Thursday, July 2, 2020
Thursday, June 25, 2020
Sudan, Ethiopia, Abyssinia, Egypt, Somalia, Yemen and the Anti-African Plans of the Colonial Orientalists and of their local stooges
What follows is my
response to a Somali friend who asked me about various aspects of the colonial
distortion of African History with focus on the Horn Region, the historical
background of the ethnic and culture divide between Semitic Abyssinia and
Cushitic Ethiopia, and the ensuing benefits for the colonial powers France,
England and America. The unprecedented affair of historical name usurpation by
Abyssinia ('Ethiopia' is the historical name of Sudan – not of Abyssinia)
brings into the picture Sudan, Africa's greatest land and possible
anti-colonial locomotive, which was continually, systematically and efficiently
targeted by the colonial powers with the evil theories of Pan-Arabism and
Islamism.
----- Answer to a
Somali friend about Colonial Distortion of African History ------
Dear Mohamed,
Thank you for your
questions and apologies for my late response!
I don't know to what
exactly you are referring by mentioning the "Amhara distortion of
Ethiopia's and Horn of Africa region's History". This sentence is not
clear and perhaps you misunderstood parts of an article of mine.
The Amhara and Tigray
Abyssinians did not "distort" any region's or country's History. They
simply had their own version of world view, their own eschatology, their
historical tradition, which was a forgery of course, and their expansionist
plans. That's one point.
A totally different
point is the Western falsification of the World History, which started in parts
of Western Europe as early as 1500, and after being tyrannically and
deceitfully imposed there, it was 'exported' worldwide by means of colonization,
modernization and globalization.
These two issues were
two initially unrelated developments that one needs to first study per se
(independently); only at a later stage the two developments converged. The point
of conversion was surely the period from the middle of the 19th c. to the
middle of the 20th c. when the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian rulers adjusted
their visions and world views to the Western historical forgery and established
a link with the Western plans for globalization, however managing to keep their
tyranny far and almost cut off (if possible intact) from the rest of the world,
because they did not agree with various elements of the Westernization process.
By this, I mean that the world-known situation of underdevelopment that still
characterizes Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) today was a very conscious decision of
the Abyssinian rulers (be they monarchical, Third World communist or
pseudo-republican) of the country over the past 70-140 years.
I. Abyssinia
re-baptized as 'Ethiopia': a French colonial concept and decision
However, it was not an
Abyssinian decision to re-baptize the country as "Ethiopia"; this was
a Western plan that Haile Selassie only followed and implemented locally. Your
question reminds me of the telephone call of an Australia-based Oromo friend of
mine back in April 2007.
This long telephone
call resulted in an article that I then published under the title "Ethiopia:
a Panacea for Tyrants, a Stiletto in Colonial Hands" (27th April 2007) in
AfroArticles, Buzzle and American Chronicle; that article was extensively
republished at the time, but I think that by now it is not anymore available
online. So, I promise you now that I will do my best to re-upload it within the
next few days.
In that article, I
expanded on this issue; it was my former professor of Egyptology in Paris (from
1978 until 1981), Jean Leclant (1920-2011 / read his curriculum in brief here: https://journals.openedition.org/lettre-cdf/2729?lang=en),
who convinced his personal friend Haile Selassie to officially rename
"Abyssinia" as "Ethiopia".
When events of such
importance take place, one has to automatically understand that they don't
reflect the innovative ideas of a young Egyptologist (who was also fluent in
Ge'ez), but constituted deep colonial state machinations and evil conspiracies.
It may sound strange to
you, but the real reason of re-baptizing Abyssinia with the historical name
that describes Sudan (something that was well-known to Leclant) has more to do
with Sudan itself, and less with Abyssinia.
Basically, it has to do
with the general and vast falsehood that colonial diplomats, Orientalist
academics, and statesmen diffuse and impose worldwide as "World
History"; it is only a small piece in an entire mosaic.
When Leclant was
assigned the task (following earlier diplomatic contacts between the French
ambassador and Haile Selassie) to set up the Service of Antiquities in
Abyssinia (: Fake Ethiopia), another French scholar, Jean Vercoutter
(1911-2000, so 9 years older than Leclant) was tasked (following earlier
agreements between the French and the English diplomats at Khartoum) to
establish the Service of Antiquities in Sudan (when that country became
independent).
II.
Sudan, the only true Ethiopia: the ultimate target of the criminal colonial
Orientalists in the middle 1950s
What the French
colonials (who are the main standard bearers of the worldwide colonial
historiography and of all the ensuing fallacies and distortions) wanted to
achieve was this: they wanted to disconnect Sudan from
- its own past and
5000-year old heritage,
- its diverse and
multifaceted historical tradition,
- its true national
name,
- its African cultural
identity, and – above all –
- the enormous
perspectives that the historical reality de facto offers to Sudan at the academic,
educational, intellectual, cultural, political, regional and international
levels.
In other words, they
wanted to prevent Africa's largest country from rising to political, economic,
academic, intellectual and geostrategic supremacy, which would be very easy,
following a proper nation-building effort, which would involve a genuine,
historical name for the country and a real, clear linguistic-cultural identity.
Sudan is the only
country that has historical right to the name of Ethiopia. And Leclant knew
this very well because his thesis concerned the historical period of the 8th
and the 7th c. BCE, when first Upper (: Southern) Egypt and then Lower (:
Northern) Egypt were under Cushitic / Ethiopian, i.e. Sudanese control. This
development occurred because the Egyptian priesthood of Amun at Thebes (Luxor)
wanted to use the Napata (today's Karima)-based Kings of Cush (Kas in Ancient
Egyptian Hieroglyphics) in its clash with the Heliopolitan priesthood of Ra,
which was based in the area of today's Cairo and supported by Berber princes of
the African North-Northwest (spanning across the area of today's NW Egypt,
Libya and the African Atlas).
The Egyptian
Hieroglyphic term 'Kas' (also used among the Cushites of Ancient Sudan –
Ethiopia for their own land, country and kingdom) was translated as Mat Kusi in
Assyrian-Babylonian and as Cush in Ancient Hebrew; it was the equivalent of the
Ancient Greek term 'Ethiopia', and we know this not only because there are
Ancient Greek historical references to the state immediately south of Egypt as
'Ethiopia', but also because in the Septuagint Ancient Greek translation (3rd
c. BCE) of the Hebrew Bible the terms 'Cush' and 'Ethiopia' are used in Ancient
Greek interchangeably.
Jebel Barkal (the holy mountain of Amun of Napata, venerated by the Ancient Cushites-Ethiopians of Sudan and by the Ancient Hamites of Kemet-Egypt) at the outskirts of Napata (today’s Karima) and the pyramids of the Cushitic Qore (: Kings) of the 8th-5th c. BCE (first two pictures); El Kurru pyramids near Karima (third picture); Nuri pyramids on the other bank of the Nile, opposite Karima and near Marawi (fourth picture)
At this point, it is
important to add that first, the territory of Ancient Cush with either Napata
or Meroe as capital never encompassed lands of Abyssinia, and second, there was
never a significant state located in the area of Abyssinia before Axum; and
Axum rose to power only in the 4th c. CE.
Now, you may ask me
what would be the result of a right nation building process carried out in
Sudan in the late 1950s and the 1960s. This would be astonishing, but few
people can now comprehend what great developments for the entire African
continent the evil colonial fallacy of the French managed to avert.
Meroe and its pyramids represent a later phase of Ancient Sudanese, i.e. Ethiopian – Cushitic Civilization (4th c. BCE – 4th c. CE), which is totally unrelated to Abyssinia (today’s Fake Ethiopia)
III.
What would happen if Sudan did not fall victim of Pan-Arabism, Nasserism and
Islamism?
First, the Sudan would
not be plunged in the Arab Nationalist (or Pan-Arabic) fallacy that absorbed
all the resources of the victimized countries, which accepted this colonial
Orientalist distortion and, after losing their true national identities, were
plunged into disastrous wars, civil strives, severe oppression, genocides (like
Darfur), and choleric processes of linguistic Arabization and pseudo-religious
Islamization.
There is not even one
drop of Arab blood in any Sudanese citizen's veins. The country accepted Islam
at a later age and without any sort of invasion. This is also true for Upper
Egypt; Sohag, Qena, Luxor and Aswan do not have an Islamic past that exceeds
1100 years. Iberia and North India, Central Asia and Sicily were under Islamic
rule, Constantinople was attacked by Islamic armies, but Luxor and Aswan were
calm and pious Christian cities of the Kingdom of Nobatia that had capital at
Faras, near Abu Simbel.
The fallacious Arab
identity of a genuinely non-Arab country like Sudan alienated the quasi-totality
of the African nations gathered within the colonial structure under a fake name
and a monstrous identity. All these ancient and noble African nations did not
need to either learn the fabricated, fake modern pseudo-language that is called
'Modern Arabic' or to become Muslim.
There were already
enough Muslims in the Sudan, from the Furis (of Darfur) to the Nubians to the Beja
to the Berta; modern Sudan's most illustrious anti-colonial exploits and heroic
battles were undertaken by Muslims. First Sudan and the noble leader of
Muhammad Ahmad the Mahdi stood against the Anglo-French colonial cholera and
died fighting to avert Africa's colonization. Quranic Arabic was their
religious language and it was wonderful like that. These Muslims did not have
major clashes with the non-Muslims of various adjacent regions. Only within the
abnormal and inhuman frame of the vicious, Satanic colonial rule, all African
nations were oppressed and all Africans started fighting against one another.
Axum, the capital of Ancient Abyssinia during pre-Christian and Christian (4th – 7th c. CE); Abyssinians spoke and wrote Ge’ez, which remains until today the religious language of the Modern Abyssinians, i.e. the Amhara and Tigray. Abyssinians are Yemenites who crossed the Red Sea and settled in Africa as late as the 2nd half of the 1st millennium BCE. The famous stelae of Axum testify to Axum’s pre-Christian civilization and date back to the first centuries of the Christian Era.
IV.
What a true nation-building would mean for Sudan, rightfully named 'Ethiopia'
With Ethiopia as
national name, Sudan would give all its citizens the true portion of historical
heritage and antiquity that belongs to them and they would all find elements of
their culture, spirituality, faith and world view in the Ancient Cushitic and
Meroitic past. Learning that Napata (today's Karima) was already a holy place
for the Ancient Egyptians, all Modern Sudanese would grasp an idea of the
greatness of their land and of the splendor of the past that belongs to them –
and not to the colonial gangsters who appear under the evil masks of
Orientalists, archaeologists, epigraphists, Africanists, linguists,
ethnographers, philologists and historians, only to
- minimize the African
past,
- conceal its
cataclysmic impact on the formation of civilization on European soil, and - subordinate
it to the racist fallacy of Hellenism, Greco-Roman civilization, and
Euro-barbarianism.
With Ethiopia as
national name, all Modern Sudanese would become proud of their civilization and
of its radiation. In striking contrast with the colonially corrupt, idiotic and
worthless Modern Egyptians, who have been stupidly selling their own antiquities
for 222 years, Modern Sudanese would undertake the research of their past, the
exploration of their antiquities, the decipherment of their ancient writing
systems, and the reassessment of their diachronic role in World History at a
national, sovereign level, finding the true, non-colonial partners for these
purposes.
Second, because of the
absence of the above, a true nation-building effort would take place and, as a
consequence, today's Sudanese would be all fully conscious of
a- their Cushitic –
Ethiopian historical and cultural heritage
b- their Ancient
History, as it is recorded in Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics and in Meroitic
hieroglyphic and cursive writing systems
c- their ethnic,
national, cultural, historical and spiritual interconnection with the Oromos
and the other subjugated Cushitic nations of Abyssinia
d- their Christian
Nobatian, Makurian and Alodian History, as it is recorded in Coptic, Old Nubian
and Makurian writing systems
e- their Islamic
African History that is totally unrelated to Arab presence
f- their pro-eminent
role across the trade routes of the Antiquity and the Islamic Ages, when the
Historical Ethiopia (i.e. Sudan) linked
- Egypt with Sahara and
the Western African world,
- the Mediterranean
world with the Horn of Africa region, and
- almost all the
African Muslims with the three cities of Islamic Pilgrimage, namely Mecca,
Madina and Al Quds ash Sherif (Jerusalem).
V. Regional
and international consequences of a true nation-building in Sudan, rightfully
named 'Ethiopia'
Third, because of the
above, Sudan would
a- help dissolve the
criminal colonial state of Abyssinia, by incorporating Oromia into
Sudan-Ethiopia and by making Afaan Oromo the official language of the new, magnificent African super-state
b- help form numerous
independent nations on parts of Sudan's soil, namely among the Bejas in the
East, in Darfur, in Kordofan, and in the South – when the Westerners were not
there to fuel rebellion against Pan-Arabist Khartoum that they (: the Western
colonials) fabricated in the first place
c- help establish
numerous independent nations on parts of the criminal colonial state of
Abyssinia, namely Afar, Ogaden, Sidama, Hadiya, Kaffa, Kambata, Shekacho, Wolayita,
Agaw, Nuer, Anuak, Berta, etc. whereby every nation would have their own language
as official
d- help dissolve the
filthy colonial fabrication of Djibouti, a pseudo-state created by the
criminal, murderous gangsters of France, and in the process help Afar nation
pull together all parts of their nation and Isa tribe merge with the other
Somalis
e- strike an alliance
with the Eastern Cushitic nation of Somalia in order to impose a genuine,
anti-colonial, African Order across Africa, which would bring forth the
dissolution of fake colonial states whereby many different historical nations
are oppressed by the filthy nation or tribe that had previously been the
lackeys of their colonial masters, like the Kikuyu in Kenya
f- launch an African
educational, academic system in total refutation of the Western Orientalism,
Hellenism, 'Greco-Roman Civilization' and fake Africanism, and in total
rejection of the racist, Eurocentric version of World History,
- by highlighting the
superiority of Ancient African civilizations (Egyptian, Cushitic-Meroitic,
Carthaginian-Berber) over Ancient Greece and Rome,
- by establishing the
correct links between the Ancient African civilizations and the Ancient
Oriental civilizations (Sumerian, Assyrian-Babylonian, Hurrian,
Hittite-Anatolian, Canaanite-Phoenician, and Iranian),
- by meticulously
examining and widely publicizing the multifaceted, overwhelming African
cultural, religious, spiritual, artistic, literary and linguistic impact on Ancient
and Medieval Europe
Black Egyptian high priests were initiating White Romans into the mysteries of the Ancient Egyptian divine concept of Isis (Aset in Egyptian Hieroglyphics); hundreds of temples of Isis (Iseum – Isea in Latin) have been excavated across Europe but this evidence of absolute African Egyptian impact on European civilization remains hidden to Europeans and others – in order not to function as a rejection of the still prevalent, racist pseudo-historical model of ‘Hellenism’ and Greco-Roman civilization’. Iseum Campense, Rome
g- promote a system of
cultural, academic, educational and intellectual interconnection among all
African nations, imposing
- the immediate
obliteration of the colonial languages, English and French, across the
continent,
- the prohibition of
these two languages from the primary, secondary and tertiary education of all
African states, and
- their replacement by
a system of all-African multilingualism, involving the major African languages,
h- destroy all fake
pseudo-states that the colonial powers, France, England and America, produced
over the past 222 years on African soil, notably Fake Egypt, Fake Morocco, etc.
and help generate genuinely African nations instead.
What I am saying with
the aforementioned brief diagram is that a non-Arab, non-colonial, genuinely
African Sudan, named Ethiopia, in the middle 1950s should act as if having
fully understood, assessed and capitalized on the historical conclusions of
scholars like Martin Bernal (author of the venerated "Black Athena: The
Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization", in three volumes: 1987,
1991, 2006) and Edward Said (author of the highly respected
"Orientalism", 1978). This aphorism of mine may sound as preposterous
because these great opuses were published more than 20 or 30 years after Sudan
proclaimed its independence.
However, all the
constituent elements, the textual and archaeological evidence, which led the
aforementioned scholars to their groundbreaking publications, were there
already in 1956. As a matter of fact, all that an African scholar needed to do
was
- study the historical
sources and the archaeological material record
- identify the
discrepancies between historical sources and colonial bibliography
- list a vast number of
topics commonly shared among colonial scholars but hidden from the Western and
worldwide public (readership)
- analyze the reasons
of the unrepresentative selection of historical sources for educational –
intellectual – cultural purposes, as carried out by colonial scholars
- examine the above
through the question 'qui bono' and accurately specify the colonial intentions,
and
- conclude about a) the
racist, criminal, and inhuman motives of the colonial pseudo-academia and b)
the ensuing benefit for the colonial powers and their false historical version.
VI.
Anti-colonial struggle means total rejection of the colonial fallacy still
diffused worldwide as 'Word History'
A non-colonial,
non-Arab Sudan, officially named Ethiopia, would of course demolish fundamental
colonial myths and highlight concealed facts that constitute basic elements of
today's Western version of World History. The topic is as vast as an entire encyclopedia,
but I will herewith offer few examples pertaining to Africa and the surrounding
seas.
a- there is no such
country as "Egypt" and there is no such thing as "Egyptian
Civilization". The country's real historical name is Kemet, which means
the 'Black Land' or 'the Land of Black People', and this is due to the fact
that the Ancient Egyptians were both, dark brown and black. So, there was
Kemetic or Kemetian Civilization. Today, a liberated, non-colonial country at
the northeastern corner of the Black Continent must be called Kemet – not Egypt
– at the international level. Egyptian politicians and statesmen accepting to
name their country 'Egypt' at the international level are born slaves and
constitute a most disreputable clique alien to the great history of that land.
b- the name 'Egypt',
used by Egyptians, constitutes a colonial relic of the filthiest and most racist
contents. The word originates from the Ancient Greek word Aigyptos, which is
the Hellenization of the Ancient Egyptian term 'Hwt Ka Ptah', i.e. 'the
enclosure of the soul of Ptah'; Ptah was a marginal deity in Ancient Egypt, and
the Ancient Egyptians would never accept to name their country after that deity
of the polytheistic priesthood of Memphis. This is the first point against the
use of the term. The second point is related to the fact that European and North
American colonials view the use of this term as resulting from their cultural,
political, academic and intellectual supremacy over colonized (since 1798)
Modern 'Egypt'.
c- Modern Egypt cannot
be called "Egypt" at the international level for one extra, totally
different, reason; the use of this name, which is totally alien and unknown to
today's average Egyptians, consists in an unprecedented colonial denigration
and vulgar deprecation of the modern nation, which uses the name Masr to denote
their identity. Assyrian-Babylonian of origin (Musur and Mat Masri, lit. 'land
of Egypt'), this name was diffused among Aramaeans and Hebrews, before being
adopted among Arabs.
And notice the
difference, if you please: the authorities of Myanmar managed to impose at the
international level respect for their country's name, which is the
aforementioned, officially accepted, name and not the filthy, colonial parody
of Burma that the English colonials used since the early colonial days. But the
idiotic, colonial, Pan-Arabist rulers of Kemet / Masr from Nasser to Mubarak to
Morsi never raised such a subject in an effort to always remain disgustingly
servile and docile enough to please their colonial masters – the Satanic
gangsters of France, England and America.
d- there is no such expanse
of sea as "the Indian Ocean"; this is a fake term introduced by the
English, Dutch, Portuguese and French colonials as late as the 16th c. In the
Antiquity, the most commonly used term was "Red Sea" (in Ancient
Greek: 'Erythra Thalassa'); during the Roman and Arsacid / Sassanid times, this
term denoted the seas that we call today 'Persian Gulf', 'Red Sea' and 'Indian
Ocean'. When Agatharchides writes in the 2nd c. BCE his treatise on the Red Sea
(Geographi Graeci Minores), in the part of his work in which he describes the
natural phenomenon due to which the sea was called 'red', he narrates an event
happening in today's coast of Hadhramaut or Mahra in SE Yemen.
e- if one wants to name
the entire Afro-Asiatic expanse of sea after the national name of the first
seafarers and navigators who, after studying the meteorological conditions, the
winds and the oceanographic data of that sea, sailed across the ocean from the
Horn of Africa region to today's coast of Malabar, then one has to call the sea
"Yemenite Ocean". First, the Qataban Yemenites, with capital at
Timna, established safe navigation from the Gulf of Aden to the Malabar coast
where they established commercial relations with the local Dravidian (not
Indian, not Indo-European) kingdoms as early as the middle of the first
millennium BCE.
Qataban Yemenite
thalassocracy across the Yemenite Ocean lasted many centuries and was matched
with an early colonization of the East African coast where the Qatabanis
intermingled with the local Ancient Somalis of the coast of Azania (from the
Horn of Africa down to today's Daressalaam in Tanzania). Qatabani supremacy was
terminated when the Himyarite Yemenites and the Sabaean Yemenites made an
alliance to vanquish Qataban and accumulate in their palaces the mythical
treasures that used to be garnered at Timna. This happened ca. 115 BCE.
The Himyar – Sheba
alliance was not as experienced as the Qatabanis seafarers; their heavy taxes
were a problem for the last Ptolemies who were easy partners. After Octavian
invaded Kemet (Egypt) and annexed the land of the Nile to the Roman Empire (30
BCE), the Romans proved to be difficult partners and in the year 25 BCE, Aelius
Gallus, prefect of Egypt, undertook a maritime expedition against Yemen, which
also involved several land expeditions. At the end, after many collateral damages,
the Romans managed to destroy the main Yemenite port of call at Aden and thus
force the Yemenites to cooperate with Rome and reduce the customs.
Yemenite thalassocracy
across the Yemenite Ocean continued, evidently coordinated with the Roman
imperial establishments at Egypt and Leuke Kome (NW coast of today's Saudi
Arabia), and it is well documented in historical texts like the Periplus of the
Red (Erythraean) Sea, which was written by an Alexandrian Egyptian captain and
merchant who traveled across the coastal regions from Suez to China at the
times of the Roman Emperor Nero (so in the middle of the 1st c. CE). The same
text describes the continuation of the Himyar-Sabaean colonization of Azania
and prevalence across the seas. There have truly been found Roman coins in
different archaeological sites across the Malabar coast where the kingdoms of
Damirica, Nelkyndis, Cerobothra (Chera) and Pandya were located according to
the Periplus of the Red (Erythraean) Sea.
But Yemenite traders
and sailors used these coins while sailing across the Yemenite Ocean; and these
kingdoms were all Dravidian – not Indian. And the Dravidians never demonstrated
navigational skills, which is one more reason for which we cannot call this sea
'Indian Ocean', pretty much like we cannot call 'India' the cemetery of South
Asiatic nations that the English colonials prepared for more than 100 years
during their calamitous colonial presence there. 'India' is only the land
around the Indus River, and this concerns only a minor part of the state which
is nowadays fallaciously called with this name.
At the beginning of my
response, I mentioned the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian world view, eschatology,
and historical tradition. This relates to their famous historical book Kebra
Negast, which was written in Ge'ez, their religious language down to our days. First
written in Coptic, then translated to Arabic (early 13th c.), and last rendered
in Ge'ez at the beginning of the 14th c., Kebra Negast is a historical forgery
prepared by Amhara debteras (monks) only to justify their false pretensions to
ancestry and to royalty and to prepare the ground for expansionism of
apocalyptic and eschatological contents.
The disappearance of
Islam, the common borders between Abyssinia and a Zionist state in the area of
Palestine, the fallacious and unhistorical theory of Axum being the 'New Zion',
and the fabrication of Menelik, nonexistent son of Solomon (Suleyman) and
'Makeda', the fake queen of Sheba (that kingdom was located only in Yemen, not
in Africa), do not bode well with the future of Africa but are all some of the
targets of the real authors of this forgery. All later Amhara and Tigray 'prophecies'
about their expansion are repetitions of earlier material included in Kebra
Negast. Somali, Sudanese and Egyptian (not to mention more) scholars are
idiotic enough not to learn Ge'ez, not to study Kebra Negast and not to
highlight the fallacious nature of the book that prepares the Amhara and Tigray
Abyssinians as followers or conscious slaves of the Antichrist (Masih
al-Dajjal). But this is a totally different subject, as I already said.
Best regards,
Shamsaddin
Sunday, June 21, 2020
The Colonial Powers' Most Ominous and Secret Evildoing: Cultural, Academic, and Educational Disconnection among all the Nations of the World
What follows is the
publication of an exchange of email with a South Africa-based friend from
Malawi whose interests cover all aspects of colonialism and colonially-imposed
divisions, cultural alienation, and historical identity loss that the criminal
colonial powers of France, England and America generated in Africa and
worldwide.
----------------------
MY FRIEND'S FIRST EMAIL ------------------------
Hi Shamsaddin,
I can't resist asking
you these two questions:
It is true that Islam
has its roots in Africa? Where is the Evidence (If Yes).
Who were the
Ephraphites? I have noticed that the word is in the Jerusalem Bible but not in
any other Bible. I know you are very conversant with the History of North
Africa and the Middle East.
Kind regards,
Kondwani
----------------------
MY FIRST RESPONSE ------------------------------------
Hi my dear friend.
Thank you for your
questions!
I.
The distortion of Ancient Oriental History as carried out by ignorant religious
leaders
I start with your
second point; you heard probably a mistaken pronunciation or you read the name
misspelled.
It is Ephrath, so the people
who live there are Ephrathites. Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephrath
Every attempt to locate
Ephrath outside Canaan is a distortion.
Bear in mind that
«Ephrathite» is NOT a national name. It is an adjective formed out of a
toponym: like 'Berliner' or 'Parisian' or 'Muscovite'.
It is a most
unimportant location in terms of Oriental History.
Anyone (as author) who
focuses much on scarcely documented toponyms, instead of the main
centers of the ancient world, like Nineveh, Assyria, Babylon, Thebes of Egypt,
Heliopolis (Iwnw) and Memphis, Hattusas, Ugarit, Mari, Ebla, Kalhu, Persepolis,
Byblus and Carthage, is most probably a forger.
In the cases of Ancient
Mesopotamia and Egypt, you have hundreds of thousands of ancient texts that
document all the details of those ancient civilizations.
The Ancient Hebrews and
the Jews left few texts; the Bible is mostly unreliable and insignificant, and
those who speak of it today, only misinterpret it for evil political
reasons.
In any case, compared
to the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Hittites, the Egyptians and the
Iranians, the Ancient Hebrews were a marginal, impotent and worthless state.
Focusing on them,
instead of studying the other, sizeable and leading empires of the Ancient
Orient and Africa is as if someone today ignores everything about Germany,
China, the US, Russia, India, etc. and focuses too much on Singapore!
That's ridiculous!
II.
Two points about Islam's presence in Africa
No, Islam does not have
its roots in Africa but in Arabia - Asia.
But it depends on what
you mean by saying «Islam».
As per the Islamic
viewpoint (which is mostly forgotten by most of today’s Muslims), Islam was not
first preached by Prophet Muhammad but by Adam, Enoch, Noah and all the early
prophets.
Islam means submission
to or contact with God.
The epitome of Islam is
the belief in One God (monotheism).
Now, if you mean that
there were pre-Islamic monotheistic faiths and religions in Africa, then
yes!
There was «Islam» in
Africa long before Prophet Muhammad.
Pharaoh Akhenaten
abolished Theban polytheism and instituted Atenism, a monotheistic religion in
the middle of the 14th c. BCE. Monotheistic hymns to Aten are found copied and
pasted in the Hebrew Bible. Without Akhenaten, there would never be Moses.
More:
Best,
Shamsaddin
------------------------
MY FRIEND'S SECOND EMAIL -------------------
Good Morning
Shamsaddin,
Thank you for your
response. You have now given me good reason to rather dig further into History
when it comes to what has been fed to us by the colonialists. Now I understand
what is meant by the Bible being copied from much older books, for example I
have come across an Ancient Egyptian text that the Psalms were
copied from. The analogy you have used of Singapore has given me a better
perspective of what ancient and available records bear witness to. I really
appreciate it.
And about Islam you
have given me the best answer, especially when you illustrate that it was
rather preached by Adam initially. It makes a lot of sense now because somebody
told me that it means `submitting to God' but I needed further
elaboration.
It is such knowledge
that I have no doubt will fill the generation gap or find the missing link if
we search hard enough and eventually empower us towards a brighter future. I
love the thought of the unknown possibilities.
Enjoy the rest of your
day further,
Regards,
K.
------------------------
MY SECOND RESPONSE --------------------
My dear friend,
Hope you and your
family are doing well, being of the best health!
Your response contains
many points worthy highlighting.
III.
Viewpoints, nationalist Greco-centric psychopaths, and my personal standpoint
as attested across my publications
You certainly
understand that everything hinges on viewpoints, i.e. on through how many
angles you saw a topic. This is a vast issue that applies to everything.
What I said to you
about the small Ancient Hebrew state, comparing it to immense, sophisticated
and very advanced empires of Assyria, Babylonia, Egypt and Iran, I also said in
Greece back in the middle 1980s about the tiny Ancient Greek states (the likes
of Sparta, Thebes, Corinth and Athens) that constituted the barbaric periphery
of the then known world. I triggered an overwhelming rage among the idiotic,
nationalistic, chauvinistic people who are omnipresent across the entire
political spectrum of that unfortunate and ill-fated state. They accused me of
high treason!
Haha! Stupid!
One of those guys – I
still remember – asked me exactly this: "if your opinions are these, you
Dr. Megalommatis, how have you been degraded so much as to become a …..
White"?
Of course, I did not
answer, but I really enjoy it when my opponents make so devilish comments.
I regret for having not
kept record of his name so that I ask him back in 2015 when Greece collapsed
financially: "if your opinions are these, you Mr. Greek, how have you been
degraded so much as to become a ….. bankrupt and a beggar"?
I found it amusing,
rewarding and sublime!
When evil people hate
you and insult you, God sends you a message that you are on the correct path.
I remained the same
during my entire 35-year long career, which started only after 11 years of
graduate, postgraduate and doctoral studies in more than 10 universities of 7
different countries were completed.
I always tell the truth
however unpleasant or hurting it may be; as I say, between my country and the
truth, I always side with the truth.
IV.
Religion, Theology, Politics, and my personal standpoint as attested across my
publications
The same happens when
it comes with my religious beliefs; I was born Christian Orthodox, I rejected
(but did not hate) Christianity, I was a Greek citizen without religion for
some years, and then I adhered to Islam. This was a spiritual path and every person
has his own path.
If Islam was good for
me, Buddhism may be better for another European, and the Waaqeffanna
traditional Oromo religion is perhaps the path of a third person from Europe.
But the spiritual
choice must never affect the standard orientation of the heart and of the mind
toward Truth.
So, I reject many wrong
points that today's Muslims believe as "religion" whereas these
points are a pure matter of historical developments first distorted and then popularized.
Today's Muslims,
Christians, Hindus and many others fail to see the limits between Spirituality,
Moral, Religion, Theology, and Politics.
Politics is
impermissible in Religion, sinister in Moral, and diabolical in Spirituality.
Theology may eventually
match with politics, but Theology consists in the most disastrous distortion of
Religion, in the most calamitous breach of Moral, and in total abandonment of
Spirituality.
However, I must admit
that today many people deliberately confuse Religion with Theology; but this is
perfectly revelatory of the evilness of politics which must not exist among the
faithful anytime anywhere.
There was not any politics
among your ancestors before 300 years (thank God!), there was not any politics
among the ancestors of Oromos before 400 years, there was not any politics
among the Ancient Egyptians of the times of Nechao (whose fleet achieved the
circumnavigation of Africa), there was not any politics among the Ancient
Somalis of Punt (Horn of Africa) when Pharaoh Hatshepsut (the World History's
first queen) sent her fleet there before ca. 3500 years, there was not any politics
among Christian Eastern Romans of the times of Justinian I, there was not any
politics among the Iranians of the times of Shapur II, there was not any
politics at the times of Harun al Rashid, the Abbasid Caliphate's greatest
emperor before 1200 years, and more importantly, there was not any politics
around Muhammad, there was not any politics around Jesus, there was not any
politics around Zoroaster, Buddha and Confucius, there was not any politics
around Moses, and so on.
Politics is the evil
tool of post-Renaissance world gangsters in their attempt to first corrupt and
then eliminate the Mankind.
I say all this because
many people believe that my texts are affected by the fact that I am a Muslim.
That's very wrong and absolutely untrue. Oromos are divided among Islam,
Waaqeffanna and Christianity, but I explicitly support Waaqeffanna as the most
genuine religious choice for all Oromos. On the other hand, through many
articles, I demanded as early as 2004 and 2005 the formation of a Christian
Aramaean state in parts of today's Iraq and Syria to save Oriental
Christianity; this did not happen and I am sure that you know what evildoing happened
instead….
Recently, I republished
a series of articles that I published in 2007-2010 in favor of Kosovo, its
secession from Serbia, its national independence, and its international
recognition. I did not support Kosovo and the Kosovars' plead for National
Sovereignty because of the coincidence that they are Muslims and I am a Muslim
too! I supported them because this was historically right and morally correct.
If you don't use moral criteria while evaluating historical developments or
when siding with today's conflicts, you end up a wild animal in today's jungle.
A Greek friend of mine
from Georgia (in the Caucasus region) wrote to me to react against my articles and
say that Kosovo became a narco-trade center and a hub of Islamists. Nonetheless!
Because they made a very bad use of their freedom, this does not mean that they
should not become independent. My friend's observations were correct, but his
remarks wrong. By the way, do you know one modern state that is not ruled by
narco-gangsters? There may be few exceptions, but you know, always an exception
reconfirms the rule!
-------------------------------------------------------
Isis Temple at Philae Island, Egypt – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Iraq.
Nuri Pyramids – Karima, Sudan – It is impossible to study about them in a university in Morocco.
Djenne Mosque, Mali – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Somalia.
Ras Hafun 17th c. Mosque, Somalia – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Sudan.
Volubilis, Morocco – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Nigeria.
Queen Arwa as-Sulayhi Mosque – Jibla, Yemen – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Egypt.
The Sacrifice of Conon – Wall Painting of a Temple in Dura Europos, Syria – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Greece.
The Ancient Wall of Zaria and the Muslim Queen Amina of Zaria (1536-1566) who led her armies at the battlefield – It is impossible to study about these topics in a university in Yemen.
Somali Ajuraan Sultanate and their relations with Ming China – It is impossible to study about them in a university in Turkey.
Aramaean Mar Mattai Monastery – North of Mosul, Iraq – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Mexico.
Nineveh Walls – Mosul, Iraq – It is impossible to study about them in a university in Algeria.
Tesifun (Ctesiphon) – Al Mada’in, Iraq – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Azerbaijan.
Takht-e Suleyman, Iran – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Lebanon.
Takshasila (Taxila), Pakistan – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Kazakhstan.
Balkh (Bactra), Afghanistan – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Palestine.
Nemrut dağı – Adıyaman, Turkey – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Iran.
Shah Jahan-abad (Old Delhi), India – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Tanzania.
Registan – Samarqand, Uzbekistan – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Indonesia.
Sigiriya rock, citadel and palace, Sri Lanka – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Malaysia.
Borobudur – Central Java, Indonesia – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Pakistan.
Great Mosque at Xi’an, Ancient Capital of China – It is impossible to study about it in a university in Turkmenistan…….
…….. but it is always possible to study about all the above mentioned topics in universities in Denmark, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Switzerland, Czechia and Finland.
--------------------------------------------------------
V.
The first Victims of the Colonial Falsehood are the Western Europeans and the North
Americans.
You say something
critical: "what has been fed to us by the colonialists". This is
true, but this is only partly true. And if you don't see the rest, you will
never realize the extent of the problem.
The colonial falsehood
diffused in Asia, Africa and Latin America to ensure obscurantism, failure,
ignorance, deception and impotency really pales if compared to the earlier
lies, historical distortions, and theoretical forgeries that the Western
Europeans diffused among their own populations. Entire nations like the
Italians, the Spaniards, the Germans, the Poles, the Greeks, the Russians, the
Danes, the French, the English, the Dutch and many others had been fed with
enormous quantities of deception and fallacy instituted as Enlightenment,
Romanticism, Classicism and Renaissance (I advance backwards in time).
It is essential that
you understand that the European populations were the first victims of 15th –
16th c. European intellectual, religious, spiritual, academic and scientific
elite. Only because generations after generations of Western European
populations believed the falsehood and the deception diffused among them, they
were able to perform as colonial administrators, military, diplomats,
academics, instructors and businessmen in Latin America, Africa, India, SE
Asia, Middle East, and China.
First, they
"believed" that their Christian past (330-1453) was a barbaric period
called "Dark Ages". That was wrong – it consisted in a vicious lie.
They were civilized then, and they became barbarian with the Renaissance
corruptive falsehood and intellectual contamination.
Then, they postulated
that Greek and Roman Antiquity (500 BCE-330 CE) was a highly civilized period.
That was wrong – it consisted in a vicious lie. The Western elites wanted only
to portray the diabolical Ancient Greek orgies and Roman symposia as
"civilization" and the religious (Christian, Islamic, Jewish and
other) moral discipline and abstinence as "barbarism".
Later, they idealized
the Greek and Roman Antiquity, forcing European populations to reject their
Christian identity and to stupidly imitate the Satanic rites performed in
Ancient Greek and Roman temples dedicated to demons like Zeus, Hera, Apollo,
Aphrodite, Vesta, Athena, Mercury, Saturn, etc. Read the Satanic works by
Racine, notably Phaedra, to realize what I mean! Only a paranoid Satanist like
Moliere could compose a nauseating and disgusting filth like Tartuffe as a
villainous attack against the divine life style and the morals of the average
Christians of his times.
Subsequently, being
"sure" of their supremacy, the Satanic rulers of Western Europe noticed
that Oriental Christians, Muslims, Africans, Hindus, Buddhists, Confucians and
others differed from them; the difference of the others was tantamount to
"inferiority" as per the already sick and corrupt minds of the 18th
c. Europeans.
As they found superb
references to the Ancient Oriental civilizations (Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia,
Iran, Sudan and India) in the Ancient Greek and Latin texts, the first Western
European Orientalist and Africanist explorers started their notorious
itineraries. They had big amount of monies with them in order to purchase
ancient documents, manuscripts, and various antiquities. But they did not love
the lands they explored; they hated them terribly because they could not
"find" there what they had read in the Ancient Greek and Latin texts.
VI.
The Evil Colonial Deeds have nothing to do with Economic Exploitation, Military
Presence or Political Interference: the Problem is elsewhere
This is the way the
world's most monumental lie started: Orientalism (including European
Africanism).
Point 1 –
Concealment of Ancient Greek and Roman acceptance of the Oriental and African
Originality and Superiority in terms of Spirituality, Culture and Civilization
Western Europeans tried
first to conceal the fact that the Ancient Greek and Latin texts are plenty of
references testifying to the facts that the Ancient Greeks and the Romans
viewed the Oriental civilizations as qualitatively superior to themselves and
went there to study, to learn and to venerate. Ancient Greeks and Romans were
honored to have Black hierophants, high priests, mystics and astronomers,
cosmologists and spiritual masters as their teachers. The most important
Ancient Greek author, Plutarch (1st – 2nd c. CE), the high priest of Ancient
Greece's most venerable temple, the Oracle at Delphi, wrote about the Ancient
Egyptian Cosmogony, Spirituality and Eschatology in his De Iside et Osiride (:
'About Isis and Osiris' – part of his Moralia), also testifying to the
diffusion of Ancient Egyptian religions, spiritual and esoteric rites, cults and
faith among the Ancient Greeks.
The tendency went down
to the Christian and Islamic times; St. Augustine, a major Father of the
Christian Faith, was a Berber – a Black. His Roman and European disciples were
White but had no problem. This was so because Christianity was a normal
religion but it ceased to exist with the rise of the Satanic, Jesuit
Renaissance.
Point 2 – Abysmal
minimization of Ancient Oriental achievements, exploits, sciences and culture
in parallel with a magnification of Ancient Greek and Roman deeds
Second, the Western
European Orientalists and Africanists did their ingenious best to incessantly
minimize the radiation and the achievements, the exploits and the masterpieces
of all Oriental civilizations, while magnifying the achievements of the Ancient
Greeks and the Romans.
Examples: on one hand, they
magnify the exploits of Alexander the Great, who in reality invaded only one,
vast but decayed, state: the Achaemenid Empire of Iran. The advance of
Alexander beyond the eastern borders of Iran was minimal. On the other hand,
they minimize the Egyptian invasions of Senusret (Sesostris) III (1878-1839 BCE),
who crossed through Caucasus to the eastern coasts of the Black Sea and beyond,
colonizing Colchis and Scythia. Why? Because this fact bears witness to Black
people presence in Europe, as well as to the diffusion of Black civilization
across the barbarian realms of 2nd millennium BCE Europe.
They minimize the
Egyptian presence off the East African coastlands (Punt) and the Horn region as
early as 2000-1500 BCE. They minimize
the extent of the Iranian invasion of Egypt, Libya and Sudan (: 'Ethiopia' in
Ancient Greek texts) under the Achaemenid Iranian Emperor Kabujiya (Cambyses)
II (530-532 BCE). Invading Napata (Karima in North Sudan: 750 km south of
today's Sudanese – Egyptian border alongside the Nile, so 2200 km from the
present Egyptian – Palestinian border at Gaza), Cambyses was farther from his
capital than Alexander was from his, 200 years later, when the Macedonian king
invaded parts of the Indian North beyond Punjab (Pentapotamia).
The aforementioned is
only indicative because, if I am to make a complete list of Orientalists' and
Africanists' persistent effort of minimization of the achievements, the
exploits and the unparalleled radiation of the Ancient Oriental and African
civilizations, I will need a 100-volume encyclopedia.
Point 3 – Usurpation
of an Ancient African Civilization: Ancient Crete is not a European island or
civilization
Third, in their evil
effort to fallaciously represent the Ancient Oriental civilizations, the
Western European Hellenists, Latinists, Orientalists and Africanists depicted a
genuinely African civilization as European: Minoan Crete. This disgraceful
usurpation of African Heritage (King Minos was an Ancient Egyptian and he did
indeed bear the name of an Ancient Egyptian God) was vitally necessary to the
spiritual genocidal gangsters of the Western European universities, because
they wanted to pretend that European History starts in Crete as early as 2500
BCE and offer thus a civilized Antiquity to the European barbarian past. This
evil attempt orchestrated before more than 100 years by a most disreputable
English pseudo-archaeologist, Arthur Evans, is a paranoid aberration.
Point 4 – Selected
popularization of historical snapshots from the Ancient World to distort the
average Westerners' education and culture and to turn Europeans and Americans into
racist supremacists
Fourth, the Western
European and North American Hellenists, Latinists, Orientalists and Africanists
undertook a vast but vicious project of selected popularization of historical snapshots
from the Ancient World. Their yet unnoticed technique, which brings calamitous
results in terms of historical forgery and total misrepresentation of the World
History while also exonerating the scholars and academics of the Western World,
consists in the attitude to expand (or diffuse or popularize) at the general
public level prejudicially more about Herodotus and abysmally less about the
Annals of Assurbanipal, more about the tragedies of Sophocles and less about
the Assyrian-Babylonian epic of Gilgamesh, more about the discourses of
Demosthenes and less about the Hittite epic of Ullikummi, and so on, and so on.
Publishing houses, newspapers, TV channels, radio programs, weekly magazines
and monthly reviews, as well as major Internet portals and mainstream sites
have been ordered to proceed in this manner, and – worse – their home and
school education predestines them to continue the evil practice. At this point
again, the long list of the Western colonial deceitful priorities and
sophisticated distortions would cover many volumes. Particularly, when it comes
to the overwhelming Oriental and African impact on the foundations and the
formation of civilizations in Europe, all average people in Europe and in North
America are deliberately misinformed and systematically deceived.
Point 5 – Colonized
nations prevented from studying, honoring, reassessing and delving into their
historical past and cultural heritage
Fifth, the Western
European and North American Hellenists, Latinists, Orientalists and Africanists
systematically prevented all the indigenous nations from thoroughly studying
their own past, from accurately assessing the unmatched greatness of their
Cultural Heritage and from meticulously examining their ancestors' determinant
and overwhelming impact on the lower civilizations of Ancient Greece and Rome.
Evil ideologies, historical forgeries, and political nonsense are mobilized in
this case in order to totally disorient the indigenous nations of Asia and
Africa: Fake Pan-Arabism, political Islam, Wahhabism, Marxism – Leninism,
Fascism, Western Liberalism, Evolutionism, Materialism, Consumerism, Modernism,
etc.
A very typical example is
given by the education, the culture, the publications and the mass media of
Egypt; although average Egyptians get an idea about the History of Ancient
Egypt during the 3rd and the 2nd millennia BCE and also learn about the Islamic
periods of History, they know nothing about the history of their country from
the Iranian invasion under Cambyses II (525 BCE) to the arrival of Islam (642
CE).
Yet, Late Antiquity is
Ancient Egypt's most important period of History, because it is at those times
that Ancient Egyptian religions, cults, faiths and concepts truly speaking 'invaded'
Ancient Greece, Rome and the entire European continent where hundreds of
Egyptian archaeological sites have been excavated. Western European
Egyptologists brought to daylight hundreds of ancient temples of Isis, Horus,
Osiris, Sarapis, Anubis and other Ancient Egyptian concepts of divinity on
European soil but no one, either in Europe or in Egypt and the rest of the
world knows about it. Greek Isidists, adepts and believers of the Egyptian
divinity Isis, traveled (3rd c. BCE – 4th c. CE) as pilgrims from Greece to
Philae Island, 5 km south of Aswan, to venerate the world's holiest temple of
Isis and to write inscriptions on the temple's walls, but this is worldwide
prohibited knowledge for average people in Egypt, Greece, Europe and the rest
of the world.
It is during the
Ptolemaic and Roman times that appear in Egypt numerous schools of faith,
religions, cults and philosophies that we now call Gnosis or Gnosticisms. From
Egypt, Gnostics' teachings, preaching, cosmogonies and eschatological
revelations where diffused to NW Africa, Europe, East Africa, and India. Yet,
today's Egyptians know nothing about Gnostics, Hermetics and Manichaeans.
Point 6 – Post-Renaissance
European sickness, barbarism, pseudo-literature, bogus-philosophy, and corrupt dementia
diffused and tyrannically imposed worldwide as "Civilization"
Sixth, the Western
colonials dictatorially imposed and methodically (through bribed local stooges)
projected onto all the colonized nations of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and
Eastern Europe the immoral, inhuman and utterly lawless elements of their
bogus-intellectual life, i.e. the worthless trash of Moliere, Racine, Rousseau,
Coleridge, Kipling, Victor Hugo, Karl Marx, Albert Camus, Jean Paul Sartre,
Lenin, and their likes. This effort constituted an unprecedented profanation
and an unmatched barbarization process that plunged the entire world to the
early stages of the present chaotic disorder and irrevocable disintegration.
Yet, the Tuareg and the
Berbers of the African Atlas, the Hausa of Nigeria, the Bantu of the African
South, the Cushitic Africans of the Horn region, the Egyptian Copts, the
Muslims and the Hindus of India, the Christians of Malabar, the Yazidis of Iraq
and Armenia, the Turkic nations across Asia, the many different nations of
Iran, Russia, China and SE Asia did not need to forget their illustrious past and
noble authors, poets, mystics, erudite polymaths, philosophers and scholars in
order to absorb the cultural excrements of Europe and North America.
Point 7 – An evil plan
of total cultural – academic – educational disconnection among all the nations
of the world was successfully implemented without anyone noticing it
Seventh, the Western
colonials deployed an unparalleled effort to disconnect the colonized nations
from one another; this has been the most criminal act that they have ever
perpetrated. Due to this detrimental fact,
1- there are no
Moroccan Egyptologists
2- there are no
Nigerian Iranologists
3- there are no Somali
Assyriologists
4- there are no Afghani
specialists in Coptic Language, Literature and History
5- there are no Uzbek
specialists in Hausa and Berber
6- there are no
Pakistani specialists in Aztec hieroglyphics
7- there are no Indian
specialists in Hittite Language, Literature and History
8- there are no
Tanzanian specialists in Tatar Language, Literature and History
9- there are no Algerian
specialists in Chinese Manichaeism
10- there are no
Filipino specialists in Zoroastrianism
11- there are no
Peruvian specialists in Mithraism
12- there are no
Egyptian specialists in Confucianism
13- there are no
Turkish specialists in Quechua, Aymara and other Andes languages
14- there are no Malay
specialists in Sumerian
15- there are no Azeri
specialists in Carthage and Carthaginian Language and History
and so on, and so on.
---------------------------------------------------
Universities in Peru, Argentina, Cameroon, South Africa, Kenya, Sudan, Iraq, Sri Lanka, and Indonesia must not offer seminars about the Bezeklik caves in Turfan (Eastern Turkestan, Sinkiang – China), the Manichaean wall paintings, and the diffusion of Manichaeism in China, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Holland, Austria, Sweden, Belgium and France.
Universities in Venezuela, Colombia, Algeria, Egypt, Tanzania, Yemen, Madagascar, Philippines, and Vietnam must not offer seminars about the Sogdian Civilization, History and Art (as attested in Panjikent wall paintings in today’s Tajikistan), but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Holland, Austria, Canada, Spain and Italy.
Universities in Congo, Chile, Morocco, Iraq, Angola, Azerbaijan, Thailand, Myanmar, and Pakistan must not offer seminars about Manichaeism and its diffusion from NW Africa to Egypt to China, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Australia, and Germany.
Universities in Ghana, Brazil, Paraguay, Jordan, Uganda, Zambia, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Iran, and India must not offer seminars about Nestorian Christianity and its diffusion from Mesopotamia to Bezeklik (Eastern Turkestan – first picture) to the historical center of Imperial China (second picture), but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Denmark, England, Finland, Poland, and Russia.
Universities in China, Uruguay, Taiwan, South Africa, Cambodia, Sudan, Malaysia, Greece, Syria, Georgia and Afghanistan must not offer seminars about the wall paintings of the Arsacid – Sassanid palaces at Kuh-i Khajeh near Zabol, Iran, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Italy, Belgium, Holland, Canada, Austria and the US.
Universities in Mexico, Zimbabwe, Albania, Bolivia, Senegal, Romania, Iran, Guatemala, Tunisia, Armenia, Bulgaria, and Saudi Arabia must not offer seminars about Khotan, Khotanese language, Khotanese Buddhism and the Celestial King Vaisravana, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in England, France, Germany and Sweden.
Universities in Brazil, Indonesia, UAE, Vietnam, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, Morocco and Nigeria must not offer seminars about India’s Ajanta Caves and their frescoes, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Canada, the US, Holland, Austria, and England.
----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Universities in Peru, Argentina, Cameroon, South Africa, Kenya, Sudan, Iraq, Sri Lanka, and Indonesia must not offer seminars about the Bezeklik caves in Turfan (Eastern Turkestan, Sinkiang – China), the Manichaean wall paintings, and the diffusion of Manichaeism in China, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Holland, Austria, Sweden, Belgium and France.
Universities in Venezuela, Colombia, Algeria, Egypt, Tanzania, Yemen, Madagascar, Philippines, and Vietnam must not offer seminars about the Sogdian Civilization, History and Art (as attested in Panjikent wall paintings in today’s Tajikistan), but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Holland, Austria, Canada, Spain and Italy.
Universities in Congo, Chile, Morocco, Iraq, Angola, Azerbaijan, Thailand, Myanmar, and Pakistan must not offer seminars about Manichaeism and its diffusion from NW Africa to Egypt to China, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Australia, and Germany.
Universities in Ghana, Brazil, Paraguay, Jordan, Uganda, Zambia, Turkmenistan, Turkey, Iran, and India must not offer seminars about Nestorian Christianity and its diffusion from Mesopotamia to Bezeklik (Eastern Turkestan – first picture) to the historical center of Imperial China (second picture), but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Denmark, England, Finland, Poland, and Russia.
Universities in China, Uruguay, Taiwan, South Africa, Cambodia, Sudan, Malaysia, Greece, Syria, Georgia and Afghanistan must not offer seminars about the wall paintings of the Arsacid – Sassanid palaces at Kuh-i Khajeh near Zabol, Iran, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Italy, Belgium, Holland, Canada, Austria and the US.
Universities in Mexico, Zimbabwe, Albania, Bolivia, Senegal, Romania, Iran, Guatemala, Tunisia, Armenia, Bulgaria, and Saudi Arabia must not offer seminars about Khotan, Khotanese language, Khotanese Buddhism and the Celestial King Vaisravana, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in England, France, Germany and Sweden.
Universities in Brazil, Indonesia, UAE, Vietnam, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, Morocco and Nigeria must not offer seminars about India’s Ajanta Caves and their frescoes, but these topics are ‘allowed’ for universities in Canada, the US, Holland, Austria, and England.
----------------------------------------------------
Notice carefully the
countries that I offer as case studies! I don't give small countries as
examples; the smallest among them is Azerbaijan (with ca. 10 million people).
The selection of paradigms was deliberate. Some people may ask why it should be
a) Azerbaijan's
priority to have specialists in Carthage and Carthaginian Language and History,
b) Somalia's priority
to have Assyriologists, and
c) Afghanistan's
priority to have specialists in Coptic Language, Literature and History.
These questions are
paranoid; they are made by either ignorant idiots or bribed criminals who
merely implement Western policies that destroy the entire world through this
systematic disconnection among the formerly colonized countries.
The world's worst
fallacy is that new countries need studies and faculties in Engineering,
Economics, Finance & Banking, Business Administration, IT and the like. All
these fields help countries only to become the realms of besotted people and silly
local elites that are easily cheated by the evil colonial powers and their
diplomats.
Countries without a
complete array of Humanities (as per above) in their universities are a filthy
trash of impotent monkeys that are dealt with by the colonial powers in the
manner Saddam Hussein, Qaddafi, Mubarak, Ali Abdallah Saleh, and many others were
thrown out of power.
Humanities must cover
50% of a country's universities' academic staff if a country wants to be a
standalone entity and not the trashy plaything of every colonial gangster named
Macron, Tony Blair or Obama. One could certainly expand much on this topic, but
this is not possible within the limits of a simple response. However, I will
suggest you in this regard to see things through another viewpoint, which will
make perhaps everything easier for you.
Why should small
countries like Finland, Sweden, Austria, Czechia, Belgium, Switzerland, Belgium
and Holland (with less than 20 million people each of them) have specialists on
almost all of the aforementioned academic fields and countries with more than
30 or 40 million people (as per my above examples) have none?
By the way, only the
aforementioned practice is quite enough to prove that UNESCO is a vicious
colonial institution that helps not unite but divide the different nations
worldwide.
Even worse, there is
more to it. The aforementioned colonial system of total cultural – academic –
educational disconnection was implemented successfully not only among countries
of different cultural and historical backgrounds (such as Peru, Angola,
Somalia, Myanmar, South Korea, Kazakhstan and Romania) but also among all the Muslim
countries, which one could think that they would be better connected at all the
above mentioned levels since they evidently share a common heritage.
Unfortunately, today's Muslims are totally unaware of their common heritage,
and for this reason the silly and uneducated sheikhs find it easy to pull large
populations to fake beliefs, distorted History (as per the needs of the colonial
powers), and self-disastrous fanaticism and extremism.
As a matter of fact, the
vast disaster caused worldwide by the colonial criminals in this regard can be
more emphatically attested within today's Islamic World. In a nutshell, Muslims
do not know one another, because the colonial gangsters limited the ignorant
sheikhs of today's fake Islam into a narrative parody of Prophet Muhammad's
life and few extra points – that are all perceived by Muslims as a
"political opposition" to the West. This has been a subtle colonial trickery,
because this is the only way to lead today's Muslims to permanent
underdevelopment, ignorance, silly fanaticism, and an abysmal misreading of the
Islamic History.
What today's Muslims
know as Islam is NOT Islam.
And not even 1% of the
History of Islamic Civilization is known among today's Muslims. More
specifically, at the level of secondary education (whereby in Italy, Italian
pupils study texts of Ancient Roman poets, authors, historians and
philosophers),
1- not one Moroccan
pupil studies excerpts from Tabari
2- not one Nigerian
pupil studies excerpts from Jelaleddin Rumi
3- not one Libyan pupil
studies excerpts from Nizami Ganjavi
4- not one Egyptian
pupil studies excerpts from Ferdowsi
5- not one Somali pupil
studies excerpts from Ibn Hazm
6- not one Tanzanian
pupil studies excerpts from Mohyieldin ibn Arabi
7- not one Sudanese
pupil studies excerpts from Babur
8- not one Iraqi pupil
studies excerpts from Al Makrizi
9- not one Syrian pupil
studies excerpts from Ibn Khaldun
10- not one Azeri pupil
studies excerpts from Al Farabi
11- not one Turkmen
pupil studies excerpts from Al Qurtubi
12- not one Pakistani
pupil studies excerpts from Nasir al din al Tusi
13- not one Indonesian
pupil studies excerpts from Ibn Rushd
Even worse, today's
fake Muslims have no idea about any Islamic monuments outside their own
country:
A- Senegalese do not
know even the existence of the Samarqand Observatory, which was the world's leading
institution of its time (15th c.), built by Ulugh Beg, a consummate astronomer
and the world's most erudite king of the last 2000 years
B- Mauritanians do not
know the existence of the Maragheh Observatory in Iran
C- Sudanese do not know
the existence of Divrigi mosque at Sivas, Turkey – which is the only Seljuk
mosque with Indian style decoration
D- Egyptians do not
know the existence of the illustrious Masjid-e Shah (Mosque) at Esfahan, Iran
E- Yemenis do not know
the existence of Registan esplanade at Samarqand with the three illustrious
medresas (religious schools)
F- Indonesians do not
know the existence of Queen Arwa Mosque in Jibla, Yemen whereby the illustrious
queen of the Sulayhid dynasty left the best token of her rule.
One can fill volumes
with similar paradigms of cultural ignorance which are all due to the fake
theological dogmas presently taught as 'Islam' among Muslims as per the
colonial orders that the idiotic sheikhs implement.
-----------------------------------------------------
Yes, you are right!
Entire verses of the Hymns to Aton have been preserved in the otherwise
'genuine' texts of the Biblical Psalms.
About the Singapore
analogy: teaching History means representing accurately past moments to present
people. Examples must be striking.
In the 20th c. it was
easy for an army to advance 2000 km; hm!! Before 3600 years, it was not so easy
for armies to cover such distance and destroy the faraway target successfully.
So, now, you can understand how great was the victory of the Hittite King
Mursilis I, who invaded Babylon in 1596 BCE.
All the best and best
regards,
Shamsaddin
Labels:
African education,
African History,
African Renaissance,
Africanism,
Afrocentric,
Asia,
Classicism,
Classics,
colonialism,
England,
France,
Hellenism,
Orientalism,
racism,
Renaissance,
white supremacism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)