What follows is
my response to a Turkish friend, who -a while back- wrote a separate email to
ask me whether I knew a French book written by an anonymous author and
published in the 19th c., about a nation that never existed: the Greeks. The
book was published (in 1870) in order to circulate among representatives of the
19th c. French colonial establishment and thus 'educate' the various tenants of
that state about the French state's doctrine about the topic.
In and by itself, this
book proves that the colonial historiography is a fallacy engineered by
bogus-scholars, who acted like agents of falsehood and state functionaries,
promoting all deceptions and forgeries needed for the criminal policy of their
state.
The colonial needs of
France and England imposed the creation of a racist, anti-Ottoman,
anti-Turanian, and anti-Islamic state located at the southern end of the Balkan
Peninsula that they would utilize every now according to the anti-Ottoman
targets of Paris and London. The local inhabitants were not 'Greek', and had no
relation with the various ancient tribes of South Balkans, which were
collectively called by many different names (one of which was 'Greeks').
Unrelated to the
indigenous Ancient Pelasgians, peripheral to the Ancient Macedonians,
Illyrians, Thracians, Phrygians, Lydians, Carians and Lycians, the so-called
Ancient Greek tribes killed one another mercilessly and to the last, until they
gradually vanished from History, without leaving any other memory than
ceaseless bloodshed, pseudo-religious fornication, pseudo-theoretical nonsense
called 'Philosophy', and lawless dissident states whereby the ignorant, immoral
and pathetic magistrates did not want divine rule over them. All factors of some
value that have been found among them were the lowest elements of Oriental
civilizations diffused across the South Balkans throughout the millennia.
Theater is a religious
representation invented in Ancient Egypt; as such it was incomprehensible to
the spiritually impotent and culturally defective Athenians. Consequently, the
Ancient Egyptian Theater was degraded by the Athenian fools into farcical and
spiritually nonsensical plays deprived of anything divine and
transcendental.
Philosophy was not a
target for the Ancient Ionians; instead, Wisdom ('Sophia') was. However, Wisdom
and Spirituality were the privilege of the Assyrians, the Hittites, the
Babylonians, the Egyptians, and the Iranians. Since the Ancient Ionians were
the low level students of the Mesopotamian, Anatolian and Egyptian high priests
and spiritual masters, they could not achieve 'wisdom' and they were therefore
satisfied to limit themselves to the mere search of wisdom, which is exactly
what 'philosophy' means. In fact, in the Ancient Greek dialects, 'philosophia'
is a clearly derogatory term. Opposite to 'sophia', 'philosophia' sounds like
'monkey' opposite to 'human'.
Democracy existed in
Carthage since the very moment of the foundation of the colony of the
Phoenician kingdom of Tyre in Africa; in Athens and elsewhere in South Balkans,
Phoenician colons diffused this system of governance. The Ancient Macedonian
(i.e. non-Greek) philosopher Aristotle described in detail the
republican-democratic system of the Carthaginians (Politics, book 2: 11), but
due to the revival of Roman Anti-Semitism in Modern Times, this historical
truth is concealed by the French academia. But Aristotle did not say a word
about the barbarian contamination of Ancient Athens…
After the French
academia fabricated the nonexistent ancient nation of 'Greeks', they wanted to
prolong its existence down to the Christian-Muslim times. However, the
survivors of the Ancient Ionians intermingled with many Anatolian, Balkan and
other nations, notably the Romans, and accepted Roman political ideology,
becoming 'Roman citizens' thanks to the Constitutio Antoniniana (the famous
Edict of Caracalla, 212 CE). After they accepted Christianity, they dissociated
themselves from the Ancient Greeks, who were viewed as the world's most
barbaric abomination. Even more significantly, the Ionians of the Christian
times named themselves 'Oriental Romans', and after the division of the empire
'Eastern Roman Empire'.
The French academia
promoted then the fallacious and deceptive term 'Byzantine Studies' and
'Byzantine Empire', projecting the name of the Pre-Christian Ionian colony of
Byzantium onto the Roman Christian city "Nova Roma' (New Rome), which was
later called Constantinople and Istanbul. Sheer dementia and ostensible viciousness…
After all these lies,
there was only one more fallacy to be invented: the otherwise nonexistent link
of 'continuity' among
a) the disparate tribes
of the Antiquity that were collectively called 'Greeks', although they never
set up a united state of their own;
b) the Christian
Eastern Romans, who formed a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, and multi-lingual
imperial state, dissociating themselves from the Anti-Christian 'Greeks'; and
c) the modern
descendants of the Christian Eastern Romans, who were calling themselves
'Romioi' (Rumlar), their nation 'Romeiko', and their various languages
'Romeika'.
This fabricated link of
pseudo-continuity produced by the French academics is exactly what this
fallacious manual calls as «Les Grecs à toutes les époques», i.e.
«The Greeks throughout History».
The book attempts
therefore to present the 'Greeks in all the epochs' in a gravely sick effort of
indoctrination that was applied to all French state functionaries, who had to
reproduce this bogus-historical dogma wherever they were. With manuals like
that, French and English diplomats, agents, explorers, merchants, antiquarians
and fake scholars fooled and aptly manipulated the Balkan and Anatolian
populations of the Christian Eastern Romans, who belonged to the Ottoman
Empire. They convinced them to betray their own country, i.e. the Ottoman
Empire, "because they were supposedly the 'glorious' descendants of the
Ancient Greeks"; by so doing, the English and French colonial gangsters
managed to monstrously destroy the identity, language and religion of the
Christian Eastern Romans, while promising them a new great state that would
replace the Ottoman Empire. The modern pseudo-state of Greece is what is left
from those fake colonial promises.
The Ottoman Empire
failed to timely find such publications, identify the hidden intentions of the
gangsters who wrote them, and prevent the ensued developments. The conclusion
is simple: the most difficult war is not carried out against military
regiments, but against the evil pseudo-scholars of the Anti-Christian Western
European and North American states of the Post-Renaissance times.
Response to a
Turkish friend about the book 'Les Grecs à toutes les époques' of
anonymous author
……………………………………..
Now, I will respond to
your question about the cover of the French book.
Yes, I knew the entire
series of 19th c. French books "Pour la Question d' Orient".
You have the
entire book (Pdf) in attachment.
The title «Les
Grecs à toutes les époques» means «The Greeks throughout
History».
As you see on the inner
cover page, it is written by an anonymous author self-styled as «un ancien
diplomate en Orient», which means «a former diplomat in the Orient». As it
is the practice in every French book (in contrast with the English system), you
have the list of contents at the end — on pages 433-436 of the book
(starting with page 441/448 of the Pdf file).
Scholarly (academically
or scientifically or intellectually) the value of the book is nil.
It goes without saying
that every book published by an author, who does not present his true name, is
an academically worthless book.
And so this book is as
regards the History of 'Ancient Greece'.
It is not only a
forgery and a falsification, but a very low level dissertation, if compared
with academic bibliography that was published in the second half of the 19th
c. about 'Ancient Greece'.
Even more so, the book
was not written with the ambition to be one of the best treatises of its
time about the topic mentioned in the title.
However, the book has a
tremendous value within a totally different sector of Humanities.
Its value can be
revealed within the context of Western Colonialism, Hellenism,
Orientalism, and the creation of the (inspired by the French) Modern Greek
(: colonial) political, academic, intellectual establishment.
Furthermore, the
book is very important for anyone, who wants to know details about the
formation of the bogus historical dogma that the Modern Greek state imposed
dictatorially in Modern Greece across all levels and sectors: primary and
secondary education, universities and academic life, political ideology,
publishing houses and books, newspapers and mass media in general.
Within these sectors,
the book epitomizes what role France wanted to give to the Modern Greek
state and how France instructed and educated Modern Greek politicians,
diplomats, public sector employees, military, academics, journalists, high
school teachers, theologians, priests, and intellectuals (in brief, the
entire Greek regime in all its aspects).
As a matter of
fact, what this book stipulated in … 1870 (!) is now believed as
«historical truth», as «importance of the Greek civilization», and as «the
diachronic contribution of Hellenism to the World History» among the
colonial academia, the average French, English, other Western European nations,
and the fake nation of 'Modern Greeks'. The constructed, fake term of
'Hellenism' is conceived as the 'cultural and ethnic/racial continuity of the
Greek nation across History', so for 3500 years. Such notion never existed. And
all these silly descriptions are pure lies.
Hellenism is a
nonexistent, evil ghost for racists who reject the historical truth that Cyprus
-as an island- belongs to Asia, whereas Crete and Sicily are by definition
African islands, and they were never considered as 'European territory'
throughout History.
Today, all the paragons
of the dictatorial Greek establishment believe about the fake, fabricated Greek
nation the historical falsehood that this book presents as «true history» and
as «extraordinary importance of the Greek nation diachronically». No
challenge is allowed or tolerated, and no scholar can survive in that
God-damned state, if he rejects the evil and racist pseudo-historical dogma
that is imposed in a more totalitarian manner than Nazism in Hitler's Germany
and Marxism-Leninism in Stalin's USSR.
Saying this, I don’t
mean that this book was necessarily studied by Modern Greek politicians,
diplomats, public sector employees, military, academics, journalists, high
school teachers, theologians and priests, intellectuals, after 1870 and down to
our days.
No! Perhaps very few
Greeks knew this book at the time, and even fewer know about it today. But …………
1- Whatever French
historians, archaeologists, philologists, philosophers, theologians,
ethnographers, art historians, historians of religion, intellectuals and
thinkers wrote and taught about Greece — either in books and
articles exclusively related to Greece or in books and articles pertaining
to other topics but which contained a brief reference to anything about Greece
— was a reflection or repetition, expansion or explanation,
consolidation or re-affirmation of what was contained in this book, from
those days until now (so for no less than 150 years).
2- Similarly, all
Greek historians, archaeologists, philologists, philosophers, theologians,
ethnographers, art historians, historians of religion, intellectuals
and thinkers, who studied in France (or attended classes in
Greece with professors who had studied in France), repeated the teachings
and the texts, the ideas and the propaganda of their French professors and
masters.
3- Even more
importantly, all the historians, archaeologists, philologists,
philosophers, theologians, ethnographers, art historians, historians of
religion, intellectuals and thinkers of other nations (from Belgium,
to Argentina, Mexico, Canada, Algeria, Lebanon, Iran, India, Cambodia,
Vietnam, Japan, Russia, Poland, Romania, etc.), who studied in
France (or attended classes in their respective countries’ universities with
professors who had studied in France), repeated the teachings and the
texts, the ideas and the propaganda of their French professors and
masters.
In brief, this book is
the epitome of what the top of the entire French academic-intellectual elite
(and consequently, France itself at the most official level) has believed,
taught, diffused and propagated worldwide about Greece and the Greeks (from the
Antiquity to the end of the 19th c.) — all social, educational, professional
levels included.
This book could
therefore be given another, clearer and most summarizing title: «the
historical falsehood that France created and imposed worldwide about Greece» or
«the official position of France about all things Greek».
In a simple manner, one
can describe quite accurately this book as a «guidebook for colonial
masters and their puppets».
Practically speaking,
there is nothing said in the book that is not believed, said and propagated by
villainous persons like Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, etc.
However, this is
not the only book authored by this anonymous author (or these anonymous
authors); there were many other similar books that epitomized France’s
position toward countries that the colonial regime of France wanted to educate,
form according to the interests of Paris, and incorporate in the supreme plan
in view of the (then impending and surely attempted) global Empire of
France.
Another similar
book is this: «Le Dossier russe dans la question d'Orient: la
politique de la Russie envers la Pologne et la Turquie», published in 1869
(«The Affair ‘Russia’ in the Oriental Issue: Russia’s policy toward Poland
and Turkey»). Notice that both books were published at the time of the
French Empire (under Napoleon III)! Quite interestingly, this book focuses on
Czarist Russia’s policies toward «Poland» and «Turkey»! However, at those days,
there was no Poland, because that land was divided between Prussia (and later
Germany) and Russia.
Also, the appellation
of the Ottoman Empire as «Turkey» was very typical policy of
18th-19th c. France and England.
This policy applied
also to Safavid/Afshar/Qajar Iran; it was distorted as «Persia». But Iran
is not Persia, and Persia is not Iran.
https://www.academia.edu/43365931/Iran_is_not_Persia_and_Persia_is_not_Iran
This policy applied
also to the Mughal Empire, the Gorkanian of Delhi; it was distorted
as «India», which is a fake term for the entire subcontinent, because for
the Ancient Iranians, «Hindush» (India) was basically a mere satrapy, i.e.
an administrative province at the eastern confines of the vast Achaemenid
Empire. The Iranian territory designated by this term was small and included
parts of the today's provinces Sindh and Punjab of Pakistan and Rajasthan
of India. The term was later used by the Greeks and the Romans, but
-again- it never denoted the entire subcontinent. About:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindush
The contents of this
book explain in what points Czarist Russian policy opposed the imperial
plans of France in the cases of the Poles (in Eastern Europe) and the
Ottoman Empire. You can find this second book (about Russia) here:
http://www.marelibri.com/t/main/3307261-asiaOrient/books/RELEVANCE/350?l=en
I came first to know
about these two books, when I was a postgraduate student in France (1978-1981).
I then came to know that these forged documents were extremely important
for the colonial and messianic/apocalyptic plans or agendas of the Jesuits,
the Freemasons, and the Zionists in the 19th c. At those days, these secret
societies (or groups of power) and the colonial countries (that they
controlled and used) deployed their foremost effort to turn the then world
into what the world has become today.
There are many other
similar texts determining to newly initiated Freemasons, Jesuits and Zionists
what the respective organization’s plans are — per topic or region
(Russia, Serbs, Greeks, Northwest Africa, Turkey, Caucasus, Mesopotamia, Iran,
Egypt, Sudan, Abyssinia, etc.). Thanks to your email, I made a small online
research; I then found that the book about the Greeks is already
translated in Turkish. You can find it here:
https://www.kitapyurdu.com/kitap/caglar-boyu-yunanlilar/119998.html
This is a simple thing
to do. However, if someone tried to explain why, how, and in
what one pseudo-historical point (: a historical distortion) made in the
book is politically useful to the French, he would have to expand much,
but he would bring forth impressive and unexpected results. The reason is
simple: few people worldwide know why the colonial powers needed the specific
lies and historical distortions that they produced, when invading a
territory either in Asia or in Africa. But in these points are hidden all
their secret plans.
Another issue related
to both books is the life of the publisher, Edouard Dentu:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89douard_Dentu
He was associated with
the Mormons, a branch of Freemasons related to a group of Zionists. Dentu was
known for his powerful connections, his involvement in Black Magic, and many
other evil activities. Here you can get a small idea about who this
disreputable person was: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89douard_Dentu#cite_note-3
The conclusion is
simple.
The Ottoman Empire was
a useless and self-disastrous state that failed to have agents working in
France and able to catch documents like that. The worthless Ottoman
sultans, the stupid sheikhulislams and theologians, and the entire court
and administration were totally unable to understand what was under
preparation under their nose (without them understanding anything) and how
close the total obliteration of their state was.
The Ottomans sultans,
like the shahs of Iran and the Mughal emperors, were idiotic enough to believe
that victories can happen in the battlefields. That’s stupid.
The real victories are
a matter of intellect. Good or evil, it does not matter. A good but
stupid person will always be defeated by an evil but intelligent
person.
Of course, all
this colonial work of historical falsification is evil. But it was greatly
successful for those who undertook it. Why? Because due to this
forgery, the Ottomans were thrown out of almost all of their provinces!
And without Kemal
Ataturk, there would never be Turkey today. On the contrary, there would be
some Greek provinces in «Constantinople» and in Western Anatolia; Armenia
would be extended as far in the West as Malatya; there would be a Kurdistan and
a Greek Pontus state; and Antakya would be part of Syria.
You want to know what
would happen in Cappadocia?
If there was no Kemal
Ataturk, in Central Anatolia, there would be 5-10 small Turkish states
(Kayseri, Sivas, Konya, Yozgat, Amasya, etc.) stupidly fighting against one
another, as it happens nowadays in Somalia, Afghanistan, Nigeria, Sudan,
Yemen, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, etc. This is what the colonial
powers want for Turkey: the final solution for Anatolia.
The only chance for a
country to oppose the colonial regimes of France, England, US, Israel, Holland,
Canada, Australia, etc. is to present in public the evilness of the colonial
agenda, by revealing how, why, and in what each historical
falsification helped the colonials to setup today’s evil world. All the
rest is useless, because the colonial powers can easily oppose and quickly
destroy their enemies.
But the revelation of
the colonial agenda's needs for historical falsification will enrage the
colonial powers to total paranoia.
Either you like it or
not, it will be like this: either this (as I suggested) will happen or the
nuclear extermination under preparation will take place.
This is all about this
book!
Edouard Dentu!!!
Hahaha!! Good publisher!
Do you know who his
friend was?
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon,
the anarchist!
The evil guy who said
that «property is theft»!
Who believes this
today?
The Satanic fake pope
of Rome! Francis I: the Jesuit pope! A gangster worshipping Satan by Black
Magic techniques, the fake pope of the homosexual marriages!
Benedict XVI was far
better; incomparably better. And everything he said about Muslims was
up-to-the-point!
No comments:
Post a Comment