books of the Kings and the Chronicles, but a later effort to depict the petty
kings of Israel and Judah as following the Assyrian-Babylonian and Egyptian
tradition of inscribing Imperial Annals on the walls of majestic palaces (in
Mesopotamia) and mortuary temples (in Egypt), in addition to the creation of
outstanding monuments (like the Kurkh Monoliths, the Black Obelisk, the Stela
of Ashurnasirpal II, the Balawat Gates, etc.) and highly distinct objects (such
as the Prisms and the Cylinder of Sargon II, the six-sided Prims of Sennacherib,
the Zincirli Stele of Esarhaddon, the Rassam Cylinder, etc.)? About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurkh_Monoliths
http://helpmewithbiblestudy.org/17Archeology/InscriptionKurkhMonoliths_Graves.aspx
https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-near-eastern-world/kurkh-monolith-black-obelisk/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stela_of_Ashurnasirpal_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Obelisk_of_Shalmaneser_III
https://tyndalehouse.com/2020/11/20/the-black-obelisk/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balawat_Gates
The Royal Inscriptions
of Tiglath-pileser III (744–727 BC) and Shalmaneser V (726–722 BC), Kings of
Assyria
https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/119667/1/Tadmor_Yamada_RINAP_1.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annals_of_Sargon_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargon_II%27s_Prisms
https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=2416
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sennacherib%27s_Annals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victory_stele_of_Esarhaddon
The Royal Inscriptions
of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680–669 BCE)
http://www.aina.org/books/trioe.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rassam_cylinder
The Royal Inscriptions
of Ashurbanipal (668–631 BC), Aššur-etel-ilāni (630–627 BC), and
Sîn-šarra-iškun (626–612 BC), Kings of Assyria, Part 2
https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/94879/1/0RINAP5_2.pdf
https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/116650/1/0RINAP5_3_final.pdf
It is in the light of
this documentation, which is trustworthy as contemporaneous with all the
aforementioned Assyrian emperors, and in view of similar, abundant
Assyrian-Babylonian evidence that we can embark on the study of the Biblical
texts, which were recorded so many centuries and/or millennia later and with
evident the readiness of the scribes to usurp a heritage that was never theirs.
VIII.
Assur, the Only God, spoke to Jonah
With respect to the references
to Assyria within the books of the prophets, we can certainly find notions,
like what you mention in Nahum, as well as in Hosea, Amos, Micah, and Isaiah;
but every textual Biblical reference to Assyria is eclipsed by the entire Book
of Jonah, which was definitely far more important in terms of posterity, if we
take into consideration first, the discourse of Jesus about the Men of Nineveh
and Jonah, and second, the entire chapter (the 10th Surah) that the Quran makes
available about Yunus (Jonah), namely an early, Meccan revelation.
The entire situation is
described in an illustrative manner; God speaks to Jonah and orders him the
following: "Go to the great city of Nineveh and preach against it, because
its wickedness has come up before me" (New International Version-NIV; note
that I systematically reject the fallacious King James Version, because it is
the product of foremost malignancy). If compared with the Septuagint text,
there are few mistakes (ἀνάστηθι καὶ πορεύθητι εἰς Νινευὴ τὴν πόλιν τὴν μεγάλην καὶ κήρυξον ἐν αὐτῇ,
ὅτι ἀνέβη
ἡ κραυγὴ
τῆς κακίας αὐτῆς πρός με.), notably "preach
against it" (the correct is "preach in it") and "wickedness"
(the correct is "evilness" or "badness").
About: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/κακία
All the same, it is
clear that Elohim/Yahweh (as much as Assur Himself) was highly concerned with
Assyria, and more specifically its neo-Assyrian capital Nineveh; it is
ostensible that, as per the word of God, the Assyrians had gone astray. As
principal contents of the description ('evilness') can be considered the
following:
- reluctance to fulfill
the divine mission that the Assyrians had (a mission that is extensively
documented in Neo-Assyrian sources),
- deviance from the
right path (introduction of manners and attitudes of polytheistic societies),
- tolerance toward
polytheistic states (notably Elam) and
- materialistic
endeavors in striking contrast to the disciplined conduct, military austerity,
and devotional abstinence that suit the truly faithful, i.e. monotheistic societies.
Quite indicatively,
when the Emperor of Assyria, the nobles, and the people repented, they returned
to their temporarily lost austerity and abstinence; this is clearly stated in
the third chapter (verses 5 and 7): "The Ninevites believed God. A fast
was proclaimed, and all of them, from the greatest to the least, put on
sackcloth" and "By the decree of the king and his nobles: Do not let
people or animals, herds or flocks, taste anything; do not let them eat or
drink".
My intention at this
point is not to analyze the Book of Jonah in the light of the extant cuneiform
Assyrian-Babylonian sources, but to contextualize its narratives. The period
that fits the description is the beginning of the reign of Sargon II (Sarrukin of
Assyria). The clear distinction between a) opulent and insensible Assyrians and
b) sentient and conscious Assyrians is made (and this can be observed in the
existing cuneiform sources) with the rise of the Sargonid dynasty (722-609
BCE).
IX.
Divine Assyria, Deviate Assyria, the Preaching of Jonah, and the
Universal-Eschatological Role of the Sargonid Empire
What had occurred can
be described in brief as it follows: after the stable period of expansion,
which characterized the reigns of Ashurnasirpal II (884-859 BCE) and
Shalmaneser III (859-824 BCE), when the Assyrians functioned as the rod of
God's anger (Isaiah's 10th chapter echoes those days), Assyria underwent a
period of vanity and complacency that had nothing to do with the Assyrian
universal mission as well documented on cuneiform sources.
From Shamshi Adad V
(824-811 BCE) down to Shalmaneser V (727-722 BCE), with the honorable exception
of Tiglath-Pileser III (745-727 BCE), Assyria underwent a century of slumber,
self-satisfaction, and idleness. It was as if, after the shocking and
unprecedented conquest of Babylon by Shamshi Adad V (following the famous and
stupendous Battle of Dur Papsukkal, in 814), a curse fell on Assyria and the
various successors of the emperor lost the feeling of their mission. It is not
therefore without meaning that Sargon II pretended to be the son of
Tiglath-Pileser III, as he wanted to put an end to the troublesome situation
that God decried in numerous Assyrian texts of the Sargonid times and in the
Hebrew Bible. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Dur-Papsukkal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Assyrian_kings
The four principal Sargonid
emperors, Sargon of Assyria (722-705 BCE), Sennacherib (705-681 BCE),
Esarhaddon (681-669 BCE), and Ashurbanipal (669-625 BCE) covered the period of
an illustrious century of regional expansion, irrevocable transformation, and universal
resonation; it is not a matter of quantitative evaluation but qualitative
impact on World History. Very little matters that -for the first time- all the
lands from Western Anatolia to the central Iranian plateau and from the
Caucasus Mountains to the southernmost confines of Egypt were ruled by only one
sovereign.
The following critical
historical landmarks of the Sargonid times determined the destiny of mankind,
irreversibly fulfilled all Assyrian eschatological prophesies, and remain until
now the root causes of the historical process, and of its real prospects:
- 722-719 BCE: the conquest
of Samaria by Sargon II, the abolition of the Kingdom of Israel, and the resettlement
of the Israelites in the NE confines of Assyria
- 719-705 BCE: the
beginning of the dispersion of the Israelites outside the Assyrian Empire
- 701 BCE: the destruction
of the kingdom of Judah and the siege of Jerusalem by Sennacherib
- 689 BCE: the conquest
of Babylon by Sennacherib
- 648 BCE: the conquest
of Babylon by Ashurbanipal
- 640 BCE: the conquest
and total destruction of Elam by Ashurbanipal, which was described as the Fulfillment
of Time by the Assyrian Emperor, as it happened (as per the Annals of
Ashurbanipal) no less than 1636 years after the Flood; this was so because the
Elamites were always considered by the Assyrians (and by the Babylonian
monotheists) as the focus of evil, as inhuman beings, and as the main enemy of
mankind. The army of the Assyrians did not only carry out a terminal genocide
against the Elamites, but it also spread salt throughout the devastated
territory in order to cancel what had been done on it as lawless life by their
enemies.
- 640-630 BCE:
departure of the bulk of the Assyrian population from Assyria, dispersion along
the lines of the Israelites, who had left earlier, amalgamation with them, and
spread of all the migrants across Eastern and Central Europe under the names of
Cimmerians and Scythians.
- 625-609 BCE: after
the bulk of the Assyrian population left, Assyria was a vast empire with an
empty center; the remaining guards of the main cities would not stand for long,
because they were not a match for the Babylonian-Median alliance.
After the last battles,
no Assyrian was left alive in the quasi-uninhabited center of the vast empire,
and for this reason the division of the conquered lands was easy to make between
Babylon and Ecbatana (the capital of Media). Assyrian was never written again,
whereas Babylonian was written for more than 600 years after the Fall of
Babylon (539 BCE) to Cyrus. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargonid_dynasty
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akkadian_royal_titulary
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargon_II#Early_reign_and_rebellions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Israel_(Samaria)#Conquest_by_the_Neo-Assyrian_Empire_(732%E2%80%93720_BCE)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Lost_Tribes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sennacherib#Assyria_and_Babylonia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sennacherib%27s_campaign_in_the_Levant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Azekah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Lachish
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_siege_of_Jerusalem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sennacherib#Destruction_of_Babylon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Halule
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Babylon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esarhaddon#Military_campaigns
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_conquest_of_Egypt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sas%C3%AE_movement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashurbanipal#Egyptian_campaigns
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashurbanipal#Civil_war_with_Shamash-shum-ukin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%A0ama%C5%A1-%C5%A1uma-ukin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kandalanu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_conquest_of_Elam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Susa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elam#Neo-Elamite_II_(c._770_%E2%80%93_646_BC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cimmerians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scythians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medo-Babylonian_conquest_of_the_Assyrian_Empire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_Harran
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Carchemish
X. Jonah,
Jesus, and the Return of the Assyrians at the End of Time
The end of Assyria was
temporary; In fact, it was a departure, a long period of absence, and a
spectacular return at the Second Coming, i.e. the second 'Fulfillment of Time',
when the great Assyrian Emperor, according to his own confession that is recorded
in his Annals, will return to bring his people back. That's why the Book of
Jonah ends with the permanently binding statement uttered by God to Jonah in
the form of a question:
- And should I not have
concern for the great city of Nineveh, in which there are more than a hundred
and twenty thousand people who do not make a distinction between their right
and their left hand, and also many animals?
The eschatological
meaning of this sentence reveals the nature of Celestial Nineveh, after the End
of Time; the people, who will survive and live there, will not be divided into
'right' and 'left'. In this regard, it is essential to point out here that the
two terms are used with their moral and spiritual notions.
Quite meaningfully, foremost
importance is attached to Assyria and Nineveh within the Book of Tobias and
Tobit, in which the Archangel Raphael refers (12:11) to the mystical importance
of the Ancient Emperor, who will return at the End of Time: "it is good to
conceal the mystery of the King, while also revealing in glory the works
(deeds) of God".
With respect to this
topic, there is a remarkable continuity, which transcends all the subsequent
religions, namely Christianity and Islam. Not only is the 'Sign of Jonah' going
to be the most determinant point as regards salvation at the End of Times as
per the words of Jesus, but also "the men of Nineveh will stand up at the
judgment with this generation and condemn it" (Matthew 12:41); exactly the
same sentence can be found in Luke (11:32). This is one of Jesus' most critical
eschatological definitions, and as you see, there is no return of Jews (which
is a tragi-comical lie necessary to the Jesuits and the Freemasons more than to
the Zionists), but the return of the Assyrians and the Israelites, who were
also Mesopotamians, as I already said. The spectacular event will be of
absolutely transcendental nature, and it will therefore terminate all norms of
the present world.
In Matthew 24:30-31,
Jesus speaks very clearly, but the systematic misinterpretation of the
Christian sacred texts prevents people from properly understanding the true
meaning and the allusion made by Jesus: "Then will appear the sign of the
Son of Man in heaven. And then all the tribes of the land will mourn when they
see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory. And
he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his
elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other".
The 'Son of Man' is the
term used by Jesus for the Ancient King; his 'sign' is precisely the
spectacular return, which will look like "as lightning that comes from the
east is visible even in the west" as per Jesus' own terms in Matthew
24:27. The "elect" will not be the Ashkenazi Zionists who were the
useful idiots for the evil Jesuits and the perfidious Freemasons, but the
returning Assyrians and Israelites.
On exactly the same
wavelength, the Quran (10th chapter, namely Surah al Yunus, verse 98) reads:
"If only there had been a society which believed ˹before seeing the torment˺
and, therefore, benefited from its belief, like the people of Jonah. When they
believed, We lifted from them the torment of disgrace in this world and allowed
them enjoyment for a while".
XI.
Jesuits, Freemasons, Zionists, and Catholic Rome/Babylon the Great to be soon
windswept
To close this lengthy
response, I will briefly comment on some of the points you made in your
question.
Yes, indeed, Nahum
mentions debauchery and witchcraft as strategies of the Assyrian kings, who had
gone astray and intended to use the same means and techniques that their
enemies were known for practicing. This is a calamitous attempt; it is
impossible for a morally sound, spiritually virtuous monotheist to oppose the
evilness of polytheistic states, societies, elites and rulers with their own
means, methods and tactics. What better example can one offer you than today's
Muslim states, statesmen, administrations and elites?
Their filthy attitude
of having relations with the West is tantamount to spreading excrements on
their Qurans and desecrating their mosques; the evil, pseudo-Muslim states and their
Satanic governments must all be monstrously exterminated. If they are not
lynched and dismembered alive, all these filthy, ignorant, and villainous
statesmen will bring about the annihilation of two billion Muslims. What
happens in Gaza is the dress rehearsal for the elimination of Iran, Egypt,
Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
It is exactly the same
as with the paranoid pseudo-Muslims, who happened to be the filthy leaders of
Hamas; they -and not the Israelis- are the sole responsible for the ongoing
massacre of Gaza. The stupid gangsters of Hamas wanted to make silly resistance
against Israel from their lavish villas in God-damned Qatar. This very shameful
attitude is exactly what Nahum called 'debauchery'. The wrath of God will
eliminate all the criminal, ignorant and idiotic elites of today's Muslim
states for precisely this reason.
Yes, indeed, you are
right; "the structure of society has changed little since then".
That's correct. If most of the people do not understand this fact, this is due
to the systematic misinterpretation of the New Testament and of Jesus'
eschatological comments and narratives. When Jesus uses the term "this
generation", he does not mean the "people who lived back in his time",
as the vicious Jesuits and the fallacious professors of the Western European
and North American theological seminars teach, pretend and claim. This is
already easy to understand thanks to the few excerpts that I mentioned in my
response. "This generation" is a diachronic term used for all the
people who may have lived from the Flood to the End of Time. Even more so,
since "the men of Nineveh will stand up at the judgment with this generation
and condemn it"!
Last but not least, you
are also right saying meaningfully that secretive societies "practice
witchcraft to discredit and destroy so-called "undesirable" citizens".
But this happened always; this life is a period of exam, which is offered to
each and every one of us. There is no such thing as 'material standards of a
person's success in life'; the only measures are moral. When we perform as we
are expected to, we have nothing more to do in this life and we return to the
spiritual realm where we belong in. The idiotic people, who seek material
successes, are at the end consumed by eternal fire; there, at the very bottom
of the Hell, their wretched souls realize that no one can possibly discredit or
destroy an 'undesirable' person anytime anywhere and under any circumstances
whatsoever.
So, the absurd idea
that a man can potentially 'target' another human being is nothing more than a fraudulent
hope of few sunny hours before night comes and then the idiotic person, who
attempted this evildoing, gets "a more perfect inward vision of the truth
of his hopelessness".
Many thanks and best
regards,
Shamsaddin
================================
Download the article in PDF:
Text only
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_15105
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/HVznbnrQfa?
https://archive.org/details/assyria-israel-judah-babylon-end-times-the-bible-and-the-jesuit-forgery-of-world-history
https://online.fliphtml5.com/qynhg/fqfw
https://anyflip.com/fdfzl/uqfe
https://pubhtml5.com/jxyro/sjyz/
https://www.academia.edu/144534974/Assyria_Israel_Judah_Babylon_End_Times_the_Bible_and_the_Jesuit_Forgery_of_World_History
with
pictures and legends
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_15123
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/WJqHPowefa?
https://archive.org/details/assyria-israel-judah-babylon-end-times-the-bible-and-the-jesuit-forgery-of-world
https://online.fliphtml5.com/qynhg/csqs/
https://anyflip.com/fdfzl/ilaf
https://pubhtml5.com/jxyro/pyxz/
https://www.academia.edu/144548300/Assyria_Israel_Judah_Babylon_End_Times_the_Bible_and_the_Jesuit_Forgery_of_World_History_WITH_PICTURES_and_LEGENDS_
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2025/10/17/assyria-israel-judah-babylon-end-times-the-bible-and-the-jesuit-forgery-of-world-history/
https://www.patreon.com/posts/141605607
