Восприятие
Божественного - I
God created Man and not Man God;
consequently, God defined Man and not Man God. That is why Man sensed God,
perceived the Divine, and acted accordingly within the spiritual and the
material universes. Due to the first fall of Man, this sense and this perception
were gravely impaired. Because of this situation, the early men started
developing faculties in order to catch up with what they had missed but to no
avail. These faculties, which we now identify as the basics of civilization,
were truly unnecessary and they only resulted in further falls.
If we consider the original sin as an infidelity, the so-called 'human civilization' was constructed on unrequested powers, skills and intelligence. This invalid, counterfeit intelligence is what exactly we read in the First Epistle to the Corinthians (3:19; ἡ γὰρ σοφία τοῦ κόσμου τούτου μωρία παρὰ τῷ Θεῷ ἐστιν / Sapientia enim hujus mundi, stultitia est apud Deum): "For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God's sight".
Texts and representations from the scene related to the Weighing of the Heart of Ani, which took place in the Hall of Judgment (from the Papyrus of Ani); Ani and his wife Tutu (lower section, left) enter the realm of the Divine. At center, Anubis, in kneeling position, weighs Ani's heart (left plate of the scale) against the feather of Maat (right plate of the scale). He is observed by the divine forces Renenutet, Meshkenet, and Shay, as well as by Ani's own Ba (lower spiritual body which is depicted as a bird with human head). At the right end, Ammut, intending to devour Ani's soul if his heart is proven sinful, awaits the verdict. Identified as the Divine Wisdom, Thoth (with human body and the head of the bird ibis) prepares to record it. In the upper section, all supreme aspects of the Divine act as judges: (from left to right) Hu and Sia, Hathor, Horus, Isis and Nephthys, Nut, Geb, Tefnut, Shu, Atum, and Ra-Horakhty. Written by the Theban scribe Ani -for the preparation of his life in the Hereafter- in the first half of the 13th c. BCE, the Papyrus of Ani was discovered in 1888 in Luxor by the English Egyptologist Sir E. A. Wallis Budge and smuggled to the British Museum. It is a 24 m long scroll that has a width of 33 cm; the monumental document needed three volumes to be duly published (introductory analysis; transcription and translation; facsimile reproduction),
Yet, this conclusion is
nothing more than the true essence of Ea's advice to Adapa (the First Human)
according to the Ancient Sumerian/Assyrian-Babylonian sacred text "Adapa
and the South Wind":
«At the door of Anu,
Tammuz and Gishzida are standing,
"they will see thee, they will ask thee; 'Sir,'
For whose sake dost thou so appear, Adapa? For whom
Art thou clad in a mourning garment?' 'In our country two gods have vanished,
therefore
Am I so.' 'Who are the two gods, who in the land
Have vanished?' 'Tammuz and Gishzida.' They will look at one another and
Be astonished. Good words».
https://sacred-texts.com/ane/adapa.htm
In other words, in the
original Paradise, there would never be any 'civilization'. Then, the quest for
the original perception of the Divine is a direct, straightforward and
conscious rejection of all the human cultures and civilizations. Quite
unfortunately for them, all those who intend to stick to their traditions and
cultures, by so doing, they bring the total collapse of the human civilization
closer. This is apparently so because their civilization is flawed and
putrefied, their faith nonexistent, and their perception of the Divine
dishonest and erroneous.
The Wisdom of God was represented in Ancient Egypt by the Ibis-headed Thoth. Above: wall painting from the mortuary temple of Ramesses III at Medinet Habu, Luxor West; below: wall painting from the tomb of Seti I, Valley of the Kings, Luxor West; as per the existing material record and textual sources, it becomes therefore clear that for the Ancient Egyptians, ibis was deemed worthy to represent the Divine Wisdom.
Among modern Egyptians, the same bird is viewed as very stupid. Colloquially pronounced Abu Gerdan (but written Abu Qerdan / أَبو قِرْدَان), the appellation is quite bizarre, because it means "the father of Gerdan", thus leaving everyone with the question who Gerdan is. The contrast is therefore very striking in the human evaluation of the said bird. Instead of relying on absurd theories and socio-anthropological nonsense to explain what cannot be explained, it should be practical to realize that neither the humans nor the fauna remained unaffected during the series of falls from the original and the antediluvian world to the Late Antiquity and down to our days.
Содержание (Часть I: I-VI)
Введение
I. Человек:
душа, тело и характер
II. Связь с
материальной вселенной
III. Связь
с духовной вселенной
IV. Функция
человека: взаимодействие души, тела и характера
V. Ум без
мыслей; сердце без чувств; солнечное сплетение без желаний
VI. В
противоположность древним Духовным Наукам, Современная Психология производит
монстров, тем самым способствуя истреблению человечества
VII. Человеческая душа, ее части и их функциональность
VIII. Сознание души без подсознания и бессознательности
IX. Знание как
самосознание: Язык, письменность и обучение не нужны
X. Мудрость как осознание собственного предназначения в материальной
вселенной
XI. Судьба: процесс всех взаимосвязей и взаимного влияния всех созданных
факторов
XII. Удача (непредсказуемость судьбы): врожденное чувство условий,
позволяющих человеку превзойти то, что предначертано Судьбой
XIII. Восприятие Божественного: от Пяти Элементов до Двенадцати Высших
Существ
XIV. Бог и Божественное против Божественного и богов
XV. Восприятие Бога и восприятие богов
XVI. Человеческое понятие Божественного: результат неисправности Падшего
Человека
XVII. Конец Времен: освобождение от мыслей, чувств, желаний, языков и
систем письменности
Contents (Part I: I-VI)
Introduction
I. Man: soul, body, and
character
II. Communication with
the material universe
III. Communication with
the spiritual universe
IV. The function of the
Man: interaction among soul, body and character
V. Mind without
thoughts; heart without sentiments; solar plexus without desires
VI. At the antipodes of
the ancient Spiritual Sciences, Modern Psychology produces monsters, leading to
the extermination of mankind
VII. The human soul,
its parts, and their functionality
VIII. Soul
consciousness without subconscious and unconsciousness
IX. Knowledge as
self-consciousness: no need of language, writing and learning
X. Wisdom as consciousness
of one's own destination in the material universe
XI. Fate: the process
of all interconnections and mutual impact of all created factors
XII. Fortune: inherent
sense of conditions enabling man to outdo what Fate specified
XIII. Perception of the
Divine: from the Five Elements to the Twelve Supreme Beings
XIV. God & the
Divine vs. the Divine & the gods
XV. The perception of
God and the perceptions of gods
XVI. The human concept
of the Divine: result of the malfunction of the Fallen Man
XVII. End Times:
liberation from thoughts, sentiments, desires, languages & writings
Introduction
The modern Western (in
fact: Western European) world, which by means of military, political, economic,
academic, intellectual, educational, religious, cultural and spiritual
colonization invaded and (by so doing) desecrated the rest of the world, has
been based on a peremptory, 'humanist' assumption, an arbitrary, detrimental
rejection of the pre-Renaissance world, a baseless, yet unprecedented
historical revisionism, and a self-determination to deliberately define God.
Within this vicious and calamitous context, which precipitates the total
annihilation of the mankind, there is absolutely no place for perception of the
Divine.
Nonetheless, it has
been inevitable that several humans managed to liberate themselves from today's
destitute, fake and corrupted religions, absurd and nonsensical philosophies,
and various other schemes, theories and ideologies in order to find their true
inner selves and in the process perceive the Divine.
In today's world, there
is no self-definition of Man. This is so because the peremptory concept of
Humanism constitutes an unfounded dogma and the foundation of all posterior
conclusions, considerations and theories. Any spiritual-intellectual attempt to
question the validity of the 'humanist' absurdity results instantaneously in utterly
dictatorial persecution, hysterical rejection, and fanatical, systematized
defamation. Yet, the insanity of 'Humanism' leads straight to the eradication
of mankind.
As a matter of fact,
for every civilization and culture, the self-definition of Man was never the first
priority in terms of ancestral narratives, meditation, rumination and world
view; on the contrary, the definition of God was the central, fundamental task.
We do not exist of our own; we live because God created us. Contrarily to Him,
we cannot say "I am who I am" (אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר
אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה;
ἐγώ εἰμι
ὁ ὤν;
ego sum qui sum / Exodus 3:14). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_that_I_Am
Similarly, and more
authoritatively than the Torah, the Assyrian-Babylonian sacred text of Enuma
Elish (the world's paramount 'Genesis' or 'Cosmogony') in its 3rd and 4th verses
stipulates the following: «apsûm-ma rēštû zārûšun; mummu Tiamat muallidat
gimrišun» {Naught but
primordial Apsu, their begetter, (and) Mummu Tiamat, she who bore them all / as per the transliteration in
P. Talon, The Standard Babylonian Creation Myth: Enūma eliš; Helsinki, 2005}.
https://www.soas.ac.uk/baplar/recordings/babylonian-epic-creation-enuma-elis-tablet-i-lines-1-16-read-jan-keetman
https://ia600707.us.archive.org/16/items/Holy-Books/EnumaElish.pdf
Everything, every aspect of the Divine, every later name of God or aspect of God depended on the primordial Apsu and Tiamat, the names of God before Creation. In the World History's first and foremost holy text, the narrative of the Creation starts before the Creation. After the original moments of Becoming are stipulated, all the rest follows. In other words, only because humans defined God first, they were able to determine who they were at a second stage. But to define God, men had to perceive the Divine at an earlier moment.
Cuneiform tablet with excerpts from the sacred text Enuma Elish; from the library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh, 7th c. BCE; copyright: Osama Shukir Muhammed Amin Associate Professor of Neurology; about: https://www.worldhistory.org/article/225/enuma-elish---the-babylonian-epic-of-creation---fu/ In the Electronic Babylonian Library: https://www.ebl.lmu.de/corpus/L/1/2 https://www.ebl.lmu.de/corpus/L/1/2/SB/I
I.
Man: soul, body, and character
In
this brief presentation, I don't intend to expand on the perception of the
Divine of the Ancient Sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians-Babylonians and Egyptians,
thus composing a historico-religious monograph. On the contrary, I will use
material and concepts, methods and approaches of the Ancient Mesopotamian
monotheists, which can help today's people to best question and ultimately refute
the prevailing, absurd and preposterous definition of the Divine, which has
become good reason for the mankind's decay.
There
cannot be mental, sentimental or sensual perception of the Divine. The brain,
the heart, and the solar plexus are parts of the human body that function at
the very intersection of the soul and the body within every human being;
however, they still generate material functions. Through these means a human
obtains perception of the material universe. However, only the human soul
creates spiritual functions, and it is only through one's soul that a man can perceive
the spiritual universe, the Divine, and God. In brief, there is only spiritual
perception of the spiritual world.
Wearing the blue khepresh crown (suitable for wars), Ramesses III is embraced by Isis (: symbolic representation of the Ancient Egyptian monotheistic priesthood); from the tomb of Prince Amun-her-khepeshef (QV55), Valley of the Queens, Luxor. Isis places her right hand behind Ramses III's neck to offer consolidation and support to his body's emission center of electric fluid, whereas her left hand closes and protects the pharaoh's solar plexus, thus allowing him to preserve the totality of his body's electromagnetic flow. Ramses III places his right hand in front of Isis' face, which means that he is incessantly absorbing electric fluid, as if he were an electron; theoretically interpreted, this stance and this act correspond to making an oath. All the same, back at those days, it had an exclusively spiritual, not nominal, meaning. Last, the pharaoh's left hand embraces Isis' body at the lower spine (or lumbar curve) where is located the source of magnetic fluid; this act also ensures the preservation of the totality of his body's electromagnetic flow (i.e. spiritual-material power retention). Prince Amun-her-khepeshef was a royal scribe, commander of the cavalry, and son of Ramses III (the ninth on the list of his sons). About:
https://thebanmappingproject.com/tombs/qv-55-prince-amenherkhepshef
https://archiviofotografico.museoegizio.it/en/archive/theban-region/valley-of-the-queens/qv-55-tomb-of-amonherkhepeshef/?ff=1&photo=C01642
https://egyptianaemporium.wordpress.com/2012/08/21/tuesday-tomb-qv55/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amun-her-khepeshef_(20th_dynasty)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_burials_in_the_Valley_of_the_Queens
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khepresh
Because
the dissociation between the human soul and the human body is the result of the
successive falls of mankind, today's man has lost the originally inherent
ability to establish a complete synergy between the soul and the body. Many
misinformed and disoriented people, who believe in the existence of the human
soul and the spiritual universe, think that the thoughts, the ideas, the
theories, the sentiments, the desires and the passions constitute the soul, but
that's very wrong.
As
driving force of life, the soul is entirely different from the body; it does
however permeate the human body and, to enable the human being's major functions
at the material level, it forms particular junctures within the body in the
heart, the brain, and the solar plexus. At best, which means before all the Falls,
the three junctures (or intersections) are totally empty, and ethereal vitality
keeps the human being in perfect synergy between the soul and the body.
The
electromagnetic flow is thus exemplarily processed, being uninterrupted and
unabsorbed by the various, unnecessary debris formed during cases of traumatic
experience. Then, this man is well-lit and bright, able to emit light, and
transform his eye into a lantern for his body; this is the meaning of Jesus'
famous hint "The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are healthy,
your whole body will be full of light" (Ὁ λύχνος τοῦ σώματός ἐστιν ὁ ὀφθαλμός· ἐὰν οὖν ὁ ὀφθαλμός σου ἁπλοῦς ᾖ, ὅλον τὸ σῶμά σου
φωτεινόν ἔσται·; lucerna corporis est oculus si fuerit oculus tuus simplex totum
corpus tuum lucidum erit; Matthew 6:22)
Quite
contrarily, in the case of the man of the Fall, the three intersections are
filled with unnecessary data, pieces of 'knowledge', amounts of worthless
information, endless thoughts, considerations, theories, ideas, ideologies,
sentiments and desires, not to mention passions and abominable calculations,
which keep the human being captive of the worst enemies of mankind. In such
cases, the soul is greatly affected and clearly condemned to damnation. These
unfortunate and unsubstantiated beings have thus already become 'persons', overwhelmingly
filling the part of their soul that we conventionally call 'subconscious' with collateral
debris, which constitute an enormous burden for the soul and gradually force
her to incapacity and castigation.
The
intersections of the soul and the body (solar plexus, heart and brain) create
what we come to know as the character of the human being; the character is the
epitome of individuality. But a human being, i.e. an individual, should never
become a 'person'. The character corresponds to what many mystics call
conventionally 'lower spiritual body'; this is wrongly called 'astral body' (it
has nothing to do with stars). Few days after the separation of the soul from
the body (i.e. the 'death'), both, the material body and the lower spiritual
body, start getting disintegrated.
Being
aware of the intensified spiritual attack against the mankind and the increased
number of sinful humans, modern mystics wanted to find a convenient and very
conventional 'solution' of the problem. They therefore invented the childish
theory of generalized reincarnation. It is certain that some souls can
reincarnate; spiritually and materially, reincarnation is possible. Jesus spoke
explicitly about that, referring to the Men of Nineveh, i.e. the Ancient
Assyrians: "The men of Nineveh will stand up at the judgment with this
generation and condemn it; for they repented at the preaching of Jonah, and now
something greater than Jonah is here" (ἄνδρες Νινευῖται ἀναστήσονται ἐν τῇ κρίσει μετὰ τῆς γενεᾶς ταύτης καὶ κατακρινοῦσιν αὐτήν, ὅτι
μετενόησαν εἰς τὸ κήρυγμα Ἰωνᾶ, καὶ ἰδοὺ πλεῖον Ἰωνᾶ ὧδε; viri ninevitae surgent in iudicio cum generatione
ista et condemnabunt eam quia paenitentiam egerunt in praedicatione Ionae et
ecce plus quam Iona hic; Matthew 12:41).
The
generalized theory of reincarnation invalidates the purpose of the Creation. It
is an absurdity according to which one human being can achieve perfection in
three lives, another man in six lives, and a third person in nine lives; indeed,
this is utterly blasphemous. If things had been arranged in this paranoid
manner, God would have been snoring at the end station of this useless and otherwise
comical process. Only pathetic ignorance and abject immorality can make someone
think that the Moral Order does not matter and that the facts of spiritual
reward and spiritual castigation are meaningless. Contrarily to this
nonsensical scheme, for all early sacred texts, it matters greatly whether the
Moral Order is maintained and respected by all humans or not. Without Order
there is no Creation; breaching the universal Order is an act that destroys
some part of the universe. That is why reward and castigation are
consequential, instantaneous and inevitable.
In
this regard, it is absolutely puerile to suggest that, since most humans were
sinful, if we happen to believe that there will be reward for the innocent and
punishment for the guilty, we will end up in a scarcely inhabited Paradise with
few souls and in a densely populated Hell packed with the souls of sinners. I
am absolutely convinced that this is a hypocritically childish response (pronounced
in Modern times) to an inconsistent and unsophisticated sermon (given in
Christian and Islamic times).
I
cannot expand further here (as this article does not concern the Structure of
the Spiritual Universe), but I have to point out that it is mere theological vanity
to try to interpret terms like "eternal life" and 'eternal fire"
within the context of life of the Fallen Man. Sacred texts that use similar
terms apparently give figurative sense to several terms that they use, since
their readers will ostensibly be totally unable to fully and deeply comprehend
them. I must therefore conclude that modern mystics' opposition to
Christian-Muslim preachers is an intentional evildoing, although the latter
clearly failed to accurately interpret their respective sacred texts.
II.
Communication with the material universe
Today's
man is not the same as the Man created by God; the fallen Man is inferior to
the antediluvian Man, who is in turn lower than the original Man in terms of
spiritual potency, spiritual-material synergy, and material abilities and
capacities.
Man
was not created in order to be further developed and improved by himself, and
due to circumstances of personal or social experience; this misconception is
surely the result of the evolutionist absurdity. Quite contrarily to what many
worthless academics assume today, it is evident that the early men were able to
spiritually communicate with one another without the need of a language. There
was no language and there was no need for it.
At
this point, it is essential that I make the distinction between 'language' and
'name'. Names, as phonemes, are sounds; as such, they exist within the
spiritual universe, being not a mere particularity of the material universe.
Without a name, a soul and a spirit cannot exist. But being able to communicate
spiritually, the early humans did not need a language. As a matter of fact, the
languages (and later the writings) were the early consequences of the
successive falls of Man. Actually, if we do not doubtlessly accept the inherent
ability of spiritual communication among the early humans and we take into
consideration the fact that they lacked a proper language, we will be forced to
conclude that the Creation was not flawless.
Affected
by numerous absurdities and nonsensical philosophies, today's people are forced
to see the original or the antediluvian men though the distorting lenses of
rationalism, nominalism, empiricism, materialism, evolutionism, etc. This
situation does not only generate disbelief but also drives people to dementia;
it is certain that most of the sicknesses that are attested nowadays are due to
sick theories, absurd and abnormal considerations, arbitrary beliefs, and
counterfeit concepts. The ill, the rotten, and the dead emit illness,
rottenness and deadness.
It
is as simple as that: if the created man "had needed" to speak a
language, God would have had the foresight to incorporate or accommodate the
entire vocabulary and the grammatical-syntactical stricture of a language
within the inherent stock of knowledge that the First Man had. If the created
man "had needed" to write a text, God would have had the foresight to
embed or entrench all the signs of a writing system into the same stock of
knowledge.
By
thinking that the created Man lacked anything in terms of skills or capacities,
any man would automatically make of God the Creator a lower spirit. In fact,
such evil machinations are the foundations of modern times' disbelief.
As
a matter of fact, what stands between us and the antediluvian and the original
men is the series of falls that took place and the detrimental consequences that
they had on the average human being. But if we carefully examine each skill,
every fall, and the consequences brought about after every historic event
mentioned in a sacred text, we can reconstitute the pieces of an enormous
puzzle that has been deliberately held hidden from the men.
Using
his soul, body and aspects of his character, the original man was able to fully
communicate with the material universe. I am convinced that, at this point, I
must highlight few points that today's humans fail to grasp, due to the
prevailing false philosophies, inconsistent sciences, and deliberate
distortions of every sort. The material universe is not what people today think
it is.
The Benben (pyramidion) of Amenemhat III (end of the 12th Dynasty during the Middle Kingdom; ca. 1850 BCE) was the capstone of the Black Pyramid at Dahshur, 40 km south of Cairo (west bank of the Nile); preserved almost intact, it can be now watched in the Egyptian Museum of Cairo. Atop of all pyramids and obelisks, the Benben symbolized an important element of the Creation stories according to the Ancient Egyptian Khemenu (Hermupolitan) and Iwnw (Heliopolitan) religions; actually, Benben was said to be the original Earth (or mound) which arose from the primordial waters Nun and Naunet, after they were separated. Related to the Benben conceptualization, which promulgated the sacredness of the Earth, the primordial bird Bennu played a determinant role in the Creation. Praised as "He Who Came into Being by Himself" and "Lord of Jubilees", Bennu was believed to be the Ba of Ra and to have enabled the creative drive of Atum.
Having flown over the waters of Nun before the Creation, according to the Ancient Egyptian sacred texts, the bird Bennu did exactly what Elohim (the Biblical and Christian God) was said to have done in the compilation of preposterously altered and distorted texts that the Jews call Tanakh and the Christians define as the Old Testament: "and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters" (in Genesis 1:2; וְרוּחַ אֱלֹהִים מְרַחֶפֶת עַל פְּנֵי הַמָּיִם; καὶ πνεῦμα Θεοῦ ἐπεφέρετο ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος.; et spiritus Dei ferebatur super aquas.)
Then, Bennu landed on a rock and issued a call, which made it all happen. That's why it remained a symbol of rebirth and was associated with Osiris, before being later diffused among several Mediterranean cultures. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benben
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bennu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramidion_of_Amenemhat_III
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Amenemhat_III_(Dahshur)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahshur
https://www.wmf.org/project/west-bank-nile
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nu_(mythology)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_creation_myths#Hermopolis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atum
https://www.topoi.org/project/c-4-5/
In
fact, there is no created being or entity that is lifeless; this means that not
only the animals, the birds and the trees have their souls, but also mountains,
rivers, valleys, lakes, rocks and stones have their respective spirits. To best
grasp this forgotten reality from which today's Westerners have been detached
to their own detriment, one must take into account that a soulless being or
entity is dead; it therefore cannot function. In fact, there can never be a
material being without its spiritual counterpart (soul or spirit).
Of
course, everything plays its own role and every being is ascribed its own
function; communication involves surely a purpose, but in an environment of
spiritually acquired knowledge, this is mainly a matter of coordination. In
today's world, the real meaning of words such as innocence, chastity, piety,
sacredness, sanctity, etc. has been lost; however, these concepts, principles
and values are omnipresent in ancient sacred texts, not as abstract notions but
as description of practical action and perfect human behavior.
For
the original Man, orchestrating or coordinating the praise and worship of God
that the entire Creation incessantly delivers was a most outstanding duty that
today's fallen people are virtually unable to possibly fathom. A widely known,
but by now incomprehensible example is that of Enoch (Idris): "Enoch
walked with God, and he was not, for God took him" (וַיִּתְהַלֵּ֥ךְ
חֲנ֖וֹךְ אֶת־הָֽאֱלֹהִ֑ים וְאֵינֶ֕נּוּ כִּֽי־לָקַ֥ח אֹת֖וֹ אֱלֹהִֽים׃; καὶ εὐηρέστησεν Ἐνὼχ τῷ Θεῷ καὶ οὐχ εὑρίσκετο, ὅτι μετέθηκεν
αὐτὸν ὁ Θεός.; ambulavitque cum Deo et non
apparuit quia tulit eum Deus; Genesis 5:24).
III.
Communication with the spiritual universe
Today's
man is mostly cheated by spirits of lower hierarchies whereas he is dodged by
benevolent intelligences and hierarchies of the high ethereal spheres. The
reason for this situation is very simple; in their overwhelming majority,
today's mystics and spiritual masters are so unclean and so contemptible that
they create a very negative aura around them. It is also well known that, due
to the prevailing ignorance, moral degeneracy, and materialism, few people
really care about the spiritual universe. Few among them pursue their spiritual
studies, perform their exercises, and live in seclusion from the rest of the
world; but these efforts are futile if their mind, heart and solar plexus are
gravely affected (not only because of the subsequent falls of mankind but) by
their own self-indulgence, and their lack of moral discipline, abstinence and
celibacy.
The
worst cases of failed mystics and depraved spiritual masters are individuals transformed
into persons, egoistic and egotistic beings, and disingenuous creatures, which
act on the basis of selfishness and self-interest. As these individuals become,
truly speaking, cancerous tumors at the spiritual level, they are easily
exploited by all sorts of evil and malignant spirits, which deceitfully contact
those fools, effectively impersonate higher hierarchies, and terminally subdue
their victims, whom they effectively utilize as per the scope of each unclean
spirit's hierarchy.
Man
was created as a spiritual-material being of perfect balance between the
spiritual and the material universes. This involved conscious, complete and
instantaneous integration with the scope of the Creation. Free will made of the
early human being a very distinct creature, but this was meant as an element
necessary for the exercises to which God would submit Man – not as a
circumstance that would expose the early men to deception, trap and sin. The
original sin (and fall) prevents today's people from properly comprehending and
duly assessing human life as a liminal space of time. Yet, the liminality of
human life is of paramount importance for the purpose of the Creation; that is
why it is repeated in all the exercises of initiation that God may put in front
of all humans.
Instead
of the rigid, posterior, flawed, and partly distorted text of the Old Testament
(Torah), Ancient Sumerian-Akkadian and Assyrian-Babylonian sacred texts reveal
the tendency of the Divine realm to incessantly test the original Man and to regularly
submit him to initiation practices and processes, which would reveal
unfathomable realities of the universes to him. Be that as it may, Adapa (Adam)
should not have taken divine suggestions at face value, accepting them all; on
the contrary, he should have treated them wisely, respectfully, and solemnly,
but also conscientiously, earnestly, and selectively.
God
is not the grim, covetous, bitter, low and irked spirit that the Biblical
Yahweh appears to be. In striking contrast to Elohim and the biblical texts of
the Elohist source (as per the documentary model of Pentateuchal composition
introduced by Julius Wellhausen), the 'god' of the Yahwist (or Jahwist) source is
entirely due to a preposterous, polytheistic distortion of the earlier Ancient
Hebrew concept of God. The disfigurement of the earlier texts and the final
composition of the Biblical text were first undertaken at the times of the
Babylonian exile, although later copies may have further distorted the text.
In
fundamental opposition to the (venerated by the Pharisees) noxious spirit of
Yahweh, Jesus' God ('our Father in Heaven'), as attested in the Gospels,
resembles best the Divine realm that the Ancient Sumerians, Akkadians, and Assyrians-Babylonians
believed in. Apsu, Tiamat, Lahmu, Lahamu, Anshar, Kishar, Anu, Enlil and Ea are
not at all 'many different gods', as the late 19th c. and early 20th c.
Assyriologists had thought due to the then underdeveloped stage of History of
Religions but varied aspects of the Divine realm that the early humans were
able to discern whereas we are not.
Jesus'
parables remind us more easily the riddles that the early humans had to solve
as per the Mesopotamian sacred texts rather than the ruthless formulas uttered
by the monstrously distorted and absurdly vindictive Yahweh of the Old
Testament. Communication with the spiritual universe for the early humans meant
ability to discern between Anu (: God as the King of Heaven) and Ea (: the
Wisdom of God). This is exactly what the sacred text "Adapa and the South
Wind" tells us. In one version of the text, we read about Adapa that
"Ea created him as his follower among humankind", but as the story
unfolds, we come to learn that "Adapa, the son of Ea, has broken South
Wind's wing". Following the subsequent demand of Anu, Adapa must be
presented to Him, and then Ea offers the necessary guidance: "Ea, aware of
heaven's ways, touched Adapa, made him wear his hair unkempt, dressed him in
mourning garment, and gave him instructions".
%20Old%20Babylonian%20period,%20National%20Museum%20of%20Iraq.jpg)
Tablets with the Me-Turran (modern Tell Haddad) version of the sacred text "Adapa and the South Wind", dating back to the Old Babylonian period (today in the National Museum of Iraq); text: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Une-version-sum%C3%A9rienne-de-la-l%C3%A9gende-d%E2%80%99Adapa-de-X)-Cavigneaux/d4fb9e0b88b15a9fe8240ad9170611bcd66203c7 / transliteration: https://www.tau.ac.il/~izreel/publications/Adapa_N&E_KutscherMem1993.pdf
Ea's
subtle advice involves the impersonation of divine qualities by Adapa; the Man
is guided to tell Tammuz
and Gishzida, the two guardians at Anu's gate, that they have vanished in his
country and for this reason he is dressed in mourning cloth. But at the end of
His advice, Ea foretells Adapa the following: "when you stand before Anu,
you will be offered food of death, so do not eat; you will be offered deadly
water, so do not drink; you will be offered a garment, then put it on; you will
be offered oil, then anoint yourself".
Adapa
should have realized that Ea's advice included a terrible trap; in fact, it
would be inconsistent for the Divine Wisdom (Ea) to offer a controversial
advice. So, how could the King of Heaven (Anu) possibly offer 'food of death'
and 'deadly water' to a human? On another note, it is intriguing that out of
four items anticipated to be offered by Anu to Adapa, the Divine Wisdom
suggests Adapa to accept only two (garment and oil) and deny the other two
(food and water). It makes no sense.
It
would take long to comprehensively analyze this sacred text, but the morale is clear
and appalling. Facing the Divine realm (Anu, Ea, and representatives of high
spiritual hierarchies), Man should be able to discern well the divine aspects,
spot eventual traps, and avoid blind obeisance; sensing inconsistencies hinges
on human impulse, which -along with human imagination- is the Divine realm's
most valuable present to humans. In this regard, miscommunication is definitely
due to lack of impulse. The entire story ends with the verdict pronounced by
Anu "Take him and return him to his territory", an utterance that is
reminiscent of Adam's expulsion from the original Paradise.
IV.
The function of the Man: interaction among soul, body and character
If
the soul permeates the entire human body, where is located its very base? For a
high priest, a mystic, and an emperor this issue was of paramount importance.
One soldier loses a hand, another has his leg amputated, and a third fighter is
hurt in the eye. Who becomes dysfunctional at the spiritual level, following a
material wound?
Sacred
texts and burial practices, hymns and prayers written on the walls of tombs and
mortuary temples constitute an enormous documentation that sheds light on this
topic. Although every individual's three spiritual bodies totally comprise its
material body and are therefore present throughout every single portion of the
material body, the primary interconnection point between the soul and the body
is the heart, not the brain.
Although
all the human body organs perform functions that are necessary at both, the
material and the spiritual levels, the real seat of the soul in the body is the
heart. Modern mystics, false doctors, and malevolent spiritual masters diffuse
the absurdity that the pineal gland is the seat of the soul in the human body.
This is utter Satanism.
In
Ancient Egypt, the embalmment (mummification) traditions were exactly based on
the spiritually inherent and historically inherited knowledge that all humans
had in the beginning but they progressively lost. In the face of such enormous
evidence, the New Age quacks of Jesuit, Freemasonic or Zionist vocation should
just shut their dirty mouths.
The
mummification process was geared in Ancient Egypt in order to ensure that the
deceased individual's body would unite with the soul again and thus live
forever, as it would be presented in front of Osiris (Wser: the Well Being). The
preservation of body (embalmment), as procedure, took 70 days, but I want to herewith
draw your attention to the following facts:
a-
the lungs, the stomach, the liver, and the intestines were removed and placed
within separate jars, which were named "The four sons of Horus" (i.e.
the Messiah) in Ancient Egypt, whereas modern Egyptologists confusingly call
them "Canopic jars", after the location known in Ancient Egyptian
Demotic as Pi-kuat, in Ancient Greek as Canopus, and in Modern Arabic as Abuqir
(25 km east of Alexandria Raml Station). About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canopus,_Egypt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canopus_(mythology)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Qir
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatet_El_Raml
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canopic_jar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canopic_chest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_sons_of_Horus
https://shedet.journals.ekb.eg/article_322453.html
https://www.thecollector.com/canopic-jars/
https://www.thecollector.com/canopic-jars/
https://karger.com/pat/article/85/5-6/267/266427/Egyptian-Canopic-Jars-at-the-Crossroad-of-Medicine
https://karger.com/pat/article/85/5-6/267/266427/Egyptian-Canopic-Jars-at-the-Crossroad-of-Medicine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neith
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serket
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apep
b.
the brain was taken out through a particular technique (excerebration).
About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excerebration
c.
the body was meticulously drained and left with skin, muscles, bones and hair;
the process of complete dehydration involved natron, which was found in abundance
near the western extremities of the Nile Delta in Wadi Natrun. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natron
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wadi_El_Natrun
d.
But only the heart stayed in the body forever. This was due to the very simple
reason that the heart was considered already as part of the soul and, in
addition, because the deceased human being would subsequently be processed
through the Hall of Judgment and his heart weighted against the feather of
Maat, i.e. the divine order of the universes. All men lived in Ancient Egypt
with the hope that their hearts would be evaluated as lighter than the feather
of Maat and that the verdict Maa Kheru ("true of voice") would be
said about them, so that they afterwards rejoice living in the Aaru (: heaven).
About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maat#42_Negative_Confessions_(Papyrus_of_Ani)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_afterlife_beliefs#Judgment_of_the_dead
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assessors_of_Maat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighing_of_souls#Ancient_Egyptian_religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maa_Kheru
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaru
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duat
https://houseoftruth.education/en/library/sacred-writings/egyptian-book-of-the-dead-42-negative-confessions
Further
readings on the mummification process and the Ancient Egyptian beliefs about
the Hereafter:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embalming#History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy#Egyptian_mummies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Egyptian_mummies_(royalty)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_funerary_practices#Mummification
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opening_of_the_mouth_ceremony
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_mummy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_afterlife_beliefs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_Texts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffin_Texts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_funerary_texts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papyrus_of_Ani
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ritual_of_Embalming_Papyrus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortuary_temple
Modern
scholars customarily project their own beliefs, concepts and worldviews onto
the ancient texts that they attempt to decorticate and understand; by so doing,
they fail to have direct access into the ancient mindset, knowledge and wisdom.
Inevitably, they confuse their readers by saying that the Ancient Egyptians
believed that their mind was based in their heart; that's gibberish. By so
saying, Egyptologists end up presenting the Ancient Egyptians as finding no use
or function for the human brain. That's very wrong. What truly happened in the
leading civilized societies of the late 3rd, 2nd, and 1st millennium BCE is
that people functioned very differently from today's corrupted humans; although
spiritually and materially fallen, they were still much closer to the
antediluvian and the original men than to us.
In
a previous article published only few days ago under the title "Spiritual
Potency, the Loss & the Recovery thereof: from Adapa (Adam) to Gilgamesh to
the End Times", in the 3rd part (III. The Tree of Life, its loss, and its
eschatological recovery)
(https://www.academia.edu/124307059/Spiritual_Potency_the_Loss_and_the_Recovery_thereof_from_Adapa_Adam_to_Gilgamesh_to_the_End_Times), I wrote the following: "Every well-founded spiritual
quest is therefore the search for the Tree of Life; I surely understand very
well why so many mystics in so many, different, socio-cultural environments
were so obstinately determined not to allow thoughts in their minds. This is a
paramount effort of self-purification. Thoughts are useless forms of
self-destruction. Adam, before his sin, did not 'think'; he did not need to.
Angels do not think; souls, spirits, spiritual intelligences, and other
hierarchies of the non-material universe do not think. Will (voluntas) is
unrelated to thinking".
This
is what exactly happened in the Antiquity; people did not flood their minds
with useless thoughts, unnecessary considerations, worthless ideas, absurd
theories and selfish calculations. The curse of calculative mind did not exist,
and for this reason there was no propensity to dehumanizing. The humans were
defined by God, and consequently, they were human; there was no need for
self-definition of the humans, as this preposterous attempt would be tantamount
to dehumanization.
When
you know what you need to know for a lifetime, you certainly do not need to
find out anything new, and you do not need to question your knowledge and
wisdom; this occurs only to ignorant barbarians whose ancestors have been
totally dissociated from their souls. Despite the undeniable series of falls to
which testify historic events recorded in ancient sacred texts and historical
sources, the human society was definitely superior to ours and the average man
was not as lowly as today's disoriented, toxic beings.
On
the basis of the existing documentation, we can understand that the interaction
among soul, body and character is primarily performed in the heart, the solar
plexus, and the mind; however, in the past, this function was very different
from what occurs among today's humans. The heart and the solar plexus played
indeed a more conclusive role, whereas the mind was limited merely in the
representation of the human being's individuality to the other spiritual and
material beings.
In
the Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic writing, the ideogram D 1 (head in profile)
was used to write the word 'tp' (head) and the word 'tpy' (chief); it was also
used to denote several other expressions such 'tp nefer' (good beginning), etc.
(see Sir Alan Gardiner, Egyptian Grammar, p. 449-450 (485-486 of the 683 pages
of the PDF) and p. 599-600 (635-636 of the 683 pages of the PDF). In detail: https://ia802809.us.archive.org/31/items/egyptiangrammar_202001/Egyptian%20Grammar.pdf
Also:
https://www.archaeopress.com/Archaeopress/Products/9781803274775
https://www.brainhq.com/brain-connection/think-like-an-ancient-egyptian-the-first-mention-of-the-brain/
https://medium.com/@allisonwilam/how-did-ancient-egyptians-conceptualize-the-human-mind-765886b1fec4
In
our world, words like 'brainless' and 'mindless' have rather negative
connotation, but this is due only to the reality of the decayed, terminable
societies in which we are living. In spite of the fact that the average people
in the Western world were certainly more mindful and less corrupt before one
century, the then prevailing situation was definitely inferior to the
conditions of spiritual-religious-intellectual-cultural life which had been
present in the pre-Renaissance societies, let alone the world of the Ancient
Oriental civilizations.
During
human life, three main sectors of every human being's individuality are formed
at the intersections between the soul and the body, thus creating the
uniqueness of every character: the sentimental (in the heart), the libidinal (or
desiderative; in the solar plexus), and the mental (in the brain). However, neither
these words have now the same meaning that they had before 4000 years nor the
functionality of the sectors is the same.
V.
Mind without thoughts; heart without sentiments; solar plexus without desires
The
Ancient Oriental civilizations cover the longest period in the History of mankind;
but from the early urban agglomerations in Southern Mesopotamia (4000 BCE) to
the Iranian Conquest of Babylon (by Cyrus the Great; 539 BCE), the human
societies experienced many ups and downs in terms of spirituality, moral
decency, sapiential authority, imperial universalism, sacerdotal cult,
scientific knowledge, cultural dignity, and social prosperity. The same
concerns indeed the Late Antiquity (539 BCE-622 CE) and the Christian and
Islamic Times (622-1453 CE).
From
Sargon of Akkad (2334–2279 BCE) to the Neo-Sumerian Ur-Nammu (2112–2094 BCE),
and from the Sumerian Urukagina (24th century BCE) to the Amorite Babylonian Hammurapi
(1792-1750 BCE), there was no evolution, but interminable volatility; one breakthrough
was followed by one setback and vice versa. The same situation was valid in
Egypt, Anatolia, Cush, and Canaan; and in later periods, it concerned the
entire Earth. When we attempt to reconstitute the past, it is essential to
always remember this fact. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargon_of_Akkad
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urukagina
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur-Nammu
https://cdli.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/postings/185
https://cdli.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/artifacts/464358
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammurabi
Because
we excavate, decipher, study, transliterate, translate and comprehend ancient
texts that date back to the 1st, the 2nd or the 3rd millennium BCE, and in view
of the fact that we find some parallels with our times (example: an enormous
documentation about commercial activities, economic transactions,
administrative tasks, private correspondence, etc.), this does not mean that we
should project on them the value, the importance and the notion that these acts
have for us. The people, who were the creators of all these preserved documents
that we explore, were very different from us.
Even
today, any money dealing and/or financial operation does not have the same meaning
for a faithful, pious person living in a remote region in India or Africa and
for an atheist or an agnostic inhabitant of a major urban agglomeration
somewhere in the US or Japan. Within a totally different cultural milieu,
everything gets an entirely dissimilar meaning. It is essential to take this
reality into account, because entire schools of historical research (like the
Soviet historiography or the French School of the Annals) were formed on the
wrong basis of preconceived ideological imperatives and unrestrained projection
of modern standards onto the Antiquity. Even worse for philosophically based
academic militants and academic extremists who elaborated supposedly historical
researches only to corroborate the absurd and nonsensical ideas of nominalism,
rationalism, Anglo-Saxon empiricism, materialism and evolutionism! German
historicism was also heavily impacted by this approach (projecting modern
standards onto past periods).
It
may be true that thoughts are created in the mind, sentiments are formed in the
heart, and desires are shaped in the solar plexus, but this reality has
multiple limits. First of all, this situation is relevant to the fall of
mankind; under perfect conditions, humans should not have thoughts, sentiments
and desires. These three sectors of individuality within the context of a
sinful life (and this is life after the original sin) tend to convert the
individual into a person; and this situation makes humans proliferate the sins.
Second,
it is wrong to believe that you can think only through your mind. It is also
possible for humans to think through their heart and/or solar plexus.
Similarly,
it is also feasible for humans to develop and express sentiments through their
mind and/or solar plexus.
Last,
it is quite achievable for individuals to form desires through their mind and
heart.
It
all hinges on the essence of the three intersections or interfaces between the
soul and the body; in fact, the brain (the mind), the heart, and the solar
plexus are diverse windows that humans possess and can use in order to make the
particularity of their individuality known to the universes.
At
this point, in the wake of the aforementioned, a consequential question may
come from an attentive reader.
If
under perfect conditions a human should not have thoughts, sentiments and
desires, what are then the brain, the heart, and the solar plexus good for?
Or,
alternatively, what is it to be processed by the brain, the heart, and the
solar plexus, if thoughts, sentiments, and desires are to be eliminated?
Responding
to such a question is difficult, because it is almost impossible for today's
man to even assume the functions of the original man's body and to envision how
the synergy between his soul and body worked. However, ancient sacred texts and
prayers include several hints about how life according to the purpose of the
Creation had to be, and on some occasions, how it was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaru
https://www.osirisnet.net/tombes/artisans/sennedjem1/e_sennedjem1_01.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sennedjem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servant_in_the_Place_of_Truth
https://egyptsites.wordpress.com/2009/02/07/tomb-of-sennedjem-tt1/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TT1
https://madainproject.com/tt1_(tomb_of_sennedjem)
The
brain, the heart, and the solar plexus were crucial for the original human in
order to play a role that today's fallen humans cannot possibly fathom. The
three intersections or interfaces between the soul and the body had the scope
to best connect the human being with the Twelve Supreme Divine Beings. This
supreme spiritual hierarchy has been differently identified and described in
various cultures and civilizations. To some they constitute independently
created forms of Divine Rule; to others they consist in inherent Names of God.
This differentiation is due to divergent methods of spiritual comprehension and
to distinct efforts to express in words (and structured human language) situations
that exist in the spiritual universe.
In
fact, 'Creation' is a later concept, and as such, it is perhaps less clear and
less accurate than the earlier accepted notion of 'Emanation'. Referring to the
former, we must admit that it produces (in us) a feeling and an understanding
of distinction between the 'Creator' and the 'created' (or the 'creature');
when using the latter to comprehend sacred texts about what people today call
'Creation', we avert such misunderstandings, because we can easily assess that
the 'emanated' (or 'emanation') is more or less consubstantial with the Divine
Source from where it came forth.
To
describe the Twelve Supreme Divine Beings, many modern mystics use names that
may be confusing for the average reader who belongs in a fallen society. It may
be correct to call them 'fundamental truths' (which is the term used by Franz
Bardon) but in such case, we risk leaving readers with the impression that
these 'truths' are abstract 'ideas', 'concepts' or 'principles'. However, this
would be wrong, because the first emanated spiritual beings are as real and
substantive as the Angels and other hierarchies in the spiritual universe. As a
matter of fact, there is nothing abstract in the spiritual and the material
universes, except the lie; but this is off topic.
Now,
the Creation of the Man was apparently undertaken in a way to duly empower men
to be actively participant in the varied circumstances of the spiritual and the
material universes; amongst others, this involved the ability to interface with
the Twelve Supreme Divine Beings, who are the terminal reference (before God
Himself) of every created being. This may sound as a form of polytheism but it
is not; on the contrary, it is a confirmation of true, and not fake,
monotheism. Confusion at this point may be due to the fact that I did not name
the first emanations. So, before I explain the original purpose ascribed to the
brain, the heart, and the solar plexus of the human being, I will specify the
members of the highest spiritual hierarchy.
Twelve Supreme Divine Beings
- Guardians of the Axis of Being–Nonbeing
God-Unity
/ Oneness
Immortality
Omnipresence
Lawfulness
- Guardians of the Axis of Being–Becoming
Purity
Wisdom
Piety
/ Love
Omnipotence
- Guardians of the Space of the Emanation of Forms
Omniscience
Royalty
/Nobility
Justice
/ Magnanimity
Procreation
This
classification shows to some extent the assignments ascribed to the three
groups of Guardians that make the Twelve Supreme Divine Beings. There can certainly
be, and actually there have been, other classifications as per different
regroupments, which represent separate human efforts and independent attempts
to better fathom the role and comprehend the function of the supreme hierarchy
in the spiritual and material universes. One of them was the Ancient Egyptian Khemenu
School of Wisdom (also known as the Hermupolitan Ogdoad). About:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ḫmnyw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermopolis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogdoad_(Egyptian)
https://henadology.wordpress.com/theology/netjeru/hermopolitan-ogdoad/
With
the aforementioned members of the supreme spiritual hierarchy men were created
able to communicate
a-
through their heart with the Guardians of the Axis of Being–Nonbeing,
b-
through their brain (mind) with the Guardians of the Axis of Being–Becoming,
and
c-
through their solar plexus with the Guardians of the Space of the Emanation of
Forms.
In
fact, for the original and the antediluvian man, the contact with the Twelve
Supreme Divine Beings had the function of going to resources. And this shows
why the heart was considered as the most important organ or part of the human
body by the Ancient Egyptians; it was the intersection or interface with the
Supreme Divine Beings that were ascribed the guardianship of the Axis of Being
and Nonbeing, i.e. the most crucial foundation of the Creation. This tells us
that due to his heart (not mind, not solar plexus) a sinful human being may end
up (not in Hell but) in the Nonbeing, which is the worst eventuality that can
happen to anyone.
Furthermore,
we can certainly deduce that for the Ancient Egyptians, the solar plexus played
a more important role than the brain (mind) during the lifespan of a human
being in the material universe. This is so because, although the Space of the
Emanation of Forms is situated on the Axis of Being–Becoming, and it therefore
consists in a part of it, it is there where the volition becomes impulsively
creative and transformatory events come to pass. In addition, the embalming
procedures of the Ancient Egyptians fully demonstrate the veracity of the
aforementioned statement because the stomach, the liver, the lungs, and the
intestines were carefully placed and preserved in the Canopic jars, whereas the
brain was merely taken out (excerebration) and disposed of.
The
distinction is already clear at the level of the Twelve Supreme Divine Beings;
the Guardians of the Axis of Being–Becoming guarantee the continuity of the
Axis, but the Guardians of the Space of the Emanation of Forms ensure and
stimulate its effective functionality.
When
the early functionality of the brain, the heart, and the solar plexus gradually
stopped being important, the respective parts of the human body started working
for the needs of a deformed human character that was excessively sinful and
counterfeit. Then,
-
the heart, instead of pondering about existential questions, rejoicing in the
Oneness of the universes, and seeking recomfort in the praise of God, started
emitting praises for the split individuality of the early human being and for
all those who were viewed as 'friends' of the fallen man's 'ego';
-
the brain, instead of generating considerations and ruminations about the human
contribution to the Divine-initiated purpose of Becoming, started making thoughts
and plans to serve the 'ego', which appeared to be a real cancerous tumor; and
-
the solar plexus, instead of creating the conditions, which would transform the
universes as per the purpose of the Creation, started forming lascivious
desires for the needs of the voluptuous 'ego' of every member of a fallen
society.
It
is clear that for the Ancient Egyptians, the heart and the solar plexus were
far more active intersections or interfaces with the supreme hierarchy and, in
general, with the spiritual universe than the mind. As task, the communication
with the Guardians of the Axis of Being–Becoming and the ensuing human
considerations and ruminations did not have the strength of vigilance that the incessant
praise of God involves, when it comes to the heart and its role. On the other
hand, the communication with the Guardians of the Space of the Emanation of
Forms demanded absolute devotion, concentration, and strength of attraction.
For
this reason, the need for permanent calmness in the mind led the Ancient
Egyptians to the establishment of a parallel with Nu (or Nun), who -as element
of the Khemenu Hermupolitan religious dogma- represented what we now call the "Soft
Waters" in binary, masculine and feminine, forms (Nun and Nunet). The
topic has many analogies with the Sumerian-Akkadian-Assyrian-Babylonian sacred
texts and with Ea portrayed as the Divine Wisdom and the Creator of human
intelligence. To effectively play its role as intersection and interface with
the spiritual universe, the brain (mind) has to be absolutely calm and unquestionably
serene; this is something that modern humans have never experienced and
therefore are genuinely unable to possibly understand - with the exception of
various mystics and wise elders of remote realms that are safe and far from the
technological rubbish.
That's
why, as I already said, the Ancient Egyptians established a parallel between the
human mind and Nun, a primordial element that can be linguistically affiliated
with Nen, which means "inactivity". And this is exactly what the
contemplation about the Becoming demands: spiritual and physical inertia that
renders the mystic forceful.
Nun,
as embodiment of the human brain (mind), stands at the origin of the Ancient
Greek name 'noos' or 'nous'; however, being the trivial and inconsequential
pupils of the Ancient Egyptian high priests, mystics and spiritual masters, the
Ancient Greek philosophers failed to understand that the mind ('noos' or
'nous') had a limited scope of contemplation, namely the generation of
considerations and ruminations about the human contribution to the
Divine-initiated purpose of Becoming. They confused the roles of the heart, the
brain (mind), and the solar plexus, they associated volition with thinking, and
to eventually understand the universes, they started committing the two worst
mistakes in this regard:
-
they believed that by thinking they can learn, know and explore, whereas the
opposite is correct, and
-
they parameterized everything to their "ego" whereas their sole
chance of potentially reaching the truth would have been to first eliminate it.
When,
3500 years after the Golden Age of the Ancient Egyptian kingdom, Muslim mystics
of the Golden Era of Islamic Civilization started exploring and defining the
mysteries of the Twelve Supreme and Divine Names of Allah (Laa illaha
illallaah, Allah, Hu, Haqq, Hayy, Qayyoum, Qahhar, Wahhab, Fattah, Waahid,
Ahas, Samad), they did not know how spiritually close they were to their
Sumerian, Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian and Egyptian forerunners.
The
difference between the Twelve Supreme Divine Beings, according to the Ancient
Oriental spiritual masters, and the Twelve Supreme and Divine Names of Allah,
as per the Muslim mystics is merely a matter of differently structured
comprehension. And what if all the Names of God are 99 as specified by Muslim
theologians? From the Twelve Supreme Divine Beings numerous Derivative Divine Beings
emanated to best attract all created beings to the scope of the Creation.
About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nu_(mythology)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nous
h
ttps://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/νόος#Ancient_Greek
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pronoia
h
ttps://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/πρόνοια
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Dynasty_of_Egypt
https://www.scribd.com/document/110697437/The-Mysteries-of-the-12-Supreme-and-Divine-Names-of-Allah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_God_in_Islam
VI.
At the antipodes of the Ancient Spiritual Sciences, Modern Psychology produces
monsters, leading to the extermination of mankind
In the modern Western
world, people live with the panic that humans may one day rediscover their
souls and reestablish the necessary (for their survival) synergy between their
souls and bodies. To eliminate the cause of panic, modern scholars and vicious
fraudsters fabricated the falsehood of the modern science of psychology; the fraudulent
nature of the science has been explicitly demonstrated already in its odd name.
By using the Ancient Greek words "psyche" (soul) and "logos"
(study; among several other meanings), they set up "the scientific study
of the human mind and its functions, especially those affecting behaviour in a
given context" (according to an authoritative definition); that's utterly
nonsensical, hypocritical, biased and heinous.
The reason for this
evaluation is simple: if they intended to focus on "the scientific study
of the human mind" and they wanted to utilize Ancient Greek words for
their scientific discipline, they would name it "noology", because
the Ancient Greek word for "mind" is "nous" (or
"noos"). In any case, there is nothing about soul in modern
psychology. About:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/logos
https://www.ibat.ie/ibat-college-blog/how-can-enrolling-in-a-diploma-in-psychology-help-you-understand-the-human-mind.html
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/nous
Even worse, the
prevailing, absurd dogmas of nominalism, rationalism, Anglo-Saxon empiricism, materialism, and
evolutionism prevent
the ordinary study of the human soul and the spiritual universe, which was
designated as "Divina Studia" in Latin during the Late Antiquity and
the Christian-Islamic times.
Taking into
consideration the fact that the soul is not the mind, we have to conclude that
what the founders of modern psychology and psychoanalysis really intended to do
comprised of the following targets:
i- blocking and
discrediting all paths to spirituality, spiritual exercises and practices;
ii- averting the spread
of the Divina Studia (Spiritual Sciences) among humans;
iii- preventing the
study of the soul, its interaction with the body, and the formation of the
character;
iv- presenting the
human character as of entirely material dimension;
v- denying the
existence of the soul, and of the spiritual universe;
vi- prohibiting the
academic historical research about several ancient nations' beliefs about the
soul, the spiritual universe, and its interaction with the material universe;
and
vii- distorting or
concealing ancient texts, which comprehensively documented several ancient
nations' beliefs about the soul, the spiritual universe, and its interaction
with the material universe.
The monstrous and
calamitous results of Modern Psychology have been widely noticed since the 19th
c.; most of the wars, the genocides, the hysterical hatred, and the abysmal
anomalies that have taken place or been expressed worldwide are due to the
enormous fraud called "modern psychology" and its numerous
side-effects.
Many people believe
that Nazi Germany expelled several psychologists and limited the scope of work
of many others, because the founders of psychoanalysis were Zionists; that's
entirely wrong. As example in this regard, I present the following excerpt from
the Wikipedia, which is totally erroneous.
"In Germany after
World War I, psychology held institutional power through the military, which
was subsequently expanded along with the rest of the military during Nazi
Germany. Under the direction of Hermann Göring's cousin Matthias Göring, the
Berlin Psychoanalytic Institute was renamed the Göring Institute. Freudian
psychoanalysts were expelled and persecuted under the anti-Jewish policies of the
Nazi Party, and all psychologists had to distance themselves from Freud and
Adler, founders of psychoanalysis who were also Jewish".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology#Consolidation_and_funding
The grave mistake is
not in the facts that are herewith stated clearly; it has to do with what is
not stated. As a matter of fact, all the Nazi elite members were already
significantly affected by the modern bogus-science of psychology, by its
vicious association with Eugenics-related research, groups of paranoid
gangsters, and funding organizations, and by the devilish system of psychoanalysis.
The best proofs for this are Hitler himself and his texts.
If, in the light of
earlier units of the present article, an objective reader goes through, and tries
to assess, the following excerpt from his "Mein Kampf" (Volume One -
A Reckoning; Chapter VI: War Propaganda), he will be immensely astounded. I
also add that the excerpt in question had already been quoted by Wilhelm Reich
in his "The Mass Psychology of Fascism":
"The
people in their overwhelming majority are so feminine by nature and attitude
that sober reasoning determines their thoughts and actions far less than
emotion and feeling. And this sentiment is not complicated, but very simple and
all of a piece. It does not have multiple shadings; it has a positive and a
negative; love or hate, right or wrong, truth or lie, never half this way and
half that way, never partially, or that kind of thing".
https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/monsters/drake/Lecture%20Notes/mein_kampf_by_adolf_hitler.htm
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8197594-the-people-in-their-overwhelming-majority-are-so-feminine-by
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mass_Psychology_of_Fascism
Any unbiased reader and
observer can easily comprehend the unprecedented extent of the extreme
calamity, which befell on the mankind, by comparing this confused, heinous and
nonsensical dictum with the Forty Two (42) Negative Confessions that the
Ancient Egyptians lived their entire lives in order to empower their souls to
utter in the Hereafter, when they would be processed through the Hall of
Judgment in order to face the Forty
Two (42) Assessors of Maat. I
herewith make available one of the existing versions of the 42 Confessions,
which have been preserved in several papyri.
Hail, Usekh-nemmt, who
comest forth from Anu, I have not committed sin.
Hail, Hept-khet, who
comest forth from Kher-aha, I have not committed robbery with violence.
Hail, Fenti, who comest
forth from Khemenu, I have not stolen.
Hail, Am-khaibit, who
comest forth from Qernet, I have not slain men and women.
Hail, Neha-her, who
comest forth from Rasta, I have not stolen grain.
Hail, Ruruti, who
comest forth from heaven, I have not purloined offerings.
Hail, Arfi-em-khet, who
comest forth from Suat, I have not stolen the property of God.
Hail, Neba, who comest
and goest, I have not uttered lies.
Hail, Set-qesu, who
comest forth from Hensu, I have not carried away food.
Hail, Utu-nesert, who
comest forth from Het-ka-Ptah, I have not uttered curses.
Hail, Qerrti, who
comest forth from Amentet, I have not committed adultery, I have not lain with
men.
Hail, Her-f-ha-f, who
comest forth from thy cavern, I have made none to weep.
Hail, Basti, who comest
forth from Bast, I have not eaten the heart.
Hail, Ta-retiu, who
comest forth from the night, I have not attacked any man.
Hail, Unem-snef, who
comest forth from the execution chamber, I am not a man of deceit.
Hail, Unem-besek, who
comest forth from Mabit, I have not stolen cultivated land.
Hail, Neb-Maat, who
comest forth from Maati, I have not been an eavesdropper.
Hail, Tenemiu, who
comest forth from Bast, I have not slandered [no man].
Hail, Sertiu, who
comest forth from Anu, I have not been angry without just cause.
Hail, Tutu, who comest
forth from Ati, I have not debauched the wife of any man.
Hail, Uamenti, who
comest forth from the Khebt chamber, I have not debauched the wife of [any]
man.
Hail, Maa-antuf, who
comest forth from Per-Menu, I have not polluted myself.
Hail, Her-uru, who
comest forth from Nehatu, I have terrorized none.
Hail, Khemiu, who
comest forth from Kaui, I have not transgressed [the law].
Hail, Shet-kheru, who
comest forth from Urit, I have not been wroth.
Hail, Nekhenu, who
comest forth from Heqat, I have not shut my ears to the words of truth.
Hail, Kenemti, who
comest forth from Kenmet, I have not blasphemed.
Hail, An-hetep-f, who
comest forth from Sau, I am not a man of violence.
Hail, Sera-kheru, who
comest forth from Unaset, I have not been a stirrer up of strife.
Hail, Neb-heru, who
comest forth from Netchfet, I have not acted with undue haste.
Hail, Sekhriu, who
comest forth from Uten, I have not pried into matters.
Hail, Neb-abui, who
comest forth from Sauti, I have not multiplied my words in speaking.
Hail, Nefer-Tem, who
comest forth from Het-ka-Ptah, I have wronged none, I have done no evil.
Hail, Tem-Sepu, who
comest forth from Tetu, I have not worked witchcraft against the king.
Hail, Ari-em-ab-f, who
comest forth from Tebu, I have never stopped [the flow of] water.
Hail, Ahi, who comest
forth from Nu, I have never raised my voice.
Hail, Uatch-rekhit, who
comest forth from Sau, I have not cursed God.
Hail, Neheb-ka, who
comest forth from thy cavern, I have not acted with arrogance.
Hail, Neheb-nefert, who
comest forth from thy cavern, I have not stolen the bread of the gods.
Hail, Tcheser-tep, who
comest forth from the shrine, I have not carried away the khenfu cakes from the
Spirits of the dead.
Hail, An-af, who comest
forth from Maati, I have not snatched away the bread of the child, nor treated
with contempt the god of my city.
Hail, Hetch-abhu, who
comest forth from Ta-she, I have not slain the cattle belonging to the god.
https://houseoftruth.education/en/library/sacred-writings/egyptian-book-of-the-dead-42-negative-confessions
Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assessors_of_Maat
Download the article in PDF:
https://megalommatis.wordpress.com/2024/10/09/the-perception-of-the-divine-i/
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_13617%2Fall
https://www.academia.edu/124640118/The_Perception_of_the_Divine_I
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/gDKwQNhKku?
https://pubhtml5.com/jxyro/hthn/
https://online.fliphtml5.com/qynhg/cjta/
https://anyflip.com/fdfzl/dfrj/
https://www.calameo.com/read/007156897ffb26644b74e
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/The_Perception_of_the_Divine_-_I/27215478?file=49759170
https://www.patreon.com/posts/113973864
