What follows
is my response to the brief comment sent by a good friend about a recently
published article of mine; the text involves hints of many major issues of Christian
and Modern History, being an opportunity for various readers to explore the
hidden interconnection of several topics that are customarily thought as
totally independent from one another. As several issues impose discretion, I
remove (by marking xxxxx) names that could reveal the identity and occupation
of my highly knowledgeable interlocutor.
Apparently,
my response cannot and does not constitute a systematic presentation of the
topic; however, it is certainly a stimulus for readers to effectuate in turn their
own research and to start seeing things out-of-the-box, thus duly rejecting the
pre-arranged and subtly imposed viewpoint over World History and conventional
way of perceiving situations, developments, facts, ideologies, theories, and
trends.
The Christian and the Anti-Christian: Sophia Palaiologina (1455-1503; forensic facial reconstruction by S. A. Nikitin) and Ignatius de Loyola (1491-1556; posthumous painting by Francisco de Zurbarán)
It goes
without saying that, when I speak of intentions and plans of groups of power
and secretive orders, I do not imply that they will be materialized, let alone
that I agree with them.
As my friend
and I speak -among other languages- French, Russian, and English, the conversation
was held in French. The present text is an English translation.
------------------ A friend's comment about one of my articles
------------
Surprising
idea! In this area, I have no skills; I benefit from the generosity of our
communication. In the 1990s, my father-in-law had a very good relationship with
Ariel Sharon, but something went wrong after that. Now I understand the meaning
of several events (the purchase of xxxxx announced by Shimon Peres, the start
of the revolution at xxxxx by pastor xxxxx, etc.) and the personal conclusion, namely
that xxxxx is the political instrument of the Jesuits in xxxxx).
I thought
Macron was a Mason but his efforts to force xxxxx into war with Ukraine (with xxxxx)
confused me. Ursula: is she also an instrument of the Jesuits? The
neo-Bolshevism of the EU Commission is very evident. Were they also involved in
the Bolshevik Revolution? The similarities are obvious.
What fate
would we have had if we had known one another before 1989! Maybe we could have changed
history!
I thought
about writing, but decided not to unveil anything I know in public. I am not
interested in money, and xxxxx don't deserve it. I am however concerned about
clarification and peace of my soul. My past should be fully understood first so
that you know me personally. In this regard, I have made progress, which was due
to your help. Thank you very much! I am grateful!
------------------- My response ----------------------
My dear friend,
Thank you for your reply, your comments,
your compliments, and your questions! I'm glad that this short text was so
interesting to you. Yes, it all makes sense, once you realize that the secret
leaders of the world do not constitute one group all together, but are divided
into several conflicting orders.
Your statement that you thought
Macron was a Freemason says it all! Do you know why? Because the world leaders
of the period 1989-2024 took great care to ensure that you and others thought
this way. How? It is easy to detect, and you already know it.
Opponents of the "world
order" primarily blame the Freemasons, and only to a lesser extent the
Zionists, for what is happening in the world. Moreover, in doing so, they
falsely identify the Zionists with Netanyahu, who is a Freemason and not a
Zionist (like Smotrich, Ben Gvir, Ariel Sharon, and Golda Meir). So, do you
understand now the full extent of the distortion?
Instead of blaming the Jesuits for
what's happening, the confused opponents of the system were foolish enough to
blame the Freemasons. And instead of identifying Zionism with the Ashkenazi
banking families, they believe Netanyahu is the main representative of this
power group.
But you clean your ears and eyes
every day. You have certainly heard or read that Yair Lapid, the leader of the
opposition in the Knesset, declared (rather stupidly) that "if Netanyahu
wins again in the next elections, it will be the end of Zionism"!
However, things are not always easy
to detect. Sometimes, a tool of the Jesuits may have learned to publicly appear
as a Freemason; and vice versa. There's something called "trickery",
you know! I'm saying all this for Macron.
Yes, Ursula von der Leyen belongs to
the Jesuit circle.
Shimon Peres was a Freemason and a
close friend of François Mitterrand. Yitzhak Rabin sided with the Jesuits, the
only ones who truly wanted peace and two states in Palestine (not because they
loved peace, but to make it as easy as possible for the implementation of their
agenda). His mother vilified the kibbutzim and rejected Zionism; they were
typical idiots who thought it normal to participate in such a movement of
populations without being caught up in the game of the great powers.
Incredible!
Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin hated
one another. Although being political opponents, Peres and Netanyahu secretly
supported each other.
You have to understand: the
developments envisioned by Gorbachev, Reagan, Thatcher, Mitterrand, and Kohl
were literally hijacked by the Jesuits.
These power groups (orders or
societies, etc.) can keep their members or accomplices dormant for decades. Edward
Shevardnadze was the Soviet Minister of Foreign Affairs and the first President
of Georgia even before he was born. It is not always easy to detect such situations,
but please, at least, try!
I know when Georgians celebrate
Saint Abo, Saint David, and Saint George! But do you know when Saint Edward's
feast day is in Tbilisi? No need to answer! I will do it for you! Such a feast
day does not exist, because there is no Saint Edward in Georgia! His parents
were already employed by the British secret services; they always did as they
were told. Even in choosing the name, raising, and educating their child.
That's why Shevardnadze didn't meet the same fate as Ordzhonikidze! Nice, eh? I
say this as a hint for the people you mention in your country, because I didn't
know them.
Now, the Jesuits and the Catholics
in general were particularly despised in Muscovy and Russia, where the local
priests and monks rightly followed the Eastern Roman tradition of rejecting
Rome and being suspicious of the forces that supported the Pope. I simply
remind you of the famous journey of Sophia Palaiologina, who left the southern
confines of the Balkans for Italy, then Muscovy, to marry Ivan III, become the
mother of Basil III, and -consequently- the grandmother of Ivan IV. An entire
delegation of Catholic priests accompanied her. Forget everything else but
retain this: the Moscow authorities did not allow any Catholics into the city
of Muscovy! They were helped to setup an encampment outside the walls of the
principality—at a distance of course, so as not to contaminate the true
Christians. Read:
Маршрут
путешествия был таков: на север из Италии через Германию, в порт Любек они
прибыли 1 сентября. Приходилось объезжать Польшу, через которую обычно
путешественники следовали на Русь сухопутным путём — в этот момент она
находилась с Иваном III в состоянии
конфликта. Морское путешествие через Балтику заняло 11 дней. Корабль пристал в
Колывани (совр. Таллин), откуда кортеж в октябре 1472 года проследовал через
Дорпат (совр. Тарту), Псков и Великий Новгород. 12 ноября 1472 года София
въехала в Москву.
Ещё во время
путешествия невесты по русским землям стало очевидно, что планы Ватикана
сделать её проводником католичества потерпели провал, поскольку Софья
немедленно продемонстрировала возвращение к вере предков. Папский легат Антонио
Бонумбре [эст.] был лишён возможности въехать в Москву, неся перед собой
латинский крест (см. Корсунский крест) [10].
Венчание в России
состоялось 12 (22) ноября 1472 года в Успенском соборе в Москве. Обвенчал их
митрополит Филипп (по Софийскому Временнику — коломенский протопоп Осия) [11] [12].
По некоторым указаниям, митрополит Филипп был против брачного союза с униаткой.
Официальная великокняжеская летопись утверждает, что именно митрополит венчал
великого князя, но неофициальный свод (в составе Летописей Софийской II и Львовской)
отрицает участие митрополита в этой церемонии: «венча же протопоп коломенскый
Осея, занеже здешним протопопом и духовнику своему не повеле…».
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Софья_Палеолог#Свадьба_с_Иваном_III
(the last three paragraphs of this
unit)
((Note: as my friend and I speak
Russian, I preferred this except from the Russian Wikipedia because it is more
informative, more accurate, and closer to the facts. What follows is the
English translation of the three paragraphs.))
The journey's itinerary was as
follows: north from Italy through Germany, arriving at the port of Lübeck on
September 1. They had to bypass Poland, through which travelers usually
traveled overland to reach Rus', which was at war with Ivan III at the time.
The sea voyage across the Baltic took 11 days. The ship docked in Kolyvan
(modern-day Tallinn), from where the cortege proceeded in October 1472 through
Dorpat (modern-day Tartu), Pskov, and Veliky Novgorod. On November 12, 1472,
Sophia entered Moscow.
Even during the bride's journey
through Russian lands, it became clear that the Vatican's plans to make her a
champion of Catholicism had failed, as Sophia immediately demonstrated a return
to the faith of her ancestors. Papal legate Antonio Bonumbre [est.] was
prevented from entering Moscow while carrying a Latin cross (see Korsun Cross) [10].
The wedding in Russia took place on
November 12 (22), 1472, in the Assumption Cathedral in Moscow. They were
married by Metropolitan Philip (according to the Sofia Time-Longer, by the
Kolomna Archpriest Osya) [11] [12]. According to some sources, Metropolitan
Philip was against the marriage union with a Uniate. The official Grand Duke's
Chronicle asserts that it was the Metropolitan who crowned the Grand Duke, but
an unofficial compilation (contained in the Sofia II and Lvov Chronicles)
denies the Metropolitan's participation in the ceremony: "The wedding was
performed by the Kolomna Archpriest Osya, since he did not order the local
archpriests and his confessor..."
((I herewith add links to the
respective entries in the French and the English Wikipedia; you can read the
rest of my response thereafter.))
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Pal%C3%A9ologue#Mariage_avec_Ivan_III
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Palaiologina#Grand_Princess_consort_of_Moscow))
This attitude was the rule for the
Russians and continued until Nicholas II. This created a situation in Imperial
Russia where
a) Freemasons gradually penetrated
(notably under Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, and Alexander II, who was
killed by a Zionist) into the Russian elite,
b) Zionists were still present (the
Ashkenazi Khazars), but
c) the Jesuits were kept at bay.
Of course, if you look closely, you
can detect their efforts to build a base in Russia; however, these efforts were
minimal, and the Russian Orthodox Church successfully contained them. Shall I
offer an example of Jesuit infiltration in Russia? What else?!
Imiaslavie! About:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imiaslavie et https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Имяславие
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imiaslavie
The February
Revolution of 1917 in Russia was the work of the Freemasons, and it is well
known that Kerensky was a Freemason (as were several ministers and prime
ministers of Nicholas II).
And the
October Revolution of 1917 in Russia was the work of the Zionists, among whom
the Freemasons had managed to integrate and promote Lenin and Stalin. On the
contrary, Trotsky was a true Zionist. Stalin eliminated the Zionist elements
and all party members associated with them, but not the Jews. It is rather the
opposite that happened!
Alexander II, Kerensky, Lenin, Trotsky, Alexander Bulatovich founder of Imiaslavie
The Jesuits
have never forgotten Russia; in fact, they cannot. If they truly intend to put the
entire world under their exclusive control of eschatological dimensions, this
plan requires total control over Russia. To make this happen, the Jesuits
performed a supposed miracle, involving endless discussions, stories,
confessions, interpretations, documents, an evil secret, and a diabolical
conspiracy ever since. This is what is called the "Miracle of Our Lady of
Fatima" and the "Miracle of the Sun". Go through the following
links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_F%C3%A1tima
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Miracle_of_Our_Lady_of_Fatima
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_Sun
After all,
you can guess the vicious spiritual deception that is behind what is called the
"Third Secret of Fatima".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Secrets_of_F%C3%A1tima
This
incredibly voluminous amount of execrable lies, wickedness, odiousness,
inhumanity, and putrefaction culminates in the Jesuits' most vile target: the
so-called consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin
Mary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consecration_of_Russia_to_the_Immaculate_Heart_of_Mary
Behind
everything you have seen, during all these recent years, in Ukraine lies this
secret Jesuit plan: the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of the
Blessed Virgin Mary.
Responding
to the last paragraphs of your comments, I have to admit that, yes, you are
right! It would be very interesting for both of us to have met before 1989. But
you know what? Back then, we were not the people we are today.
Change the
world? We can always change the world! Anyway, the world changes by itself, and
all useless beings sooner or later end up decomposing into their own elements
and being annihilated! Don't worry! No technology can surpass nature! You would
have to be crazy to believe this!
Thank you
for drawing my interest to these topics!
Do me a
favor! Sit down at your laptop, offline, or in front of a piece of paper, and
write down your memories and perspectives on an event in your career or life that
has disturbed you. Write for at least 2 to 3 hours! In your native language, of
course! Show the text to your wife! Let her read it, then burn it! Or empty the
Word doc., save it, then delete it, and empty your computer's recycle bin as
well. Truly! Literally! Then, forget about it for a few days! Later, write to
me about how you felt while writing! Describe how you felt mentally and
emotionally during the process!
Best
regards,
Shamsaddin
Addendum
Ah! One more
point! I forgot! You have established a link between the current ideology of the
EU leaders and the Soviet ideological system. There is obviously a parallel,
but this fact does not mean that, because the current EU leaders are primarily
controlled by the Jesuits, the USSR had also been founded by them. I must admit
that I spent some time examining how the so-called "liberation theology",
which had so many affinities with communism, despite its Jesuit origin and nature,
could have endured in this manner!
First of
all, I noticed that the first type of kolkhoz were what we euphemistically call
"Jesuit reductions" in South America. They were actually "the
first concentration camps" in World History; in other words, they
constituted full proof of the Anti-Christian character of the criminal Jesuit Order
and of the bogus-Christian Church of Rome. Basics about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_missions_among_the_Guaran%C3%AD
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_Missions_of_Chiquitos
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_reductions_in_the_Andes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainas_missions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encomienda
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yapey%C3%BA_Reduction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poblacion
Natives at the service of Jesuits in the reduction of Tapuyos in Brazil (painting by 19th c. German painter Mauricio Rugendas) and Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto: the same madness of evil forces to gather, limit, segregate, and exterminate humans
But it was
only after many years and much hard work that I understood at last that, at a
theoretical-intellectual level, today's Zionists and false Freemasons are indeed
the "intellectual children" of the Jesuits. That's why I call most of
today's Freemasons "false Freemasons" and describe their lodges as
"apostate". They are the intellectual offspring of the Jesuits in the
sense that they accepted the Renaissance, an evil invention of the Jesuits. The
true Freemasons of the time, i.e. the Knights Templars and the Rosicrucians, rejected
the falsehood, the villainous nature, and the inhuman evilness of the so-called
Renaissance.
All the
same, two centuries later, all the then newly established false Freemasons
accepted the Renaissance, as they did not attempt in any way to challenge the
execrable phenomenon. How come? The answer is simple: what is presented to us
as the "modern reestablishment of Freemasonry" (with the formation of
the first lodge in London in 1717) is a counterfeit! This lodge and many similar
other false, useless and deceptive societies were founded by masqueraded Jesuits
malignantly posturing as Freemasons; the process involved an unprecedented
destruction of earlier material and manuscripts of Rosicrucian-Freemasonic
contents, which defined perfectly well the faith and the world
conceptualization that makes of someone a Freemason. The few true Freemasons
operate actually in invisible inner lodges, thus constituting "lodges
within lodges". As a matter of fact, the false Freemasons, bastard
offspring of the Jesuits, hate ferociously all the true Freemasons.
If what I
say about the Renaissance seems strange to you, you can ruminate over the
following and let me know your conclusion; at least, give it a try:
a- travel
back in time to the year 1483 (!!);
b- visit
Simeon I, then Patriarch of Constantinople;
c- meet also
with Saint Gerontius, then Metropolitan of Moscow and All Russia;
d- take both
of them with you on a supernatural journey to Rome and, invisible (all three of
you), and enter the then inaugurated house of prostitution (I merely use a term
stated in sacred texts), which is commonly known as the "Sistine Chapel";
e- show your
two companions the evil distortion called "The Creation of Adam", and
ask them:
- Is this a
Christian painting?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symeon_I_of_Constantinople
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerontius,_Metropolitan_of_Moscow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sistine_Chapel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
Only then, you
will understand everything as regards the methods through which the entire
mankind has been completely and comprehensively deceived. In front of this
fact, all the religions, the faiths, the ideologies, and the theories, all the
people, religious or irreligious, faithful or faithless, ruling or ruled, are
meaningless, useless and pointless.
Every false story that starts as per above ends as per below…
This is the
cardinal point of History; only people, who reject the evil obscenity of the
Sistine Chapel, have a chance to survive and find a worthwhile posterity. The
rest will burn in the Eternal Fire in which the Jesuits, Vatican, the
Anti-Christian Church of Rome, their followers, supporters, partners and
interlocutors, namely Babylon the Great, will vanish once forever, thus setting
the true mankind free.
Best regards,
Shamsaddin
=====================================
Download the article in PDF:
https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2025/10/28/from-the-renaissance-to-the-war-in-ukraine-to-the-destruction-of-russia-the-jesuit-plan-for-the-end-of-mankind/
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_15183
https://vk.com/megalommatis?w=wall429864789_15184
https://www.patreon.com/posts/142249449
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/vKEzLgAdfa?
https://www.4shared.com/web/preview/pdf/yP53uTbVge?
https://online.fliphtml5.com/qynhg/mmey/
https://anyflip.com/fdfzl/ucsl
https://pubhtml5.com/jxyro/jumm/
No comments:
Post a Comment