The present article
consists in a brief outlook of the nature of the diverse educational systems
either in the rising and falling imperial realms or in the chaotic and
worthless republics that lack sanctity, legitimacy, and humanity. Here you will
find its third part. The earlier two parts you can read here:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2021/04/14/secular-education-oriental-empires-cultural-nations-spirituality-religion-theology-down-to-renaissance-part-i/
and
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2021/04/15/renaissance-colonialism-anti-christian-western-european-politics-fake-historicity-political-nations-and-historical-education-part-ii/
This series of articles
will be completed with the fourth part, which will be published shortly.
XVII.
An Example of Failed State with no Historical Education: the Ottoman Empire
opposite the Rum Mutiny that the French and the English termed 'Greek
Revolution'
An excellent example of
19th - 20th c. failed state is the Ottoman Empire.
First, the idiotic,
corrupt and worthless sultans and their ignorant and pathetic sheikhulislams
thought erroneously that, as Muslims, they would have the favor and the
blessings of God against the Rum 'infidels' (gâvur), who -incited by the
English and the French- rebelled in the South Balkan confines in 1821; that was
silly and absurd. As a matter of fact, the Ottoman Empire did not represent
Islam, but the shame of Islam. And the use of the term gâvur for the Christian
Orthodox Rumlar reveals the attitude of a Satanist, not a Muslim.
The local, ignorant and
paranoid elite of Ottoman Constantinople (the city was finally named officially
'Istanbul' only thanks to Kemal Ataturk) thought that they believed in the
religion preached by prophet Muhammad, but in reality they believed in
irrelevant, useless and heretic theological teachings that were dated many
centuries after the death of prophet Muhammad. The consequences of the Ottoman
evildoing were noticed quite soon: in 1826, the pseudo-Islamic
Constantinopolitan theological cholera forced the Sultan to massacre the
Janissaries and to ban the Bektashi Order; and in 1828, the secession of the
(fabricated by the Anglo-French) pseudo-state of Greece was a fact. It was
merely the normal consequence.
It would surely appear
awkward that a state and a government, which were so profoundly characterized
by self-ignorance and lack of knowledge of their own country's History, could
possibly know their enemies, bother to learn the history of their enemies'
proxies, and be smart enough to study and outdo the historical lies diffused by
their enemies. However, I intend to herewith offer few paradigms of incredible and
only self-disastrous Ottoman ignorance, indifference and complacency that
brought the entire empire down. I will limit the paradigms of Ottoman lack of
elementary historical education, and of its catastrophic consequences only to
the rather minor case of the secession of 'Greece' in 1828. Far more important
case was indeed the secession of Misir/Egypt, following Napoleon's invasion of
the Valley of the Nile in 1798; this was so. because of Misir's/Egypt's very
important geo-strategic location.
XVIII.
Adamantios Korais: the Ottoman Native, who fabricated the language that sent
the Ottoman Eastern Romans (Rumlar), transformed into Modern Greeks, up to the
outskirts of Ankara 100 years later
Second, the Ottoman
authorities believed that the outcome of the confrontation with the Eastern
Roman (Rumlar) rebels of Mora (Peloponnesus) would be determined exclusively in
the battlefield; that was a pathetic and ludicrous assumption. In fact, the
independence of the pseudo-Greek state had been prepared several decades before
1828 in France's colonial pseudo-universities whereby a fake Modern Greek language
was fabricated by Adamantios Korais (1748-1833), an Izmir-born Eastern Roman
peddler recruited by the secret services of France for the purpose of the
progressive dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.
However, the worthless
Ottomans knew nothing about all that, caring only about their material
possessions, their Satanic harem, and their fake religion that had nothing in
common with Islam (being merely a false reading and a magnificence ignorance of
it). Quite idiotically, the Ottomans believed that their insidious deeds would
be enough to save them; but as it is well-known, fake religions only destroy
those who believe them and they never saved anyone.
After his studies,
Korais undertook the fabrication of a pseudo-language with French syntax-
grammar-usage and Greek vocabulary, eliminating the bulk of the then existing
linguistic treasure among the indigenous local Eastern Romans (Rumlar) of the
Ottoman Empire's South Balkan confines, only for the sake of a theoretical, racist
'Greek' ('Hellenic') purity. This inhuman fact reveals -in and by itself- the
inhuman absurdity of the 'political nation'; if Korais' linguistic construction
was taught to the Zulus, the Zulus would be comfortably presented as
'descendants of the 'Ancient Greeks' by the perfidious Anglo-French gangsters. But,
as we know, the Zulus did not have the correct color! However, the stupid
Sultan and the idiotic sheikhulislam had no clue about all these developments,
because they did not care about the down-to-Earth reality, but about their
nonsensical and delusional, pseudo-Islamic theological doctrines and
aberrations.
It was then obvious
that one of the most important components of the Ottoman Empire, namely the
Eastern Romans (Rumlar) of the South Balkan Peninsula, was -at least partly- targeted
for cultural extinction and spiritual genocide by the French colonial
gangsters. The pre-fabricated linguistic monster, i.e. the fake Modern Greek
language, would apparently be later imposed as national and official language
throughout the state that France, England and Russia would produce in due
course of time.
But the naïve, ignorant
and insensible Ottoman authorities could not possibly grasp the colossal
tsunami that the Anglo-French colonial gangsters were unleashing against the
Ottoman Empire; this was apparently an enormous tsunami that would make the
obsolete and otherwise useless state of the comical and egopathic sultans and
the paranoid and pseudo-Islamic authority of the villainous, deleterious and
evil sheikhulislams shake from its foundations. Those idiots wanted to rule and
represent the entire Islamic world, but they were absolute incapable of
understanding what it meant that the English and the French academics,
intellectuals, diplomats and agents were mentoring selected Eastern Roman (Rum)
Orthodox natives of the Ottoman Empire, teaching them that they were the
descendants of the Ancient Greeks (which was then known to all that it was an
enormous lie) and that they would deserve an independent state of gigantic
proportions.
And this is actually what
happened between 1787, when Korais submitted his doctoral thesis, and 1828,
when the ethnically heterogeneous Slavic-, Arvanitic-, Turkish-, Vlach- and
other idioms-speaking Eastern Romans of South Rumeli became independent. It
took only 40 years for the Anglo-French criminals to sign the death warranty of
the unsuspecting, brainless, and lethargic sultans, who were lost in their
delusion of being the 'defenders of Islam', while being unable to discern what
was going on under their nose. But the useless Ottoman Empire, which is the
best example to avoid, was a so dysfunctional and so purposeless state that
could not monitor any act and deed undertaken by its own enemies in view of its
demise.
XIX.
Fallmerayer: the German Historian who unveiled the Truth about the Fake Greeks
in 1830, met the Sultan, but was not appointed as Ottoman Grand Vizier
Third, even worse, the
pseudo-Muslim imbeciles of the Ottoman Empire, after losing the provinces of
Egypt and Greece, still did not understand anything and continued living in
their pseudo-Islamic darkness, ignorance and barbarism. In 1830, one of Europe's
foremost historians, Jakob Philipp Fallmerayer (1790-1861), published the first
volume of his legendary treatise 'Geschichte der Halbinsel Morea während des
Mittelalters' (History of the Morea Peninsula during the Middle Ages). In his
masterpiece, he expanded much, presenting all the important historical sources
that fully demonstrate that the South Balkan Rum population, which was
viciously called 'Greeks' ('Hellenes') by the academic, intellectual and
diplomatic elites of France and England, was not Greek at all.
Fallmerayer fully
demonstrated that the Ancient Greeks were exterminated during the overwhelming persecution
of pagans in the Roman Empire; that event lasted from the times of Constantine
I (306-337) to the reign of Justinian I (527-565) and further on, until the end
of the 8th c., when the few hundreds of remaining pagans resisted being christened
and were executed in the extreme southern confines of Morea (Peloponnesus)
Peninsula.
The great German historian
specified that the physical elimination of the Ancient Greeks was not only a
matter of persecution and physical extermination due to their vividly polytheistic
and Anti-Christian beliefs, their insolent cult practices, and their daily
activities; as a matter of fact, the final and irreversible extinction of the
Ancient Greeks from the entire South Balkan Peninsula was due to the severe
depopulation caused because of the numerous invasions and migrations, which
took place throughout Europe for a period of at least 700 years, namely 100-800
CE.
By systematically and
extensively referring to the Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine VII
Porphyrogenitus (920-959), who was a prominent scholar and a consummate
historian, Fallmerayer revealed some of the most important historical sources
that bear witness to the fact that all the modern inhabitants of the Morea
Peninsula are basically of Slavic origin; today's revivalist Anglo-French
colonials and their pseudo-Greek stooges and scullions may ridiculously call
Morea Peninsula 'Peloponnesus', but the truth is that, when the Slavic
ancestors of today's pseudo-Greeks settled there around 600 CE, the land was
almost totally uninhabited.
Focusing on later
periods, the prominent German historian highlighted the Albanian, Vlach and
Turkic migrations and the settlement of these migrant populations in the lands
that were selected by the English and French colonial gangsters in order to set
up their vassal, pseudo-Greek statelet. In fact, only two years after Fake
Greece was instituted, Fallmerayer annulled the reasons of its genocidal
existence. This is the most spectacular conclusion that Europe's leading early
19th c. historian drew:
"Das Geschlecht der Hellenen ist in Europa
ausgerottet. Schönheit der Körper, Sonnenflug des Geistes, Ebenmaß und Einfalt
der Sitte, Kunst, Rennbahn, Stadt, Dorf, Säulenpracht und Tempel, ja sogar der
Name ist von der Oberfläche des griechischen Kontinents verschwunden.... auch
nicht ein Tropfen echten und ungemischten Hellenenblutes in den Adern der
christlichen Bevölkerung des heutigen Griechenlands fließet".
A rough English
translation reads:
"The race of
the Hellenes has been exterminated in Europe. Beauty of the body, sun flight of
the spirit, symmetry and simplicity of custom, art, racecourse, city, village,
colonnade and temple, yes even the name has disappeared from the surface of the
Greek continent ... not even a drop of real and unmixed Hellenic blood flows in
the veins of the Christian population of today's Greece".
Immediately, there was
an enormous, hysterical reaction against Fallmerayer, his books, and his
perfectly well documented and solid argumentation; this was due to the fact
that his magnificent opus revealed the truth about the nefarious Anglo-French
conspiracy against the Ottoman Empire and also about the crime committed by the
genocidal state of Fake Greece against the non-Greek inhabitants of the seceded
territories, who were exposed to the forced, tyrannical, monstrous and hideous
process of Hellenization. All the various puppets, stooges, and lackeys of the
colonial regimes throughout Europe were bribed, commanded and mobilized in
order to save the Frankenstein-like, monstrous pseudo-nation that the evil
ateliers and the bogus-universities of France and England had just manufactured.
It was then that the pathetic pseudo-state of 'Greece' hired several ignorant
and ridiculous scullions like Constantine Paparrigopoulos to pen a diatribe
against the leading European scholar, who had just proved that the illusory
pseudo-state 'Greece' should not exist.
As the one of the
world's most authoritative historians, Fallmerayer encountered king Otto I of
Greece in 1847 and few months later, he was summoned by Sultan Abdulmejid I (1839-1861;
Birinci Abdülmecid / (عبد المجيد اول, who
offered a Certificate of Honor to the German scholar. But what was the effect
of the entire story on the Ottoman Empire's decision-making and national
defense against the Anglo-French machinations? Nothing! The Ottoman
administration, influenced by the villainous pseudo-Islamic theologians, was
genuinely unable to comprehend that the future of the Ottoman Empire hinged on
Fallmerayer's book, and not on the Quran. Instead of translating it into
Ottoman Turkish, Arabic, Farsi, Russian, Italian, Spanish, French and English,
to use it as a means of denunciation of the Anglo-French monstrosity, they
prepared a Certificate of Honor as if scholars and erudite polymaths like the
German historian needed extra papers! Instead of carefully studying it in order
to assess the unprecedented extent of the colonial menace, they went back to
their fully useless five prayers per day! Instead of concluding about the
correct counter-measures to the formation of the pseudo-Greek state, the
Ottomans did nothing! That's why 100 years later there was no Ottoman Empire –
thank God!
XX.
Dimitrios Byzantios' Babylonia: an Ottoman Rum's (Eastern Roman's) Play that reconfirmed
Fallmerayer's Historical Verdict
Only six years after
the publication of Fallmerayer's outstanding study, an Eastern Roman Orthodox
intellectual, author, and Ottoman native, born in Istanbul in 1790, came to
give the final, irreversible and permanent blow to the credibility of the
prefab pseudo-state of Greece. This came in another form – not as a historical analysis
and synthesis, but as literary reflection of the daily life of the various
indigenous people, who lived at the time in the South Balkan provinces of the
Ottoman Empire and spoke many different languages, being therefore totally
unable to understand one another.
Dimitrios Haji-Aslan
Konstantinoğlu (later known as Dimitrios Byzantios, 1790-1853) was an Eastern
Roman Orthodox polymath, fluent in his native Eastern Roman (Romeika / ρωμέικα) language and in several other
languages, notably Ottoman Turkish, Farsi and Arabic. Like all the other
Eastern Romans (Rumlar) of the Ottoman Empire, he knew very well that he was
not 'Greek', that his mother tongue was not 'Greek', and that at those days in
the South Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, which became independent in
1828, many different nations lived speaking different languages from province
to province, from city to city, and from village to village.
Dimitrios Haji-Aslan
Konstantinoğlu was a distinguished member of the Ottoman elite and administration;
in the 1810s, he served in Tunis as interpreter of the local bey - a high rank
of the imperial administration at the local level. When the English and the
French instigated the Morea Peninsula mutiny in 1821, he went there and managed
to be a member of the illegal, clandestine and self-styled 'Peloponnesian Senate',
i.e. a group of fanciful murderers, Anglo-French stooges, local landowners,
activists, rascals and criminals, who -performing under systematized and
incessant Anglo-French guidance and interference- supposedly impersonated the
'elected authorities' of the otherwise nonexistent Greek nation. Not one man
elected those terrorists; yet, they wanted to lead the 'struggle' for the
delusional liberation of an area inhabited by an overwhelming majority of
Muslim and Christian loyalists, who very much loved their country, i.e. the
Ottoman Empire, being unwilling to betray their ancestral land and disobey the
Ottoman authorities just for the villainous interests of the English and the
French bastards.
Although the personal
motives of Dimitrios Haji-Aslan Konstantinoğlu cannot be described as very
clear with respect to the secession of the South Balkans' Eastern Roman
Orthodox Ottoman natives, we can be sure that he deplored the fake state of
Greece in which he found himself in 1828. Although in the 1830s he had good
connections with the royal administration and he served in several important
positions, he was slandered by several people, who hated and envied him, and
then dismissed from his position in Rumeli (Phocis), which is quite normal,
taking into consideration that most of the persons around him were ignorant shepherds,
idiotic farmers, naïve seamen, lawless plunderers, criminal rapscallions, and
former gangsters. For the last two decades of his life, he lived as painter of
churches in various parts of Western Greece.
Of course, he had to be
renamed as Dimitrios Byzantios, after the purist, racist pseudo-Greek state's
processes during which dozens of thousands of toponyms and personal names were
dictatorially and inhumanely changed in order to 'prove' as 'correct' the
fallacious 'Hellenic' indoctrination, which had been fabricated by the
Anglo-French academia in order to become the foundation stone of the
pseudo-Greek statelet. 'Byzantios' meant 'Istanbulite' or 'Constantinopolitan',
after the pathetic, pseudo-historical revivalism, which has ever been the disreputable,
genocidal and necrolatrous dogma of Modern 'Greece'.
Why this name was
invented to replace the real surname of the great author and intellectual is
simple to grasp. The geographical location of Istanbul-Constantinople was
mythologized during the Antiquity as founded by the imaginary king Byzas; it
was therefore named Byzantion and inhabited by colons from Megara, an Ancient Dorian
Greek city. 'Byzantios' being an adjective derived from 'Byzantion' was used as
surname in order to purify the Turkish names 'Haji-Aslan Konstantinoğlu', which
-in and by themselves- proved that first, the pseudo-Greek state was inhumanely
racist and second, Dimitrios Byzantios was not a descendant of Ancient Greeks,
but an Eastern Roman Orthodox Christian irreversibly amalgamated with the
various Turkic migrants and Islamized Eastern Roman inhabitants of the Ottoman
Empire.
XXI.
The Tragic Revelations of Dimitrios Byzantios' Babylonia about the Fake
Statelet of Modern Greece
Dimitrios Haji-Aslan
Konstantinoğlu 'Byzantios' published 'Babylonia' in 1836. This is the
chronologically first masterpiece of literature produced in the pseudo-state of
Modern Greece. As a play, Babylonia features various Eastern Roman Orthodox characters
originating from different parts of the Ottoman Empire and the then seceded,
tiny state of 'Greece'; they all meet in the first capital of the new statelet,
namely Mora Yenişehri (Italian: 'Napoli di Romania' / English: Nauplia) as
Nafplion was then named. But unfortunately, they cannot understand one another,
because their languages are different, their traditions, behavioral systems,
and lifestyles diverge enormously, and consequently they miscommunicate and
fight against one another. The encounter and the interaction of these theatrical
characters in the play underscore the historical reality and highlight the Anglo-French
colonial crime; in addition, they constitute a real prophecy about what
happened in that cursed land that fell victim of the racist Anglo-French
machinations. Modern pseudo-Greeks of the prefab fake state have ceaselessly
fought one upon another and pitilessly killed one another for almost two
centuries in exactly the same manner the illustrious Constantinopolitan
playwright's characters do in Dimitrios Byzantios' fascinating and enthralling
Babylonia.
The only truth is that
there were no Greeks in South Balkans in the early 1800s. The different Christian
Orthodox Rumlar (Eastern Romans) of the various regions of the Ottoman Empire
were speaking languages that diverged from one another pretty much like
Castilian (Spanish) differs from Catalan, Portuguese, and Galician. If no
foreign colonial intervention took place, these different languages would
generate over the span of about a century several modern nations, because the thriving,
educated and prosperous Eastern Romans of Pontus, Cappadocia, Ionia-Aeolia and
Istanbul, Macedonia, Albania and Epirus, Rumeli, Mora, Cyprus, Crete and
Calabria were in fact speaking 10 different languages. Almost all these nations
were culturally massacred and linguistically exterminated within the Cemetery
of Nations called 'Greece' through the imposition of the fake 'Modern Greek'
language that the vicious renegade Adamantios Korais produced working as a
slave of the French academic Satanists. About:
The full text is here
(in Modern Greek):
https://el.wikisource.org/wiki/Βαβυλωνία/Πράξις_πρώτη
https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Δημήτριος_Βυζάντιος
(There is nothing about
Dimitrios Byzantios in the English Wikipedia!)
http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-no98091886/
https://books.google.bg/books/about/He_Babylonia.html?id=krUomgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
And this is exactly why
the title of the theatrical masterpiece is 'Babylonia'! It has nothing to do
with Ancient Babylon and the History of Mesopotamia! It is only an allusion to the
Judeo-Christian narrative of the Tower of Babel; it was there where all the people
started speaking many different languages and failing to understand one another.
And Dimitrios Byzantios, as a visionary and pragmatist at the same time, tells
us with his splendidly apocalyptic-eschatological play that the pseudo-Greek
state is doomed to collapse, being punished by God, and to disappear in chaos,
disorder and panic.
Thus, similarly with the
Tower of Babel and following the Rum Mutiny, the "chaos" came to Mora
Yenişehir – Nafplio in 1828. The plot is quite simple, but the play is
incredibly rich at the linguistic level and very critical at the
historical-national level. According to the story, many people
meet in a lokanta (i.e. a restaurant; this word was among the thousands of
words that were banned for all 19th c. Eastern Romans who happened to be entrapped
in the pseudo-Greek state). The lokanta is located, as I already said, in
Nafplio - Mora Yenişehir; the characters are Orthodox Christians. They are
happy because the fleets of France, Britain and Russia have just won a victory
over the Ottomans, but they will soon end up in the jail, after fighting
against one another. So, the plot is set after the naval battle in Navarino
(Naval Battle). About:
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navarin_Deniz_Muharebesi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Navarino
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibrahim_Pasha_of_Egypt#Operations_in_the_Morea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sailing_ships_of_the_Ottoman_Empire#Battle_of_Navarino_(1827)
The theatrical story
was as a matter of fact the daily reality of all Eastern Roman Orthodox natives
across the Ottoman Empire. They used the language of the Christian scriptures for
religious purposes, but it was a dead language. It was no longer the mother
tongue of anybody. They used the terminology of the last Eastern Roman Orthodox
Emperors of Constantinople to write official documents among themselves; but
that language (Early Eastern Roman) was a dead language too. It was no longer
the mother tongue of anyone. And they spoke Ottoman Turkish to communicate with
the Ottoman authorities.
However, their mother
tongues were numerous and differed from place to place, being different
amalgamations of various components: Slavic, Albanian, Vlach, Turkish, Greek,
Latin, Venetian, Arabic, and other. They all identified themselves as Eastern
Romans (Romioi-Romii/Ρωμιοί/Rumlar);
accepting the Constantinople Patriarchate as their supreme religious authority,
they were all Christian Orthodox, but, as it happened, an Eastern Roman
(Romios/Rum) from Crete and an Eastern Roman (Romios/Rum) from Yanya (Ioannina)
did not speak the same language. Sometimes, two Eastern Romans (Romii/Rumlar)
were speaking in Ottoman Turkish to better communicate between themselves.
If all these people
were to become independent and secede from the Ottoman Empire, there had to be
many small states (each of them having approximately the size of Montenegro,
Slovenia or Albania) and each small state would have a different language (as
different as Neapolitan is from Sicilian, Sardinian and Venetian). This would
be the normal, natural, historical development and the true wishes of all the
populations, which were disastrously deceived to sell their soul (identity) to
the devil (the pseudo-state of Greece) for the mere reward of ceaseless Anglo-French
lies, shameful and ridiculous praises of their fake ancestral 'achievements',
and vain promises from the 'Greek' politicians.
Because of the racist
purification process, which was a most totalitarian aberration, many thousands
of rebels lived in the mountains in 'Greece' for many decades after the
pseudo-independence (1828) to remain clean from the nauseating filth, the
hellish depravity, and the fatal corruption of the pseudo-independent statelet.
They were incessantly fighting heroically against the Bavarian and the Danish
kings that the perfidious English imposed in their 'pseudo-Greek' colony, and
they were brave enough to repeatedly deliver many merciless blows to the evil
regime of Athens. Finally, all the Eastern Roman languages that existed on the soil of the pseudo-state
disappeared around the end of the 19th c. and the beginning of the 20th c., following
the white terrorism practiced by the Athens dictators. This was what happened
in the South Balkan Ottoman provinces, after the French and British expelled
the Ottomans from there.
Dimitrios Haji-Aslan Konstantinoğlu
Byzantios' Babylonia was adapted into a feature film, released in 1970. About: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0229010/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl
You can watch the movie
here: https://ok.ru/video/1474317191789
By mere coincidence
(!?!), the 'Greek' film director's name (Yorgos Dizikirikis) is entirely
Turkish; 'diz kırığı' (diz+kırık) means 'the man who broke his knee' in
Turkish. Say 'cheers' to the South Balkans' Greek monkeys! About:
http://www.greekanimation.com/artists/dizikirikis-giorgos/
Consequently, the aforementioned
points conclude the case for the pseudo-Greek colonial state that the English
and the French created, maintained, and helped expand as per their agenda. The
attitude of many political scientists, Human Rights activists, humanitarian
intellectuals, and political commentators, who happen to focus only on the
racist state's attitude toward a) the Turkish minority in Western Thrace, b)
the Macedonian minority in Greek Macedonia, and c) the Cham Albanian minority
in Chameria (Epirus), is a disastrous mistake and a deplorable oversight.
Long before the fake
state of Greece persecuted the Western Thrace Turks, long before it carried out
a 100-year long genocide against the Macedonian nation, long before it attempted
the extinction of the Vlachs in Thessaly and elsewhere, and long before it
expropriated the Cham Albanians from their own lands, this same fanatical, vindictive,
discriminatory, racist, revivalist and irredentist administration, which had
been methodically fabricated in disreputable and criminal institutions in
France and England, did indeed carry out an enormous, multifaceted, and
enduring genocide across its 1828 territories in a most inhuman and devilish
attempt to
A- obliterate the local
languages, cultures, traditions, values, and behavioral systems of the
indigenous subject population,
B- delete the genuine
Eastern Roman (romeiki) identity and integrity of the same population, and
C- impose on their
subjects
i- the prefabricated
nationalistic-chauvinistic dogma,
ii- the historical
forgery that the English and the French academics taught them, and iii- the
entirely fake Modern Greek identity.
In fact, the so-called combatants
of the Rum mutiny (1821-1828) did not liberate but actually enslaved the
unfortunate and ill-fated locals. And this is exactly what is perfectly well
illustrated in Babylonia by Dimitrios Byzantios.
XXII.
The Tragic Revelations of Dimitrios Byzantios' Babylonia about the Failed
Ottoman Empire
If the above criticism
concerns the modern state of Greece, what follows offers the chance to see the
historical developments from another viewpoint. It is therefore time to ask now
how the Ottoman Empire reacted to the fact that an outstanding Ottoman
administrator moved to the seceded statelet and, after participating in the
events of the period 1821-1828 and serving from various positions afterwards, he
felt obliged to write a play in order to decry the absurd, self-contradictory,
and highly pre-occupying situation that was created there following the
secession of the said state.
The Ottoman authorities
simply did not get any info about this valuable book/play at the time. This shows
that they did not perceive the Anglo-French colonial threat at the time. Even
worse, today's Turkish authorities still have no clue about Dimitrios
Byzantios' Babylonia and its deep meaning; this shows that the state created by
Kemal Ataturk malfunctioned after 1938, because Turkey did not serve the
purposes and did not achieve the targets that its founder set for all Turks. About:
https://www.academia.edu/44743768/Kemal_Ataturk_1938_2020_the_World_s_Greatest_20th_century_Statesman_betrayed_by_Islamists_Pan_Turanianists_and_Kemalists
Due to their ignorance
of the aforementioned books and because of their total inability to understand
the down-to-earth reality, we can safely claim that the worthless advisers
around the Sultan did not realize, back in the 1830s, that what had already taken
place was not geared to be only an isolated circumstance, but in order to be
continued.
Being indoctrinated
with their fake Sunna, intoxicated with tons of pseudo-Islamic theology,
characterized by ignorance because of the abolition of sciences in the Ottoman
Empire after 1580, incapacitated due to their lack of learning, knowledge,
exploration and study of the 'Other', plunged in absolute darkness thanks to
their erroneous reading of the Quran, and invaded by incommensurate volume of
Satanic pride and arrogance (this was the result of their delusional belief
that they were good Muslims whereas they were worse than hyenas and wild dogs),
the egotistic and inane Constantinopolitan theologians around the sheikhulislam
and the sultan thought that the loss of Greece in 1828 was merely an isolated
phenomenon, and not part of an entire agenda providing for the total and final demise
of the Ottoman Empire.
These evil and inhuman Ottoman
theologians, who were incapable of anything related to common sense, scientific
method, and down-to-earth reality, wanted still to have a say in the governance
of an empire of which they could only trigger the death, due to their ignorance
and uselessness. In reality, they were the best agents and stooges of the
English and the French, because without even being on the payroll of Paris and
London, they fully played into their game.
Unfortunately, Kemal
Ataturk came too late and was too sentimental, too humane and too merciful. He
should have killed all the sheikhs, imams and students of pseudo-Islamic
theological schools throughout Turkey. He should have closed down all the
mosques and madrassas, prohibited all types of study of Islam (because they
were all wrong, sick, corrupt and absolutely anti-Islamic), introduced unbiased
and non-partisan History of Religions as the means to study the Islamic
religion too, and prohibited the possession of any theological books written in
Arabic across the country that he saved. The Ottoman Empire's pseudo-Islamic
theological establishment should have been reduced to extinction, because it
was the sole responsible for the progressive dismemberment of the vast state.
The 19th c. was indeed
a period of increased involvement of the theologians around the sheikhulislam
in the governance of the Ottoman Empire; this fact contributed to the
destruction of the Ottoman state because, by spreading ignorance, idiocy and
incapacity, the useless sheikhs and imams played exactly into the evil
Anglo-French colonial anti-Ottoman game.
Therefore, Dimitrios
Byzantios' Babylonia fully demonstrated that already in 1828 the Ottoman Empire
was an absolutely impermissible state. Its apathy would sooner or later drive
it to nonexistence, and there was nothing more anyone could possibly do about
it. The useless empire had to be instantly dissolved in order to prevent the
calamities that fell upon all its inhabitants irrespective of origin, identity,
language and religion. It is well known and accepted by all that, between 1828
and 1923, across the Ottoman Empire, many hundreds of thousands of people were
killed in internal clashes and undeservedly massacred. This was evidently scheduled
as per the Anglo-French colonial maneuvers and machinations; however, had the
Ottoman authorities been different, i.e. had they been elucidated, better
versed in spirituality, moral, culture, education and sciences, and therefore
able to discern clearly, they would have certainly been able to outfox the plot.
In fact, you cannot
combine the tenebrous theological contamination of Ahmad Ibn Taymiyyah with any
aspect of human civilization or superior intellect. The Constantinopolitan
theologians of the Ottoman Empire were barbaric and un-Islamic. The only chance
of survival that the Islamic Caliphate had after 1580 would be a sultan/caliph,
who would not be held captive of those evil theologians, but able to work with
along the Janissaries, the Bektashis and the Mevlevis to physically eliminate
the entire theological class, which in any case was totally impermissible in
the true, original Islam, as preached and practiced by prophet Muhammad.
XXIII.
How the Ottoman Authorities would use Dimitrios Byzantios' Babylonia, if they
were not indoctrinated with Pseudo-Islamic Theology
Dimitrios Byzantios'
Babylonia should have been an alarming warning for the Ottomans. If the
populations of the seceded lands were forced to become 'Greek', then practically
speaking, any Eastern Roman Christian Ottoman could eventually be forced to
also become 'Greek'. The Ottoman administration and elite did not only have to
get a copy, translate it to Ottoman Turkish, and duly study it, but they should
also popularize it extensively among the other Eastern Roman Christian Orthodox
populations, expansively analyze it to them, and fraternally warn them that, by
becoming 'Greek', they would gradually be pulled back to the Ancient Greek polytheism,
pedophilia, prostitution, fornication, Dionysian orgies, bloody political
divisions, and homosexuality.
In this manner, with
solemn condemnations and mass meetings every Sunday outside the churches of
every Ottoman city, they should mobilize not the Muslims but the Christians of
the Ottoman Empire against the pseudo-state of 'Greece'. Orthodox Christian
populations of the Ottoman Empire should be alarmed against the anti-Christian,
pseudo-Greek state much more than the Muslim populations. Every Christian
inhabitant of the Ottoman Empire should come to know that his daughters would
become prostitutes, if their region happened to be targeted by the English and
the French as the next step of expansion of the Athens regime. A
Christian-Muslim alliance should be built against the anti-Christian statelet
that was a mere instrument at the hands of the English and the French.
Having to oppose the
plots of France and England after the fabrication of the pseudo-Greek state,
the Ottoman administration did not use the real tools that they possessed. They
stupidly thought, as I already said, that this would be a matter of military
movements and diplomatic efforts; this aberration was lethal indeed for the
Ottoman Empire. Why the Ottomans did not use the tools that they surely had is
easy to assess; the evil pseudo-Islamic theologians did not want to study
Ancient Greece, Christianity and many other similar topics, because in their
stupid heads they had the deeply anti-Islamic belief that "at the end, all
the people will become Muslims" and in the back side of their mind, they used
to hide their evil intentions to force everyone into accepting Islam – which is
totally Satanic. If you are an inhumane idiot and you think that "at the
end, all the people will become Muslims", you don't need to do anything
else except either staying in lethargy for many long years or massacring
everyone that the ignorant, Satanic sheikhs order you to kill in the brief
intervals.
And this is how the
pseudo-Islamic Constantinopolitan theological cholera affected extremely
negatively the Ottoman society: those who followed them were plunged indeed into
an incredible lethargy interrupted only by few short periods of conflicts and
massacres. Many independent European travelers sojourning in parts of the
Ottoman Empire for some time during the 19th c. wrote their travelogues
afterwards and they thus reported this situation; some among them may have well
been agents of the colonial powers, but we cannot afford to discredit them all.
Many among them had a truly genuine interest and they were absolutely veracious
in their descriptions.
Christian or Muslim,
all Ottomans indiscriminately were living in impermissible conditions, and by
this I am not referring to the issue of technological modernization, which is
not important, but to the troublesome social, socio-behavioral and cultural
situation. Compared to the socio-cultural conditions of life in the Abbasid
Caliphate 1000 years earlier, Ottomans -during the 19th c.- were simply
culturally inferior, spiritually dead, educationally destroyed, socially
putrefied, tribally divided, and religiously split along sectarian lines. For
all this and for much more, the only responsible were the pseudo-Islamic
'Sunni' Constantinopolitan theologians.
Absolute lack of
knowledge of the 'Other' ends up as misperception and hatred of the 'Other'; and
when a subconscious vision of one's own lethargy, uselessness, misery, ineptitude
and depravity comes to the surface of one's own consciousness, then the only
responsible "is" the "Other", and in order to
"pay", "he must die". This explains everything that
occurred in the decayed Ottoman Empire during the period 1798-1923. In real
historical terms, Kemal Ataturk did not actually abolish the Islamic Caliphate;
he simply buried a dead corpse that had been calamitously left on the surface
of the Earth way too long (after 1580). Those, who opposed its abolition, were
inferior brainless beings with detrimental impact on their societies. Those,
who wish an Ottoman revivalism or even worse an Ottoman comeback today, must be
de facto acknowledged as fake Muslims and enemies of the Mankind.
In fact, after 1798 and
more particularly after 1828, the Ottoman Empire existed hopelessly for another
95 years. It did not have a chance in the centillion (i.e. a number equal to 1
followed by 303 zeros) to possibly survive. Anyone who today imagines that it
is possible to open the coffin of the Ottoman misery and revive the putrefied
body of that -useless after 1580- state is either mad or possessed by evil
demons. The Ottoman Empire is good stuff for Education though; until 1580, it
offers a great chance to students of History to examine what it is for a major
empire to miss great opportunities. And after 1580, it offers them the
possibility to examine how disastrous and lethal a theological indoctrination
can be, particularly if it is noticed by enemies.
XXIV.
What a Salvation Plan of the Ottoman Empire in 1828 would look like (if a
Sultan eliminated the Evil Theologians in the first place!)
What could the Ottoman
administration do to successfully prevent most or all of the developments that
took place in their European provinces between 1828 and 1914? This question can
eventually have a potential response only in case we assume that a forceful,
impulsive and unpredictable sultan succeeded with the help of the military to
eliminate the pseudo-Islamic theological schools around the sheikhulislam and
to exterminate their main followers and supporters, thus imposing a totally different
version of Islam than the Ottoman pseudo-Islam of the period after 1580.
Several practical
suggestions are mentioned below, covering mainly three sectors:
A.
Governance
1- Prevent any French
and English from crossing Ottoman territories;
2- Implement an
advanced project of national awareness campaigns among all the inhabitants of
the empire through use of selected, hired, educated and guided natives from all
the nations that lived there;
3- Transform the
Ottoman Empire into a multi-national empire whereby all nations would be very
conscious of their common, deeply anti-Western values, cultures, traditions and
faiths;
4- Incorporate all
ethno-linguistic and religious groups into the governance of the vast state and
study them extensively;
5- Abolish the useless
and self-disastrous system of millets;
6- Promote systematic
and extensive inter-ethnic and inter-religious mutual knowledge, understanding
and communication, starting from the level of Education;
7- Defame methodically
the Western colonial countries by ceaselessly reporting all their crimes,
corruption and obscenity to all the inhabitants of the empire;
8- Prepare the
conditions for an Ottoman-Iranian merge into one empire that would also
comprise the Central Asiatic khanates.
B.
Education
1- Introduce an
Albanian writing system in Ottoman characters and systematize National
Education in Albanian for all the populations of today's Epirus province of
Greece, Albania, Kosovo, Sanjak and adjacent territories;
2- Introduce a Vlach
writing system in Ottoman characters and systematize National Education in
Vlach for all the populations of today's Thessaly province of Greece and all
Vlachs in Macedonia;
3- Introduce a
Macedonian writing system in Ottoman characters and systematize National
Education in Macedonian for all the populations of Ottoman Macedonia (the
Manastir, Kosova and Selanik vilayets);
4- Introduce a Karamanlı
writing system in Ottoman characters and systematize National Education in Karamanlı
Turkic for the Christian Turkic populations;
5- Introduce (in Greek
characters) the writing system of the various Eastern Roman languages in
Pontus, Cappadocia, Ionia-Aeolia, Macedonia-Thrace, Crete, and Cyprus;
6- Follow similar
policies as regards the Romanians and the Bulgarians early in the 19th c.;
7- Dissociate the
Ottoman Empire's Eastern Romans and the other Christians from the
anti-Christian pseudo-state of Greece and reveal to all Christian populations
of the Caliphate the deeply Anti-Christian targets of the pseudo-Greek state's
Anglo-French masters
8- Constantly update
the Ottoman Empire's Eastern Romans and the other Christians about how Eastern
Romans were culturally humiliated (example: the Don Pacifico affair / https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0355)
and socio-behaviorally disfigured and Westernized in the pseudo-Greek statelet
(notably with the ignominious abandonment of the foustanella traditional attire
and the orchestrated imposition of the 'franghika', i.e. the Parisian
bourgeois, supposedly 'Western', clothing, which was a development that took
place at slow pace during the 19th c. and the early 20th c. as part of the
Anglo-French colonization of those South Balkan Ottoman lands).
9- Implement a vast
Aramaization program among all the Dialectal Arabic-speaking populations of
Syria-Phoenicia, Mesopotamia and Palestine in order to effectively oppose the
already evident Anglo-French colonial plans that provided for the
linguistic-political Arabization of the Berbers, the Egyptians and the
Aramaeans across the Ottoman provinces in Africa and Asia. As none of these
historical nations was associated with the Arabs in any manner, their disorientation
and captivity within the false ideology of Pan-Arabism, which was generated
very early by the French academia, would trigger enormous turmoil in the
Ottoman Empire.
Acting as per above, the
Ottoman authorities would avert the pernicious Anglo- French infiltration among
the empire's various nations, thus preventing the formation of various
secessionist movements, and all the subsequent, disastrous developments. Only
by fully integrating the properly formed and educated representatives of the
various nations into the process of the imperial administration (see above
parts A4, A6 and A7), would the Ottomans be truly able to unify their vast but
incoherent and disparate state.
C.
Foreign Policy
1- Dispatch
well-prepared agents to France, under the coverage of trade or business, with
task to study in-depth the languages and the cultures of the various oppressed nations
of France, namely the Corsicans, the Occitans, the Catalans, the Basks
(Euskadi) and the Bretons, and establish connections with them;
2- Dispatch
well-prepared agents to England, under the coverage of trade or business, with
task to study in-depth the languages and the cultures of the various oppressed
nations of England, namely the Irish, the Scots and the Welsh, and establish
connections with them;
3- Invite to the
Ottoman Empire many hundreds of representatives of England's and France's
oppressed nations, prepare, train and guide them adequately, and then send them
back in order to launch secessionist movements and trigger turmoil and chaos in
both colonial countries;
4- Organize unrest
across all formerly Ottoman territories that were detached by the colonial
powers (notably Egypt);
5- Establish strong
contacts with all Turkic and Muslim nations that were subjugated by the
Russians, notably the Tatars, the Circassians, the Chechens and several others,
and train them properly to instigate rebellions and chaos inside Russia;
6- Establish strong
contacts with all Turkic and Muslim nations that were subjugated by the English
in British India and prepare them to revolt against the colonials.
However, it sounds
unrealistic to demand the aforementioned measures from the collapsing Ottomans
of the 19th c., and it truly is. We have to accept that the lack of real
awareness of the lurking dangers that characterized the obsolete structure of
the Ottoman Empire was exclusively due to its fake religious authorities, which
spread darkness instead of knowledge and hatred instead of love, contrarily to
the true preaching of prophet Muhammad. As a matter of fact, we have to admit
that the ineptitude, inertia, inappropriateness and incapability of the Ottoman
family to rule the empire had already noticed several centuries earlier. These
issues did not date back to the 19th c., but much earlier.
The Ottomans did not
care to monitor (let alone prevent) the infiltration of the Catholic
missionaries among the Aramaean Christians of Syria-Palestine and Mesopotamia already
in the middle of the 16th c.; they did not realize the tragic consequences that
this evil infiltration generated for an old nation that was divided between the
Ottoman and the Safavid empires. And they failed to understand that various
types of Western infiltration among the marginalized ethnic and religious
components of their state would only herald its demise. As a matter of fact, if
the Ottomans failed to defend the nations inhabiting their territories in the
16th c., when they were in the peak of their power, how could they possibly manage
to do this in the early 19th c.?
On the contrary, what
happened was a disastrous self-destruction: their sectarian theological
pseudo-Islamic decisions further alienated the bulk of the Ottoman populations,
namely most of the ethno-religious groups and nations (milletler) of the vast
empire, from the indoctrinated Constantinopolitan élite that was totally
detached from the real world. If we take into consideration the fact that one
of the best tactics of the colonial powers is to engulf enemies in sterile,
unrealistic and self-catastrophic theological indoctrination, we can conclude
that the best tools of the evil colonial powers were the inane pseudo-Islamic
'Sunni' theologians of Constantinople who pushed their own country to the
abysmal precipice in order to materialize the goals of their demented theories
and their evil faith. The same occurs also today in Turkey. That is why I
intend to complete this series of articles with the forthcoming presentation of
what the pillars of Turkish Education must be in the years ahead, if Turks do
not want their country to have the same fate as the defunct Ottoman Empire.
The disreputable fatwa issued by the evil and idiotic şeyhulislam Hasan Hayrullah Efendi for the dethronement of Sultan Abdülaziz: one of the most shameful documents of the Ottoman History
No comments:
Post a Comment